>every single game release, shitposters use metacritic to argue that a game is bad if it gets anything lower than fucking 85 minimum
>not a single person has pointed out pkmn go's abysmal score with both fans and critics
>nintendo stock has increased nearly 100% just for having a stake in the app, they didn't even make or formally publish it themselves
explain this
>>345153991
>explain this
"Reviews" are for cucks who cant think for themselves
i didnt know mobile games get metacritic pages
>>345153991
Everyone is too busy outside playing pokemon go to care.
>>345153991
Easy.
Think back. When metacritic has been used to point out that a game was bad, was it ever a mobile game? No, it wasn't. Pokemon Go is the first mobile game people here talk about at all in ages, if not ever.
There you go.
I like it because it has pokemon
>>345154134
This. How long has this been a thing anyways?
Legitimately curious
>>345154093
I'm pretty sure reviews are for deciding on whether you want to spend time/money on the game beforehand.
>>345154185
it already has 220 user reviews and still only manages a 6.
>>345153991
Mobile games are cancer for gaming for that reason
Lodes of money for abysmal games
>>345154319
i don't know WHAT the fuck is going on here.
>>345153991
>nintendo stock has increased nearly 100% just for having a stake in the app
I Don't Understand How Market Works: the post
>>345155542
So explain it to me then, Mr Genius Economist.
I assume you know how much Niantic and GF's stock went up?
