> Historically accurate WW1 game
> Negligible amount of female soldiers in World War 1
> largest female group in WW1 was Russian and lasted under a year
> Can't even play as Russia
> chances of seeing a woman on the battlefield are so low that it'd be a waste of time to put them in
> Despite all of this, give you the ability to play as a female in campaign, at least that way it's immersive and realistic while being inclusive
> People still throw bitch-fits
Why are these people never pleased?
>>344948004
What bitch fits?
>>344948004
>historically accurate WW1 game
>regenerating health
>access to a pinpoint accurate minimap at all times
ok
>>344948004
>Historically accurate WW1 game
>>344950712
>Posting asian pewdiepie
>>344948004
I believe they said rooted in history, not historically accurate.
Being historically accurate would be extremely difficult without ample development time to research extensive. Rooted in history can just make a fictitious WW1 with some historical elements.
>there's only one white character on the allied side in multiplayer
I can't wait to pop open my future child's history book to read about how black soldiers won the war
like seriously I get the whole "need a black guy" part of today, but what the actual fuck made it okay to blatantly revise history to a point where britbongistan ingame only has a single white character model out of like 4?
>Not being Trench Warware
>>344950394
>He doesn't play hardcore
>>344952453
>Playing hardcore.
Fucking bush wookie fags I swear.
>Islam
>allowing women to fight
>Historically accurate
>>344951532
They took out the French who had the most blacks and said "french are racist" then went "hmm who can we supplant the blacks onto that is similar enough to that Americans will accept as factually correct? Oh I know!" And bam. Britain is black powa. And I say that as a legit black guy who thinks that shit is dumb as fuck. Either stay accurate or just say it's fantasy