Blunder of the eon
What went wrong?
>>343055625
Not sure about the developers shilling here last night, but the studio in charge of publishing it is well known for selling $8 games for real prices.
>>343055776
>last night
I hadn't heard of the game till the thread that's going on right now and this one.
>>343055625
>ign
>4.9 is "Bad"
What the fuck.
>>343056065
This is on PC/Xbone/PS4 you console war faggot
Shame, looks like it could have been a sleeper hit.
>>343056149
Kill yourself
>>343056149
U mad
>>343056024
>>343055625
>Unconvincing characters
Shit, if that's a legitimate problem, you could skewer The Witcher 3.
I saw it on steam. The three videos up there don't show any gameplay at all, neither do the screenshots. Anyone who gets excited for cutscenes is a moron.
>>343056348
>Anyone who gets excited for cutscenes is a moron.
Telltale fanbase.jpg
>>343055625
Is this an honest to goodness AA game in the year 2016? That in and of itself is interesting. I mean, not interesting enough to play the piece of shit, but still, seems like everything is AAA or indie shit these days.
>>343055625
>Studio that made the game only made shit games and one average game
>Latest game is still shit
Anyone actually thought it would be good?
>>343055625
so, its better than god hand?
>>343055625
Some of the trailers looked good,but I expected that
>>343056303
Look mom I said it again!!
>he doesn't like AA games
Sucks to be you. I'll just be over here enjoying this solid 6.5.
better than nothing
>>343056512
But this is the sequel to the average game.
Spiders and Focus Interactive always put out very rough and niche games
Why does this surprise anyone?
>>343056736
Todd posters are shilling hard for their master.
>>343056628
>>343055625
> listening to ign
I really enjoyed MWL, but IGN gave it a mediocre score. Haven't bothered listening to anything they've had to say in a long time.
btw, http://au.ign.com/games/mars/pc-14328808
>>343055625
I bet it's gud and IGN are just faggots again
>>343056552
He's correct, third one had atrocious characters.
>>343055625
DOES THIS GAME HAVE WAIFUS
>>343056936
Like mighty blunder 9, right?
>>343056024
You fucking sucked at school despite what mommy told you.
>>343056879
Same, iwas interest in the technomancer but the review are bipolar.
Story some say it's great other says it's shit
Gameplay some say it's shit others says it's great.
FIrst time i see something like this.
>>343055625
shame,it looked like a fun not so serious RPG with playable Riddick
I'll propably have to wait for the new Pirahna Bytes game
>>343056024
Video game ratings are
4: Unplayable
5: Bad
6: Below par
7: Good enough
8: Very good
9: Pretty damn good
10: Masterpiece
>>343055625
>4.9
>Bad
??????
>>343057261
Unlike mighty, RPGs aren't as dependent on solid gameplay, you can enjoy them for the story progression alone, Planescape is a good example of that.
It got much better reviews on playstation. What gives?
>>343056024
The more recent reviews I've seen from IGN seem to be working on a proper 10 scale.
The 10 scale that reviewers were using before 4 is almost never seen.
>>343057376
That's exactly how most AA games go, you either like them or not. Sopirateand see for yourself.
>>343057521
>What gives?
$$$$$
>>343057445
7.5 is average.
>>343055625
kek I was just watching a livestream of it and thought it looked alright
>>343057401
Actually it is
1,2,3,4 not worth getting it for free.propably crashes during the intro
5 -it's shit,but I menaged to beat it OR it is good but indie/japanese/not AAA game
6-It's bugged shit but it's AAA game
7-It is a working AAA game
8-It's a almost fun AAA game
9-It is propably a good game
10-I was given 1000$ to give this game a 10
>>343055625
>dropped witcher 3
>only played Wasteland 2 from the recent iso-rpg resurgence
>completed Mars: War Logs on the highest difficulty
>completed Bound by Flame twice
>will play this
What is wrong with me.
>>343057401
>4: Unplayable
>5: Bad
>6: Below par
What? No. 5-6 are mediocre/flawed games
4-3 are heavily flayed but still playable.
>game by Spiders
Oh jeez, who could have foreseen this. Surely the studio that made such classics as Mars: War Logs and Bound by Flame would made another masterpiece of generic gaming.
>>343057550
>spiders
>having money
Rethink your meme ways.
>>343055625
Focus Entertainment has been publishing shit for a while now.
>>343056195
This. Bummer.
>>343056552
Are you kidding? I spent most of the game wondering why I should help anyone.
>>343055625
Now this is disappointing, I wanted this to be at least decent
>Blunder
>4.9 for a game made by Spiders
Kind of expected, no?
>>343055625
Are we really trusting a website that thought "too much water" is a legit game flaw?
>>343055776
no, they're known for selling $8 games for $8
>>343055625
REMINDER
E
M
I
N
D
E
R
>>343055625
I'll just pirate and check for myself.
Could be a case of Alpha Protocol or something
I liked some of the themes, like Mars is like a poor man's Arrakis
>>343059996
They should start doing that then.
>>343055625
>What went wrong?+ 0 post omitted.
Made by the same guys who did Mars Wars Logs and Bound By Flame, two absolutely shit games.
Not really a surprise that third time wasn't the charm.
>>343060134
REMINDER DIFFERENT PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT OPINIONS
it looked fucking terrible
how is ANYBODY here surprised?
>>343060134
those cons.... it's a VN
>>343060134
REMINDER THIS JUST HAPPENED TODAY
10/10
http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/06/28/inside-review
Actually this game feels more like a 5.4 than a 4.9 ... Fucking inaccurate reviews
>>343061916
I like the look and the settings. Also it's not bad graphically for a AA game. Unfortunately if the combat and story sucks I can't see why I would bother playing it.
reminder that there are no facial animations
>>343055625
>ARPG
>it's not a clicky lootfest
Shit game. Deserves an even lower score.
I toldya nobody talked about it, can't wait until it's $5, it looks like witcher on mars
>>343062376
It's easily a 5.7, and not a decimal point below, you nigger
>>343057401
10: paid
9.5: overrated shit
9: it's alright
8.5: GOTY
8: GOTY
7.5: underrated
7 and below: shit
>>343056024
>literal fail grade
For some reason video games are marked on a school grading scale rather than an Internet scale where 5 is the mean.
So 7 is meh and everything below is bad.
>>343060134
>Different people have different opinions
HOREY SHIEET!
>>343055625
This game is made by Spiders, a budget Euro RPG developer. All their games get scores like this.
Not everybody's cup of tea, but I like Eurojank.
>>343062365
>same guy gave Alien Isolation a 5.
I do agree with him that the game went on for a bit too long, but its a 7 at the very least, so I doubt Inside is the masterpiece he claims it to be.
Where's the torrent?
>>343065408
game not released yet
>>343055625
>Blunder of the eon
Not really. It's a budget title. Who was expecting much of it in the first place?
>>343055625
From Bound by Flame, I would say that this studio is allergic to fun and fluidity in their design.
>>343065556
Thx, anon. I can wait a little longer.
>>343055625
It didn't live up to the first game.
>>343066320
>Tech Romancer
Is it a mech dating sim ?
>>343066396
Ye, galbot on the left is a real tsundere
>>343058228
i enjoyed trying to choose between evils
>>343060490
>REMINDER REVIEWS ARE REPRESENTATIVE OF WEBSITES AS A WHOLE OR THEY WOULDNT ALLOW THEM TO BE PUBLISHED
>>343065681
bound by flame was a chunk of coal that couldve been a diamond with competent devs
Bound by Flame was just unplayable, boring trash.
I don't think there's any question that PR people from the publisher/developer are on here pushing this turd.
I can't even fathom that anyone would be so completely insulated from actual good games that they'd be hyped for this trash.
