>Civ 5
>Complicated

TOP KEK

When I was still in school, someone once forgot a Civ III (I think it was III) manual in our computer class. It was 300+ page tome.

>>343743891
it seems to me . Only RTS or strategy game i played ever was red alert 2 .

is it comperable to that?

>>343743819
>civ 5
>complicated

>>343743819
Throw yourself into your first game on easy
Do it again
Read a guide
Discover the actual mechanics
Try a real difficultly and lose
Come in a years timeframe and try again but read a guide for your civ
Realize that to win in civ 5 all you need to do is the same bs over and over again
gg

does this not have a tutorial campaign like every other strat game?

>>343743819
You ought to be literally retarded to lose to medium level AI

>>343744212
not at all. Civ isn't an RTS, it's turn based. Plus, Civ 5 has a really easy to learn style with plenty of tooltips and information that they give you up front while playing that you can turn off at any time. It's one of those games that's actually kinda fun to learn how it works.

RA2 is probably my favorite RTS though so you have good taste.

You must be a nigger

civ 5 is incredibly easy to learn
you can start up the game and play just by doing what the 'next turn' button tells you to and hovering over the tooltips

>>343744515
>google.com.tr embedded.jpg

It's basically a game about harvesting dots OP.

>google.com.tr embedded.jpg
>shit seems so complicated