He makes a good point.
>>342128472
In terms of narrative, on a theoretical level (because we've seen just how "elegant" Bioware actually is when it tries to be all-inclusive), maybe. Let's see how he argues against CDPR when it comes to gameplay, though.
>>342128472
I didnt play the game the post
>>342128472
No he doesn't. He just can't cope with fictional settings having less than ideal characters who treat everyone like they're fucking princesses.
>Witcher 3
>Lacks respect for women, homosexuals, and minorities
C'mon, its 13th Century.
>>342128472
>promiscuity is empowering
>prostitution is exploitative
Heard it hear first, according to liberals, women have control of their bodies, but only as long as they don't sell them.
Yennefer is literally the strongest female character in gaming
Prove me wrong, you cant
>>342119369
>>342119369
>>342119369
We didn't need another one thanks
>>342128472
>problematic
yeah, about being a huge faggot.
>>342128472
>When OP can only get attention by making weak-ass bait
>>342128472
>problematic
>>342129393
Not defending the post in OP's image but it's not hard to see the logic behind that.
Women being casually promiscuous = something they enjoy and can stop at anytime.
Women engaging in prostitution = something they might not enjoy but need to do in order to eat. Although many have more of a choice, of course.
>>342128472
This fucking thing again? The other thread just died.
No he doesn't have a point, Witcher is not like what he described at all.
