Is 80k miles on a RWD auto m sport e90 risky?
- Home
- Board: /o/ - Auto
- Reading: Is 80k miles on a RWD auto m sport e90 risky?
Is 80k miles on a RWD auto m sport e90 risky?
>>15255070
Completely unrelated you dolt
>>15255088
>this assmad
BMW BTFO!!!
>>15255092
Here's your (You)
>>15255104
>bmw cuckgirl this mad
>>15255110
You must live a sad life dude.
>>15255134
No, I have ur mom to comfort me.
>auto m
>>15255070
May as well compare an M4 GTS to a Fiesta ST you tool
>>15255200
>costs exactly the same
NO!!! IT'S NOT FAIR!!!
>>15255203
Using that logic a Veyron is better than a Phantom just because it's quicker, stick to F&F champ
>>15255203
Also sitting in that 350R would be about as comfortable, luxurious and well built as a phonebooth in comparison
>>15255221
The phantom doesn't cost 2 million bucks, dumbass.
>>15255225
[citation needed]
why do you reply to alphonse.
>>15255234
assmad gm fangirl spotted
if you can't afford the maintenance, yes its risky
otherwise, no, you should be fine
i advise against buying an automatic, though.
>>15255067
It really depends on how the car was maintained before and how it was driven. BMW can be a very expensive dice roll after 100k miles and tend to depreciate a lot more compared to other brands.
>>15255067
>///M
No.
>>15255067
Nearly zero info. Try this instead...
"Is a $YEAR $MODEL M-Sport auto with 80K miles risky?"
