It's gonna require a 970 minimum isn't it
>>343445778
Has anything required a 970 minimum yet?
Nah they just released new cards. 1070 minimum. And that's without Denuvo. With Denuvo it'll require a 1080ti for 720p 30 fps.
>>343445778
1080p? sure as fuck.
1440p? cinematic FPS.
Doesn't look much better than HR desu
>>343446028
Literally means nothing
>>343445947
Nice fearmongering.
>>343446128
>all modern western SE denuvo games have fuck-awful performance
>deducing DXMD will continue the sad trend is fearmongering
>>343447514
Is rise of tomb raider the same engine? I know MD PC port is being done in house
>>343448095
RotTR is the same engine as TR2013, it runs on the x360 as well
Thr visuals look as if it needs a 9600GT minimum
>>343448187
Well MD is an entirely new engine. Denuvo doesn't exactly impact performance as much I think. MGSV uses it and ran so well I had no idea it used denuvo
>>343448809
TPP runs worse than GZ
>>343449187
It's Also a much bigger game with more going on
>>343449187
only slightly for obvious reasons
it still runs great even on weak setups
Depends on whether Nvidia or AMD is sponsoring the game.
NVidia sponsored games these days tend to be optimized like ass in order to provoke people to buy newer cards.
>>343449187
both still run great on very low end shit, surprisingly
makes me really sad because fox engine could've been a godsend for low end gamers
>>343446028
You must be blind. HR looked like ass even in 2011.
From what we have seen, it will probably advertise a 970 minimum, but probably work fine on a bunch of older tech with a few of the fancy options turned down a little. It only looks like a small step up from Human Revolution graphically, and will probably be pretty scale-able if I had to take a guess.
Hell, my friend was able to play HRDX maxed out on a older GPU and a 2500k the other day.
Who getting a 1060 here?
>>343449907
HR was a last gen game. A lot of devs just said fuck optimization with the new gen.
Just play it on low settings?
Graphics fags are the worst
>>343453113
You act like there will be any large performance difference between min and max. Obviously you don't know how AAA companies operate.
Denuvo.
>>343453113
Still sub 30fPS
>devs optimizing anything ever
how many well optimized games have we gotten in the past, say, five years?
three?
>>343453578
Well the devs have said that console ports to PC is disrespectful so maybe it'll be ok
>>343445778
>A multiplat game requiring a 970 minimum.
At worst, it'll require a 660 or 750 ti.
>>343453578
The new Doom seems to be pretty well optimized. Sniper Elite 3 was well optimized but also sacrificed some stuff to run well. MP3 and GTAV were pretty well optimized I'd say. Might count MGSV/GZ but part of that also is just sacrificing things that would bog down the performance.
>going anywhere near this game after just cause 3 and hitman, not to mention six month delay
>>343453832
yeah when you actually list them there are a few i guess
but its not like its alot
>>343453867
>Different developers
piratefags already shitting on it because of Denuvo
>>343449187
Not sure if just me but TPP actually runs better than GZ on my system for whatever reason
