http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime
Post your reaction time, mouse, and monitor.
Logitech g502 - BenQ xl2411z 144hz
120ms
Logitech 20$ mouse and keyboard
AOC 27inch 1080p monitor
>>343563680
>proof
120ms is significantly better than jet fighter tier, anon
>>343563731
I hope your not saying I play airplane Sims and it's made my reaction better
Here's something of interest.
205
gateway mouse that came with the computer
acer 1080p tn monitor
I'm35
How long until my reaction time really goes to shit?
235ms
Shitty cheap laptop display + $12 gaymen mouse (with fully controllable RGB lighting doe)
And I'm sleepy + slightly drunk
I get almost exactly 250 every time no matter what. Same mouse as op and 27" 1080p monitor
>>343563962
Statistically speaking, 5 years
Delay this by eating a lot of fatty fish, ideally salmon, which contains the correct fats to feed your decaying nerves.
Avoid tuna though, way too much mercury. Did you know pregnant women aren't supposed to eat tuna at all because of the high ethyl mercury they get from eating smaller mercury-collectant fishes?
>>343563731
>jet fighter tier
Jet fighter for what? This kind of reaction is useless everywhere except for maybe PRESS X WHEN GREEN game moments
>>343564229
>This kind of reaction is useless everywhere
1/10, made me reply
>>343564229
anon, having a good 'press x when green' reaction means your nerves are effectively wired. you don't have different types of reaction times to different things.
your auditory reaction time is about 30ms lower than your visual reaction time, for instance, but 'press x when green' will accurately tell you how fast your reactions are. the air force test for USA and Germany pilots is essentially a 'press x when green' test too, except not green.
I got 262 but I smoked a lot of weed today so it could be that.
>>343564712
What?
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a178485.pdf "Visual Acuity and Reaction Time in Navy Fighter Pilots"
>The simple visual reaction time test required subjects to respond by pressing
the joystick at the appearance of a supra-threshold spot stimulus.
>Simple reaction times ranged from 143 to 461 msec, with a mean of 223 msec (SD = 0.055).
kinda funny that some of the people in this thread react faster than jet pilots. i guess vidya really is good training
although jet pilots probably are selected more on their discipline level, these days, since dogfighting is now more about loosing missiles at the correct time, when the enemy is so far away they can't even be seen outside of radar
>>343564169
>Tfw I love tuna and eat it once a week with crackers.
It's so scrumptious! I don't wanna die
>>343564904
As long as you're a large person eating one tin of tuna per day, and it's light tuna instead of albacore (important - albacore has 7x the ethyl mercury level) you should be okay.
Some people think mercury poisoning in non-immediately-lethal amounts isn't a huge deal, because current testing indicates that trace mercury biocollects in your bones and becomes neutralized ie. not capable of interacting with tissues.
Beat this fuccbois
>>343565146
>Average | 231ms
is there a mobile version
>>343563854
>that goodfeel when you were considering buying a deathadder but went with g402 instead
I did this on my phone.
>>343563571
i surprised even myself.
>>343565304
Guessing don't count nigg
>>343565146
>>343565304
You fuckwits don't seem to understand how it works. Hitting it early once doesn't mean shit because you didn't react. You guess. Nice averages by the way you fucking turtles.
>>343565409
>>343565427
Stop being jealous because you're slow as turtles.
>>343564896
>Simple reaction times ranged from 143 to 461 msec, with a mean of 223 msec
JET FIGHTERS only achieved 27 milliseconds faster reactions than the average person?
>>343565535
>jealous of someone slower than me
...wat
>Not being perfect
>>343565775
So not only are you slow in reaction time , but also slow in the head.
![2acb565dfc[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/ZxPU7GI.png "2acb565dfc[1].png")
logitech g400s
DELL U2312HM
>>343563571
>xl2411z
It's a rebranded xl2420z with the displayport port removed, same exact panel, you're literally smurfing with a near-0 visual delay by participating here
Only monitor with a lower delay is the near-extinct 240hz CRTs
Please delete this thread.
>>343563571
250 something. Pretty bad
Logitech G9
ASUS VG278HE 27" 144Hz
>tfw $10 dell mouse and keyboard combo and $40 60hz monitor
>tfw some of your mice cost more than all my peripherals put together
>>343566224
>failed attempts 387
>>343566224
nice guess.
>>343563571
this shits great, I forgot about it.
243 average, logitech mouse and a philips monitor
>tfw tried again to see if it was a fluke
>got exact same average
>tfw only 23
kill me
>>343563571
230ms
Logitech g502
Samsung Syncmaster 226BW 60hz (actually 59 or 58hz now)
I used to be much faster. Maybe it's age now that I'm well into my 30s?
>>343563571
I just tried to do this using peripheral vision, and somehow the green is white and the text is red when I do that. Weird.
>>343563571
216ms
Acer XB270HU, 144hz
So am I good?
>>343563571
Zalman m600r
benq xl2411t
I had a beer and feeling a bit buzz so I think I could shave off 10~ ish ms at least
>benq faggots cheating
This isn't your real reaction time, add like 30 to it
>>343567602
>This isn't your real reaction time
oh shit, benq monitors time travel for you?
>>343566779
I'm 21 and getting 250 ms consisently
strangely I'm still really good at video games
>Since this site was created, it's recorded 33,071,804 reaction time clicks.
>The median reaction time is 265 milliseconds.
>The average reaction time is 276 milliseconds.
http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime/statistics
>>343567602
Is that what IPS 60hz pleb tell themselves when they lose online ?
Was hard at first but got it down in the end not bad but whatever
>>343563571
No wonder I used to get fucked by Nashe's overhead.
ITS
NOT
FAIR
THERE IS LITERALLY NO WAY TO GET GUD AT THIS
>there's people who actually think shit like this is what matters in professional gaming
Finding out how muscle memory works will be like waking up from the matrix for you
>tfw girl
>tfw hardwired to lose at this
thanks god
Oh and some dell monitor and hp mouse. I'm sure its 60hz
Its not that hard
219 ms
Logitech G500
BenQ XL2410T 120hz
green ?
>>343568296
>there's people who actually think shit like this is what matters in professional gaming
I don't think anybody said this.
As someone in the average points I can tell you that hand-eye coordination is miles more important.
Are you even trying?
>>343567862
>being this stupid
>>343568416
add me on steam
acer 144hz monitor here, admittedly I'm only averaging about 230, not proud of it
>>343568416
I hope you get raped, bitch.
And do you know what he said
>>343568668
Also
Samsung SyncMaster S23B550
Logitech G300
Getting 400-500 on mobile. Should I kill myself?
>>343568548
to be forthright with you, family, I'd be considered a 'pub stomper' in both FPS and RTS and mine is around this every time I try it
there may be some correlation, hard to tell without widespread statistical study
>>343568813
Phones have potato-tier input delay, so not really
>>343568759
disabling aero, using IE 11 and holding your mouse with your left hand and using your right index fingero only to click helps improve reaction time
but yeah there should be a standard or something, however I find the test quite useful to measure input lag on some devices
>438 average
Im 24, am i dying?
>>343563571
282
half 12 in night
super tired
carpal
trackpad
laptop monitor
and i'm 25
Still doesn't explain how I can rek bitches in reaction time fights
>>343565146
go 57 once because I preempted the green light.
>>343569164
Your brain is. Consider sudoku
Average of 283
using a lenovo ideapad y500I'm only 21
How do I get good?
Earlier this week I upgraded to a really good PC for the first time in 10 years, was on a 60hz monitor and crappy mouse
Went from average 270 reaction time on this site to this. Feels good man. g402/benq 2720z
Playing FPS with stable 200+fps at 144hz is fucking incredible, I feel like a hacker
>>343568897
Yes, but reaction times don't directly relate to performance, it's definitely a edge over the competition, but hand-eye coordination is the main factor.
You could have a fantastic 100ms response time, but if you cannot get that crosshair to the opponent's head, you're screwed.
I don't think RTSs are very affected by this.
As a fightan player, having average to low reaction times has hurt me plenty, but my hand-eye coordination and muscle memory has got me into the upper 60/70% win rates in most games I played.
>>343569021
it actually helped, thanks
>>343569713
>Playing FPS with stable 200+fps at 144hz is fucking incredible, I feel like a hacker
Man, If only you knew what it felt like to play on 160hz CRT back in the day
Fun experiment for those of you with good mouse and monitor: do this on your main machine, then borrow someone else's shitty one and do it
I shaved off literally ~80ms between my computer and my sister's laptop
>>343568813
That's average, phone reaction times are atrocious.
t.400+ on phone.
I'm ready for the air force.
>>343563571
>average 252
I blame it on the beer
>>343568668
Is it better to have the taskbar on the side?
>>343568416
>>343568731
Wooah lad, get a girl in real life.
>>343569903
>160hz plebeian
>not playing on one of the 240hz CRTs
by the way, asus revealed a real 240hz TN monitor (not strobed 120hz, actual 240)
http://www.144hzmonitors.com/monitors/asus-rog-swift-pg258q-24-5-inch-full-hd-g-sync-240hz-gaming-monitor/
>>343563571
245, but I am high on benzos so my reaction time will be shit
Fuck posting my equipment
Average 307
I'm gettin' too old for this shitI'm only 28
Best I could do in 10 tries without guessing.
>people with over 275ms now know how it feels to be black
it's not fun when there's statistical proof that you're inferior, is it?
>60 hz
250ms
>120hz
200ms
>>343570251
Nevermind I beat my high score.
>>343570091
I like it because of my monitor setting and i find it better
>>343570103
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66fW9PVn-k4
Some dude designed a board to overclock the most popular 144hz panels out there up to 270hz
150$ price tag though and needs quite a bit of knowledge of electronics I reckon to set it up
>>343570449
How do you see it better?
is this good?
>>343570530
>Increasing latency by a few ms
No THANKS
>>343567862
>292.0
I'd hang myself, but I'd take too long to react to the noose tightening.
>>343570575
Did a bit better the 2nd try
Deathadder Chroma
Got an Acer 144Hz monitor and an ASUS 60Hz monitor. On my 60Hz monitor my average was 208ms
Tested between my sister's laptop and my computer (and tried hard on both)
>>343563962
I'm 33 and 270 ms. Just kill me now.
>people getting 160
photoshop
human reaction average is 250, people shaving literally 100ms off that is like the 0.01th percentile
I'm 19 and averaging 250
Now I feel insecure for petty shit like this
Fucking kill me
G400s, 144hz asus
>>343563571
>21 with a 250ms average
just kill me now
>>343571847
>>343571519
The difference in frame time between 60 and 144 Hz is about 9ms. A difference in your average that large is almost definitely something to do with the mouse buttons on your sister's laptop being shitty.
>people with logitech shitmice that will fall apart in 6 months think 10ms matters
The candle that burns brightest burns half as fast
>>343572046
>The difference in frame time between 60 and 144 Hz is about 9ms.
it's the panel calculations themselves
TN gaming panels usually have a 'low delay' mode where they disable complex colors in order to get retard-fast input response
see: >>343565971
there's like a 30ms difference btween the fastest and slowest one on that chart, and i think they're all 144hz too although too lazy to ccheck.
>>343572046
Also the overall power of the laptop. I used to try this test on mine, and the results would vary anywhere from 10 to 80 ms based on how much shit I had open in the background
>>343571919
Same.
Let's kill each other.
This test has just made me realise that at all times I'm a fifth of a second behind what's actually happening around me.
>>343572112
I have my g300 for 3 years, come on
doing this on a laptop with a 40hz display and a shitty $8 logitech mousegg no re
DAILY REMINDER TO SWITCH OFF WINDOWS AERO BEFORE TRYING THIS TEST
You're gimping yourself by like 30-50 ms otherwise.
Try this before killing yourself.
Windows 10 users are SOL as far as I know
>>343572724
Avoid this by switching your monitor to fullscreen mode (f11)
Interesting to see that words are probably stored in a completely different way to numbers and images.
>tfw can't get below 280 ms no matter what i do
at least i'm 6'0 have a 7 inch penis
>230ms~
dell ips monitor andwirelessmouse
>>343572467
Real deep, but unfortunately that's not how anything works. If you were constantly a chunk of a second behind, music would be impossible. This is simply testing your ability to react to one sudden change that you can't predict. If you could predict it, you'd be able to hit it on time.
>>343572990
Don't try anything bub.
If you try to steal our girlfriends we'll react faster than you and start crying at least 40ms faster than you would be able to.
>>343573061
>If you were constantly a chunk of a second behind, music would be impossible
No it wouldn't, open your favorite media player and put a song on and set a delay of 1 second, hell put a 10 second one if you want
>>343563571
>>343571847
>doesnt know gamers literally have faster reflexes
its science, bitch
>>343572835
Good advice man, I'll pass that on from now on
>>343566779
I just got 234.
I'm 25 but I'm also a few beers in
NIGHTMARE MODE:
Post reaction time and game with highest playtime
>>343573820
234
Arma 3
>>343563571
263ms, 10 tries
MX518
Some shitty ViewSonic from 2010
Feeling real old right now.
>>343573940
>that image
Man, think of the damage an MG42 gunner with infinite ammo and barrels could've inflicted in Roman times. He could've literally conquered any empire.
>>343567764
>strangely I'm still really good at video games
being good at anime visual novels doesn't mean you're good at video games you fucking loser.
>>343571847
Gamers indirectly train themselves to have a quicker the reaction time. If you take a random shopkeeper, they'd probably be in a surprisingly high percentile when testing how quickly they can add and subtract numbers.
Unidentifiable mouse - Acer S200HQL
Fuck me, but I can't find out anything about this mouse. I know at some point I bought it for 4 bucks, but I can't find a box, order, brand name, nothing.
>>343574037
A testudo with an MG42 in the mix.
Any Rome 2 modders out there?
220ms, razer deathadder, some cheap shitty 60hz dell monitor
:(
>>343574104
take a picture of it
>>343573402
Do you have a link to that study? I'd like something concrete to counteract the "reaction time isn't trainable" defeatists that always show up
>>343574483
Are you a LONDON?
275 with cheap mouse and monitor
Having a good mouse and monitor probably wouldn't change it much, my reaction time is really bad.
>>343563854
>just bought a Rival 300 to replace my DeathAdder 3500 which shit the bed yesterday
I regret nothing.
>>343572631
did it again just for funsies, avg reaction is 165-225
>>343574035
Looking up cases where you have armies mainly consisting of spear men and guys with other melee weapons against world class armies equipped with rifles and machine guns, it's insane that any of these commanders thought that they stood a chance.
>>343563571
post your best flukes
>>343574880proof
>>343574996
>mg42 encirclement vs drunk russians with mosins
>>343575161
>force of 544,000 encircles a force of 627,000-850,000
>22:1 kill ratio
JUST vodka my shit up
>>343574561
two seconds in google
http://www.futurity.org/video-games-speed-up-reaction-time/
>>343574507
My shitty flip phone can't post on 4chan. The sides glow orange and pic related is near the back of the mouse.
>>343575339
Well thanks for those two seconds regardless
>>343563854
>tfw bloody tl8 terminator
could have been without all that terminator theme but still feels good, really good mouse
>>343575589
how did you even buy it? are you in asia?
post a screenshot off your OS's 'devices' page showing the mouse
>>343575161
>>343574996
It's interesting how the same things happens with modern armies vs what are essentially cold war era armies. You wouldn't think the difference would be that great.
>>343575161
What the fuck, if I was russia I would've surrendered way before that happened
700,000 dead in one battle, for only 26,000 german dead. The population is iceland is only ~350,000
>>343570345
I have an high IQ but I do shit at this test
>>343575736
well i cannot find """""devices""""" page which wouldnt show just "mouse" but here, bloody software packaged into the box with mouse.
also poland here, was looking for a good mouse at okay price and found this beauty for about 50 dollars or so (200zl+ here)
>>343571913
same here
>>343571913
same here, nothing to worryi guess, please someone calm me down
>>343576186
You're an anomaly then, because there's a wealth of peer-reviewed evidence linking IQ and reaction time.
https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/18489/is-reaction-time-correlated-with-intelligence?answertab=votes#tab-top
>All this bullshit about fighter pilots
I've (successfully) been through the selection phase with an 8 hour testing day, and none of it involved such simple things as testing reaction times.
>>343574996
It can be done.
Bring 15k Zulus to your 1k Redcoats and you've got a chance.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Isandlwana
On second thought:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Rorke%27s_Drift
>all these people having a breakdown because they're 30ms slower than some other people
now you know why it's taboo to talk about the differences between race
>>343571913
>>343576281
>>343576364
>AVG 350
>don't give a shit
>not particularly fond of twitch reaction time games
who really cares
>6'2, good-looking, 170ms reaction time
>barely even play video games
Are you perturbed /v/?
>>343576730
but do you even fuck men
>>343576213
>report rate set to 250hz
ANON WHAT ARE YOU DOING
SET IT TO 1000HZ
>been getting ~200ms
>try one time and get 90
The fuck
>>343576730
>about 6'0, REALLY good looking, sometimes even complemented on that pointsfrom fems, 250ms but its allright, somehow that doesnt slow me down
>fucking chubby with moobs
kill me famalam
>>343576902
Sometimes I seem to get in 'the zone', then automatically respond and get a much lower time
>>343577030
cardio famalam
>>343577030
>moobs
>6'0
>""REALLY good looking""
anon..
>>343577030
Eat less fatty. It worked for me.
I sit down for 12 hours per day, sleep for 10, and I weigh 112 lbs (at 5'2)
After you eat a normal amount of food (for your energy expenditure) level for a duration of one month, it feels totally normal then. You'll be hungry until a month passes but deal with it. I eat one decent sized meal or two small ones per day and it feels totally filling.
![ulMkk2W[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/3hi67cZ.png "ulMkk2W[1].png")
Try and beat me fags.
![U53o0XI[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/b5Np5TN.png "U53o0XI[1].png")
>>343577443
>>343577292
no really, my moobs are about the same size of my belly, and my belly is not that big, but given those are FUCKING MOOBS we are talking about, they are pretty big. nothing i can do other than cardio and diet.
also bit offtopic, is diet really that important? or can i eat everything combined with cardio?
>nightmare mode: go to your monitor's settings and change it to 30hz
>you are now in console mode
If anyone gets below 200ms in 30hz mode and proves it with a screenshot I'll post a steam game key in this thread and whoever reacts first will get it, kek
On a $50 ThinkPad lol
>>343577648
Diet is extremely important.
>>343577648
diet is extremely important
>>343577648
diet is vastly more important than exercise, you can only do a certain amount of exercise per day but you can eat as little as you want to get to the right weight (just take vitamins) then eat a moderate amount to stay there
take it from me, eating correctly and being lazy is way, way more fun than eating like a slob and having to exercise hard for hours every day
22 and 263ms
help
laptop with microsoft intellimouse 3.0, I don't understand how it's that bad
maybe i need a new hobby
>>343577648
diet is extremely important
>>343577821
>bad
Anon, 250hz is the human average for visual stimuli
The other 13ms is easily covered by your laptop's shidiet is extremely important
>>343577770
>>343577814
>>343577869
>>343577971
diet is extremely important
>>343571601
20 years old and averaged 324 ms
>>343577770
>>343577814
/v/ is a hivemind confirmed
>>343577648
Depends on the person and it's more important what calories you're taking in when you're just looking at weight. What you actually eat to meet that calorie count will have less of an effect on weight and significantly more on overall health.
That said, having a crap diet in general will make you feel like garbage and not perform as well during exercise. Diet will also affect how quickly you recover and development of muscle.
>>343577971
diet is extremely important
this is more of a test of monitor latency than anything else
>>343578026
23 years old
376 average
yosh
>what I have learned from this thread
• 144hz is not just a meme
• Buy logitech mice and avoid razer like the plague
• I am a genetic dud
• Diet is extremely important
>>343578283
>•
another thing to learn
200~
60hz
also long time pot smoker
>24 years old
I could do worse I guess.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_chronometry#Mental_chronometry_and_cognitive_ability
>Researchers have reported medium-sized correlations between reaction time and measures of intelligence: There is thus a tendency for individuals with higher IQ to be faster on reaction time tests.
It looks like /v/ was right when it told me weaboos are retarded.
>>343578713
DELETE IT NOW
THIS IS FAKE
>>343577648
It could also be gyno caused by all the unhealthy shit you've been eating.
>>343578713
>>343563571
240ms was my fastest.
T-90 "Great Fighter Inception" wired mouse.
I'm also suffering from a case of Hand Foot Mouth Disease (Helped at a local pre-school, fucking teachers neglected to mention one of the little bastards had HFMD) , and my mouse hand belongs to a twice broken, once mauled arm.
24. Not even high or drunk or anything. Oh well, not like I need fast reaction times to play weebshit games anyway.
does having a wireless mouse and having my PC hooked up to a TV affect the scores?
>>343577648
Remove soy and soy produccts from your diet (high in estrogen)
http://healthyeating.sfgate.com/eating-soy-increase-estrogen-production-2870.html
>Soy contains phytoestrogens called isoflavones that may mimic the activity of the hormone estrogen in your body. The effects of soy isoflavones on human estrogen levels are complex. Soy is safe for everyone to consume in moderation and can have a modest effect on estrogen levels
it will give you moobs
>>343577671
>still no takers on this
>>343563571
330 ms, azio gm2400, some 39 inch hdtv.
>>343565807
LOL!
>>343578283
Why does /g/ recommend the deathadder then on their infopics
>1080 Samsung TV shit
>23 y.o.
I'm consistently hitting 250, which seems slow seeing your results since I consider I have good reflexes in general
>>343579540
Deathadders have, or at least had, the best sensors.
>>343579540
They're 'counter-culture' idiots
>>343579732
>Some modern TVs add as much as 150ms!
I'll assume that's playing a role. Let the placebo begin
>>343579849
/g/ shits all over Razer every chance they get. They would never recommend a Razer product unless there was a good reason for it.
>>343579836
g502 has the pixart 3366, a sensor logitech engineers moved to pixart to help develop
it has DPI nativity at all DPI (aka you can turn the DPI as high or low as you want and tracking granularity isn't affected, there is no interpolation regardless of DPI) something no other sensor has
>>343579965
Your average is way more telling than your guess.
LMAO I LEFT HUMANITY BEHIND
ARE YOU KIDS EVEN ON MY LEVEL
>>343563571
>3 digits
>>343580640
>cutting off your average
I have the highest score in this thread, guess /v/ is just filled with dumb idiots
Nothing impressive
>>343563571
324ms average
Looks like I'm pretty shit
>>343568806
GOD DAMN LOCH NESS MONSTER!
>/v/ is jet pilots
posting from your f-18 cockpits you fucking assholes?
Is "I'm using a phone," a valid excuse?
>average of 300
getting old sucks...
then again my tv has a 30 ms lag and my mouse is a cheap chinese wireless...
still my best score was 200 though i feel i just got lucky.
>>343582138
what time do jet pilots need to get?
>>343576382
From your link: "Most importantly, the correlation is moderate, and not total. Plenty of intelligent people may have slower than normal reaction times. Plenty of unintelligent people may have faster than normal reaction times."
Which is the scientific equivalent of "one rabbi says X, the other rabbi says Y".
i'm pretty drunk right now but heres mine
234 at 30 years old isn't too shit, right?
>>343564896
>>343582381
223 ms, pretty easy desu
>282
>47th percentile
You know what, my eyes are shit. I'm okay with having above average knowing that.
Logitech G900
BenQ XL2420G
>>343580031
G900 uses the same exact sensor. It's good to see Logitech using their best sensor in more mice. I'd like comparable sensors to start popping up for all brands.
>>343583278
Being drunk improves reaction speed
>>343584018
>g900
didn't even know this exists, $150 for a g502 with different body seems silly. get 2 g502s for $60 each and they'll last a decade
258 ms
>>343584203
I actually have the 502 and 900. I prefer the 900 overall. It's super light and wireless without sacrificing responsiveness. It's also got the best wireless connection of all mice, nothing and I mean nothing can interrupt or interfere with the connection. It's basically the worlds first wireless gaming mouse with the best sensor on the market. I also got it for 41 dollars off with employee discount where I work or else I may not have picked one up.
>>343584496
Also forgot to mention it has faster clicks than the 502 and it's pretty noticeable. It feels like half the distance of the click on the 502. It may not sound like much but you gotta feel it to really appreciate it.
why bother trying 5 or more times for an average when it takes only one to gauge your reaction time
when all they will do it change the time limit on when it will turn green, not a very good test
>>343572990
>tfw float around 250-350
at least i'm 5'7" girl and have a7½ inch penis
>>343584886
now just to prove, did it the final 4 times
I can't accept I'm only average at something that involves my favourite pastime.
>>343584178
and i've got tits like Scarlett Johansson
Don't worry guys, most mice have button delay
http://www.overclock.net/t/1411332/mouse-button-lag-comparison
The visual memory game is actually pretty fun to play.
beat this
