No, you can get a better deal with the samsung galaxy S4 ($179) from the best buy website:

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/boost-mobile-samsung-galaxy-s-4-4g-lte-with-16gb-memory-no-contract-cell-phone-white/9130016.p?id=1219700124139&skuId=9130016

1080p screen
accepts 128GB microsd cards
16GB internal/2GB RAM
removable battery (you can use bigger zero lemon batteries)
1.9GHz 4-core krait 400
adreno 320
13MP camera

The zenfone 2 is nice but only worth it if you get the 64GB version with 4GB of RAM. But last time I checked it was like $350.

The 64GB is $300 on amazon

>>97086
>snapdragon
Dropped.

http://wccftech.com/security-exploits-put-snapdragon-powered-devices-at-risk-of-hacking/

>>97227
Meh, if you weren't comfortable with security holes you could drive a truck through and security architecture a chimpanzee could improve on, you wouldn't be getting an android in the first place.

>>97241
This. Android has never been secure.
But since you brought it up, the Zenfone uses a 64bit quad core Intel processor.

>>97271
So the logic step is to buy the more insecure one I can find?

>>97801
"Insecure" is like "pregnant".

If you're either secure, or you aren't secure. There's not degrees of it.

If you want secure, get an iPhone and never connect it to iTunes. If you don't care about security, then all Androids are interchangeably insecure.