>http://blockadblock.com/
ADBLOCKING FAGS ON SUICIDE WATCH
tip top kek
Keked
>>54530346
>>https://blockblockadblock.com/
Laughable, a worthy site doesn't need to force their users to disable their adblocks, they will whitelist you because they want.
>>54530384
>>https://blockblockblockadblock.com/
Checkmate, blockfags.
oh man is this some memescript that will destroy the site after 24 hours or something ?
>Go to the site
>They tell me to please turn off my adblocker
>I click OK without turning adblock off
>Site loads without problems
WOW, high technology here
>>54530456
hats off to the memer that made this, lots of effort put into it
>>54530456
Yeah, you just need to inspect element and break the scrip manually for the page to load correctly.
>>54530489
>Configuration Options
>Block Screen Settings
>The "block screen" is the screen-overlay that protects your site and asks users to whitelist you.
>Block Mode
>Select this mode if visitors must disable their ad blocker before continuing to your site.
>Nag Mode
>Select this mode to nag vistors just once before letting them continue to your site.
Baby first script, somebody frustrated with adblockers.
>>54530327
nice thread
ok bye
>>54530544
I know jack shit about programing and I can probably do a better anti adblock script with the few Pascal shit that I remember
>>54530544
How do you break this kind of adblock blockers?
Can you give me an example? I have ublock Origin. There are some websites that I visit that have started doing this shit.
>>54530707
>inspect element
>delete gray or whatever colored screen on top of site
>done
>>54530746
Doesn't works.
>>54530327
>literally albanian virus
>>54530800
give me a link
>>54530327
This only affects people who let non-free javascript programs run on their computers.
Cock block adblock
Suckin cock around the clock
Especially black cock
Cuz im a cuck
bye
>>54530833
pcgames-downloadDOTnet
>>54530844
I can block it using Ublock Origin Block Element option but it comes back with every reload.
>have ublock and anti-adblock killer
>all these scripts made by buttmad sjws have absolutely no effect
I love it
>>54530844
>pcgames-downloadDOTnet
too easy
Where can I test the script?
>>54530844
I don't get the blocker, just a shitty popup saying "don't kill the best download site" or some shit like that.
>>54530844
>>54530860
pcgames-download.net###niceMessage
>>54530844
>pcgames-downloadDOTnet
I don't see any.
>>54530844
document.getElementById('niceMessage').remove()
>>54530864
Pretty much this. The only ones that get past the filter are minor websites that made their own variants, and even then, it's easy to block the overlay that they add.
i tried putting it on my site but its not doing anything. do i actually have to have ads to trigger it or something?
>>54530983
Doing this it comes back when reloading the page.
>>54531077
I blocked nice.message.css?ver=4.5.2 and used Ublock block element to remove the text on top and now it doesn't comes back even after reloading the page.
>>54531230
https://reek.github.io/anti-adblock-killer/
You're welcome
>just paste all this shit onto your site and ur good to go
>>54531607
>and your done!
>>54531607
Looks legit :^)
>>54531607
So it's just obfuscated javascript?
That should be fairly easy to block with any script blocker.
>>54531607
lmao there's probably a very recent windows
remote exploit there
>>54530491
>Brave browser
>Javascript inventor
a way atone for his sins?
>>54531607
>>54531681
and blacklisted by google for spreading malware
>>54531607
I wonder how many web admins are stupid enough to copy paste this suspicious string of obfuscated code onto their website. I think if you ever actually come across this on a website you should just discontinue browsing that site immediately and never go back.
UMATRIX
M
A
T
R
I
X
// LEGAL NOTICE: The content of this website and all associated program code are protected under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Intentionally circumventing this code may constitute a violation of the DMCA.
>>54531868
Does blocking the script count as circumventing it? I mean technically I wouldn't be "blocking" the script I would just be simply not requesting it.
>>54532062
Disabling javascript on the site kills the adblock nag script. Like >>54530544 said, baby's first script.
>>54532062
Yes, expect a letter from their lawyers imminently.
>>54532062
>>54531868
I'M NOT EVEN IN THEIR SAME STATE. THEY HAD TO DESERVED IT IT'S MY RIGHT TO RUN WHAT I WANT ON MY COMPUTER REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>54530544
>>The "block screen" is the screen-overlay that protects your site and asks users to whitelist you.
Remove this element or block this element. I've done it countless times. Removes every overlay blocking the page. Also removes those transparent shits people put to prevent right click save as on images.
Serving a different page to adblock users would at least require a moment of effort to bypass, but this one is so easy as to be laughable.
>>54532177
why did I read this as "Disabling javascript on the kike"
>>54531868
>intentionally circumventing
Not guilty then. I disallow all scripts by default and whitelist only ones that seem relevant to page content.
It's the only way around browser lag with loads of tabs, and prevents tons of malware infections.
>>54530327
Feels good to be European for once. Hope every anti ad-blocker company get sued into oblivion once the legislation is in place.
>>54530844
using that site is probably unwise.
I didn't even have to block anything.
>>54532456
I for one hope this misguided legislation gets repealed. Legal remedies for technological problems almost never work as intended, and often end up causing nasty unintended side effects. The one exception is cases where there's no viable techological fix for the problem. Things like net neutrality where an ISP can block or throttle traffic and you can't really do anything about it if they've done it competently.
Adblock blocking is a problem where not only is there a technological fix, but it's already deployed. Users just need to check the anti-anti-adblock filter list and most of the problem is gone, and the extension could be made to check it by default.
Yes, the adblock blocker companies will surely work to evade filters, but the filters will be updated just as quickly, and with far less effort than was spent to evade them. It's cat-and-mouse and the mice always win in the end.
>// LEGAL NOTICE: The content of this website and all associated program code are protected under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Intentionally circumventing this code may constitute a violation of the DMCA.
You fucking what?
>>54532265
Their scrip doesn't do that, it deletes the content elements on the site so even if you block the "overlay" you end up with nothing.
It is the same method wired is using, maybe even the same script.
But because the script is inline you can just block first party scripts and it still works. Many sites don't even use first party scripts for anything important.
>>54532868
Yeah. Then simply block the script.
3rd party script? Block the domain it comes from.
1st party external script? Block the js file path.
1st party inline script? Block that element or run it through a local filtering proxy.
>>54530327
>recapturing lost revenue
fucking lel
>>54530327
jesus fucking christ this website is the most obnoxious thing i've read this year.
>Sounds good to me.
don't compliment your own product as though you're a third party
>I'm ready to stop losing revenue every day!
>What is this awesome thing, you ask? This is BlockAdblock.
>And why exactly do I need this awesome thing, you ask? Everyone needs it.
awesome xD
>Will BlockAdblock recapture lost revenue?
>This largely depends on your site and on your revenue model.
You made an unambiguous claim on your front page. Don't backpedal now.
Good thing it gave me the following information
>It also plays nicely with the Googlebot useragent to keep your SEO happy.
So there we go, use Googlebot's user agent and no wankcuntery for you.
At least he's nice and lets you send him feedback. http://blockadblock.com/contact.php
>>54533171
>So there we go, use Googlebot's user agent and no wankcuntery for you.
>tfw I can switch to this UA with a mousegesture
>>54532577
Been using that website for months without problems.
>>54533171
>So there we go, use Googlebot's user agent and no wankcuntery for you.
Actually that probably won't work. If their script works by deleting content elements that have already been served up, it doesn't need to be disabled for Googlebot UA. Googlebot reads content and doesn't execute the script.
And this is the code.
https://ybin.me/p/81e4c1d347cca256#CSezMVcxflCOLfJxRsoO4aq+wqRJMYazpLF8Is6SrSE=
A quick browse through of the code, it appears to make a div called banner_ad at a negative position (off screen) and then checks if the div display value gets changed to hidden or none, maybe some other checks as well.
Basically it is planting something to trigger the adblocker and then reacting when it does by deleting content.
wew
>>54531843
You'd be surprised. Most Linux users are dumb enough even to paste commands from the web into their shell. Those are the folks administering most web servers these days.
>>54533338
>enable javascript to view a pastebin clone with light on dark theme and a weird custom scrollbar
>shows it in a 2 line high area
Fuck this cut rate pastebin clone
Okay, there are three levels to this script and it is pretty fucking gay.
1) it tries to make a div off screen called banner_ad and sees if it gets hidden
2) it tries to load favicons from ad domains like google, doubleclick and yahoo and sees if they fail to load
3) it tries to load a handful of images from a selection of other ad domains such as ebay, mail.ru, espn, foxnetworks and more and checks the result. A note here that the filenames it requests are random and probably don't exist on the servers but any response, even a 404, is more than you get from the request being blocked.
The major concern I have here is that even if you request a flat file from a server that request can still be rewritten so it will be parsed through something like php and thus the content delivered can be dynamic, this means that these websites it is randomly picking to test adblocking could deliver javascript into the browser and thus malware.
This blockadblock script is literally dangerous.
>>54533867
Just view source and copy the code out senpai.
>>54533906
You can see it attempting to connect to random ad domains in your browser console as well.
>>54533960
i could do that, but i could also fuck your mom. do you really want people going around doing things just because they "could?"
>>54534006
Yes.
>>54533906
Pretty cool breakdown.
I am no webdev but wouldn't a better method to block ad blockers be to check for blockers before requesting dynamic content from the content management system. Detecting a blocker must still be done, but it would eliminate any opportunity of content viewing by blocking the script out the div.
>>54534006
Well, my mom has been really lonely since my dad died, so if you could do that I'm sure she would appreciate it
>>54534018
The problem is that they are loading things from other websites so it would mean that the content wouldn't load until after those websites have responded.
Having a slow website looks bad, so it would be a detrimental setup even for those who aren't blocking ads.
This is why they also specifically say to place the script at the bottom of the webpage, so that it will be parsed by the browser after the content has been parsed.
>>54533639
Are you talking about yourself?
uBlock origin here. No suicidal ideation here.
>>54534079
Yup didn't think of that.
>>54534079
Don't then this is basically the epitomy of anti adblock? Are there any other possible solutions?
>not having AdBlock Block Unblocker for AdBlock Blocked Ad Blocks 2016
>no scriptblock block
its useless
it's just an obfuscated script embedded into the html... nothing to stop you from just blocking that script anyway
also lol@anyone who thinks pasting an obfuscated javascript eval() into their site is a good idea. this script could be doing anything, including loading in another script from a remote resource. letting a third-party inject their own javascript into your site is giving them the keys to the castle so you better fucking trust them 100%
>>54534169
The solution is to look for a better funding model because web advertising is actively out to scam you as a content provider.
>>54532838
>"may"
A.K.A. they're bullshiting you.
>>54530327
Pretty good idea. Convince amateurs web developers to use your service. It may not actually stop adblock users but it does allow you to inject tracking cookies into multitudes of websites. Enjoy profits.
>>54534764
Exactly, I might just do this too to make money but without the code obfuscation.
>>54533612
>mfw been using uBlock Origin for years and preaching it
>mfw I finally investigated uMatrix
>same exact developer, updated just as frequently
>provides waaaay more granular control than uBlock Origin
>mfw my OCD for controlling every HTTP request is fulfilled
>>54533612
>he doesn't block cookies plugins and scripts at a global level
What's the most user friendly, configure it rarely type of replacement for adblock plus?
>>54535255
uBlock Origin
You don't need to configure a single thing.
>>54535255
prbably uBlock Origin with a default install. it has an "advanced user" mode but you have to manually enable it.
Well shit if I didn't have to worry about sites using ads that infect my computer, maybe I wouldn't give a fucking shit.
These 5 amazing things you GOTTA see in your life like this post.
The kikes are really rustled in the jimmies now that their fake and gay clickbait blogging empire can no longer generate revenue.
When will it be google and fagbook turn I wonder.
Thank god for https://reek.github.io/anti-adblock-killer/
>>54535255
Uorigin actually easily to configure then Adblock plus. Adblock plus allows that aren't what they consider harmful. Whereas Ublock block all ads at out of the box, and comes with element blocker too, and has strict blockng that you can disable if you want.
>>54535376
>The kikes
Which kikes exactly? Who's leading this charge and why? Sorry I'm just really outta the loop.
>>54535418
There's actually two groups complaining about adblockers. There's the actual websites that are being moderately affected by them and there's the advertising agencies that are slowly being cut off.
Websites are resorting to anti-adblocking scripts(not this one though this one is just dumb).
The advertising agencies are trying to fight back at adblockers themselves by making them illegal. There's a gorup that represents ad agencies that has repeatedly tried to sue adblock plus. They paint the story as adblock plus stealing their revenue with their acceptable ads shit.
>>54535512
I can't really see this panning out for them. It's like other people say, whenever technology and law get into an arms race the law always loses.
>>54535142
Use them together. uBlock to block ads based on filters, uMatrix to block frames, scripts and such from unwanted places.
>check on PC
>uBlock Origin with almost everything checked
>loads no problem
>check on phone
>host adblock
>loads no problem
Wow it's nothing.
>>54535580
So far Eyeo(adblock plus company) has won every case against their software. The law is aligned with them for now
>>54535730
Did you even wait? It takes a few seconds before it will remove the content and replace with the message.
>find post talking about how using adblock is unethical, accusing me of theft because I don't want to get infested with malware
>lay down, take 2 hour old man nap
>wake up, see this
man I'm really digging the whole minimalistic webpage design, it blends well with blog posts disguised as news articles with faulty statistics such as
>100% of UK users will use adblock in 3 years!!!
>>54530844
This website is basically the average "content creator" you imagine getting starved out by adblock: just a website filled entirely with other people's shit. "B-but i'm not hosting any copyrighted files!" They know exactly why their website generates traffic.
>>54530489
Not to mention that these are always disabled when javascript is disabled.
>>54535920
look m8 I dont care bout you and your content creator bullshit I just want free games on mega links kkthx.
>>54536156
>Visit OTHERPEOPLESSHIT dot COM
>Here's the thing with AD BLOCKERS
>We get it, ads aren't what you're here for, but ads help me pay my bills. So, add me to your whitelist to help support me while I give you OTHER PEOPLES SHIT.
Sure thing m8
>>54535920
How does a man nap differ from a regular nap?
>>54530327
Let the war begin.
>>54530327
>ublock works on their site
>>54530327
>Enable Anti-Adblock Killer
Well then, Gonna need more then javascript to block adblockers.
I'm using uBlock Origin with Reek's anti-antiadblock list but the site still detects uBlock.
What gives?
>>54530327
Daily reminder that only Jews block ads!
>>54530346
dumb question:
what does it mean when ublock does this?
>>54537208
topkek
fucking jews
>>54537545
didn't mean to quote
TOPKEK. Turns out that preventing my browser from requesting some resource is illegal. What's next? Antivirus being illegal for blocking access to viruses?
>>54537440
ublock has prevented the page from loading
>>54537256
>Daily reminder that only Jews use ads!
ftfy
ads are immoral and deceptive.
>>54537545
>>54537576
what about people which don't live in eurabia or burgeristan, though
your laws don't matter outside your Free™ countries
>>54537579
no shit but WHY
works great ;^)
>>54537634
Because the site matched a filter.
"Strict blocking" is the default behavior in uBlock Origin. If you navigate a site that has been blacklisted the request will be intercepted and a warning page will be put up instead. Some of ublock origin's blocklists involve sites that distribute malware so allowing you to visit them wouldn't be very useful. The other ublock and adblock plus have strict blocking disabled by default
>>54530327
how long until block block adblock?
>>54537630
>eurabia
see
>>54535738
>>54534120
I'm talking about all the pajeet sysadmin wannabes who flooded the market after Linux (sadly) replaced most of Unix.
>>54530327
http://techdows.com/2014/04/what-is-adblock-warning-removal-list.html
>>54537545
Some Text-Browsers don't even load the css. kek.
>>54535814
Yes, I read a few things on their site. Nothing.
I use Safari so I can't use something like ublock origin, only ublock
Or ABP
Is there any extension that allows me to block a single portion of javascript?
>we block ad blockers who block ad blockers who block ad blockers who block ad blcokers ourselves! as you might have guessed, we block block ad ad blockers blockers who who have have
Filthy fuckers should get real jobs
The whole concept is shooting yourself in the foot.
Might as well close down your website it's that efficient.
>>54530327
Their script is literal malware, surreptitiously connecting to other domains to "test for your adblocker", any of which could deliver malware into your browser.
They should be completely fucking ashamed of themselves.
>>54530707
example.com##script:inject(bab-defuser.js)
>>54530327
>uBlock origin lets me block the content-blocking div boxes which are supposed to kill ad-block with an easy right click
i laugh at your foolishness, adblock blockers
>script complains about you using other's bandwidth without paying
>uses ebay and other sites, bandwidth without paying to test if you've got an adblocker
>Life imitating art?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mK0q7d3pLH0
>people hide ads because they want pages to load faster
>admins stick bazillions extraneaous scripts that make page load slower just to stop "ad blocking"
>entirety of the Internet suffers slower page loading speeds, regardless of whether you adblock or not
Kek. Either adblocking or adblock blocking has to be made illegal for the good of the Internet.
This is one of the endless loops where neither party will give up, and as a result the number of scripts on pages will rise exponentially over time.
One party has to be stopped by an outside force otherwise we're doomed.
>>54543365
Considering the webmasters/site owners have a finical interest in the functionality of their website, I'm willing to bet that they'll give up first.
>>54543460
Funny that you mention it.
Because the deeper into the block-blocking hole we go, the bigger the market for websites that are simply ad-free and use no silly scripts.
So at some point the big "anti-adblock" sites will just be undermined by simple alternatives.
Can't say I'm not looking forward to it.
>>54542963
>this antiadblock is a contentblocking div and not a content div deleting script
>>54542983
Now this is true.
Mind you I believe the file names it requests are random and probably don't exist on the servers, which means you get 404 or nothing as results, and it only requests from a few of the total pool of domains it has in the script to spread the load, but it is still using up resources and if the popularity of the script were to grow it would result in more and more connections being made to those servers, not enough to effectively DDoS but every connection is a use of server resource.
>>54533244
t. cool pirate man
>>54542983
>>54542983
underrated post
>>54535410
>Adblock plus allows that aren't what they consider harmful
You uncheck one easily findable checkbox and that's fixed. Or, you can be a fucking autistic retard and download Adblock Edge.
Either way, it's really a nonissue.
>>54530327
I block adds in host file
