So not only is the campaign's protagonist a black man, 75% of the playable soldiers seen in multiplayer footage are also black.
How is DICE going to be able to pass this off as historically accurate? This is outright racism and disrespect to Europeans that fought and died in a battle negros barely had a part in. This is just typical Swedish cuckery at it's finest.
And before redirecting me to /pol/, give me a reason why I don't have the right to complain.
they're not passing it off as historically accurate, they said that when they were called out on the soldiers having automatic weapons
Swede here. We're rewriting history and you better get used to it, shitlord.
>How is DICE going to be able to pass this off as historically accurate?
They aren't, they've already said that it isn't an accurate depiction of WW1. Only one class has access to bolt action rifles, do you think that's historically accurate? Of course not, 99% of soldiers had bolt action rifles and many of the weapons in the game never saw combat.
It's not meant to be accurate, if you're expecting realism in a fucking Battlefield game you're a retard.
>>342871664
People actually care about the campagin in a battlefield game?
>>342872614
I think it's more to do with the fact that it's a WW1 campaign than anything else.
>>342872436
Does that mean I can make a game with an inaccurate depiction of ancient Japan where everyone is white?
Imagine the fucking shitstorm that would generate.
>>342872786
Happens all the time in movies and people are complaining about it, lefties just don't care because you can only be racist if you're white and lefties are the ones who are more likely to bitch and moan.
SJWs hate history.
Auto sage. SJW janitor.
