Historical suits of Armour
- Home
- Board: /hr/ - High Resolution
- Reading: Historical suits of Armour
Everybody loves armour. And the metropolitan museum of art in New York has probably the best collection in the world, unless someone can show me another.
Here we go
Worcester Art Museum also houses the Higgins collection now, known to be the second largest collection in America.
And that's all I've got. Would love to see some more contributions
nevermind, found a few more to share
>>2408481
>boner armor for when you get so excited in battle
wouldwear.jpg
>>2408497
That's fucking beautiful.
No one has any more photos? Come on now. What a pity.
I've been waiting for this thread.
More OC, and that's all I've got.
>>2408960
Where did you find these?
And do you prefer Maximilian to tradional? Personally I think the close-helm with a crest is the sexiest battle helm ever conceived, but fluted German Maximilian close helms are nice too.
Im honestly just a francophile at my core and really can't get enough of traditional gendarme suits. But German suits are right behind.
>>2409316
Bavarian National Museum in Munich. I love the work from armorers from Nuremberg and Augsburg, in terms of style i prefer all sorts of hounskulls with a simple plate armor.
congrat's Op i'm liking the thread
oc is limited...
Flicker is ok but in public museums most if not all exhibits are behind Plexiglas
...and who ever likes flash glare
helmet worn by the young Henry VIII
another interesting helmet
you've got a virus mate...possibly chain mail
just...romancing the forgotten Age of armoured codpiece's
>>2408758
Wanged Hooosars! God I love how they continued to wear these suits well into the age of gunpowder, they literally did not give a fuck. Those wings man. No fantasy author or artist could imagine a more intimidating appearance.
>>2409774
This helmet (plus the replica) is perhaps one of the most amazing archaeological finds of all time. I cannot express how amazingly bad ass this thing is, it's like one of the greatest examples of Saxon/Anglo-Saxon/post-Roman Germanic culture we have.
Sutton Hoo helm ftw.
>>2409741
This is absolutely stunning. Do you have a story on this? Looks like a French royal suit but there's no real indicator.
>>2409887
Parade armor from the 16th century
image related...
Parade Armor, c1562, attributed to Eliseus Libaerts an Antwerp armourer/goldsmith, (known to be active 1557-69) who specialized in richly embossed armour, made for either King Erik XIV of Sweden or King Frederick II of Denmark.
body armour continued from it's early concepts to the present
a lovely 5th century crustacean
look but no touchy...
Riveted mail and plate coat (zirah bagtar). this armour of this type was introduced into India under the Mughals.
Date: ca. 1575
Geography: Milan
>>2409762
Where is this?
>>2409917
Absolutely stunning. I can't believe I had never seen that before. Awesome find.
I have one somewhere ... found it :-)
pommeling softly
Tomb Effigy of Jean d'Alluye
pike - a ...tourist
Sasanian king hunting rams
William the Conqueror
>>2412819
Thanks Opie, this is a great thread.
It's amazing that the museums in the USA have managed to acquire such a collection considering they never had such a thing.
The Tower of London has an excellent collection, including Henry the VIII's actual armour.
I'll see if I can dig out my pics tomorrow and post them. They are not HR though.
>>2415976
Agreed.
favorite thread in a long time.
also bump
Nuremberg Castle Museum...
More Nuremberg...
and more...nice horsey...
and more...
more you say?
more...
and some helms...
a little tight in the neck...
...this is what I'm wearing to the prom...
GQ pose, for the ladies...
...not for shag carpets...
and I love these the most...
>>2418050
Looks like Black Manta's mask
>>2408960
>yfw the joust is about to begin and you realise you left the stove on
..."Niech żyje cesarza!"
>>2419332
lol worthless wings
>>2419351
surprising how detached you sound... battling on your Xbox recently?
>>2419361
nop, my country did it's biding of crusades, and me on history classes thank you very much.
'biding' remain or stay somewhere.
"how long must I bide here to wait for the answer?"
Old English bīdan, of Germanic origin.
have a picture dude you definitely needs eine'
This exquisitely crafted and perfectly preserved suit of armor would have been worn by Abe Masayoshi during his time at the capital, where formal ceremonial attire was often required. The exceptional quality and attention to detail applied to every aspect of the armor’s creation made this suit stand out as a garment of sophisticated refinement, and distinguished its wearer as a man of fine taste, setting him apart from other provincial daimyo. Like other daimyo families during the Edo period (1603–1868),
>>2419626
This is the kind of thing that proves how sophisticated the Japanese are as a people.
It has been said that if there were no Japanese, the Western culture would have felt itself superior to every other human civilization on the planet. Only the order and discipline of Japanese society was comparable to that of the Europeans in the age of exploration, and the Japanese industrialization of the 19th century is evidence of this peerage.
But that suit of ceremonial armor says it so much clearer. Despite never making the transition to plate like the Europeans, this suit is so exquisitely detailed and strikingly stylized in its own distinct manner that it has every right to be presented alongside >>2419580
Not even a weeaboo.
>>2408484
so you were at the nelson art gallery recently?
>>2409762
armored elephant master race
>>2412815
> mfw so stoned I have to pray to not die
>>2418050
Shit, what's this helmet type called?
It's the same as the armor some infuriating motherfuckers wear in Dark Souls 2.
>>2419948
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frog-mouth_helm
Itprimaryuse wasfor jousting.
>>2420117
its primary use was for jousting.*
>>2410066
why not hide the power switch better?
>>2419742
Its funny, as I was scrolling through this thread, when I came upon that Japanese armor I was thinking to myself how primitive and simple it looked compared to the European armors. I mean sure its ornate and intricate but it just looks extremely primitive.
i love houndskull helmets
Mid-17th century Mughal cavalryman and horse armour on display in Mughal India. On Loan from the Royal Armouries.
>>2408477
moody teenagers armour
Kavacha, Armour
ca. 1600-1626
Central India – Decann, Bijapur Sultanate (1490-1686)
Steel
Height 105 cm ; Weight: 14 kg
The Kavacha, or combined armour of chainmail and plate was worn by noblemen horse riders to protect the torso and arms.
This piece is built in steel and features both a chainmail tunic and lamella plates in the torso and back areas. With long sleeves and coming down to the knee, it is remarkably well preserved, with no tears or mending.
The armour displays two engraved inscriptions – one, in the outside part of the top right plate, and another, on the inside, in Hindi and Indo-Aryan script, and in devanagari Persian writing, revealing that it was captured in 1689, in the spoils resulting from the Adoni siege in the Deccan, where the famous battle between the Mughal army and the Deccan Sultans took place.
This Kavacha was part of the group of arms which made up the arsenal of the Bikaner fort, capital of the Adilshahi dynasty, which was captured by one of the generals of the Aurangzeb (r.1659-1707), the Maharajah of Binaker - Anup Singh – when he defeated the last descendent of the Adilshahi dynasty of Jaipur.
Anup Singh (1669-1698) was the oldest son of the Karn Singh Rajah (1631-1669), the house chief of the Aurangzeb Emperor.
The very high quality of the manufacture of this armour shows that this was a piece worn by a high dignitary.
The manufacture of this sort of chainmail tunics, which belonged to the arsenal of the Bikaner fort, was traditionally associated to the city of Jaipur, in the Deccan.
Bibl.: Alexander, 1992, p. 160, fig. 100
Well, European armors were very retarded.
>>2424676
Their fat would have soaked up a bit of damage at least
Shirt of Mail and Plate
Date: 17th century
Culture: Indian, Mughal or Deccani
Medium: Steel
Dimensions: H. 35 5/8 in. (90.5 cm); W. 78 in. (198.1 cm) laid out flat with sleeves extended
Classification: Armor for Man
Credit Line: Purchase, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Gift, 2000
Accession Number: 2000.497
Mail shirts reinforced with steel or iron plates appear to have been developed first in Iran or Anatolia in the late fourteenth or early fifteenth century. Variations of mail-and-plate armor were worn subsequently throughout the Middle East by the Persians, Ottomans, and Mamluks. The style probably was introduced into India early in the Mughal period due to Ottoman influence on Mughal military practices.
The armor is part of a large group of material that comes from the armory of the maharajas of Bikaner in Rajastan, northern India. An inscription inside one of the plates gives the name of Maharaja Anup Singh (reigned 1669–98) and the date samvat 1774 (A.D. 1691). Anup Singh was a general in the armies of the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb and led a series of campaigns in the Deccan in the 1680s and 1690s, including battles at Golconda in 1687 and Adoni in 1689. The date on the armor indicates that it must have been taken as booty during one of the Deccan campaigns.
Timelines:
South Asia, 1600–1800 A.D.
Provenance:
Ex. coll.: Bikaner armory, Rajastan, India.
Guys if we were to make an armour today like they did back then, how much better could we make it? if even it is possible to make them better?
>>2426298
Who/what is your opponent?
>>2426298
maybe it'd be like Gundam, Japanese armoured mechs?
>>2408762
Jesus how much would that weigh?
>Realize thread is over 33 days old
Nice work
Post brigandines, you philistines!
>>2426298
Don't we basically have it in the form of ballistic body armor?
Also there's those new nanotechnology hardens-on-impact materials coming.
>>2431614
Well I think he meant with the same materials, otherwise the answer is quite obvious. By using the same techniques as back then I don't think there's much to improve.
Jesus my eyes hurt, please stop increasing the image size just to post greekaboo armors.
>>2431565
a ful plate armour would weight around 30 kg, its not that heavy and the weight is distrubitet over the whole body
>>2432762
It's very heavy if you have to march for hours while wearing it.
Modern soldiers train with 40-50lb (18-22kg) packs and they don't have to wield a shield and spear when they find combat.
>>2432872
No one marched around in full plate. At most infantry wore a few parts of plate.
>>2432872
yes, but when you distribute the whole weight over the whole body, 30 kg isnt that bad for exaple look at these two ppl
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hlIUrd7d1Q
>>2409773
kek'd
great thread by the way, saved everything
>>2433321
THAT IS SO COOOOOOOOOOOLLLL, and goddamn the armours looks so mobile and durable, the fucking sword swing didn't do anything to him.
Shirt of Mail and Plate
Date: dated A.H. 1042 /A.D. 1632–33
Culture: Indian
Medium: Iron, steel, gold, leather
Dimensions: L. 31 in. (78.8 cm); W. 40 in. (101.5 cm); Wt. 23 lb. 10 oz. (10.7 kg)
Classification: Mail
Credit Line: Purchase, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Gift, 2008
Accession Number: 2008.245
This shirt ranks as one of the most beautiful surviving Mughal armors and is among the earliest dated examples. The armor plates are covered in two-color gold and incised through to the dark iron with Qur'anic inscriptions in elegant calligraphy entwined with delicate foliage. An engraved inscription inside one of the plates identifies this armor as a gift from Sayf Khan, a high-ranking Mughal prince and military official at the court of the Mughal emperor Shah Jahan (reigned 1624–58). Additional inscriptions inside the plates record valuations assigned to the armor in the later years of Shah Jahan's rule, suggesting that the armor had belonged to the emperor.
The decorated plates are fitted into a sturdy shirt of thick double-riveted mail of earlier date, possibly the fifteenth century. Each ring is stamped on one side with several of the ninety-nine names of God. The multiple religious invocations on the plates and mail cloaked the wearer in protective prayer. The fish-shaped buckles are also thought to have talismanic value.
>>2434902
yes, plate armour is realy mobile and easy to move in, i dont know why ppl think its haed to move in and that you can slice them open with swords and axes, you wouldent eaven be able to cut chain maile open either
https://youtu.be/juIw20z5p0c?t=350
>>2438126
It's still extremely heavy. If you fall to the ground you will be very slow to get up. In the meantime your opponent can stab you in the exposed joints. Also the helmet has a tiny field of view.
>>2438157
dude are you retarded?, chainmail is not heavy when you wear it, if you fall you can easily get up, its just a myth that chain maile and plate armour is to heavy to get upp from the ground in, just look at a video postet i bit upp and you see that you move without problem in armour
>>2409887
My favorite thing about Sutton Hoo is that it totally legitimized tales like Beowulf, that scholars had long assumed were total fiction, due to the gold and riches described throughout.
>>2434902
Yes, cuts don't do anything to it. But a shitty made spear will pierce through that armor when it's thrown at it.
>>2439060
no it wouldent, are you sersly retarded? just watch this video, watch from 10:30 they try to pirce a pice of armour with a lance with the same amount of force you would get from a full charge from horseback
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98hRtOJqOYE
>>2439076
Are you an idiot? Do you really think armor is indestructible, and you are some kind of tank with it on?
Arrows could pierce it.
Axes could pierce it.
Spears could pierce it.
It kept you safe from slashing, cutting and blunt impact (to a degree) but there were many weapons you could use to kill someone wearing armor. Don't just go by one youtube video, actually do some fucking research. There are plenty of resources out there that describe how people fought in medieval times.
>>2439097
i have done a lot of reserch you twatt, it was just one of many exampels on how efectiv the armour was but if you done some fucking research yourself you would know it, and to think that you could pierce a breast plate with a spear is fucking retarded, and if you did pirce the ex breaste plate there would still be padding underneath, ex a gambeson, chain mail etc
10/10 threads
>you weren't alive to see these armours in use
>you weren't alive to put them to use
>you were alive though to see swaggers and morons with sagging pants
>>2408493
where is this?!
>>2441410
Image search says Musée de l'Armée, Paris. I've been there, but can't recall if I saw those armours.
>>2439130
Ever wondered how people in armour got killed in battles if it was so weapon proof?
You can pierce armour with a spear, but it depends how much force there is behind the strike, the angle of the strike to the armour, how sustained the strike is (just a stab, or sustained force?), even whether the armour is damaged already, or is pristine. The exact location of the strike is also important as some areas have more metal behind them, or are under more or less strain from the shape than other parts might be.
And if you think chain mail is padding, then you're sadly mistaken.
>>2441991
Many armours was wepon proof but that dosent help when you get blunt trauma from the force thru your plate, chainmaile etc, and still you have to be retarded to think you can pirce a currias/breast plate with a spear, and i will admit that it may have ben confusing for some peapol when i wrote padding underneath, ex a gambeson, chain mail etc, but the whay i mean it is that when you wear a plate, chain maile wont be your primary protection, and when you say The exact location of the strike i really hope that you are not so fucking stupid to count a hit in a gap/slit in the armour as a pierceing blow
contribeauty
>>2442246
>was wepon proof
No, I WAS wepon proof
Bumpity bump
A spear can definitely pierce through 2-3mm steel.
>>2408475
Holy shit, it's the Chosen Undead.
>>2444625
What is that type of helmet called?
>>2448302
Sallet
>>2426298
Here is your answer anon.
http://uwm.tv/
Bumping, want to see more armors
>>2448423
Thank you.
I never knew of the intricacies of the craftsmanship
>>2408489
what's this dress?
Guys i have a question. Where do you get all that? Are those your own photos? I often need things like these for textures and it's extremely hard to find good ones.
AND IF YOU DO NOT LISTEN
THEN TO HELL WITH YOU
>>2448427
Holy. Fucking. Shit.
Also, op here, glad to see the thread still alive. It's awesome to know that people still find this shit interesting.
>>2450335
Typically certain museums will have large online image collections.
Also, when doing an advanced google search for images >2MP it is pretty important to enter the exact name or type of armor you're looking for, otherwise you end up with a lot of crap.
>>2408475
Philadelphia Museum of Art has an extensive collection and of muskets and swords as well.
>>2408475
http://www.philamuseum.org/collections/browse.html?galleryID=247
>>2409887
Hussars didnt have wings on their armor, hardly any had wings actually, if anyone had wheels they put in on the horse saddle
>>2408506
Looks like something H.R. Geiger would have dreamed up.
>>2419351
Intimidation factor, fool. Technically all patterns and designs on armor are worthless.
>>2446109
Proof you got any proof?
Somewhere in these museums there's a whole room full of these
>>2453340
I'd need one of those.
>>2453340
Not big enough for me. :(
>>2453340
not even my tip can fit in that
need a bigger one
HOLY FUCK SON, BUMP
>>2408496
fuck they should put all of them in action poses like this it's DOPE
>>2432872
training weight mang
modern soldiers now actually carry more weight than medieval knights when they are marching.
>>2441991
>>2439097
dude people who wore plate armor got killed by heavy hammer like blows to the head, piercing weak point in the armor that have no plate (like the armpits, eyes and butt) and very rarely trough plate. plate armor in Europe was the fucking best in their time.
seriously stop man you are sounding just dumb by saying things you don't know
DON'T YOU DIE ON ME, FUCK
good thread
>>2457145
U russian or turkish? Or just plain faggot?
>>2408481
I would love to see a close up of that chest plate
>>2457145
>ancient
>medieval ages
>ancient
r u fucking 12yo?
>>2462751
>responding to 10 day old b8
>>2408492
French?
>>2408494
>thou has trodden unto ye wrong shire, knave
>>2426053
its tamgha of Oghuz Turks, members of Kayı clan
Most of these are steel, right?
Wouldn't a steel cuirass stop a bullet if further padded with gambesons and shit? So why would they go out of style to give way to just clothes?
>>2465433
They didn't give way to "just clothes", they gave way to composite layers of ceramic material that are a lot lighter than dragging full steel armor around thick enough to effectively stop bullets.
>>2465433
They didnt give way to clothes because of functionality.
Just imagine how expensive it was to train a knight from childhood and outfit him with steel armor, chain mail, padding, and equip him with the best weaponry. Then compare that to how cheap it was to train a peasant how to use a pike in two weeks with hardly any armor and you will see how the Knight in shining armor vanished from battlefields.
>>2408495
>5'11 vs 6'1.jpg
Bumparoo
These guys were some real mothafuckin Gs back in their day
>>2408495
>Manlets wearing armour
I wouldn't feel intimidated in the slightest.
>>2426298
I can only speak for chain mail, but there have been a great number of modern weaves developed long after chain mail was last used. A lot of the new weaves sacrifice favorable aspect ratios (AR) for a denser, thicker weave. AR is the ratio of wire diameter to ring diameter. The smaller this number the stronger the ring, however the higher the number the more rings you can connect to it. The most common weave you'll see in this thread is called European 4 in 1 (E4-1) where each ring has four other rings connected to it. However Japanese 3 in 1 and 4 in 1 have also been historically used, as well as logical progressions of European such as 6 in 1. This is a picture of a modern weave called Unbalanced European 4 in 1. The advantages of this weave include all of the advantages of balanced E4-1 including efficient area coverage per ring, relatively lightweight, and easy to make. Its main unique advantage is that each individual ring is harder to isolate when attacked, spreading out the damage across all the rings in the area and effectively making it harder to break. Naturally battle-ready armor would be riveted or welded whereas this sample is not.
tl;dr: We can make some things better, yes, but only marginally.
I have more examples if anyone want to know more but since this is a historical thread I won't presume to continue.
Sorry for posting just helmets (sallets in this case), but I just want to keep this thread alive with some decent content.
>>2432872
>Modern soldiers train with 40-50lb (18-22kg) packs and they don't have to wield a shield and spear when they find combat.
What the hell are you talking about? I was in the army only 10 years ago and full pack was 50kg, not even including anti armor armament such as mines and bazookas, which would weigh an additional 12 kg each.
In the nordics a standard "test" if you will involved biking and mostly marching 100-120 km within 24h with that gear. Standard, as in the most basic of soldiers were expected to make it.
50 kg is literally nothing if you get it properly distributed so much of the weight is on your hips, like proper gear does it. Granted, some 30kg of that is in a big backpack that can be dropped in times of combat, but still.
>>2475771
You're doing God's work, anon.
>>2475771
OP here, holy shit those are gorgeous. Sallet type may be my favorite helm style. Close helms/armets are a close second, as well as Houndskull visored bascinets.
How the hell is this thread still going? It's been nearly 4 months! Longest lasting thread in 4chan history?
>>2409773
holy hell this must be where they got the design for Stannis Baratheon's armour in Game of Thrones
>>2480440
Most helmets restricted your vision. But it's better to see little than to see nothing after having your eyes stabbed out.
A few from Leeds Royal Armouries
>>2481201
How do you kill a guy wearing both plate and mail? Guy's a walking tank.
>>2481207
Generally you hit them with something big and heavy enough to cause crushing injuries and internal bleeding.
>>2481215
Like MUH DEAK
>>2408475
Royal Armouries Museum
Leeds.
England.
>>2481522
These are it >>2423480 >>2423482
>>2423483
My own aren't better (maybe this one) as I was mainly there for gathering reference pics of swords and guns for a project.
>>2481521
Are there suits of continental origin there, or just English? Either way, those are freaking beautiful.
I like how English interpretation of plate armor was somewhat distinct from the mainland.
I have a couple taken in Milan
I'm already out of armors I think..
Kings Phillip Greek Macedonian King Father of Alexander the Greate
>>2485224
Beautiful. Details?
>>2485145
Leeds has armours and weapons from around the globe, but a larger proportion of British origin or found ones.
If you ever go, I'd spend more than a day if you want a long, proper look at everything. I live close by myself, so can pop over when I feel like it.
>>2481207
Crushing weapons.
Maces and morningstars worked best for that.
>>2485823
ah I don't remember very well what it was, some kind of ceremonial hunting horn made out of bone, the room it was in contained a lot of rare pieces and oddities, I don't think this horn had anything to do with warfare.
>>2489602
sorry I meant made out of Ivory. you can see it's a carved whole elephant tusk.
>>2481207
blast them with a hose and run away. Eventually they'll go all rusty
This is going way back to the Old Testament of the Holy Bible.
If you remember, Abraham had a cousin named Lot, and he had drunken sex with his daughters, resulting in the Moabite and Ammonite tribes.
>>2409741
literally porn
thread blipping for the future... page 101
>>2448922
fuck yeah!
Good thread, OP. Thanks.
We can't have any of that though. Fuck off.
>>2494273
>Led lights on an armour
Right. Fuck that noise.
>>2489992
Yes, it's called a lance rest.
>>2420613
Eastern and Western sentiments differ greatly, especially when relating to art. The East is not as much about the replication of visuals, but a translation into symbology.
>>2489992
Yes, thé lever is used to rest thé Lance on it, it made it easier to aim with it and let you get a greater Force behind it
Great thread.
>>2503759
Love that color contrast.
Beatiful.
>>2415976
Tower of London Exhibit tour stopped in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA in 1980 at the Cincinnati Art Museum. That was very nice- thank you very much! A visit towards the NE corner of the same state offered some more armor at the lovely and impressive Cleveland Museum of Art in a permanent gallery dedicated to their collection, the Armor Court which also includes Horse armor.
obviously this thread deserves Agincourt
...
conquering Europe
>>2440270
Right, because retarded fashion wasn't a thing back then, pic related.
>>2494273
...again blipping with feminine impact...
Here in the Arms and Armour section of the Kunsthistorisches Museum was ...this extremely scary suit of armor with a skirt? Were there actual women requiring feminine suits of armor? The waist seems small enough for a woman. The helmet has a devilish look, male or female. Was this suit designed to get the enemy wondering exactly what he was up against?
>>2512294
Armor like this dates from about the 1500s. King Henry VIII of England had a set like it. It was not made for a woman, but for a man planning to engage in ground combat. The skirt would protect his legs better than traditional pants-style armor. Form-fitting armor needs joints that bend. Joints mean there are gaps that a sword or axe or spear could penetrate. A strong skirt, covering the knees, might look unwieldy to us, but we might be glad enough to reach for one if we were faced with hand-to-hand combat.
>>2512295
The fluted design of the skirt was not just a fashion statement. The folds made the armor plate stronger. But it was still not strong enough to block musket fire, which was slowly taking over the battlefield. Fancy suits of armor went out of vogue on the battlefield by the 1700s, although kings and princes sometimes wore them into battle as marks of status, much as they sometimes wore battlefield crowns. This seems ill-advised to me–why make oneself an obvious target? Still, there are examples of elaborately decorated skirted suits designed to be worn on horseback.
Elven Knight Leather Armor
Bump?
>>2512942
...probably and this ones had a few clangs
Everyone stand clear!
Don't you die on me!
>>2516075
Mah boi
where's H potter when needs be...
Q: If he thrusts from above towards your breast and surprises you so that you were unable to take hold of your dagger, then with your right hand grasp his hand behind his dagger, strike with your left arm over his right arm, put your left hand on your breast, and press your right hand strongly towards yourself. Thus you will break his arm or throw him downwards in front of you as you see painted above... apparently
“This grapple allows me to strike you in the head with my axe. I’ll use my left arm to place you into the low bind, the Strong Key, which places the opponent in danger of death more than any other.”
>>2516430
>>2508179
haha i love how almost all look bored like fuck, exept for a few smug guys xD
>>2516430
its so sad that is a lost art...
>>2520032
It actually is in revival across europe right now, we have school here teaching old techniques derived from old germanic and italian scripts about medieval fighting from halberds to pommle knives and short swords. Mostly far more sophisticated the ever thought of and up to level of kung fu, judo and jiu jitsu.
It's 1:30am and I have to get up in 4.5 hrs. This thread has been outstanding! Thanks to anyone who contributed!
>see this thread only when it's about to go
Thank you for your deication.
An Italian Armor for Henry VIII
Spanish renaissance armor
Russian zertsalo armor 17th century, and Axe is from the 16th century
GERMAN MAXIMILIAN FIELD ARMOUR, circa 1520
The flamboyant armour of Emanuele Filiberto of Savoy, c. 1606.
...signing off with this brutish Field Armor of King Henry VIII
>>2408475
Armoured Skeptic? Is that you?
>>2418290
Underrated post
Thanks OP. This is a great thread.
>>2524513
Yup. Confirming.
![Knight1[1].jpg.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/cp03GgM.jpg "Knight1[1]")
![hi there].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/a6MrhLS.jpg "hi there]")
