Anons, memes aside, are we looking forward to Battlefield 1?
>>343046828
I don't buy anything with an EA logo on it
So no.
It's a fucking battlefield game with WW1 weaponry
Just like Star Wars: Battlefront was Battlefield with lasers and jedi swords. Literally nothing to get excited over.
>>343046828
no
because it literally is the same as always
>>343046914
>It's a fucking battlefield game with WW1 weaponry
Why wouldn't Battlefield 1 be a Battlefield game with WW1 weaponry?
I'm conflicted. On onehand, I'm pissed off by all the retarded blatantly non-historical shit they're doing. On the other, I kind of like the aesthetic they've wound up with. I feel like if they went full alternate universe they'd have some neat shit on their hands.
I'll probably pick it up, if only because I haven't played a modern battlefield game for half a decade.
>>343046828
No.
But I'm interested in CoD: IW singleplayer.
Does every class have to make do with bolt action rifles, or did they shoe-horn in rare automatics so the kids don't have to learn how to aim
lets go back to bc2
im only looking forward for it because of the memes
>>343046914
*with ww1 and ww2 weapons
fixed that for you
>>343047317
>and ww2 weapons
Such as
>>343047443
are you fucking shitting me?
Sten guns for once there is a few more but i forgot which ones
oh also ww1 with half the shit automatic? nope
>>343046828
nah, there's nothing to play.
>>343046828
Who cares? If it turns out to be anything like their other Battlefields, it'll be half-finished on release and a fading memory once they decide to put the actual game behind their shitty Premium paywall you'll have to spend another $60 on.
It's happened every time in every game and it'll happen again because EA is shit like that.
>>343047592
Post a picture of a Sten in BF1.
>>343046828
>we
Fuck off
All these people going on about BF1 not being historically accurate have never even touched a Battlefield game in their lives.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IHaoK1VY70
>>343047192
Its all autos and semis senpai, like every class but sniper uses autos
>>343047739
And those who don't never played a battlefield game before bad company.
>>343046914
>Just like Star Wars: Battlefront was Battlefield with lasers and jedi swords.
Not even close
It would have been actually good if it was
>>343047648
it was on the freaking game in E3, im not giving that shit any more views
take a look at it your self and you will notice various weapons that dont belong
also since the game is not outt what we see is not final
again see >>343047592
>>343048173
It wasn't "on the freaking game in E3". You can't show me a Sten because it isn't in the game. At least know what game you're shitposting about before you do it.
>>343048173
You do know that the Battlefield games have always offered heavily mod-able servers right? Admins can set up no vehicle, bolt action rifle only, hardcore servers if they want to, this is already possible in BF4.
>>343048364
i made my point already, im not shitposting but holding the fanboys to the facts
>>343048372
>implying i play any battlefield games after bc2 and even that is shit
![BF1942_SOVIET_SOLDIER_MP18[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/13Z3yca.jpg "BF1942_SOVIET_SOLDIER_MP18[1].png")
>>343048118
Ah yes, remember how the MP18 was the most iconic SMG used by the Soviet Union during WW2?
>you will never ever play strike at karkand with your middle school buds ever again
>playing battlefield
>playing a battlefield with black germans, fast tanks, and no trench warfare thats supposed to be about ww1
>>343048454
>implying i play any battlefield games after bc2 and even that is shit
Okay, but that doesn't change the fact that the ability to shape BF1 to appeal to a more hardcore, realism craving demographic will be there.
>>343048514
That's an mp34 anon
>>343048514
at least slavs are a little whiter than niggers
>>343048587
>dat loading that took forever on my shitty old PC
At least I got to listen most of the great song.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6ZnNbn0o3Q
>>343048454
What point? You lied and said the game had guns from the second World War, then when asked for proof you disappeared for nearly 10 minutes and said "j-just go look for it yourself". It looks to me like you just opened up your mouth before you knew what you were talking about.
>>343048514
>captured weapons didn't exist
Yeah the poor ivans who had a rifle for 5 people would not picky up filthy german weapons.
![MP18-1-left[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/BkQNkUy.jpg "MP18-1-left[1].jpg")
>>343048704
That's an MP18 you blind fuck.
>>343046828
It seems DICE knows nothing about WW1 in general considering France has been left out in favor of America (despite doing nothing to help out the war)
Also 4 maps on release...
>>343048674
>more hardcore, realism craving demographic will be there
this is a joke, right?
>>343048751
i said look at the E3 footage but you didt
stop sucking the EA cook so hard
>>343048783
>despite doing nothing to help out the war
That's a lie. Britain probably would have starved if not for the US.
Militarily their presence was indeed completely irrelevant.
>>343048587
>you will never be the faggot who snipes from the Carrier on Oman with your high school friends again
>you will never get kicked from a server for you and your buds all picking Recon and spamming drones at our own team
I'm gonna miss you Battlefield 3
>>343048767
The fuhrer would like a word with you
I swear half the reason this game will sell well is due to Facebook tier normies bandwagoning on the "RIP LE COD BATTLEFIELD IS OUR SAVIOR" bullshit
>>343048816
I don't need to look at the E3 footage again. I know what guns were in the alpha, and you don't. It's time to stop posting.
>>343048761
Ever played BF1942? Soviets didn't have their own weapons at all, only a mix of US/British/German weapons.
>>343048889
Not him, but the gun in BF1942 is an MP18. It says in the loadout.
>>343048816
>more hardcore, realism craving demographic will be there
this is a joke, right?
Seems like you're having trouble reading entire sentences, though unsurprisingly, you're having difficulties forming them yourself as well. Make a valid reply to my argument or stop shitposting.
>those graphics
hahaha oh wow looks like I was right all along, downgrade confirmed
>>343048816
>Make something up
>Someone calls me out on it
>HURR HURR EA FANBOY
fuck off retard
To those bitching about the accuracy and everything, I think they're going for an alternative reality kind of thing and not a simulation or even a historical title
I mean there's armored cars, submachineguns, semi automatics everywhere, tanks that actually move quickly, races that literally weren't fighting in the war, and most of all, no trench warfare
There's even that dumb blimp with guns all over it
So yeah, it's stupid, and stupid people and kids are gonna think it's a true to life thing, but they've always done that with vidya because they're pretty damn stupid.
>>343046828
Is this really BF1? looks more like battlefield heroes to me
>>343048747
Amazing , simply amazing
>>343046828
>Black ANZACs
>Negro on the cover of a WW1 game.
If you are of european heritage and you buy this game you are a fucking cunt and should kill yourself.
>>343049026
Then why even make it a WW1 shooter at that point if they aren't going to be accurate? Why not just make it some generic war setting where they define their own rules about what kind of guns are and are not there?
>>343048761
the germans used captured soviet equipment too. the PPsH was well-liked by many german soldiers.
>>343048921
exactly time to stop posting, we all saw it
now go suck some EA cock you god dammed brick wall
>>343048991
you called fucking battlefield fans "hardcore"
sorry but you are the laughing stock of the "real hardcore" folks here pal
>>343049013
>HURR DURR NO ARGUMENT
no u
>>343049113
There hasn't been a single realistic Battlefield game ever since the series started, why would they suddenly go for it now?
>>343048117
while autos did exist towards the end of the war, they're kinda... shoehorning that shit in a bit, the mp-18 is not nearly as common as they seem to want to imply, there was a few fairly portable machineguns but they weren't exactly single man weapons.
honestly I just hope every battlefield isn't going to be late 1918, I want to see some early battlefields, perhaps with restricted weapons (as if that'd ever happen.)
>>343048747
The battlefield soundtrack died at the beginning of 3
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=p1yqxbDs3iE
>replacing this with shirty radio static.
>>343049157
>HURR DURR NO ARGUMENT
no u
you literally just lied and said there was a sten in the game when there isn't???
>>343049157
>>>343048991(You)
>you called fucking battlefield fans "hardcore"
>sorry but you are the laughing stock of the "real hardcore" folks here pal
What? No, you fucking idiot. I said that through Battlefield's server options you'll be able to shape the experience to cater towards an audience that prefers realism. I never called Battlefield fans hardcore.
>>343049157
There are literally NO guns from WW2 shown in the E3 footage you complete retard.
>>343048751
technically it's true if you count all the main line rifles, hell the mosin goes back to the 1800's.
>>343049157
Jesus this guy is stupid.
Is this idiot talking about this gun, i have no clue what he means. I could see how this would be mistaken by an idiot for a sten.
This guy also goes over the guns seen so far
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19hohCtdJ4Y
>>343049387
That's completely illogical
I still fucking hate the name of this game. Like, I get it, World War 1, but
>Hey bro, wanna play some Battlefield 1
>Oh, you mean 1942?
>Na bro, not the first Battlefield, Battlefield 1!
I guess it's better than naming it "Battlefield"
>we
Anyway yeah, I like battlefield games, they're fun. I've been playing them since the first one came out, they've never been realistic or representative of the average soldier's experience.
It's goofy fun where you jump in a plane or a jeep and load it with explosive and drive it into an enemy tank or base right before you jump out then stealing an enemy vehicle and doing donuts trying to run people over until you die.
>>343049512
>Oh, you mean 1942?
Literally nobody would ever make this mistake.
>>343049512
Are there even any BF1942 servers still up?
>>343049318
i never lied, unfortunately i stopped looking for the weapon list as im not going to make those searches more popular
>>343049349
>battlefield
>realism
pick 1
im well aware of what you are trying to say and its still hilarious to everyone else who aint no EA cocksucker
>>343049356
watch it again you utterly deprived retarded moron, yes the whole stream
>>343049431
says the guy with no input
>>343049593
probably like 20 russians or something
>>343049619
You are still fucking wrong, there isn't a single WW2 weapon and you can spout your bullshit as long as you wish.
>>343049619
There are 4 separate people telling you you're wrong, but you keep going. Are you mentally ill?
>>343049512
World War 1 was the first war, so it kinda makes sense.
>>343049512
>We will never get Battlefield 0.5 - Napoleonic Wars
>>343049619
>>battlefield
>>realism
>pick 1
>im well aware of what you are trying to say and its still hilarious to everyone else who aint no EA cocksucker
Yes, through Battlefield's server parameters you can change countless gameplay options . I'm not saying you'll reach milsim levels of realism but at least you can reach out to an audience who'd like to see more realism. And the biggest complaints; too many vehicles, too many auto- or submachine guns, regenerating health are all addressed by Battlefield's server modability.
>>343049912
Battlefield Primal when?
They could put as much niggers as they want in that, fighting with sticks and stones.
>>343049846
That'sa SPICY memeball!
>>343046828
oh yeah cant wait to play a morbidly obese transblack genderqueer otherkin in a WW1 setting
>>343046828
It doesn't look interesting. There's nothing new that this game does so far that makes me want to get it. My prediction is it'll die almost if not as fast as Battlefront.
>>343046828
No. It has a retarded setting.
>>343049912
they would fuck it up
You would have a puckle gun as your primary and a Girardoni repeater as your secondary
>>343050085
Spot the 12 year old.
>>343049979
Good for you anon, very progressive! :)
>>343049512
Right? I can't believe anyone would make a blunder that stupid. They should emulate the Xbox's fine naming conventions.
>>343050154
>Battlefone
>>343049767
again watch the god damm footage already its there, its half black dudes playing so you should like the company
>>343049780
>baaaaaah baaaaaaah he is wroooooooong
sheeple please
also you realize replying will only net you more replies, right?
>>343049947
again im well aware of the various options but consider this
the moment you use the "hardcore" setting most efforts that resemble teamwork is lost which is an inherent issue with the series as a whole
the problem is also the very vocal fanbase screaming out "OH GOD I AM SO FREAKING HARDCORE, MOM GET THE CAMERA"
>>343050124
>functionally limited weaponry
>functionally limited vehicles
>no room for customization
>no modern gadgets to do crazy shit with
I love studying the Great War, but for a Battlefield game, it is absolutely retarded.
>>343050112
>quickscoping with a 12 pounder cannon
Fund it
>>343050251
Is this the gun you are referring to?
>>343049453
>>343050338
ha ha /int/ mem am i right fellow kids?
JUST A REMINDER
There's a Mod for RO2 that's WW1 focused, (there's going to be one for Rising Storm 2 as well, hopefully with destructible terrain/digging this time which will come in handy as RS-2 is Vietnam, where the VC dug tunnels).
there's a free source engine game set in ww1. (titled WW1:Source)
really Red Orchestra 2 is pretty good by itself as a representation of world war 1/it's aftermath in 1917-1918-1919.
Battlefield 1 is one of those things I wish had Faction Locked Weapons and Class Limitations (along with RO2-style gunsights because I really fucking love that feature even if it's not used, as it's immersive-detail), at the very least for "hardcore" mode, because I like games that have "atmosphere".
regardless the game and it's hype has started something that just makes me desire a game that doesn't exist Ace Of Spades(but with terrain that used a mesh like space-engineers or something) + Red Orchestra(with regards to tank-controls, rifle-controls, and possibly squad structures/class-limits) + (possibly) Rise Of Flight (or IL-2, Red-Baron or 'warbirds', where aircraft have a lot of room to maneuver, and have to land to rearm/reload, and are pretty shit at actually taking ground targets),
>>343046828
No.They are making just another neo-battlefield clone here.I still play Day of Defeat:Source and i see no reason to be bothered with Battlefield 1.
>>343050251
>again im well aware of the various options but consider this
>the moment you use the "hardcore" setting most efforts that resemble teamwork is lost which is an inherent issue with the series as a whole
>the problem is also the very vocal fanbase screaming out "OH GOD I AM SO FREAKING HARDCORE, MOM GET THE CAMERA"
I doubt you'll get Call of Duty kids on, say, a trench map that only allows bolt-action rifles, though you'll find those people in any game, even Verdun or Insurgency.
>>343050287
I actually don't think so, what is wrong is the tone.
I wouldn't mind something like "battlefield: 1930" or something, where it's like a somewhat tongue-in-cheek type thing, with brightly colored aircraft, and ridiculous/impractical tank-designs, and weird weapons/defensive structures
>>343050686
Well they added hover tanks to BF4 so maybe we could get some weird shit in BF1
>>343050251
The smg featured in bf1 is not a fucking sten, you complete retard... It's an mp-18.
I knew this off the top of my head but any idiot could have just looked that shit up on google...
>>343049453
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MP_18#Evolution
It has the "snail" magazine, senpai.
The same shitty business model that ruined their last games will make a return so I won't bother with it this time.
Since the removal of a map editor for custom maps one is supposed to buy maps via DLC but then there are no servers for those because nobody has the DLC. EA's server hosting policy is also bullshit.
Then there's a cash-shop to unlock things in the game that shouldn't be there. The idea of locking progress was to slowly ease people into certain gameplay elements instead of selling something through it - it's an awful practice riddled with balance concerns. I also don't like the gambling mechanics in the form of cases one has to grind and open. Why does a competitive FPS game need gambling?
Can't say I approve of DICE's overall take on WW1 combat - but then again there's no point in arguing about taste.
>>343050481
Battlefield isn't for realism
>>343049026
what is their intention in making the majority of the soldiers minorities
>>343048454
it was the mp18 faggot
>>343050251
>>343050581
>DICE trolls the COD Kiddies.
>hardcore mode is secretly designed to be more realistic.
>COD kiddies are quite confused at first, they spawn in as mostly riflemen,
>they're told they need to take the hill.
>they're shocked, they've got no sidearm, sidearms are only for officers and maybe NCO's, which they aren't because they've got no "hardcore"-xp
>their sights are adjustable, with pg-up/pg-dwn.
>tanks are noisy, extremely noisy, no third person, they require 2 people at minimum (1 to drive 1 to gun) in order to be effective.
>weapons are faction-locked, only germans get MP-18, only americans get trench-gun, only canadians get the Ross-Rifle (Russians get a mossy-nugat with 12 (twelve) bullets).
>LMG's can't be fired from the hip, at least not accurately at all (you'll be spraying everywhere)
>Airplanes have Torque/flight control issues that needs to be compensated for.(especially when airplanes have single rotary engines)
>Air combat happens as high as 4 Kilometers above the battlefield.
>death screams include men sobbing for their wives and mothers, there's decapitation and blood-pooling details.
>in short COD kiddies get shellshocked,
I just want a Red Orchestra WWI game.
111111111111
>>343050906
but anon, don't you know, Frostbite is just too hardcore for our PC's, Don't be entitled, be grateful you're getting a game at all
: ^ )
>>343050938
>Red Orchestra
>realistic
red orchestra isn't realistic, it's more "authentic" or has a spirit of authenticity to it,
something along the lines of this scale
>Battlefield 3/4/hardline
>Battlefield 1942/2, (along with Insurgency Verdun(to some degree) )
>Red Orchestra2/Rising Storm
>Red Orchestra:Ostfront
>Darkest Hour: 1944-45.
>Squad
>Arma
I feel like it's going to be Forgotten Weapons - The Game, so I'm looking forward to that.
>>343046828
No, there's nothing interesting in it as far as I can tell. I was hoping for a future setting that they'd take advantage of in terms of mechanics/vehicles, since they could change shit up when it doesn't have to be "realistic" or some shit. Instead we get the same crap firearms differentiated by a view model and some fucking numbers. Completely underwhelming to me, I'm sick of this shit.
After looking at like 2 30-45m raw gameplay videos this shit looks like it plays almost fucking exactly like BF4 with prettier graphics and reskins.
>>343046828
No, it seems like a really shit WW1 game and I didn't like the last two Battlefields released.
Battlefront was shit too.
>>343046828
Nope.
I'm staying with 4.
I bought Hardline and Battlefront and they both came with lacking content, a shiton of bugs and terrible balancing, and both died almost month after release.
BF1 isn't even like what WW1 is supposed to be, it literally looks like a exact reskin of BF3 just like BF4, BFH and SWB with maybe the occasional gimmick to a couple of things.
I garuntee it will be abandoned not to long after release and be laughed at by absolutely everyone.
>>343046828
I'm fucking sick of hearing about multiplayer where are the singleplayer gameplay videos? I don't give a fuck about the faggy, shitty multiplayer
>>343046828
Nope, could have been. But they already fucked it up to much
>>343052190
>>343052345
>>343052645
>>343052680
>>343052764
How many of you are the same people?
>>343048761
>I've got my WW II knowledge from movies
>>343052976
This was my first post
>>343052190
>>343048783
They haven't been left out tho. One of the SP protagonists is French, and the frogs are getting a DLC. It's cheap, yeah, but they're in it.
Another thing, the game is WWI inspired, not WWI documentary game. This is something they have said themselves, because they felt the game would be more fun to play that way.
>>343052976
all me
but seriously where is the singleplayer? I fucking hate how virtually all fps games now are "multiplayer first" and singleplayer is basically an after thought.
>>343052976
all me desu
>>343052976
I was responsible only for the first three
>>343047739
>games are games
There's a difference between a game being inaccurate in terms of real world physics for the sake of game balancing and disregarding your setting to the point of being insulting
The game looks inaccurate in terms of its subject matter, people expect the game to be loosely based on WWI and so far they've pushed out a Battlefield reskin wasting any opportunity to make the game unique within the limitations of a WWI settings. Mainly however its the decision to go with predominately black characters for classes and the glorification of various obscure aspects of the time.
Battlefield: Badcompany, Vietnam did a better job of representing the subject matter and that was literally a reskin addon.
>>343049026
Wait
>no trench warfare
Seriously? All I want is a decent WW1 action game. Today I learned that's what BF1 is. Now I'm learning that's exactly what it isn't.
>>343046828
another fun BF
>>343046828
I don't buy nigger-lover games, and I'm not even white.
>>343053270
this is battlefield, there is no real singleplayer, there never should be.
look at wolfenstein, that's a singleplayer game, watchdogs, Doom, you just need to look for them.
>>343046828
lol, you gotta be kidding me. op I hope you started gaming a few years ago if you are looking forward to casualfiel game
I hpope you only
>>343053696
They've shown 1 map and it did have trenches, but the other part was a town and field.
>>343048626
>half the guns are civilian and never used in combat
>most of them are automatic
>huge magazines, experimental modifications
>factions using whatever
Can server mods fix classes only having their faction weapons. I want to shoot bolt action rifles over trenches and wish I were dead
I think I want this to be a casual Red Orchestra 2
>>343046828
>>343046828
>>343046828
From the thumbnail I thought this was a screenshot of theoldMount & Blade. I thought DICE was known for their good audio and visuals? That looks like shit
>>343046828
Anything new that isn't an indiegame is impossible to run on old computers.
There's no point in getting excited for any new games.
>>343048372
>mod-able server preferences.
not to the degree that is necessary.
if you can't add custom maps, if you can't adjust the game mode so it's better I don't think it's necessarily going to be what some people want it to be.
in the sense of having weapon/class limitations, big squads, and mechanics that work with them.
Just limiting it to Bolt action rifles isn't good enough because the game wasn't designed around bolt-action rifle-only gameplay, so it's not going to play well with it. (and yes you can make it play well, that is possible, but you need to either have the developer do it, or have mod tools available that make it easy to attempt)
>>343048878
>you will never be the faggot who snipes from the Carrier on Oman with your high school friends again
I miss BF2 a fuckton too, anon.
Wait a minute
>Battlefield 3
>high school
>not underaged
holy fuck I'm 29 what happened. Last I checked I was a 22 year ol college dropout
>>343046828
No.
It's the same usual Battlefield with a WW1 skin.
If anything I'll stick to Bad Company 2.
>>343050287
im kinda with this guy, just play verdun
