[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Soundtrack sounds cool, and game looks good. Highest multiplayer
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games

Thread replies: 83
Thread images: 8
File: hqdefault-1.jpg (31 KB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]
hqdefault-1.jpg
31 KB, 480x360
Soundtrack sounds cool, and game looks good. Highest multiplayer FPS pre-order numbers so far.

>Call of Duty Infinite Warfare won't be successful
>>
>>344649362
t. EA employee pretending to be an Activision employee
>>
totally legit user guise

not trying to viral market at all
>>
>>344649457
>>344649502
http://www.vgchartz.com/preorders/

See for yourself.
>>
>>344649362
>tfw blew BF1 out of the water with twice as many preorders

REEEEKKKT
>>
File: 1428569775523.jpg (338 KB, 1369x1183) Image search: [Google]
1428569775523.jpg
338 KB, 1369x1183
>h-hey lets make it an epic reddit meme to downvote the IW trailer that will surely kill call of duty forever!!
>>
>>344649758
That's entirely because of the Modern Warfare remake.
>>
>>344650426
Those faggets don't even play call of duty.
>>
>>344649362
Nobody's saying it won't be successful, they're saying it's going to be shit.
>>
>>344650608
Doubt it. Getting Black Ops 3 levels of pre-orders. It's just the fanbase moving over to the most recent cod. And as for MW remastered, they're making that standalone after launch.
>>
>>344649362
Soundtrack sounds like the same forgettable trash as in every single CoD since MW2, and it looks like the same two shooters before.
>>
>>344650426
Sounds like 4chan from 2006.
Of course, you newfag cuckolds who only care about being as contrarian as possible consider it bad because it's those evil normies who are doing it.
>>
>>344650730
Who? You? And boycotters? How would you know., You don't play cod and neither do they.
>>
File: eFNXPsB.png (726 KB, 672x574) Image search: [Google]
eFNXPsB.png
726 KB, 672x574
>>344649362
Mostly kiddies following hate bandwagons on the youtube. The game will still sell like hotcakes and i expect to see 7 through 10 tmartn videos on tips and tricks.
>>
>>344650879
4chan used to be a tad more devious than just pressing a button that's there for you to use it.
>>
File: Blops 3.png (72 KB, 688x546) Image search: [Google]
Blops 3.png
72 KB, 688x546
Maybe it's better than Blops 3.
>>
>>344650808
>MW2 soundtrack
>Forgettable
>>
>>344650971
>neo-Infinity Ward, developers of MW3 and Ghosts
It won't.
They'll reuse assets from AW and BO3 to make their own futuristic turd.
Of course, the multiplayer will be even more imbalanced, and the campaign will just be linear crap with an uninteresting storyline about USA saving the galaxy.
>>
Well I hope it succeeds for once. It's the only CoD I've ever considered getting. I won't get it though because I've checked the numbers and on PC all these fucking games die off fast.
>>
>>344651148
Sorry, wanted to say since after MW2.
>>
>>344651160
Non-3A studios are those making actually decent netcode, maps, and features.
>>
>>344651240
The netcode is exactly the same in all games, and CoD hasn't had actual memorable maps since MW2 and Black Ops.
And features?
What features?
The only relevant changes in the franchise since it's conception were the jet pack, introduced in AW, and wallrunning, introduced in BO3.

Treyarch is also the only one who gives a fuck and puts some effort in their campaigns.
>>
>>344650971
>>344651160
No IW will be better than MW3 and definitely Ghosts. They made Infinite Warfare instead of Ghosts 2 for a reason.
>>
>>344651453
Because everyone hated Ghosts and they gave up on it?
Why does that mean it's going to be better?
It's actually worrying because neo-Infinity Ward is the only one so bad that they dropped their own subfranchise.
>>
>>344651446
>The netcode is exactly the same in all games
Stopped reading. Please have a clue before posting.
>>
File: latest-1.jpg (6 KB, 200x150) Image search: [Google]
latest-1.jpg
6 KB, 200x150
>>344651446
>Not memorable
>>344651561
They didn't give up on it, they were told by someone to make Infinite Warfare instead. This is the opposite of worrying because it suggests that they put in much more effort into the game by making a new series.
>>
>>344651889
And of course, you won't argue the rest.
Dayum, thank god it didn't have any spelling errors, otherwise you could have had a better reason to just drop the argument.
>>
>>344651938
>Modern Warfare 3
>memorable
>gray and brown absolutely everywhere
>gray filter on top of everything
No.
>>
>>344651945
>>344652018
I guess this applies to you too.
>>
>>344651938
>This is the opposite of worrying because it suggests that they put in much more effort into the game by making a new series.
What?
How is that the opposite of worrying?
They made a subfranchise so damn bad that they dropped it to get in line with the futuristic crap.
Basically it means that they don't give a fuck about continuity and will just follow the current trends.
Late, as usual.
>>
File: blops.jpg (821 KB, 1727x901) Image search: [Google]
blops.jpg
821 KB, 1727x901
>>344651446
>>344651889
>>344651945
Maybe I won't argue because that post sounds like advertising bullshit.

Maybe post something more than vague tripe. There are plenty of criticisms here >>344650971.
>>
>>344651938
That map is tiny and awful. It helps if characters can spawn properly.

>>344652128
They're making a much more innovative game than Ghosts 2 could have been, and if the market gives no shits about Ghosts 1, why develop it? It was just a lull in the gameplay, because the series was getting repetitive. Your implications aren't provable or logical.
>>
>>344652317
>They're making a much more innovative game than Ghosts 2 could have been
Yes, instead of making Modern Warfare 5, they are making Black Ops 3 in space.

>Your implications aren't provable or logical.
Ah yes?
It isn't logical that Cowadooty will just stick to whatever trend there's currently?
How many bucks the next, the next CoD is in WWII?
Well, maybe not the next, since it will probably be Advanced Warfare 2, but considering IW dropped Ghosts, they may drop AW too to appeal to the trends.
>>
>>344652317
Agreed
>>
>>344650918
Yes, because it's shit.
>>
File: Untitled.png (134 KB, 1029x173) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
134 KB, 1029x173
>>344650918
I'm one of the dislikes of that video, kill yourself you fucking drone, this franchise is dead.
>>
People like it, they just don't like it's COD.
>>
>>344652472
>CoD in space and other planets isn't new for CoD

This is the last CoD I'm getting, because they put effort in it to be innovative. After this, and only after this, they will probably give in to the WWII over-used last decade, trend.
>>
>>344652472
>It isn't logical that Cowadooty will just stick to whatever trend there's currently?
>It isn't logical that a studio produces what seems to sell?
It's not a point.
>>
>>344652859
>CoD in space and other planets isn't new for CoD

How about they do something that makes the game more fun instead of something that will only provide new background skyboxes for multiplayer maps?
>>
>>344652743
>dead
>most preordered FPS beating BF1 by 10s of thousands of preorders

Dislike all you want. :)
>>
>>344652920
>CoD with spaceship fights
It could be amazing, and it's something fresh.
>>
>>344650879
>le vee only wants to be contrarian as possible meme
fuck off
it's bad because the gameplay is atrocious
it's bad because the story is clichee as fuck and takes itself way too serious
it's bad because the multiplayer is full of so horribly bad gameplay-design choices that the game literally would get 2/10 points if it would've been released 25 years ago
the maps have shit-tier design
the weapons and kill-streaks are absolute bullshit(literally no skill needed to kill stuff)
CoD completely destroyed the FPS genre since Modern Warfarebut and continues to do so

literally EVERYTHING about the game is bad
>>
>>344652989
>It could be amazing, and it's something fresh.
Except you know that will only be parts of the 5 hour long campaign and won't affect the multiplayer, which is what almost everyone cares about.

Also, we already had two games with dogfighting, the only difference is that you would be in a black skybox.
>>
>>344651453
I still can't understand why people hated the MP of Ghosts
most of the time I hear it is because you don't need to level up to ridicoulus levels in order to unlock the most overpowered shit

Protip: If the only motivation to keep playing the Multiplayer of your FPS game is the pseudo-RPG aspect of the game, it may misses actual good gameplay
>>
>>344653021
That's precisely what i'm saying.
Now that everyone hates Cowadooty, some /v/edditors are starting to defend it, saying that Cowadooty in space is innovation, when the sole concept of Cowadooty in space was basically a joke only 4 years ago.
>>
>>344653197
It's not contrarian because there's no fucking opinion to be had. It's not out yet.
>>
>>344652920
Other planets.
>>344653105
Space dogfighting
>>
>>344653187
Ghosts as a whole was boring and forgettable game that brought literally nothing new to the franchise.
It was just an expansion of MW3.

>>344653265
There is, don't you see people saying how this game is pure innovation because it has very epic space fights?
>>
>>344653284
>Other planets.
How about they do something that makes the game more fun instead of something that will only provide new background skyboxes and ground textures for multiplayer maps?
>>
>>344653197
to be honest, the gameplay that everybody hates/defends has been completely the same since Modern Warfare(one)

>>344653265
>you can be supportive of a game that isn't out yet
your logic is shit

>>344653301
>Ghosts as a whole was boring and forgetttable
like every CoD since MW?
it has been the same literally everytime
>>
>>344653301
>There is, don't you see people saying how this game is pure innovation because it has very epic space fights?
It's conjecture, not opinion.
>>
>>344653187
Ghosts was bad cause you died with like 2 bullets. But the rest of the game was ok. IW will be much better though.
>>
>>344653442
>it has been the same literally everytime
Yes, but at least AW introduced jetpacks and BO3 introduced wallrunning.
Simple and forgettable mechanics, but Ghosts introduced literally, absolutely nothing new.
>>
>>344653519
>IW will be much better though.

Not really.
These hacks have always been the ones who put the least effort in everything.

They tried to make MW4, introduced absolutely nothing new in MW3, they actually reused animations from MW2 for Ghosts, and now they are just making a futuristic shooter, the third futuristic CoD in a row, probably to reuse assets from previous games.
>>
File: 1467329671654.gif (491 KB, 500x366) Image search: [Google]
1467329671654.gif
491 KB, 500x366
What's the best Call of Duty and why is it Black Ops?
>>
>>344653418
What you're saying can be applied to any game. You're replacing the word map with ground texture and skybox.

Cool map in space too. Space station.
>>
>>344653692
MW2
Don't give a shit about how unbalanced it was, it was the last CoD where I had legitimate fun.
It was specially good with alterIWnet and the mods.

BO3 could have been, but mod tools are still nowhere to be seen even though they said they would come in Spring, and by the time they do release them, the MP will be completely dead.
>>
>>344653817
So that is the innovation you are praising?
Maps with futuristic settings?
How about they do something that could make the game more fun instead?
Oh well, that would actually requiere some thought, instead of just mindlessly changing settings.
>>
>>344653692
Tie between Back Ops and World at War
>>
>>344653662
First far future CoD actually. And it shows that they're going all out with this one through 6 minutes of gameplay alone.
>>
How come you people don't trust the original team behind the first modern warfare and go to Titanfall 2?
>>
>>344654107
Yeah, they are going all out, this 6 hour long campaign by going to space, pure innovation never seen in any other FPS.

>>344654116
I am, Titanfall reminded me of MW2 more than any post-MW2 CoD.
Plus they already said all the map packs will be free, so I already made my choice.
>>
>>344653925
Yes it is. I don't see Battlefield doing this. Space battles and planet warfare is innovation for CoD. And seems like the first triple A to have some of these features like deploying your ship to go dogfighting. Destiny doesnt even have space battles.
>>
>>344649758
>vgchartz
>vgchartz
>vgchartz
lol
>>
>>344654116
Will be fun, but IW will be overall more long-lasting in terms of enjoyment and addiction. CoD always is, and I played Titanfall 1.
>>
>>344654374
>Yes it is. I don't see Battlefield doing this
Battlefield 2142

>And seems like the first triple A to have some of these features like deploying your ship to go dogfighting.
That's an oddly specific feature, like praising Black Ops 3 for letting you unleash some flies that set enemies on fire.
>>
>>344654538
No it won't, the team developing it are hacks who have already made the two worst CoD games, while the team developing Titanfall 2 made two of the best, and made Titanfall 1 too.
>>
>>344654607
That came out years ago and didn't have space battles. No it isn't an oddly specific feature, its the main aspect of the game.
>>
>>344654752
>That came out years ago and didn't have space battles
So?
It had dogfighting.
Are you seriously saying that CoD is unique because it does the same goddamn thing but in a black skybox?
>>
>>344654752
>its the main aspect of the game.
The fact that that is the main aspect of the game shows how creatively bankrupt the teams working on Cowadooty are.
>>
>>344654752
>COD IS BETTER BECAUSE THE DOGFIGHTS ARE SET SPECIFICALLY IN SPACE AND YOU CAN GET OUT OF YOUR SHIP

Sometimes I feel bad for these shills, must be hard trying to find some redeemable aspect in these stale as fuck games.
>>
>>344654374
In Battlefield I can get out of my jet at any time, and during multiplayer, not some scripted boring campaign.

So, what's your last argument, that it's a shooter set in space?
>>
>>344649362
>preorder numbers for console players
>relevant in FPS
>>
>>344655105
Battlefield is also clunky shit compared to Call of Duty's smooth mechanics. Battlefield is floaty as shit. Space+gameplay is most definitely why it has more pre-orders.
>>
>>344655885
No, it has more preorders because CoD has always been more popular.
The masses don't care about quality, otherwise they wouldn't be choosing between two shitty console shooters.
>>
>>344655956
It's the most popular shooter for a reason. It's good.
>>
>>344656028
>popularity means good
Not at all, it's a console shooter, AKA, it's horrible as shooter and doesn't hold a candle against other, actual shooters like Doom or Quake Live.
This turd of a franchise almost doomed the entire genre with their shitty practices.

Thank god there are at least some developers willing to put some work into their games.
>>
>>344656028
No, because Battlefield 2 was only on Windows/Mac.
>>
>>344656028
Why are you implying the masses care about quality?
Fallout 4 and Skyrim are some of the most sold RPGs, and are, at the same time, some of the worst.

CoD is cow being milked to the brink of death, and now it's agonizing, not knowing how to adapt.
>>
>>344656028
I have to agree with this guy. I'd rather play CoD than Battlefield because it feels smooth and you can jump into the action. It's the same reason games like Need for Speed are generally more popular than Assetto Corsa: fun and easy > accurate but clunky
>>
>>344657329
Battlefield is just as dumbed down as CoD. Literally all spawn points go straight to the enemy in seconds.
>>
>>344657329
I'd rather play Titanfall, it's already smooth as hell, plus free DLC.
Thread replies: 83
Thread images: 8

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.