Any way someone could depixelize this or make it a higher resolution? It would only take a couple seconds in photoshop
You watched too much CSI. You can't upscale an image without it looking pixellated or blurry.
Unless you redraw each detail by hand of course, but it's akin to drawing an entire painting, not "a couple seconds in photoshop".
>>76033
>It would only take a couple seconds in photoshop
Then do it yourself no? You seem to know already how to do it.
>>76038
I tried looking for a better quality image with reverse search, but nothing turned up. Who are you stalking?
>>76039
Its a picture from a random instagram that I found on my explore page, reverse image search wouldnt work
>>76034
Retard.
There's a bunch of great upscaling filters. I made this using the gimp (G'MIC's difussion upscale and thin brush smoothing, and then film grain). But waifu2x is even clearer at upscaling than diffusion. Wish they ported it to a gimp filter.
Sure, you lose some detail, but it doesn't need to look bad. This looks proper.
>>76048
Beat me to it. Oh well I'll post anyway.
>>76033
tried waifu2x looks shitty but this is as good as you will get.
>>76053
You really need to take care of that artifacting (ie the one around the hood's borders). You need to either cover it, clean it, or both. I clear it with thin brush smoothing and cover it with film grain. Waifu2x cleans it with the same neural networking algorithm it uses for the upscaling.
>>76054
Here's yours with film grain. So superior to mine, I don't even. Seriously, please, someone port waifu2x to the gimp.
>>76062
waifu2x is just a website no need to port it anywhere... http://waifu2x.udp.jp/
>>76065
I mean, yeah, but it's still an open algorithm. And the website is limited - a proper gimp filter should use the same algorithm, but allow you to specify some parameters (ie any % instead of just 1.6x and 2x).
Pic related, g'mic's diffusion upscale dialog.
