Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
So /v/, do you think BF1 will steal the graphics crown from Battlefront?
Nobody cares
>>344239317
Still wont take the crown from crysis.
The balance between graphics and physics is still unmatched.
>>344239895
I'd say it's surpassed the original Crysis already, though maybe not in terms of physics.
In fact, I can't think of many games with physics as good as the original Crysis.
No. BF1 could have technically superior graphics and it'd still look worse due to art direction and uncanny valley.
>>344240164
So the crown is still there.
A shooter without physics is a walking simulator.
Probably
>>344240276
>A shooter without physics is a walking simulator.
What?
WE
>>344240457
It's battlefield. Vehicles, players, and items have always felt very float. Not very immersive at all.
>>344240276
>A shooter without physics is a walking simulator.
DOOM CONFIRMED FOR WALKING SIMULATOR
>>344240457
>>344240595
When you play a shooter when you can use the enviroment and its pysics to your advantage, the rest is a game like the last of us, or any other walking simulator, but with a gun, and some bad guys.
It's really dark, devoid of colors and have some annoying and persistent bloom.
So no.
>>344240620
what the fuck does that even mean
did you just have a stroke
>>344240276
I wish people would stop misusing the term "walking simulator."
If the game allows you to do something other than walk, it's not a walking simulator. Have you ever played Dear Esther? You're comparing Battlefield 1 to Dear Esther.
>>344240771
>both have non non existent physics
Yes, they are.
>>344240771
Welcome to /v/ where everything we don't like is an SJW propoganda leftist cuck walking simulator and everything we like is objectively 12/10 GOAT saviour of videogames
>>344239317
OOGA BOOGA
KILL ALL WHITE MAN
>>344239317
>those raindrops accumulating on the gun
>>344240863
You might be the first person ever to define "walking simulator" as a game without physics.
So you get points for originality, at least. Unfortunately the reason your idea is so original is that it simply isn't what the term means.
>>344240638
>It's really dark, devoid of colors
To be fair, it's a WW1 game.
My question is when are we going to get an actual good game with graphics this good or better?
Also fuck that Crysis fag above. Crysis is good but it's not even in the graphics running anymore.
>>344240981
I haven't played the game but if they actually slide down the gun that's cool but I doubt they're more than just something static.
>>344241050
You do realize WWI photos being in black and white isn't because reality didn't have colors back then right?
>>344241050
Do you think World War I was really dark during the daytime for some reason?
>>344241050
>To be fair, it's a WW1 game.
>nice job asshole blocking our fucking way and getting us all killed
Such historic realism
>>344239317
>will frostbite take the crown from frostbite
gee whiz
>>344239317
I wont like the game but god damn that does look really fucking good.
>>344240638
what are you talking about, there's almost nothing but colored people in this.
>>344240276
>A shooter without physics is a walking simulator.
That's the most inappropriate use of that buzzword I've ever heard. You're an idiot.
>>344241218
Have you never been outside during a shower or are you baiting me?
>>344241050
>everything is beautiful
>except the smoke in the distance
>we still use a fucking sprite for that
>>344241178
That's why it isn't black and white. It's just overcast and covered in mud, like most of WW1.
>>344241375
>implying that anon has ever even had a shower, let alone been outside during one
>>344240276
You're retarded.
>>344241218
>>344240638
It's raining... in the game, it's fucking raining.
>>344241178
>>344241218
I know /v/ doesn't go outside often, but fucking hell.
>>344239317
>will game that uses the same engine engine look better
W E W
E
W
>>344241178
>>344241218
>weather is overcast
>shitload of smoke and debris due to shelling
Meanwhile in another direction you get >>344240457
>>344241178
>>344241218
I actually thought this when i was like 5 or 10. Thought people saw everything in low quality and bad colors in the 90's and previous years before that because of movies and photos
>>344241979
Why are you even replying?
>>344242036
There's actually been color photography of different kinds since at least the late 1800s. It wasn't common but you can find some color photos from the 1890s. It's weird seeing things from that long ago in color since the majority of stuff we're exposed to even as close as 60 years ago is in black and white.
>>344239317
Probably but that means fuck all when it will more than likely be the same cash grab horse shit that battlefront was. Battlefield has been a garbage series for awhile now.
>>344241224
Yea, DICE clearly doesn't give a fuck about being historically accurate.
>>344243383
jUST
Anybody that has played it:
Is it the same engine as Battlefront? Does it run the same? Because Battlefront was fucking gorgeous and was at 60fps at all times.
>>344243383
Its not ww1 game
its a battlrfield wih a ww1 skin
>>344243678
Dice is always going to use some version of Frostbite.
>>344244019
Why did Battlefront run so god damn well and look so good then?
It blew BF4 out of the fucking water in both of those aspects.
Why didn't they name this Battlefront 1914 or some shit?
Nah, SWBF still looks better.
>>344244536
*Battlefield
>>344244327
Post processing
>>344244327
BF4 was on last gen too right? Might just be not needing to bother supporting past gen so just being able to put all effort into current gen and using what it's technologically capable of.
Also they used photogrammetry which, while I don't know too much about it, it seems like it can make environments look really good as it's replicating data collected by the devs without too much performance impact. Battlefront does have some low poly elements to it that just look really good because of the lighting and the photogrammetry method.
They also aimed for 60 fps so they probably optimized more than they would in something like the new Mirror's Edge.
Didn't take long for triggered /pol/blrinas to come here.
I'm glad such autism is contained to this place.
>>344242036
>>344246000
You are one though
>>344246460
You sound like a wigger anon. Go back to ireland potato fucker
>>344241218
Are you retarded?
that filter look disgusting
>>344246146
at first i thought this post said "you and I are one."
>>344244536
because the first bf was in wwii and its a wwii game
>>344239317
thanks to the alpha I just realized what a spastic and shit design is dice pushing
>>344246000
I do so too, my Argentinian friend.
>>344246984
You mean the same game they've released since 2011 but with older gear?
>>344244684
Only that map
>>344243383
I hope DICE burns in hell for this.
There's nothing worse than history revisionism. They're not even American, why the fuck are they doing this shit
>>344249392
Lightning can do many wonders.
>>344248793
>history revisionism
>by putting niggers in a multiplayer shooter
dude, what?
>>344239895
Sorry m8, your opinion is wrong. Battlefront took the crown some time ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGyaR2sSBkA
>>344249603
Seriously, that's all there is to it, even with shit textures and low polygonal count you can make games look good with proper lightning.
>>344249603
>>344249801
And lack of lighting can kill whatever graphical fidelity your game has.
See: Dark Souls 2
>>344249603
>lightning
Well, the lighting looks like a lightning strike, if that's what you mean.
Also, those wall textures are pretty low-res compared.
>>344249801
>that flat debris on the floor
FOX engine looks really good, and MGS is a better game by lightyears, but Battlefront is visually better.
>>344240595
It's a walking between skateparks simulator
>>344249701
Just let them spaz out, they'll forget about it once the game is released
>>344249912
>FOX engine looks really good, and MGS is a better game by lightyears, but Battlefront is visually better.
Not saying MGSV looks better, it has low res textures and very low polygonal count due to being a crossgen game, but illumination is the key to making a game look good.
If it's trash, good textures can't save it.
>>344244684
Too bad the UI is fucking garbage, and most people play with that iphone shit turned on.
>>344248793
>be an englishman in 1916
>drafted
>shit, time to pack my things
>"I love you my dearest Veronica, until we meet again"
>"I will never forget you, Reginald, our love will never fade"
>few months later, Battle of Somme
>platoon approaches an abandoned church
>we kneel respectfully at the altar and thank the Lord for being with us in battle
>a shell explodes nearby
>ohfuck.webm
>a wounded frenchman is dragged into the church and bullets begin to whiz by
>he cries something out in french, his hands tremble as he drags out a bloodstained photo of a woman
>"C...Clémence..."
>God bless his soul
>positions are taken and the battle ensues
>take aim through a shattered stained glass window, hands shake as I try to steady my weapon
>platoon leader screams for us to take cover as a metal beast rolls in next to the church
>deafening silence in the church before a grinding sound is heard followed by a loud thud
>strange footsteps echo from outside of the church before moving within the sacristy
>we take aim, ready to unload on those filthy Huns if necessary
>suddenly the footsteps stop
>a shadowy figure emerges from behind the altar
>"GET DEM CRAKAZ"
>all hell breaks loose as strange creatures dance out from behind the altar
>the church suddenly is filled with explosive gunshots, battle cries, and mumbled ebonics
>one creature approaches the wounded frehman and snatches the photograph from his balled fists
>"who be dis cracka biotch"
>he performs unspeakable acts on the image
>suddenly my radio crackles and my ears are filled with the sound of what must be an angel
>"we have taken objective butta"
>what the fuck? where's the grizzled commander? who is this bitch?
>I am dumbfounded as my fellow servicemen drop their weapons and begin apologizing for the slave trade
>>344248793
It's a piece of electronic entertainment, jesus christ calm down
>>344250195
If we doesn't matter, why can't we finally get FPSs with Wehrmacht campaigns?
>>344239317
it wont matter because battlefield 1 is a piece of shit made by literal cuckold swedes
>>344250387
>doesn't matter if the game is good because of niggers
Why are you in /v/ if you don't care about videogames and just about political agendas?
>>344250195
>on 4chan telling people to calm down
Fuck your tone policing
>>344250305
>Wehrmacht
>WW1
Battlefield 1 looks like a piece of shit but you're also retarded
>>344239317
>>344240164
>weapon is wet with pretty little high-res droplets
>fucking soldiers' hands and arms are not
I hate this kind of fucking disgusting bullshit. Who the fuck is in charge of supervising the development of this sort of thing? Some sort of blind and ignorant retard? Why do we always have to see shit like this happen in games? There is not one single game complex enough to have everything covered. They need more autistic fucks working on their stuff and less publisher grunts forcing development teams to do half-assed jobs on their games. Fuck this shit industry.
>>344239317
Reminds me of Battlefield 3, for some reason.
>>344250620
>all this rant because there's no water drops in the hands
I'd rather have them focus on the game not being a complete broken crap at launch like BF3 and 4.
>>344250696
Blue filter?
>>344250534
Can you not read, or are you just not trying?
>>344239317
Did the raindrops roll forwards and back on the gun if you looked up and down?
I honestly cannot believe that America would let a bunch of fucking MONKIES fight their battles for them in WWI
How disgraceful
>>344250813
Daytime looks very different, definitely not a blue filter
>>344250956
No. They disappear and have specific patterns of droplets.
>>344240570
yeah maybe 10 years ago.
Shit has felt solid as fuck since badcompany.
>>344239317
Those rain textures on the gun look awful.
>graphics
Nobody that likes real games cares. Your kerfuffle murder simulator movies aren't good games.
>>344241218
>raining
>DURR WHY IS IT DARK
probably not
it looks very good but Battlefront has 40 players, no destruction, smaller maps and just far less going on in general
that being said the singleplayer could well surpass it
>>344250164
underrated post
>>344251102
Have you tried driving any vehicle in 4? Or noticed how items react when coming in collision with each other? They just bounce so fucking much it feels all too floaty.
>>344251370
>>344251102
Just watch how jeeps and shit move in third person, it looks fucking awful
>>344250785
>all this rant because there's no water drops in the hands
Not really. The rant is actually directed to any overlooked or underdeveloped aspect of games, including the work needed to make them not be a complete broken crap at launch like Battlefields 3 and 4. I just used that as an example among an entire plethora of mistakes, mostly because it really shows the amount of attention that is being put into the games' development, which is fucking zero. I just exploded on that because how the fuck can you overlook something so present in the game? Your hands and arms are probably the most recurring element of the entire game. Nothing else has more screen time than that, other than the user interface.
>>344250164
>platoon leader screams for us to take cover as a metal beast rolls in next to the church
>at somme
Congrats, you're literally retarded.
>>344251230
It should be gray, not dark and blue
>>344252460
Wow, just WOW.
I bet if it were gray(which, WHAT?) you would be bitching it wasn't green.
Why do all the BF1 screenshots have so low brightness?
>>344239317
Watch it also be devoid of content like battlefront
>rain turns off grass being green, the thread
fucking people that have never left the city, christ
>>344255602
This. Its gonna be shallow with a lot of DLC, just like BF3,4, and Battlefront. I can't fathom why ANYONE would trust the battlefield name after those games.
Just thinking about the amount of content that BF1942 had on launch is baffling. So many vehicles, maps, and loadouts to choose from. Good balance and fucking FUN matches. Shame we won't see anything on that level again.
>>344255748
>post launch patches that included new maps with new objective types
granted unless you liked air/anti-air play, those maps were terrible
>>344255748
I have a felling this game will tank on arrival and cod will come out on top again
>>344255937
>Battlefield
>tanking
Not possible.
Even less with the hype there is.
>>344255975
Okay maybe not on arrival. I give it a month like everyone did with battlefront before it Titanfalls
>play RO2 religiously still
>this game doesn't sate that desire for bolt-action gameplay
>>344256093
Why would it?
Battlefield 3 and 4 are still alive.
Even Bad Company 2 is alive.
>>344255937
I think it'll do a bit better than Hardline, but not as well as BF4.
>clear wide open fields
so do they want snipers to ruin another game?
>>344256143
I think it's going to do as much as BF4.
/v/ is literally the only place shitting on it, and it's mostly because of the niggers.
>>344256140
>Even Bad Company 2 is alive.
Is the Vietnam expansion alive too?
>>344256273
Don't think so, but I still play the main game all the time.
Vietnam's maps were complete bullshit, constant chokepoints for nade spam.
>>344255357
wow what is this a cartoon lmao
>>344256140
Because right now, even cod fags are getting hype about it (since Infinite Warfare is future) so its numbers are going to be bloated as fuck. Then in a month, all those players are going to leave and nobody but the Battlefags will be left
>>344256175
they've shown 1 map and most of it takes place in a town
>>344256340
Yeah I put it in photoshop and ticked "cartoon colours"
Has anyone also noticed form the closed beta footage with all those celebs that the losing team gets spoon fed the airship?
>>344240276
>A shooter without physics is a walking simulator.
Nigga, is you for real?
>>344256467
It wasn't a closed beta, that was from the E3.
It was fun seeing Snoop Dogg high as fuck just moving forward and backwards.
>want to play BF1
>afraid that own hardware isn't good enough
>conflicted between buying better parts and the full game at release or skip everything and focus on taking care of real life
What do? I am 28 and I am upset that I couldn't enjoy a WW1 FPS game beforeexcept Verdun, but the Early Access creeped me out even after the full release.
>>344256743
Wait and play the public beta to see if it runs well?
>>344256467
Yes, they stated that the intention is to increase the possibility of a comeback. In all the footage I've seen the side that gets the airship still loses though.
>>344250070
>>344249801
>>344249603
Is this a lighting mod? If so got any shots of Africa? That place looked notoriously god fucking awful.
>>344256919
So its basically a support streak then. Fuckin yay
Have the devs ever seen water? That looks fucking atrocious.
>>344241218
It was actually perpetually gloomy/dark in the Trenches, at least to a degree. The daily artillery bombardments pushed dirt and smoke up into the air that never had time to settle.
>>344256743
People with 8gb RAM, 2500k and 970s are running it 60fps on High 1080. Not max though.
>>344257019
It's a ENB that was focused on making the game look like in the E3 2013 demo, and it was pretty much achieved it, but without the green tint.
>>344251213
It's not about graphics it's about art direction
Battlefront is technically good but generally looks nice too, with the odd exception.
Batllefield for all its textures looks terrible. I just hope it sparks more proper WW1/2 games. Even Vietnam, just not future.
>>344257260
what enb?
>>344257309
I predict the same shit will happen where the market will get oversaturated with ww/vietnam shooters
>>344249603
>>344249801
>>344250070
Sauce on the sweetfx?
why that dumb name?
>>344257498
It's just called E3 2013 ENB, it's in the MGSV Nexus page.
>>344257421
Good. I love that era. I love bolt action and for any game I'll take history over scifi. I can't stand scifi.
>>344257498
>>344257391
http://www.nexusmods.com/metalgearsolidvtpp/mods/3/?
There.
Also, you need to put brightness on maximum, and before you install it, put the game on borderless fullscreen.
On fullscreen it crashes for some reason if you Alt Tab or you change graphics settings.
>>344257575
Im kind of the opposite. I'm an absolute sucker for Sci fi. But I do enjoy a good WW2 game every now and then
>>344257680
>>344257541
Oh man that looks a lot better. Gets rid of all that filthy washed out lighting.
>>344257309
This.
It's a shame Black Ops just went into future shit and didn't have too many Vietnam levels.
>>344251551
>No tanks
>the Somme
I think you're the retard, retard.
>>344257680
Domo arigatou anon-kun
>>344257746
Yeah, I started looking at my old vanilla screenshots and it looked really dull.
It looks like they took queues from Battlefront, but instead of 10/10 graphics they knocked it down to an 8 or 9 to fit some actual gameplay and destruction
Funny how we've gone full circle again.
People used to complain about too many WW shooters.
too bad the last batch of "sci-fi" shooters blew ass.
This game is gonna trigger me when you're in a level and like 50 German tanks start rolling towards you
Germans built like 20 domestically designed tanks in the war and there was only 1 instance of them fighting other tanks.
>>344257889
2 reasons:
>people are bored or retarded gimmicks and seeing how the only thing they do with future shit is jetpacks and wallrunning
>WWII and old settings in general are literally new for the 14 year olds since they were babies when the WWII shooter fad ended
>>344251514
like gta v where the car has "droplets" falling on it. But no actual "getting wet" texture
>>344257889
That's because there were too many WW2 shooters. Then there were too many modern shooters. Now there's too many near-future shooters.
The point isn't that we don't want to see these games, the point is that we don't want to see everyone making the same shit. We didn't need literally everyone doing the same fucking jetpack thing.
>>344257997
exactly.
We had doom and duke nulem and quake and was predominately dominated market by sci-fi shooters. (there were ww2 shooters but not as many)
Then Cod1 came out, and medal of honor and battlefield and day of defeat.
Then the market went "modern" briefly
And them "futuristic" warfare, where its just jetpacks and gimmicky, flashy bullshit.
I dont even think theres a game with lasers or anything like that in it. And thats just disappointing as fuck to me.
>tfw all the leaks have pretty much made my boner harder
Can't wait until October.
Sucks that I'm going to have to drop money on a new graphics card though.
>>344258350
It might be true that there were too many ww2 shooters.
But back then i ate that shit up, and have been disappointed ever since they just stopped coming out.
I'm a pretty bad history buff.
Yup.
>>344258602
Battlefront was well optimized.
You can try the free trial to see how it runs, this one should have the same performance.
>>344258970
I can run BF at 30 fps or so on high. I have a 760, so it's time for me to upgrade I think.
>>344257982
>50 German tanks
>in a 32 vs 32 game
???
>>344259193
I think he means single player.
>>344259120
Yeah, i'd get the 1060.
No reason to update the CPU unless it's really sold, even a slightly modern i3 is enough for this.
>>344259346
>Yeah, i'd get the 1060.
Are there even any benchmarks of this shit.
if its around the 480 i would get that because its cheaper
>>344239317
EA is garbage. Why do people care about this game again? You know you are going to get severely dissappointed.
>>344259743
It's apparently better than the 980 while drawing much less than the 480, and the 480 is basically a GTX 970 without memory issues, plus it apparently drains so much energy from the PCI line that it can damage motherboards.
Then again, this will probably be fixed in aftermarket versions.
Then it's all up to what you are willing to pay.
>>344259878
>You know you are going to get severely dissappointed
i know i won't
>>344259878
>You know you are going to get severely dissappointed.
That's why I don't get hype for anything anymore.
You can't be dissapointed if you didn't have expectations in the first place.
Looks like garbage tbqh.
>>344260613
Being this rude should be a bannable offense tbqhwymf.
How do you guys think the game will run onxbone?
>>344261620
60fps at 900p or lower depending
>>344240457
the fact that you dont understand that is very telling. Children today really think games are just maps and character models, dont theyY?
>tfw didn't get into the alpha
Whose dick did you suck OP?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PjdFBr1LIM
looks kindafun
>>344239317
I sense a distinct lack of the French.
>>344263007
>wanting the surrender monkeys in a battlefield game
xD
>>344261759
720p like the last two Battlefields.
>>344250785
>I'd rather have them focus on the game not being a complete broken crap at launch like BF3 and 4.
You can also shit in your hands and see which happens first.
>>344256743
try Battlefront trial at origins, that should do
>>344262487
>clonking into another plane doesn't do shit
Quality game there, EA.
>>344239317
Looking at those screens I was more impressed with battlefront.
Foliage and rocks (I was really liked how well rocks blended into sand) were much better.
>>344265487
The maps were much smaller and it was only 40 players too.
There's a reason why we are getting more powerful consoles next year.
>>344239317
Look, I don't give a fuck about 4K graphics: Electric Boogaloo.
All I care about is killing niggers and sand niggers with my field spade in a unrealistic WW1 setting.
Oh and the bi-plane dog fights look pretty cash too.
>>344239895
>>344240164
Crysis? Over-exaggerated physics and low quality textures? That game? Fucking idiots.
>>344239317
oh my god is that a lever action rifle?
>>344249603
that game still look shit and i hope you didnt post it as a "it looks good" image
>>344267942
I think it looks nice.
>>344268071
looks like far cry 2
>>344248793
the fact that Americans are even in the game is bad enough already
>>344268071
That's because snake went to ROSS
>>344268704
Nah, it's better
>>344248793
Because they're SWEDEN YES
>>344257257
Underrated post. Each empire called upon its colonial troops from across the globe. Why would it be called WORLD War 1 if it was isolated to just Europeans fighting Europeans?
>>344249896
Fucking thank you, people used to praise Dark Souls 1 for it's graphics but the shaders were trash and made the game look terrible
