In most historical outlooks, societies were formerly gained and changed through meritocracies of blood. This ranged from fighting the strongest of a tribe, to overthrowing an entire embodiment of government. If most modernized societies were to suddenly overturn their elections and political debates - would a meritocracy of blood replace the political scheme of most modernized nations, or would there be differences in ruling, compared to that of our ancestors?
Meritocracy is frankly a meme, it never existed in practice.
>>1405236
Yes most likely, but maybe not.
>>1405236
>I want losers to die
Sounds terrible. Meritocracy as you know and use it is a meme though
>>1405236
How would there be meritocracy without plutocracy? I understand what you're saying by "Meritocracy of Blood" but in that kind of system who else other than the wealthy would be able to be educated?
>>1405236
What is a meritocracy of blood?
> meritocracy
> of blood
Like... my father was pretty cool guy and I should rule over other people even if I am shit by myself?