Are there any other historical figures who turned out to be drug addicts?
>>72669
Addiction is not real, many historical figures used drugs we now consider "addictive" but simply did not have the culture of helplessness to justify their character weakness as a disease.
Sigmund Freud liked cocaine. Winston Churchill was an alky. That's all i can think of off the top of my head.
Was the shit he took really considerd as a drug at this time? Because i doubt this.
its like people look back at someone from our time and say: He smoked. he was a drug addict
>>73029
>Addiction is not real
....
By modern standards vast numbers of historical figures would be alcoholics. They used to drink booze all day, albeit it was weaker than today
>>73056
His doctor literally gave this man Meth.
>>73029
>Addiction is not real
>>74178
The entire German and Italian armies was on meth, it was considered refreshing and healthy
>>74891
>doesn't meet specific criteria to be considered the same as other diseases in medical terminology
>therefore it doesn't exist
okay
>>75246
>it's fundamentally different from every disease
>but it's just special, still totes legit ^_^
junkies are just shitty people
>>75205
They had meth, but only in small doses. Morell gave Hitler a shit ton of excess meth in the form of Vitamultin (it was essentially meth on steroids) along with cocaine given through eyedrops which were 5-10 times stronger than the average dose.
Hitler was so fucked up the nigga was asleep during D-Day. You can't make this shit up
