But you didn't proof anything.

I actually enjoyed DaS2, but I still think it's the weakest in the series. The straight forward paths have been a common complaint. There's this very satisfying feeling when you fight through a really hard area and find a shortcut that lets you bypass it. There wasn't as much of that in DaS2. It had a lot of variety in areas, but they didn't go the extra mile that Miyazaki's team does and felt a little bland. There were more bosses in DaS2, but they felt kind of generic. Royal Rat Authority/Vanguard were just normal enemies or bigger versions of normal enemies. Dragon Rider was recycled in Drangleic Castle. Thrown Watcher/Protector felt like Ornstein and Smough 2.0 and so on and so forth. I still think it's worth a playthrough though. And yes; Bloodborne is excellent.

>>332629227
>DaS2

Instant irrelevance.

DaS>BB=DeS>DaS2

DeS > all

BB = DeS = DaS (They all have their own flaws that balance them out a little imo) > POWERGAP > DaS2

>>332629227
How do you prove a negative, retard?
Prove yourself right.

>DaS2
no; get fucked.

>>332629227
DS1 = DS3 > DS2

BB

DeS

BB and DeS are in their own separate tiers because they are too separated from the main series. This is the only objective and fair way to judge the games.

>>332629227
3 > 1 > 2 > Demons

Bloodborne isn't a souls game.

DaS>BB>DeS>>>>>>Dragon's Dogma>>>>Shit>>>>>>DaS2

>>332633665
>DaS>BB>DeS>>>>>>Dragon's Dogma
Ha, no.

>>332629227
DaS3>Old hunters=Lost Crowns>Bloudbourne=DaS2>AotA>DaS>DeS

Only correct order

is dark souls 3 really that good, bros?

>>332629227
Nah.

DaS3 > DaS1 > DeS > BB > DaS2

>>332629227
> Proofs me wrong.
It's spelt proove, dip shit.