ITT: Games that you thought would be shit, but we're actuallyfun
Rule of Rose is not fun by any definition of the word
>>344776553
then what did I have while playing you sanctimonious fuck
i dont know about fun, but the opening is god tier
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jig_BSvn8wE
>>344776652
an errection
>>344774093
Pretty fun. Combat sucked ass though
>>344774093
horribly bad the game, i legit got the game for $10 and did not keep it since it was so shit
>>344777791
how much did you sell it for
>>344777908
$160, sold on amazon so i believe they took 15%
either way i didnt want the game
>>344778027
>>344777908
also i was just completed disappointed that everything was great but the combat and the dog was ok
>SAY
>WHERE IS MY SHAME,
>WHEN I CALL YOUR NAME?
>>344774093
Its funny because my reaction was the complete opposite
>>344778447
make a gun and shoot yourself
You know what this is? A perfectly fine implementation of stealth mechanics in a survival horror game.
I know that's not exactly a high bar to reach, and by no measure is this game great, but it still gets way more crap than it deserves and I suspect the difficulty has a lot to do with that. It's a very unforgiving game, you fuck up and you are almost certainly going to die and then it's back to the last checkpoint again. People who said shit like "It's stupid that you can't just shoot the immortal vampires to get past them" didn't quite get it. The game very explicitly says that humans are no match for vampires, as well they shouldn't be, and not to try to fight them. It's a stealth game, you are supposed to avoid being caught and if you stop, look and think for a second you won't be.
It had a bad reputation, but /v/ was banging on about how it's actually good so I gave it a try.
>>344780126
Bland as fuck