>huge graphics leap in the last few years
>didn't even notice it
crazy how this shit sneaks up on you. can barely play 7th gen games anymore
>>343654304
>4
>just fuck my shit up hair
>>343654776
>>343654304
Nice he got rid of the eyeliner.
>>343654304
It wasn't a graphics leap, it was the change from PS3 to PS4. PC graphics haven't changed much in a long while.
>>343654304
Uncharted 1-3 were more stylized than 4. It wasn't really as much of a graphics leap as much as going for a more realistic style.
Pic related was also on ps3.
>>343654304
So now they've gone from "realistic" cartoons to wax mannequins.
That's actually worse, because of the creepy.
>>343657002
Lol. Nothing on PC looked even remotely as good as PS4's cutting edge titles before 2013.
>>343657705
Prove it, i want a side by side comparison of every pc game ever made by your ps4 titles
>>343657863
You know it's true. Name one PC game that looks as good as Uncharted 4 and came out before 2013
there's much more detail in Uncharted 4 Drake, he's just awkwardly shaded so it looks flat
>huge
2000s kid detected. 5th gen to 6th and 6th to 7th were much bigger leaps. 7th to 8th is barely noticeable and pretty much unnecessary.
>can barely play 7th gen games
because you're a prissy nu male who cares more about superficial details than actual gameplay.
>>343657959
why before 2013?
>>343658725
I bet you think PS2 graphics are "good enough"
>>343658903
because next-gen games on PC obviously don't count
>>343659191
(not him, but they kinda are)
>>343657959
Crysis?
>>343659367
Crysis isn't even close
>>343659191
Not him, but I would be ok with PS2 graphics if devs focus in another things like physics or little details
![zcf92a9haxjzpb5ffwsc[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/bOn8Wvz.jpg "zcf92a9haxjzpb5ffwsc[1].jpg")
>>343659191
They're not just good enough.
They're perfect for games because there's no unnecessary pores in the skin dropping the FPS.
>>343658903
Anon, no good PC games came out on 2013. It was s stale year.
>>343659350
>>343659483
>>343659537
yeah man, I hope GTA VI looks like this so every building is enterable!
>>343659367
>muh transition
>fuck orthodontics
>>343659641
>posting the best GTA game
Nice way of defeating your own point.
>>343659537
>Perfect for games
>Blurry textures
>Blurry and cheap background scenery
>Chugging with multiple well-rendered NPCs on screen
>No native 1080p support
PS2 a shit, even in its era
>>343659641
wouldn't mind it, but there's like no economical way of doing that outside of procgen in which case I'd prefer good graphics and flat texturewalls for buildings.
>>343659725
it's outdated garbage. Aaron Garbut best describes why
>We’ve come a long, long way. Visual fidelity has knock-ons. San Andreas was effectively a bunch of cubes of various sizes stuck in between roads. I love it, and love what we did, but really that was what it was.
>>343659725
But he didn't post Vice City
I do hope games continue to focus on improving things other than graphics like how many NPCs are rendered on screen at one time because the difference between the two levels of graphics are not nearly as noticeable as the older generations yet the cost to upgrade between them sure is.
>>343657705
This is one of those times when pointing to Crysis is actually applicable
>>343654304
Graphics didn't leap much. It's mostly art and software tools that leaped.
>>343660050
Yeah, really.
I'll shit on Dead Rising 3 for a lot of things, but not the amount of zombies they fit on screen.
>>343654304
>>huge graphics leap in the last few years
How to spot someone who started gaming with the 360
I thought the UC games are okay and get too much praise and too much hate.
What I really want to know is who came up with the bright idea of completely adjusting a main character's face throughout the series. Did they just decide they made her ugly or something?
They're all bretty cute, so I don't see the point.
>>343660838
it's as big as the PS2 --> PS3 leap
>>343660894
No, it's not.
>>343659725
funny way of spelling gta 4
>>343661041
lmao, PS3 doesn't even look much better in this image
>>343661158
You're blind and retarded.
>>343661327
or maybe you're just flatly wrong
>>343660880
realism = ugly for devs these days, but I'd say
fine
fine
let it gooooo
fine
model doesn't strike me as ugly, just not perfectly beautiful, the weird elsa clone aside.
>>343660894
Not even close. Watch HL2 on Xbox and then on 360
>>343661357
Or maybe you're just an idiot who can't admit that this gen has seen very little improvement
>>343660894
Are you fucking retarded
>>343661449
Look at the OP image again friend
>>343659191
>I bet you think PS2 graphics are "good enough"
I mean, they basically are. They're the bare minimum for what anyone should accept as passable graphics, NOT TO MENTION plenty of PS2 and 6th gen games in general hold up perfectly fine or even still look gorgeous.
>>343661387
>uncharted 3 came out before Frozen
>tfw can't let it go
>tfwnever saw that shitty movie
>>343661556
What of it?
There's very little improvement between those two models.
>>343661556
Not him but I don't see much of a difference, the texture and polygon count look nearly identical.
>>343661580
Lol, no. I can barely go back and play my favorite PS2 games anymore. Tried playing Bully the other day and it's just complete garbage now
![zote.hd.01.lg[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/ohdhMFp.jpg "zote.hd.01.lg[1].jpg")
>>343659893
>muh graphics
>muh graphics
>muh graphics
>and
>muh graphics
Literally all your complaints.
I don't need photorealistic graphics to enjoy a game.
Good graphics only make a good game better, they don't make a bad game good. I would play games with sprites doodled by 5 years olds if it had the complexity of dwarf fortress and wizardry combined , preferably made by Troika.
Pic related, another fun game with unimportant graphics, shit could be made of cardboard in black and white, as long as it gives me Zero Shift and 20+ enemies on screen.
>>343661610
>>343661646
Left is photorealistic, right looks like a cartoon
>>343661724
Poor ferformance matters to the extend that a high framerate means more responsive gameplay. PS2 games frequently had sub30fps on real hardware.
But that's all that matters about his post.
>>343661724
Just play with toys if you don't care about graphics
>>343660880
They changed her face in 3 to more closely match her voice and mocap actor's face. This helped with the facial rigging since they didn't have to change all of her facial capture to fit the character's original face. They walked this back in 4 to a mix of the old face and the new face because fans didn't like her suddenly changing. They were going to do the same thing to Drake but felt they couldn't since he was the face of the series and they knew fans would be mad if they did. They didn't realize how much people loved Elena though.
>>343661806
Kek, you're retarded, there's barely any difference.
>>343662024
Left is photorealistic, right looks like a cartoon. The left literally looks like a real person
>>343662096
>>>/gaf/
You must be legally blind if you think that looks photorealistic.
>>343661702
I was never a fan of Rockstar's games but honestly, though GTAIII was a little dated visually, it was still impressive in certain ways, like the weather affects, the rain creating a certain atmosphere, random shit like NPCs crashing into each other or starting gun fights with one another. I was very surprised to see that sort of thing in an early PS2 game.
Even still, you must be a newfag or underage. Plenty of PS2 games, like DMC1 and 3, Fatal Frame 1-3, SH 2 and 3, Kingdom Hearts 1 and 2, ZoE 2, Ico, Shadow of the Colossus, and so on still look fucking great.
>>343654304
>better graphics make older games unplayable
You're a stupid whore, stop pretending to like videogames, you rapist.
>>343661901
High framerate IS important, which is why graphics are even less important, because they keep it down.
>>343661923
What the fuck is that supposed to mean? Last time I checked the first video games didn't have much for good graphics. Just watch movies if that's all you care about. Or get a PS4.
>>343662192
I don't consider any game to look "great". Once games start looking as polished as 2000s Pixar movies I'll be satisfied
>>343659641
There is a rampant community of mongoloids with your same mental illness is STRONGLY holding back progress in game design and it took me this long to realize how graphics fags are a terrible burdain, a bulging, immovable tumor that will permanently hold things like these back.
Thanks for The Order 1866, the stagnation of Total War and the rise of "cinematic games", human cancer!
>>343657959
max payne 3, hitman absolution
>>343661041
You could've used 3 images of Snake, you know. IT would show the evolution better.
>>343660880
She looked like shit until UC4, bro. Literally perfect now.
>>343662456
But Total Warhammer is great
>>343654304
Granted, for this specific example, I don't think we ever saw the character models this close up. I only remember seeing them long after the game was released.
>>343662456
games can't evolve without further iteration of graphics. once 2000s CGI is reached in real-time we can have this discussion again
>>343662345
Holy fucking shit, you are an actual graphics whore. Or graphicsfag or whatever. Kill yourself.
>>343662529
4 looks the best to me, but aside from the hair, they could be 3 different characters.
>>343662826
I don't want to play with toys friend
>>343662682
>games can't evolve without further iteration of graphics.
Excessive focus on graphics is what's causing budgets to inflate so large that they cannot experiment with game mechanics at all.
>>343662682
>games can't evolve without further iteration of graphics.
>what is better AI
>what is more enemies on screen
>what is instead of having SUPER REALISTIC 4000000 POLY MODEL THAT DISAPPEARS WHEN YOU TAKE A STEP BACK having actual environment which you can see miles away in-game
>what is better physics
>what is gameplay with more depth
>what is better weather effects
Art style, juice and TECHNOLOGY > "graphics"
>>343661041
>people talking about graphical LEAPS
>compares MGS1 to Haunting Ground
>>343663064
Actually, budgets are going down with the proliferation of PBR workflows. once ray-tracing is achieved they'll go down even further
>>343662923
>>343662682
>>343662345
>>343661923
stop
>>343662923
No, that's why you want to watch a movie.
You should do that instead of coming to the toy industry and demanding toys to accommodate your taste.
>>343663069
art style is shit without proper lighting and modeling. look at this Bioshock Infinite trailer and compare it to the final product: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYRePGtK074
same art style, far better execution. this is why graphics must continue to progress. and TECHNOLOGY can advance alongside graphics, look at GTA V
>>343654304
We barely noticed because we were lied to about graphics so much last gen that the current standard has become what was the lie.
>>343663181
PBR only affects texturing, the actual high poly model, low poly model and normals baking still needs to be done.
>>343663517
texture work is expensive
>>343660880
Fuck I remember there was like a week straight where I only jerked off to elenas model in the viewer. I've started to slow down a little bit, it's a fucking lot of cum to swallow
>>343663628
Graphics are objectively the least important aspect of video games.
>>343663696
Why the fuck do you swallow your own cum?
>>343659449
Crysis 3 then
>>343663750
objectivity doesn't exist in art
>>343663628
The whole time playing TW3 I couldn't get out of my mind how much better things actually looked in 2. The atmosphere was also so different, but I guess that's to be said about all 3.
Still love them all, but the character models were superior in Assassins over Wild Hunt.
![Monument-Valley-Gameplay[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/NpCW770.jpg "Monument-Valley-Gameplay[1].png")
>>343663458
>art style is shit without proper lighting and modeling
Not in the way you think.
Making a good art style does take effort, but it has nothing to do with "advancing graphics", it's using your currently existing tools to make something look good. You don't need higher polys or normal maps or anything of the such. You're an idiot who thinks that the only good graphics are photorealistic ones.
>>343659191
They honestly were. Fuck even psp models and graphics are fine if they're in 1080
>>343654304
>can barely play 7th gen games anymore
Fucking graphicsfags.
>>343663971
that Bioshock Infinite trailer isn't "photorealistic" by any means. it just looks good, as opposed to the actual game
>>343659893
>no native 1080p support
But that's wrong, you little shit. There were PS2 games that had a 1080p option.
>>343663730
I love that image, but you can't really compare them like that
>>343664102
Nope, they only went up to 1080i. So did the Xbox.
I'll always take simpler models with detailed textures.
>>343663982
It was always kind of jarring how 3D modeled PSP games seemed to try so hard to look like current gen games by cutting corners. They looked good, but most of the time I kept feeling like I was playing a half baked game.
Still one of the most interesting systems I owned. It Also got me addicted as fuck to watching porn on a mobile device.
>>343663730
CDPR BTFO
>>343663762
It started as a way to stop myself from cumming to her but now I find that I like the taste. It's fucking weird I know, but at least I'm not an anime waifu fag
>>343657705
>>343657959
>Nothing on PC looked even remotely as good as PS4's cutting edge titles before 2013.
>Release date(s) Microsoft Windows
>NA November 13, 2007
A 9 year gap between the 2016 release uncharted 4.
great graphics you have there, consolecuck. might want to set that arbitrary bullshit date to 2006. 10 years might just be enough to look similar.
>>343664316
You're way below that.
>>343664384
Is this supposed to look good? or comparable to Uncharted 4 in any way? it looks exactly like what it is, a 2007 game.
>>343664384
Crysis required technology that didn't exist for another two years.
>>343664197
Polygon count has gone up but texture work hasn't really changed a lot
>>343657959
why 2013? Afraid someone would post crysis 3 a 2013game in comparison to your 2016 game?
>>343659367
pic related I see
>>343664896
nice gun texture lmao
>>343664896
Crysis 3 looks like shit in comparison
>>343664513
a 2007 game that looks better than a 2016 game.
>>343664596
still fits within his arbitrary date of pre-2013 even if you consider it a 2009 game.
>>343665078
That's dof fucking it up
>>343665126
Ok anon
>>343665301
textures look muddy as fuck. just accept it, PS4 was a huge leap
>>343659367
would probably still date narcissa. little stuff though, like grabbing a slice of pizza or taking her to a small county carnival
Uncharted 3 looks like Far Cry 3. Why are you Sony faggot fanboys pretending it's anything special?
>>343665354
/thread
>>343665126
Uwotm8?
Crysis 3 looks better than quite a few modern games.
>>343665354
better than >>343665145
>>343665409
>Why are you Sony faggot fanboys pretending it's anything special?
muh exclusives
>>343665518
name 5 modern games it looks better than
>>343665354
Whatever you say
>>343664596
Huge draw of Crysis and why it was such a system is that it's all one big map without loading that streams in content as you move around.
>>343665409
They were much tamer back with the PS3 when the xbox was still a competitor, now that xbox is dead they went out of control with their shitposting.
>>343654304
What increase was character poly counts at the sacrifice of everything else
>>343663971
You deny that you benefit from better graphics. The picture you posted isn't even possible on lesser graphical systems. You think that shading is simple? Good luck reproducing it on a SNES.
>>343654304
>eye, browridge and jaw line are completely different
I am fine with improving a character with new hardware but at least keep the same facial features. People's faces don't radically change like that
>>343657959
file saved 2010年11月12日, PM 02:50:19
your move brother
>>343665597
>alone in the dark: illumination
>funk of titans
>Ravens cry
>spongebob heropants
>godzilla
>>343665853
Dude that's a phone game.
>>343665915
got me
>>343665597
Every modern CoD
Battlefield Hard-line
Until Dawn
Far Cry Primal
Hitman
Rise of the Womb Raider
>>343654304
The graphics are better but I honestly think his face looks weird in 4. It's like he's not even the same person.
>>343665972
Dude what difference does that make?
>>343666031
Far Cry Primal and Hitman are the only valid ones
>>343665853
>You think that shading is simple?
What shading?
This little fucker underneath the character?
>>343663982
Those are cutscene models, not the gameplay ones
>>343665909
The main difference is graphics?
What if you care about gameplay?
>>343659893
o i am laffin
>>343666225
Looks fine to me
>>343666120
That they're not demanding by modern standards in the least, any toaster could render those, so there's no need to aggressively push for higher polys at the expense of gameplay when you could be focusing on art style instead of skin pores.
>>343666141
All of those are valid, and you're fucking delusional if you think modern CoD looks better than Crysis 3.
>>343666357
Somebody please post more Elena, my little clitty is super sore
>>343666141
>Far Cry Primal and Hitman are the only valid ones
Kek, no.
Especially when fucking CoD is there, modern CoD still looks like trash.
And this is max settings.
>>343666450
No they aren't. Black Ops III looks great, at least on par with Crysis 3
>>343666474
>>343666202
Look at the gradient the wall takes from orange, to a slightly cooler orange as it gets near water. And the way the water reflects the orange. of the wall. the bit of ambient occlusion in crevices. And just the general warmth of red and yellow shading where light and shadow falls.
>>343666474
Is this the comfiest part of the game?
>>343666250
The argument is about graphics, not gameplay.
>Name one PC game that looks as good as Uncharted 4 and came out before 2013
>>343666553
Is this supposed to prove me wrong? Looks almost photorealistic
Even modded gtaIV from 2012 looks better
>>343666589
>>343666619
probably
>>343666563
>at least on par with Crysis 3
You are absolutely fucking insane.
Even the models look much worse.
>>343666594
dewde that's baked
>>343666426
>That they're not demanding by modern standards in the leas
Yea, because back in 1996, Graphic fags weren't satisfied with crappy N64 shaders, so they forced the industry forward, giving you the ability to make cooler styles.
There's more art to be made if we keep pushing forward.
>>343666645
Neverdead?
>>343666715
>>343666667
Come on anon, you can b8 better than that.
>>343666250
Then you aren't getting that with Uncharted, either
>>343666817
Is this the new Spider-Man game?
>>343666645
Deep black reloaded?
>sony shills
wew lads
>>343666839
I'm not baiting. Obviously the foliage is a bit flat but so is Crysis 3's. the lighting is almost as good as ray-tracing
>>343664896
nigga that better not be dreary enb
>Shit hair
>Not much more detailing
>Less shading
Only difference is I can see the stitches on his shirt.
>>343666981
>shilling
>bad
Fucking pick one you neet
>Console users argue that hardware isn't everything last gen
>Now PS4 fans are trying to argue their games look and run better than PC games
What happened?
>>343666906
Secret stunting mini-game
>>343666712
never any pedestrians in those images.
the differences between the 'prittycity' and the basic folk would clash so hard it would undo the entire spell.
>>343659367
spoiler that shit ffs
>>343667052
>literally admits to being a marketer
WEW
>>343666985
This is horrible bait anon, come on.
>>343666250
Then you better go for the platform that consistently lets you play at 60fps
>>343667084
>>343657959
Crysis 1 blows it out of the water without being prerendered static garbage.
![x56noz[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/QubK2Ux.jpg "x56noz[1].jpg")
>>343661939
>They changed her face in 3 to more closely match her voice and mocap actor's face
Yeah, nah. Uncharted 3 just had really shitty models aside from Sully. Drake has no fucking lips, for fuck's sake. ND B-team fucked up.
![iosgcrop[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/35FKP8m.jpg "iosgcrop[1].jpg")
>>343666594
>gradients are computationally expensive
Idiot.
>>343666773
>Graphic fags weren't satisfied with crappy N64 shaders, so they forced the industry forward,
They didn't force shit. Moore's Law was in effect, transistors doubled so they could afford more.
Moore's law is declining, it's getting harder and harder to double transistors and it's also getting harder and harder to make graphics better, but idiots like you are still pushing for it, making video game development extremely expensive in the process. Look at the budgets for older games compared to newer ones. Not snes ones like your retarded cherry-picked example "hurr you value graphics go back and play pac-man", but PS2 game budgets compared to PS3 ones. AAA games are as expensive as Holywood movies at this point.
>>343667167
>he doesn't want to make a little extra cash by triggering pcfags for a few hours a week
wew
>>343667412
It really doesn't.
And I bought toaster specifically to play Crysis 1 topped out at one point.
>>343667485
you don't value graphics*
>>343657959
So many games it would actually be annoying to list them all.
>>343667514
Literally kill yourself. You have to be pretty pathetic if this is the best way you have to spend your free time. And no I'm not a PCfag.
>>343667591
>those filenames
Holy shit fuck off shill.
Who cares? A shit game is a shit game - Uncharted will never be elevated no matter what Drake's face looks like.
Had these last two gens had good games instead of these movies, I'd have stomached PS2 cartoon graphics in HD.
>>343667591
>Calling Crysis ugly then posting that peice of shit
>>343667806
Dont be a tardo.
It's literally the automated filename that the game gives your screenshots on PS4.
Remember when this was the pinacle of video games graphics?
>>343667640
Name three
>>343667806
>HURR DURR SHILL
Different person, but you realize that those are the names that the PS4 gives to every screenshot or video that you take, right?
>>343667685
>free time
I'm on the clock you fuck. I know you get an allowance for your videos games/hobbies and that's fine, but most people need to fucking work to afford shit
>Valve was known for pushing computer graphics to it's limits on games with state of the art gameplay
>Valve doesn't make games anymore
why did it all go so wrong?
>>343667485
>what is inflation?
>>343667946
>>343668110
Look at what happened to Konami. The biggest innovators tend to waste money and don't make friends with the shareholders. Valve thus restructured, and none of their game talent is left.
I don't think I've been impressed by anything graphics/engine related since they first started adding physics and ragdoll to games.
>>343668110
Gabriel is dangerously overweight. Like to the point I heard his health is in jeopardy. So now they are just focusing on making as much cash as possible to keep him and his family comfortable. I'm guessing they'll go back to making games after he formally retires (which I heard will be really soon)
>>343668168
>>343667946
These look awful.
>option to turn off in-game motion blur added a month after the game has been out
Fucking Naughty Dog
>>343668389
>character model is super shiny like he's soaking wet
Sonycucks will defend this
>>343668559
>>343668559
(You)
>>343668107
Thanks for admitting to being a marketer. Enjoy your vacation.
>>343666715
Soooo ps4 has no anisotropic filtering?
>>343667485
>gradients are computationally expensive
Again you're comparing our current standard against itself, instead of looking at where we were, vs where we are. The N64 couldn't make smooth gradients like this. Even on the gamecube, the gameplay was limited because they literally couldn't render the ocean fast enough for faster sailing.
>They didn't force shit. Moore's Law was in effect, transistors doubled so they could afford more.
And if companies could get away with selling double the transistors at double the price, they would. The incentive for consumer products to upgrade was because in order to remain competitive, they needed on one-up the other company. Which means providing better graphic capability at an affordable price.
>Look at the budgets for older games compared to newer ones.
Budget increase, not necessarily because of graphics, but because of the artistic freedom that graphics has allowed. It used to be that you can be a programmer, and do graphics yourself. Now you need to hire college graduates living in san diego to do art for you. Even stylish games require a lot of work. Oh sure, realism is time intensive, but so is rendering good stylized graphics. You want your anime waifu to look her best? That takes skill. Skill you need to pay someone a good salary for.
Without the tools to render better graphics with ease, you're gimping artists, limiting what styles are actually available to them.
>>343667946
Does this game edit screenshots in any way? I remember one of the Halos on 360 made the screenshots better than in-game graphics.
![gameplay+2[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/X8QAd9x.jpg "gameplay+2[1].jpg")
is there anything comfier than 6th gen Capcom graphics? it feels just like home
>>343660880
Uncharted is one word
>>343661702
>FF XII
>RE4
>Burnout Takedown
>NFSC
>Armored Core Nexus/Last Raven
>Def Jam: Fight for New York
>DMC3
>DBZBT3
>MK:Armagedon
Kinda worth mention
>Dynasty Warriors 5 empires
You just have shit taste in games
>>343667969
>unreal coming to the N64
>>343663458
>TECHNOLOGY can advance alongside graphics, look at GTAV
You do realize they gutted the physics and TECHNOLOGY in the GTAIV engine for GTAV's graphics, right?
>>343668956
You can alter the DoF and blur but generally the screenshots are almost 1:1 to what the game looks like. For some reason I noticed the area in these pics >>343667324 looks really shitty, even in game. I think it's running at a lower resolution, I wouldn't put it past ND to do something like that to keep all their foliage
>>343669457
except they didn't, euphoria is virtually the same. only difference is the car physics which I actually prefer in V
>>343663730
>kingdom hearts and morrowind were both released in 2002
>>343668975
7th gen MT Frameworks Capcom stuff like Lost Planet 1/2. Ex Troopers is also great
>>343657413
>stylized
Suck a dick, old man.
Naughty Dog had a graphics boner for the uncharted series since day one. They wanted it to be photorrealistic.
Of course they never achieved it but it was never stylized.
>>343659945
so having your map be 90% blank falt land with nothing for miles is better than "cubes of various sizes stuck in between roads"?
>>343668956
No
Try it out for yourself
The guy posting these screenshots is using .jpg instead of png, which isn't good - it's compressed.
The game actually looks better and sharper than what he posted
>>343668975
6th gen stuff looked pretty nice
>>343669998
San Andreas is the same exact thing, just on a much smaller scale
>>343670032
Video games don't work in generations.
>>343670114
Nice bait, even the forests and desert had more personality than in V.
>>343670218
nostalgia
>>343670123
t. PCuck
>>343669975
>They wanted it to be photorrealistic.
Not that I agree with that guy, but Uncharted series was neither trying to be stylized nor photorealistic.
>>343670293
underage graphicsfag
>>343668389
Oh, they added that option now? I fucking hated it but slowly got used to it.
It was so shittily implemented, it kicked in at way to low aim speeds.
>>343670359
i'm 27, San Andreas' map is a toy set compared to V's
>they fell for the graphics vs gameplay false dichotomy meme
Fuck off nerds, games can have both
Graphics don't matter
that's why nintendo handhelds are superior
>>343670474
Sure you are kiddo. The city in V was shit and there was fuck all to do in the rest of the map. Bigger isn't better if it means most of the content is filler.
>>343670218
>personality
empty buzzword, I bet you use "soul" as well you nerd.
>>343670474
I haven't read the rest of the thread but what point are you trying to make with this? Is being a toybox somehow bad for a GTA sandbox?
>>343670638
GTA V had the same exact content as San Andreas
>>343670587
Name 30 games that are better than nintendo.
>>343670734
visually a toy set. see
>>343659945
>>343664623
I'd say that the best textures haven't improved much, but I'd say overall quality has. There's less jarring disconnect between head and clothing models for example.
Hair rendering, including stubble, has also improved, meaning that doesn't need to be part of the texture as much.
Problems with AAA games
>too much fucking marketing budget to reach all the casuals, means no one dares make any original AAA games
>to get all the Skyrim retards, everyone throws in epic sandbox memes with giant worlds that are empty except for pointless colllectibles
>stupid focus on grafix over framerate
How to fix it
>who gives a fuck just play AA games on Steam
>>343670761
Then where are San Fierro and Last Venturas?
>>343670693
>nerd
empty buzzword, I bet you use "dweeb" as well nerd.
>>343670886
I see, I'm sorry
Really looks like one set of guys is arguing over the size of the world while the other set is arguing about how detailed the world looks
This entire discussions is silly and you're all silly
>>343671109
I'd rather have a well-constructed Los Santos than 3 unaesthetic toybox cities
>games hardly look different than ps2 era
>graphic leap
sure thing shill
>>343670373
>Oh, they added that option now?
Last update, IIRC. Man, I really hate blur.
>>343671189
Funny considering SA has the only well constructed Los Santos in the series.
>>343654304
>can barely play 7th gen games anymore
>Wooow these grafix suck xDDD i just i just CANT play it! xDDD
Kill yourself.
>>343668886
That image is not making a convincing case for anisotropic filtering: just look at the crazy aliasing going on in the top-left and top-right corners. The whole point of texture filtering like this is to reduce aliasing!
As for Uncharted 4, it seems like "modern graphics" just means "wallowing in the uncanny valley." Screenshots of Uncharted 4 (and other games people have posted here to "compete" with it) are actually painful to look at. Like I'll get eye strain from their horribleness.
>>343659641
>Someone posted this ironic post unironically
Honestly, this place is actually reddit at this point.
The only thing that looks truly bad is PS1 3D bullshit
After that era, you can always tell what is going on and what everything is supposed to be, and before it everything was hand-made anyway
>>343671810
we can do this all day friend. I guess we'll just have to agree V is the superior game
>>343659191
Fucking kill yourself
