Absurd how many people still have no clue what this game is about and think it's going to suck simply because they're too dumb to look it up.
>>343559887
There's probably equally as many people who think it's going to be the best thing in the world without knowing what it is.
>>343559887
After all of the time and money you've spent advertising your oversaturated mystery box, you're going to sell a lot of copies no matter how bad your game is.
>>343559887
>still shilling no mans sky
only goes to show how insecure you are about being excited for it. I looked it up, and trust me youll be bored within a week. after that its just the same thing over and over again
>>343560329
So humour me, what do need to do in NMS?
>>343559887
From my experience with this game I haven't found anything that really intuitively describes what it is besides a big exploration game with some combat
>>343560446
"explore"
it will be like "exploring" in minecraft. randomly generated
I'll check it out when it launches but no way would I pre-order.
If it's a somewhat decent exploration game I'd pick it up for $15 or less in the future.
>>343559887
But anon, over 2 million people have already been shown that the game is about the joy of aimlessly wandering around a procedurally generated galaxy. Oh but the 'goal' is to find the center of the universe. Hm, sounds familiar somehow.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-uMFHoF8VA
Screencap me, No Man's Sky is a slightly more fleshed out Elite Dangerous and will suffer from the same problems. The game will be repetitive, and will have the same issue of a "mile wide, an inch deep". See you in August.
>>343560446
Fly around with really bad ship physics and then explore different colored planets with different colored animals and plants. If the game had some kind of building mechanic for a giant ship or giant home space station or something there could be a reason to actually do shit but this looks like one of the most boring games I've ever seen and I used to be excited for it when it was first shown and was PC only at the time.
>>343560610
Just better graphics and now its planets insted of near endless cube field and thats all i ever wanted since i was young i cant wait but im going in expecting disappointment so if its good ill be happy
>>343560934
screencap yourself, then you can look at it while you masturbate over how smart you are.
if they're making everything procedural then it's gonna be really bad
