https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qdFB_TGc9E
What do you think about FWD cars? Is FWD just bad? What about those among us who participate in racing and even drift events in their FF cars? Personally I believe FWD is for econoboxes and has no business racing or """drifting""", RWD is always a better platform for building from.
FWD will be always an inferior platform for performance and butthurt Honda owners will never accept this but somehow think benchracing a heavily modded Civic against a 20 year old car means FF is better
>>15289996
Drift events???
>>15290112
what about when a newer performance rwd is up against a 20 year old stock civic and is found lacking
this fuckign board
YEAH YEAH RWD
>>15290141
>FWD BTFO
FWD is perfectly fine for normal cars imho.
It will always have its place in econoboxes.
It will always have its gems like the Type-R.
Performance cars will always be ideal as RWD or AWD just because of the physics of 4 wheeled vehicles. I can understand this. Guess what. Not that much of a difference under 300hp
I have a FWD DD that I need for highway commuting and I can still take it on back roads and have fun (mostly because based mazda handling). Is it better than a RWD/AWD sportscar? Nope. Does it do what I need it to do while remaining cheap yet fun to own? Absolutely.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phjw32BIHjo
Anyone who says otherwise is a sheep and can't form their own opinions or rides the bus.
Pic unrelated
>>15291127
I think otherwise. I think FWD can perform just as well. Stop it.
FWD is great for cost cutting in econoboxes. That's all it's ever been good for.
>>15291190
> I think
opinions aren't facts, faggot
rwd doesn't put the cornering and drive loads on th e same wheels.
FR is at a disadvantage in terms of traction in some scenarios, but MR has no disadvantages compared to FF.
FWD is great for a DD, and nothing else
>>15291261
Did...did you not finish reading my post before you typed a reply?
>>15291285
cancer
>effu effu
