Who's excited for Civ 6?
What new things are y'all wanting in the new game?
>>342152904
Succession
Spain is in the base game
I'll probably wait till the complete edition comes out before I buy it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vVGQThK01M
Founding Fathers Shortens time needed to earn government legacy bonuses.
America gains combat bonus for fighting on home continent.
America's Leader-UU: Rough Riders Gains culture for fighting on home continent, effective on hills, low maintenance cost
America's UU: P-51 Mustang Extended range, bonuses against other fighters (Both American UUs are after industrial era)
America's UI: Film Studio Built in theater district, boosts tourism output
America also gets a boost to tourism output via national parks thanks to Teddy's leader ability.
First Look: Unstacking Cities
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_2CQxw4H20
>>342153527
>Cleopatra
[REEs excessively]
Where's best girl?
>>342153527
>>342153635
So that brings us to, what, 6/18 Civs?
>America
>Aztecs
>China
>Egypt
England
France
Germany
Greece
>India
>Japan
Rome
Russia
>Spain
The other six are Civs that have always been in the base game, so that would leave 1/3 of the Civs to be surprises.
They still "need" a North/South American representative, as well as Africa and Oceania. Persia's been in since 2. They hinted at the Ottomans.
>>342154469
Too busy getting fuck by a horse
>>342154669
Er, 7/18.
With all of the building in cities spread over multiple tiles, war seems like it will be easier.
>>342153738
Same. The Saga of Man mod for Civ 5 along with other games will keep me busy until then
>>342153527
Why is the release of their info so haphazard? E3 itself revealed very little that wasn't known from previews.
>>342155517
2K can't into marketing?
>>342155517
Still working on it?
They already had plans and couldn't spare much for E3?
I dunno
>play civ 5
>ally gets attack and lose a city
>attack that Civ and gives the city back
>they thank me
>after I conquered the attacking Civ since they want no peace treaty, ally denounce me for warmongering
T-thanks
>>342155678
mods
>>342153635
who is spain? anyone?
>>342155048
>>342155728
What are good Civ V mods
>>342155881
We don't know yet
India is Ghandi (as always)
>>342154685
And I thought theodora was the besti one.
>>342155881
We don't know yet. Historically it's been Isabella but maybe Firaxis will mix it up this time.
>>342153527
Why doesn't Hojo Tokimune look as cartoonish as the others?
>>342155012
This, seems like cities will be ruined with ease.
>>342155940
I'm tired of the nuke thing. How about them Indian scammers as the leader?
>>342156053
What are you talking about? Hojo is so cartoonish they even put Zelda Triforces on his uniform
>>342156053
Some anon said he's based on an actor that played the character in some show
>>342152904
The unfortunate thing is if we have female leaders, people are going to throw a shit fit. Same thing if we have any black leaders.
Because history was all white guys
I hope some civs get multiple leaders, just so Egypt and India can have non-meme choices too.
>>342156439
>The unfortunate thing is if we have female leaders, people are going to throw a shit fit. Same thing if we have any black leaders.
Civilization has always had female and black leaders, please don't derail this into another thread bitching about SJW pandering for the love of god
>>342156631
>Civilization has always had female and black leaders, please don't derail this into another thread bitching about SJW pandering for the love of god
Already happened in the last CIV thread when people started groaning in fear about "female leaders" being put in the game and "praying a female leader isn't picked for this country" and claiming if they are, it's because of diversity.
Also history is generally heavily targetted by the left and right psychofucks
its interesting how much of the marketing has been aimed at people who know about the series already
also i wonder if vanilla will be any good? civ v was a mess until the expansions because the guy that designed it didn't really have much experience, but ed beach seems really competent and he worked on g&k/bnw
kind of interested in how this turns out but not keen on how it looks
>>342156631
True, they should add Joan of Arc (even thought she's not of French decent) as the French leader and not Napoleon, or de Gaulle (both of them did very weak)
>>342157128
I just want to talk about fucking video games not these fucking /pol/ memes
I'd be excited if BE didnt exist.
Now I'm just interested.
>>342152904
kings and shit
>>342156631
Civ 2 does it the best.
You have the male or female leader option for every civ and no situations were you are forced to pic some retarded whore because she is the only choice for that nation.
>>342157189
Sure, why not. Civ has always had meme leaders who never actually lead the civ
>>342156439
Blacks are fine because African civs (in b4 >civ) are great fordiversityin TSL, unexceptional women being added does suck though.
>>342157259
Good luck. Have you seen the Battlefield 1 threads?
>>342157309
And her throne would be a stake
>>342156386
Hojo Tokimune, a TV series from 2001, starring Motoya Izumi.
>>342152904
I'd only get the game for based Teddy, Demi-God Emperor of the New World.
A contemporary image of Cleopatra (and Marc Antony)
>>342157378
>unexceptional women being added does suck though.
No more than any other unexceptional leader that gets added.
No female leader is as stupid as Ghandi, meme status or not.
The big problem is /v/ and other crazies will claim there were no exceptional women leaders in an effort to have some non-insane reasoning for anti-diversity
>>342157732
>( ( ( Cleopatra) ) ) and Marc Antony
>>342153635
More UUs
Chariot Archer for Egypt
Samurai for Japan (obviously)
>>342157732
>tfw i'm greek not black
>tfw i'm stalking a girl
>>342157773
>No female leader is as stupid as Ghandi, meme status or not.
really the issue with Civ leaders and nations is the legacy nations from Civ 1. We have a million Scandinavian and african tribes but still have "india" and "celts".
>play civ v
>japanese unique unit is the samuri
>replaces the european longswordsman
>it's more powerful
???
>>342158143
folded 1000 times etc.
>>342158143
it's a video game
>>342158143
this, should be something like
>same (or less) combat strength
>better movement
>cheaper to make
I hope they do something about the barbarians this time around. Their inclusion in previous games has always been really problematic.
>>342157773
>No female leader is as stupid as Ghandi, meme status or not.
Gandhi is a legacy character just as the Zulu are a legacy civ. There is simply no point making comparisons to him, because yes his meme status does matter. Also most people will agree with leaders like Elizabeth and Isabella being fine, but also disappointed that they're so inert (leaders like Boudicca and Cleopatra* for example have too much inertia for what they are).
*including the rev games
>>342158225
These days people demand that games (especially ones based on history) be realistic as possible. Generally because they get triggered if the game doesn't portray their country as a beacon of greatness
>>342158143
Samurais has a higher chance of getting a Great General,
Samurais has a Shock 1 Ability
>>342158378
Legacy character is not a sufficient excuse, sorry.
>>342158318
Samurais are not cheaper (120 production)
>>342158351
They can send scouts to your Civ and will prepare invasion forces if you don't take care of them
In general they're smarter
>>342153527
WHERE DID YOU GET THIS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>342158395
>>342158143
Also it can create fishing boats
>>342158503
That seems really ludonaritavely dissonant to me.
>>342158512ribbit
>>342158351
>civ 5
>play w/o barbarians
>too easy and not enough need for military units
>turn barbarians on
>constantly harassed from all angles
>kill some barbarians and clear a camp, another shows up in a few turns
they need to fix this
>>342158351
The way barbarians work this time is that camps spawn in fog of war as usual, but now they send out Scouts to look for cities. If they find a city in their line of sight, they beeline back to their camp.
If you don't kill the Scout before it gets home, it spawns a war party that goes after your city to raid it.
>Buying a Fireaxes game on launch
Haven't people been burned before doing this? Also, what are the Civ 1-4 shitters saying? Cause they all hated Civ V with a passion for some reason.
>Cleopatra
Why
>>342158617
>implying Civ V fags won't be the new Civ IV fags once Civ VI is out
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBlEscMLjy0
>>342158476
A sufficient excuse for what? It objectively means the comparisons aren't valid because Gandhi and Zulu have meme powers. There's nothing to excuse or debate, it's a matter of fact.
>>342158695
They're going for the biggest personalities because of the new AI agendas
>>342158617
Anyone who has played Civ before knows that the game isn't finished until they've released all of the expansions. It's been that way since III.
>>342158829
>biggest personalities
>cleopatra
Come on now
So why would I buy this if I already own Civ V? Just to have combat unit combining?
>>342152904
>female "leaders"
>all mentions of slavery scrubbed
>the most influential leaders of china/russia/germany completely scrubbed
>mobile art style
>>342158617
I've bought all the Civs new since Test of Time (I hadn't played 2 at launch, it was more like a year or so after when I finally tried it).
Part of the fun to me is seeing how they evolve in their life-time, even if they're not as good (and bug-free) at launch as the previous title.
>>342159076
>please make a history game that follows my revised version of history
>>342158709
Such is the life cycle of Civ games.
>>342156631
There is a difference between historically accurate female or black leaders, and the clear and obvious SJW pandering that Civ 5 employed.
>>342158975
Her agenda is that she will ally herself with civs that have large armies (and take out civs with small armies) because historically that's what she's done
>>342154669
>Oceania representative
>Implying they'll ever acknowledge Ak-land or Stralia'
>>342158090
>We have a million Scandinavian and african tribes
No we don't.
I just want custom leaders and civs with some kind of point buy and a step back on the whole "GRAPHIX" focus.
>>342159256
It's very obvious that Civ 5 was your first civ game, why do you feel you have the right to talk?
>>342159256
Please end your life
>>342159272
Because she is a lady and she "plays" men like a chess piece. A typical civ lady leader.
>>342159076
only black people were ever enslaved
>>342159071
It makes Civ V look like eye cancer.
>mfw I preordered the Deluxe Edition
>mfw I also preordered Beyond Earth
HELP
SOMEONE STOP ME
>>342159318
>a step back on the whole "GRAPHIX" focus.
Isn't that the reason for the cartoony art style?
>>342158695
WE WUZ WOMYN
>>342153792
>civ's get unique bonuses/units based on both the history of the civ AND based on the era of that particular civ leader
well i have no doubt now that part of the DLC will be civ leaders in addition to civs. looks like we still are gonna get george washington and other series mainstays after all.
>>342159296
Ed Beach mentioned that they're aware of people liking to play on Earth maps with start locations that put civs more or less where they should be, and that some regions of the map are much less populated than others, so they'd like to try to address that a little.
It might not mean every place gets fleshed out in vanilla, but it's definitely an expansion/DLC possibility, at least.
>>342159467
I'd like a little more Anno and a little less "style", or else dial it back a little more like sid meiers pirates
>>342159479
If there were multiple leaders per Civ then surely we would have learned about it right now, either by leaks or by Firaxis themselves
>>342158351
>>342158584
>>342158737
You can stop now.
>>342159448
As someone who bought BE at launch, this game can't possibly be as bad.
Civ6 looks nice. It might turn out to be disappointing, but it can't be as bad as BE.
>>342159256
Civ 5 had some "diversity for diversity's sake" at times but it was pretty far from SJW pandering. The majority of civs were still Euro civs after all, some people even got pissy when they went with Venice instead of some diversity++ civs.
>>342158617
I have no fucking idea why anyone would. Its best to wait until all expansions are released and bundled into some "Ultimate" edition or some shit, and they buy it on sale so you can avoid turbojew tactics like releasing fucking Spain as dlc
>>342158695
>Civ 6 you are a man now
>who do you want for Egypts leader?
>any of these great god on earth tier pharaohs that built pyramids and shit
>some whore that fucked some Roman general when Egypt was a shitty vassal
>>342159391
>>342159401
Please do fuck off. There's a difference between Elizabeth and Isabella being leaders, because they actually did something notable, and shit choices for diversity like Wuuzy and Dido.
Dido and Hiawatha are both the worst, since they're mythological. That dumb shit should've died with Civ II. No reason Dido should've replaced Hannibal or Hamilcar, and the Iroquois had leaders that actually existed.
>>342153975
Fuck, this shit looks beautiful.
>>342159701
It's likely diverse because if you make a game based on civilizations of the world and it isn't diverse, you made a terrible fucking game.
A civ game without diversity is pure garbage below that of big rigs
Can't wait for all the sfm porn of the female leaders and mods to turn all the leaders into cute lolis
>>342159701
Well Venice is kind of weird for a CIVILISATION game.
>>342159781
All I see is a retard like you with your usual political paranoia. Please, just stay the fuck away from any game involving history because I am sick of faggots like you trying to rewrite history to be more appealing to your political ideology.
>>342157910
>Chariot Archer
>Now UU
Godamn it; they should split ranged fast units from melee fast units already. The lineup shoud be;
Chariot Archer<Horse Archer<Cuirassier<Cavalry<Helicopter Gunship
Chariot<Horseman<Knight<Lancer<Landship<Tank<Modern Armour
And not nonsensical upgrades like Pikemen to Lancers or Lancers to Anti-tank Guns. This prevents upgrades from bleeding through.
>>342159771
>they went with a famous leader and not some literal who whose name has been lost to history
You gonna cry about Ghandi yet?
>>342159771
i cant wait to rape the shit out of her every game
>tfw her ai is literally programmed to cozy up to a strong military to protect her
a literal aiwhore
Civ IV > Civ V
>1upt is inferior to stacks of doom on basically every level
>global happiness is inferior to city maintenance/local happiness on basically every level
>unique abilities is okay compared to leader traits but unique starting technologies make starting out different for each civ
>civics were more interesting, more flexible and allowed for more diversity than social policies
>multiple leaders per civ as opposed to 1 each
>the ai is at least competent in civ iv whereas it's a joke in civ v
>better diplomacy in general with more options
>the land and tile improvements were better making city placement much more interesting (and tense since not expanding means the ai will soak up the land)
>culture could actually be used to overwhelm another civ and take land from them
>baba yetu
>>342159781
Hiawatha wasn't mythological, Longfellow making shit up doesn't mean he never existed
>>342159901
It's just a name faggot. Besides Venetians were complete happy merchants in their day and some Greeks didn't like Dandolo even they he did nuffin wrong, they're a cool addition.
>>342160013
No, because Gandhi is a legacy leader. No one else makes sense, either. The Gupta, Maurya, and Mughals were not Indian as a whole. Gandhi is the only dead leader of unified India proper that is well known.
>inb4 he didn't lead
Yes he did. Just because he wasn't president/king/raj doesn't mean he didn't lead.
>>342160190
>It's just a name faggot
So is everything.
>>342159929
Reminder that some units should not have upgrades.
>>342160141
114 posts until the Civ IV fags showed up, that took a while
>>342159901
>>342160190
Venice was actually pretty big-dicked in their heyday.
>Lewis was listening to a podcast about a book about the Byzantine empire by noted historian and author Lars Brownworth, because, you know.
>"They talked about the Venetians sacking Constantinople," says Lewis, "and I was like, 'Wow, these guys are awesome villains. They're really interesting and they're cool bad guys.' That sort of got the wheels turning."
>Lewis dug into the research on his own and visited Venice on his honeymoon. He was taken by the culture and beauty of the city, but also impressed by the cultural sway of such a relatively small city-state in a time of kings. He set his mind on bringing them to Civilization.
>"It was interesting trying to pick a leader for Venice," says Beach, "because we found out that all the doges of Venice were people that were established statesmen. ... They were picked by the council to be a figurehead in their last few years of life. So you get all these 80-year-old guys who reigned for about five years."
>Lewis and Beach settled on Enrico Dandolo.
>"When I was working with ... the art lead, Mike Bates ... whenever there was a concept for Enrico Dandolo, I would be like, 'More evil! He needs to look more evil!'" says Lewis. "Because I feel like the game works great when you have guys that are just bad guys, that you root against. As you know, we can't use Hitler or anybody like that, so we have these guys that are historically ... that were evil toward a certain group, great rivals. We had the Byzantine empire in Gods & Kings, and now we have the Venetians in Brave New World."
>"Here was this guy who was a sort of shrewd manipulator ... he ended up being a great character for us to have," says Beach. "But it took a little bit of digging to figure out which one we were going to go with.
He seems like a bro.
>>342159664
ditto to that.
literally played two games of it and never touched it after the first week. probably should have gotten it refunded desu
>>342160257
And the thread will 404 before anyone refutes a single point.
>>342159901
Venice was a fucking super-power in its' day, and could take on empires and win.
>>342160215
>Isn't a leader
>BUT HE LED
And yet you have an issue with an actual leader in the game?
>BUT SHE'S A WOMAN
History had leaders that don't appeal to ultra racist nat soc types, get over it and just ignore history if you can't handle it not having a blatant far right bend
>>342160309
Wish I could say the same.
I actually bought the expansion, thinking it might make the game worthwhile.
It didn't help.
>>342159918
Projection
You idiots already tried to rewrite history. Stop trying to make it about women and minorities. It's always been about warlords, emperors, and bloodshed.
If you're going to choose female leaders, choose ones that are at least as competent as the better choices for male leaders, like Hatshepsut, Elizabeth, Isabella, and... well, that's just about it. I guess Olympias could make a good Greek leader since she pretty much ran Macedon while Philip was away.
>>342152904
I ain't buying a Firaxis/Civ game until they have patched it and released all expansios.
Never played this but why can't you just pick which leader you want to be instead of making one look way more important than everyone else?
>>342154669
I wonder which long-running civ will be left out as early dlc this time?
>it's a "Gandhi is in so anybody can be a leader" episode
>>342160472
Can you explain what's wrong with it?
I'm not really interested in how fucked the game was at launch, I want to know why it's shit now.
>>342160141
This.
>>342160013
>leader
She was leading dicks into her wholes.
Ramses and Tutankhamen are equally famous but were actual leaders.
Also including retarded whores, shits on real women leaders like Elisabeth and Catherine the great.
>>342160269
>You can tell that they really want to include Hitler in Civ from the fact that he's usually the only Scenario-Specific leader to always get a 3D model
>But it'll never happen
>>342159901
Venice is the Northern Italian civ. Plus, Venice was a world super power in the 1400's and 1500's. It was them, the Ottomans, the Poles, and the Spanish.
>>342160013
Gandhi is legitimately a shit choice and his continued existence due to memes doesn't really excuse even more shit choices.
>>342160746
I can see the either Rome or Greece being left out because Ed said people wanted a more balanced TSL map
>>342160593
Please, please do the world a favor and just end yourself.
You are as big a plague on gaming as SJWs. You want to change shit that was never a problem solely because "WELL THAT CROWD IS WHINING SO I'M GONNA WHINE TOO"
Please, stay the fuck away from history games. It's blatant you types know next to nothing about history aside from whatever propaganda you get fed at /pol/. We don't need "DA DARKIES AND WYMN" removed from history because you want to spite some American women. History should never be censored or changed due to some sort of political climate
>>342160843
She was a leader
She's famous
Tut is a literal fucking meme leader
Ramses has been used before.
You literally are solely upset because she is a woman
>>342160971
>Rome or Greece being left out
I have no image for this amount of disgust.
>>342160971
At this point I would even be surprised if they combined them into the "Greco-Roman Civilization" or some shit
>>342160843
>talks about Cleopatra being a shitty leader
>brings up King Tut
hoo boy
>>342158584
They aren't retarded. They're just not civilized.
>>342160451
I just want the best choice to lead every nation. Elizabeth is the2ndbest for England, but no way is Wu Zetian the best for China.
>>342161116
She was a bitch of a roman general.
She is holywood made up cancer famous.
I am upset that there is no choice.
Do get cancer tumblershit.
>>342161371
Let me guess, there are no "best choice" that's female, right? :^)
>>342161023
>I'm totally not an SJW you guys, but aren't anti-SJWs just as bad as them SJWs?
>>342161519
>you're either with us or against us
>>342160912
>>342160437
Hmm
Fair enough. You've persuaded me.
>>342160013
>Who is Tutankhamon?
He's way more known than Cleopatra
>>342160971
>Rome
I really don't see him being left out given Cleopatra's in.
>>342161506
Fucking Victoria is the best choice for Elizabeth.
>>342161116
Cleopatra was more of a meme than Tutenkhamen. At least the later had an important father.
Ramesses II, Hatshepsut, Khufu... all more famous and important than a Greek vassal.
They didn't even make her white, the bastards.
>>342161023
I think you're lost. This isn't the place where you can win arguments just by implying that the other side is racist.
>>342161506
There's a couple. Elizabeth, Victoria, Isabella, and I guess Catherine could be thrown in, too.
>>342161519
>people hated SJWs because they were obnoxious and tried to change games to appeal to their agenda
>do the exact same thing pound for pound except change agendas
>dude how are we similar?
It's called horseshoe theory, kiddo.
>>342160269
>Venetians being the bad guys
>even though they dindu nuffin, they wuz just trading and preaching the correct word of God when the corrupt byzantines massacred them
>>342160912
>the Poles
The PLU and the memewealth were never a super-power, 3/4 of it was just empty areas with villages ruled by kikes.
>>342161728
I think you're lost. This isn't the place where we try to have history and video games changed to fit our political agenda. Try tumblr.
>>342161821
I don't think you understand why we hate people like you (SJWs)
>>342161951
Why do you hate "us"?
>>342161951
Pretty sure for the exact reasons listed, newfriend.
>>342161651
>Julius
Augustus when...
V I D E O G A M E S
![Rzeczpospolita2nar[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/XtxSgcW.png "Rzeczpospolita2nar[1].png")
>>342161935
PLC was fucking huge, and they stopped the Ottomans from buttwrecking the Austrians at Vienna.
>>342162073
Civ V.
>>342162101
Video games are merely a vessel for political nutters of both the left and right to further agendas
>>342161948
No one did that.
>>342162101
>using an image of a black man
what are you, an SJW?
V I D E O G A M E S
>>342162338
So no one here is going to have any issues with any leaders and literally no one is going to complain about "diversity" and cry for a change in leaders?
Pretty sure I see that all over this thread. History games are doomed to be targeted by /pol/ types, just look at BF1
>>342162106
>Size means power
>Especially when most of it is empty steppes or forests
Also, the germans would've stopped them anyway. Poles weren't the only ones marching there and the turks were already worn out by the time they arrived.
>>342162540
You said people are trying to change the game to fit their political agenda. That didn't happen.
>>342161897
happy merchants
>>342158090
>celts
>civ apparently supposed to represent a broad group of ethnicities which are encompassed by thousands of years of history (going by V's modern cities)
>Leaders:
>Cunobeline, Boudicca
>Brennus
>Brennus, Boudicca
>Boudicca
is it time for Brennus
>>342153792
>national parks are back
GREAT
Now we have a reason not to clear cut and strip mine every piece of land.
Are Aztecs confirmed? I want the Inca and I don't want to get cucked. Aztecs are north American, we need south American civ.
>>342163649
Montezuma was mentioned in an interview so they're pseudo-confirmed I guess.
>>342163649
I'm sure we'll get both, seems like Ed wants the whole Earth map to be used for TSL when it comes to base Civs
>>342153792
America should wreck everyone on pangaea maps
>>342163703
That pretty much seals it. Well, hopefully if they are trying to improve the earth-like map replacement, Inca will make it in. What other south American civ could? Fucking Brazil?
>>342163786
I doubt they're going to pull off decent TSL coverage with just the 18 base civs. The inevitable DLC a few months (I'm going to guess Brazil will be one) will probably fill some shit in.
>>342154669
One of the Scandinavian civs needs to be in, whichever it might be.
>>342158737
Your mother sucks barb cock
>>342153527
>tokimune
It's shit
>>342164064
They were DLC last time (despite vikings in the intro), brace yourself.
>>342161935
Agreed
We should delete Russia and America
>>342153527
Cleopatra looks kinda cute there.
I will miss the Chitzen Itza wonder quote from V.
It was great.
>>342160269
>admitting you want to use hitler but can't
Cool info
>>342165091
How about here?
>>342165827
not so much
>>342165827
She's declaring war here. People don't tend to look cute when declaring war.
>>342165827
Nice tits.
I wasn't aware people bought facebook games for $60.
>>342166783
here's your (you)
>>342152904
I'm gonna get some flak for this, but...
maybe a console port? I'm pretty sure my 5 year old PC won't be able to run it
>>342167219
I'm pretty sure your phone will be able to run it.
>>342167290
my phone can run witcher 3
>>342153975
shit, I actually really like how this looks
it looks comfy and clear
>>342153975
So does that it's easier to do a one city playthough? Since it seems you can spread a single city out to all parts of a continent manually or something and do it faster?
>>342168918
I think one-city playthroughs are gonna be much harder because Wonders take up a tile now
Also it seems wide playstyles are getting massive buffs (which is good, it's a fucking 4X game)
>>342163272
Vercingetorix pls.
>Workers no longer needed to build roads
>Trade routes build roads automatically
I don't know how I fell about that.
>>342169038
>Also it seems wide playstyles are getting massive buffs
I'm going to bet the standard maps will simply be too cramped for wide gameplay and you'll be pigeonholed into three cities.
>>342169738
You'll be able to produce military engineers later in the game that can build manual roads so I'm cool with it
Can't beleive y'all niggas aren't playing something in-depth like overwatch.
Casual plebs baka desu senpai iiiit bonsai
btw these potential civs are confirmed not in the base game
>>342169743
Civ V was geared towards ICS until they jammed on a bunch of penalties.
>>342170097
You forgot La Venta
>>342152904
I'm happy that they finally made it so you can keep playing on your phone if you have to go out and do stuff in the middle of an intense game. So convenient!
>>342170380
this shitpost is stale
>>342165827
Cleo j'aime ton nez mignon~
>>342170120
Too many god damn penalties, they murdered wide in BNW.
All I want is to have a realistic looking map with a realistic amount of cities. Civ 5 heavily punished you for cities after the first 4 so hard they weren't even worth having making domination victorys lame since you basically had to burn all the cities down
>>342171302
Global Happiness is gone in Civ 6
>>342170097
>>342170186
Though just because they're City-States in the base game doesn't completely rule them out for expansion Civs.
Civ V replaced a number of City-States as they got DLC:
Copenhagen and Oslo were changed to Sydney and Quebec City after Denmark was released.
Kathmandu replaced Seoul after Korea was released.
Dublin, Edinburgh, Helsinki, Stockholm and Vienna were removed in Gods & Kings (Celts, Sweden, Austria). A bunch more were added.
Jakarta, Lisbon, Marrakech, Rio de Janeiro, Venice and Warsaw were removed in Brave New World (Indonesia, Portugal, Morocco, Brazil, Venice and Poland) - some of them had been added with Gods & Kings. Even more were added to the game.
>>342158584
>ludonaritavely
That isn't a word you pompous ass
>>342171420
He said base game. Also each city-state comes with unique bonuses in Civ 6 so they're less likely to be removed with expansions I think
>>342171420
True enough. But you'll probably be waiting a while for the expansion.
It looks like Civ V with a few gimmicks. Literally the same buildings with the same bonuses. Same hexagonal tiles. Same type of combat.
Still not 100% sold on the artstyle after Civ 5 was so easy on the eyes. All the pictures and gameplay they've shown have blurry as fuck textures, as if they're been smeared with Vaseline
>>342153975
>>342172073
?
with this districts thing, can we build a docks district instead of being forced to settle the city on a coast?
>>342172193
It just looks like a shitty mobile game. Fuck I hate the aesthetic they chose. Of all upcoming games that I would have looked forward to, only Dawn of War 3 looks worse. Fuck!
>>342172193
I like what they did with the unexplored areas
>>342172456
Yea, you can build coastal cities without actually settling right on the coast.
>>342161023
You didn't refute anything that guy said.
>>342172570
Technically those areas are explored, this is what unexplored fog looks like
>>342172193
still looks noticeably blurry, hopefully they're sharper on release or these aren't max setting screenshots
>>342172570
yeah the fog of war looks fantastic this time, which gives me hope that the graphics will be touched up ontighten up the graphics on level 3 etc
>>342172480
>It just looks like a shitty mobile game.
it looks nothing like that
>>342171594
I know. And yeah, it makes it a bit harder, but I think they can still find reasonable replacements if they must. Jerusalem's probably the most specific so far, but even it's not the only big Holy City of history if Firaxis becomes dead set on an Israel civ.
Zanzibar could be replaced by a Maluku island if they needed it for Tanzania or something.
>>342172990
Except it really does. Super cartoony.
>>342172456
>>342172584
Though you do need to found directly on the coast if you want the Eureka boost for Sailing.
>>342172073
Pretty much everyone that got to play the demo says that it looks amazing when zoomed out, which is what you'll be playing at 90% of the time
>>342160270
> American Empire
>Teddy
delicious
>>342173185
A phone game can't look anywhere near that
Is clarity in strategy games a bad thing now?
I'm just worried about the whole wonders now take up tiles thing. I feel like that would severely limit the amount of wonders the game can have. It also it shoots down any hopes of getting my nigga Enrico in Civ 6.
>>342174120
Vencie could still come back with large, different compensating bonuses or even not using the OOC model at all.
You know, America's the first civ they've given a complete look at today.
There are 17 more weeks until launch, and 17 more civs in the base game. Think they might start a weekly feature?
>>342174518
maybe they could let you build wonders in puppeted cities and get their benefits
>>342155928
Saga of Man is a good one, I think it's still in the works tho. If you can find any others that fix the pants on head retarded AI that want 5 luxury resources, 80 gold per turn, all my uranium and my fucking firstborn child in returns for their shitass bananas, please let me know
>>342159801
>>342168623
holy shit gtfo shills
>>342176841
Seriously. This game looks like casualized asshole.
>>342174120
I like it, I think it will prevent players from building up too big of a lead early game by building all the wonders with a lucky Great engineer or 2 and turtling up their capital. Kinda reminds me of Endless Legends.
>>342172570
I just hope it doesn't remain like that forever.
A old map when you have Satellite maps would be just silly
I hope Babylon is back
>>342177023
it does make the game more interesting when you have to plan to put your wonders in easily defensible areas
>>342173709
>look like = fidelity
The art style is very similar to garbage like Clash of Clans.
>>342152904
Important question: is every single feature from 5 in 6? Including expansions.
>>342177403
Most of it is. Religion, trade, tourism etc. is in though World Congress is gone.
>>342174120
Not specifically. It looks like city borders expand out a lot more now. Venice could just have the perk of their borders expanding much faster. It will make archipelago and island nations very difficult though.
>>342177503
Oh thats good then. WC was shitty anyway.
>>342177503
>>342177770
So no UN now? I kinda of liked it, I just think their should have been an option to leave it if you didn't like the rules.
>>342177503
I won't be 100% happy until Corporations and Random Events are back.
>>342178006
Corporations weren't good though.
