It's coming...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KFv5bgIOlg4
Miller will play Gene, who was supposed to be a “meh” emoji like his parents. However, the optimistic character has a glitch that causes him to have multiple expressions outside of his control. Of course, he wants to be normal, but will his “glitch” end up being a gift?
Memetastic
>>84573760
Sony is cancer.
>>84573760
Just be glad that they didn't make it about memes
>>84574274
Who the fuck am I kidding, you know there's just going to be some meme cameo or some shit
At the very least, there's going to be a funny part where the eggplant emoji does something lewd and then the camera pans to it and it sneaks off while trying to hide it
>>84573937
So, uh, did anyone ever address if you can just up and sell this stuff as merchandise? Is it considered in the public domain?
>>84574274
>He hasn't seen the meme horror movie with Shane Dawson and Tobuscus
>>84574310
I've seen it (really just the trailer and first 10 minutes), but I just figured that it didn't count just because they mentioned /b/ and trolling for the lulz
>>84573760
This is such a naked attempt to recapture the success of The Lego Movie.
It won't work.
>>84574274
Is kinda the same.
Is /v/'s fault that memes became popular with the normies, can we blame them for this atrocitie?
>>84574304
>Is it considered in the public domain?
The copyright is held by the creator. But good luck proving who that is. And if it isn't registered with the copyright office then you're limited in the damages you can seek.
So it's technically not public domain. Even if it effectively is.
>>84573760
Animation is doomed.
Tbqh senpai I'm hyped for this
>>84573760
It's this year's Lego Movie. Already calling it.
>>84573760
>However, the optimistic character has a glitch that causes him to have multiple expressions outside of his control
if we close our eyes and believe hard enough, we might be able to pretend that this is an au vanellope von schweetz movie
By the way why is TJ Miller in everything nowadays? I don't mind him, but he's no Sam Jackson or Tara Strong...
You know, if he actually started losing his emotions half way through the movie, this shit could get kind of dark.
Almost like Flowers for Algernon but with emotions instead of intellect.
>>84573760
By the power of dubs and trips I cast you to the deepest pits of hell and never come back
>>84573760
>phoneposter
How ironic.
>>84574951
It's /mu/'s fault pic related became a normie meme.
>>84573760
I'm honestly starting to wonder if mankind is really stupid and horrible and smartphones just made this really obvious, or if smartphones are making us really stupid and horrible through the ways they channel behaviour.
Either way they aren't going away so bring on a massive asteroid or something because this has to stop.
>>84574951
This is your fault, /co/.
>>84573760
Why are they called emojis now? They used to be called emoticons, and they were smilies before that.
Imagine someone pouring their heart and soul into this generic-ass story about a fucking ":|" face.
>>84574951
It's actually /wwe/ on /asp/'s fault. A
>>84573760
Fucking why?
>>84580453
Emoticons are ascii.
Emoji are images
>>84580081
Remember that one episode of I am Weasel where Baboon wrote a book and Weasel thought it made everyone stupid but it turns out everyone was just stupid anyway?
Yeah this is that.
>we'll never have a buddy cop movie with T.J.Miller and Chris Pratt
Y live?
>>84580576
>we'll never have a buddy cop movie with T.J.Miller and Chris Pratt
And this is bad because...
>>84580521
If you want to get technical, emojis are considered ASCII now too.
>>84573760
>Miller
Oh god please tell me they didn't rope TJ Miller into this diarrhoea bath.
also
B R A N D S Y N E R G Y
R
A
N
D
S
Y
N
E
R
G
Y
>>84580582Tjey both have Canncer
>>84580586
In what way? there are only 128 characters in ASCII and none of them are emoji.
You mean Unicode, anon.
>>84580620
>You mean Unicode, anon.
SHIEEEEET
>>84580634
As a side note, j00t better add full unicode support already. Imagine the bantz on /pol/ with codepoint U+1F4A9
>U+1F574
>MAN IN BUSINESS SUIT LEVITATING
what the fuck this is some /x/ shit why do we need an emoji for this?
>there's widespread support for it, though apparently not in my browser
>>84573760
So they are actually going with this? ok.
>>84577036
I would
>He's a glitch!
That doesn't sound familiar in any way...
Also, eerie that Ralph 2 and Emoji have such a similar plot and are very close together (like 8 months to be exact)
I'm actually kind of interested in seeing how this does, because I want to see how much normies actually love emojis
Nice to have another reason not to watch modern Hollywood movies.
