Be honest, how many of the books that you regularly discuss on here have you actually read?3.5
Why would I discuss it if I hadn't read it? You've got the wrong idea mate.
>>7235568
All of them.
Not even shitting you. What I' read before I found /lit/ was also mostly classics.
>>7235578
That is literally the ethos of this board.
>>7235583
You've confused "Smart people pretending to be stupid" with "Stupid people pretending to be smart". Standard mistake. Come back in a decade or three.
>>7235587
"i was just pretending to be retarded"
-/lit/
>>7235568
At least 90% of them.
>>7235587
What about marginally smart people pretending to be exceptionally smart?
>>7235568
>how many of the books that you regularly discuss on here have you actually read?
Name some OP. I don't usually start threads discussion shit.
>>7235595
>not hiding your true power level by pretending to be an autistic retard
You are doing it (being smart) wrong
>>7235894
I ought to be. I am, afterall, not smart
>>7235926
That's the spirit
I've read most of the books I discuss, and the ones I haven't read I don't discuss as if I have.
>>7235894
You are being meta as fuck or you fell for meme autism
Honestly half or slightly more than half. But earlier this year it was maybe just 1-2 so I'm working on it.
>>7235587
both of these happen in this place
>>7235568
>discussing books on /lit/
lol
>>7236143
You'll never know ;^)
