http://www.gamesradar.com/batman-return-to-arkham-has-been-delayed-indefinitely/
>Simple job of just porting the games to 1080p and 60fps on next gen
>fuck up so bad it's delayed indefinitely like Arkham Knight was
YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP
what is wrong with them?
Did they hire some noname studio to do their port again?
And what of Arkham Knight? Are they planning on remaking the PC port?
>>343098705
>Are they planning on remaking the PC port?
I hope if they do everyone who already purchased it will get a free upgrade. That shit is just unbelievable.
>>343098351
>60FPS
I thought it was targeting 30? Also gotta love how this one isn't coming to PC; no one bought Arkham Knight not because it was broken, but because PC is entitled, so no more Batman for you. No one bought MKX not because it too was broken, but because PC doesn't care, so no DLC or Injustice 2 for you.
WB is possibly the scummiest publisher alive.
>>343098705
Yeah, a Chinese no-name studio. Invariably shit results.
>>343098705
I think they abandoned the PC port and will do so for the future as well considering the Injustice 2 isn't on PC.
>>343098856
It's not coming to PC because it already is on PC. It's named Arkham Asylum and Arkham City.
>>343098705
>>343098827
WB has expressed that they no longer want to bother with PC, as evidenced by the consistently bad ports and withheld content. Remaking the PC version would cost too much money for what they will get, when they could always get some of that Sony cash to make a PSVR exclusive Batman game.
>>343098997
What a bunch of incompetent retards.
>>343098856
How can pc games care about a game that is brought to them broken and with no repairs on sight?
>>343098351
Good. I saw the "remaster" of Asylum and it looks worse than the original
At this point everyone in the industry looking to port games or remaster them should just outsource to these guys.
Everyone else cocks it all up every fucking time.
>>343099046
That's insane WB has the money to put into fixing the port. Just do it to save face.
>>343098856
This isn't coming to PC because it looks worse than the PC version and you can already buy them two dollars
>>343099126
Read what I said, dumbass. Read it fucking carefully.
>>343099195
Listen to me, to a publisher, there is no disadvantage to making games console exclusive. In fact, console exclusive games are the ultimate way to deal business since you didn't waste money on the PC version, and you won't have to worry about a bad port. PC is a very small market compared to consoles.
Is Arkham Knight even playabe on PC yet?
>>343099191
How about rather than remastering shit that doesn't need it they make new games instead.
There's not been a single remaster that didn't look worse than the original.
>>343099479
No. It was so bad they gave everyone that wanted it a refund before swiftly removing it from the Steam store.
>>343099191
>mfw bluepoint ported mgs2 and 3 to the vita at 60 fps
>>343099479
Technically yes, if you have more than 8GB of Ram and (maybe) use the Batman tweak tool.
That's funny.
But maybe it was a good thing they were such incompetent fuckups. Last thing anyone needs is another "Remaster"
>>343099479
http://store.steampowered.com/app/208650/#app_reviews_hash
yes
>>343099479
Game runs just fine for me. 760 nvidia gtx card.
>>343099604
>MGs HD on PC never
You can t even emulate Snake Eater properly.
>>343098351
repostan
>Port the Akraham games to next gen
>Seems simple enough, easy cash
>Aw shit, it's not that easy, engine is fucking up
>Try to port them, shit is fucked, not going to be that easy
>Now we have to rebuild entire segments of code to make shit compatible
>End up looking worse than the original release
>Trailer comes out, comparison video makes our half assed coded remaster look like shit
>Delayed to try and fix this mess of a code.
>>343098705
>"give the team at Virtuous Games additional time to deliver a polished Batman Arkham game experience."
yes, yes they did
>>343099479
Yeah but with dips
I wonder what Rocksteady is currently working on?
>>343099479
Yes. You need a lot of VRAM for all the features but it runs a smooth 60fps most the time on my970M
>>343100229
Arkham VR. PS4 exclusive.
>>343098351
>people will still buy this despite the fact that the PC versions are like 5 bucks and look better
>>343099630
I'm playing with 8gb and besides PhysX shit, everything run fine
>>343098705
The port is pretty okay now. I just played through it and Asylum. Asylum actually crashed twice on me. I got through all of AK without a crash. It lags when driving and the audio cuts out for a second, though. But that just might be because my processor is kind of old. It's 60 FPS like 98% of the time.
>>343100490
>every Chad and Thad, the people AAA games appeal to, have gaming PCs and or want to game on PC
>>343100439
>VR
Oh right............fuck that gimmick shit. Would rather they tackle a new IP or hell at least a new DC character
>>343099480
MGS 2 and 3 HD disagree with you.
Just port the PC versions & remove Physx
Easy, how did they fuck it up?
>>343099480
DMCHD collection
>>343099604
but they are 30 fps though
>make Banham game
>everyone like Banham game for being new and fresh
>make new Banham game
>Banham sequel is exactly like the old one
>praised, but not as much as the first
>tease Banham triquel
>but then release a Banham prequel
>and for extra douche start adding Troy Baker into the cast list
>Banham prequel is completely average
>then release Banham triquel after delays
>Banham triquel is actually pure average suck
>unlesss you run PC in which case it's fucking awful
>so fucking awful they had to refund everyone like twice
>decide to port old Banham games to new system since everyone's doing that nowadays
>delay Banham ports for unspecified time
>hope Banham fighting game and Banham Telltale game and Banham VR game can hold everyone over
Is Warner Bros. the shittiest licensed studio in vidya right now?
>>343101697
>bamham sequel
>exactly like the first
You know it's an open world sandbox, not a metroidvania, right? Also people (other than /v/) seem to prefer City.
>>343098856
>not buying broken products is entitlement
>>343101697
>>make new Banham game
>>Banham sequel is exactly like the old one
you're being obtuse if you think this is true
>DUDE LET'S REMAKE THE ENTIRE GAMES ON A NEW ENGINE LMAO.
>WHY?
>IDUNNO
What is it with Rocksteady games catching on fire when some other developer touches them?
Is their coding Red Dead Redemption-tier or something?
>>343105634
The team that did Knight's port consisted of 12 fucking guys, you can't fucking do a port with 12 fucking people
Plus the Chinese team doing this is absolutely fucking incompetent
