So what was the best Battlefield in the series and why was it BF3?
>>342092176
We haven't even got the first game in the series
>>342092218
I like the way you think anon.
>>342092176
BF4
because it was the biggest leap perhaps?
Bf4 is great if you love the franchise but could be called an upgrade over a brand new game.
Im looking forward to 1 because i love the game play of the BF franchise and im also a fan of modern history.
>>342092176
bf4
>>342092176
BF4 is the better BF3.
>>342092176
because it was BFBC2
>>342092176
You left out the numbers 1, 9, and 4, anon
And you forgot to change that 3 to a 2
you're all over the place today, anon
2142
>>342092531
I don't get the same feels from BF4 as I did with BF3
2142.
There is no other answer.
>>342092176
1942
Anything else is garbage
>>342092176
1942.
Battlefield Vietnam.
No seriously, I put more time into that game than any other Battlefield until Battlefield 3. Only ever got to play against bots though, since the servers were sparse by the time I got the game.
>>342092724
1943 was superior.
>>342092176
bad company 2 vietnam
>>342092770
I played it close to release with like 2 other friends and it was great, driving around in on of those 3 wheeled cars with someone shooting an m60 out the side was great and the sound of the helicopters firing their missiles near was crazy.
>>342092176
>literally the worst battlefield
how the FUCK can you pick 3? At least 4 had fucking naval vheicles
>>342092176
Anything after BC2 was shite. It all went downhill after BF2 though.
>>342092965
>24 players
>3 maps
>consoles only
s-sure anon, I'm glad you enjoyed it.
BF2142 is the best game in the BF series and probably the best game in its' genre.
>>342092176
2142
Any other answer is objectively incorrect1942 and 2 are close second
Still mad we got BF1 and not BF 2143
>>342092176
Does /v/ not like bf2?
>>342092176
Bad Company 2: Vietnam I loved, But unfortunately the correct answer is BF4
>>342093125I never played 1942, i feel like i missed since i was 7 at its release.
>>342092176
Bf2(no nostalgia, still playing it)>BFBC2>BF3>BFHL>BF4
2142 was my favorite
>>342093329
Strawpoll:
http://www.strawpoll.me/10533291
>>342093249
Only kids are posting nowadays
>>342093427
>>342092176
BF3 was certainly not the best, for the supression mechanic alone. That throws player skill out of the window.
The best in terms of fun were BF2/2142 and BC2
>>342093771
>91 medals in one game because of an LMG ammo boxes and firing as long as i was alive.
I barely got any kills but the suppression was crazy.
>>342092176
Bf3 for me without doubt. Ballistic in Bf4 sucks dick.
BF2 was the best. 2142 and Bad Company had some good ideas too but the huge focus on unlocks sucks. They haven't had any new ideas since Bad Company so BF3/4 aren't that interesting.
>>342093319
1942 was the best gaming multiplayer experience I've ever had. The base game and its expansions were so fucking good
>7 factions
>literally every major battle represented in the war; dozens of huge maps; tons of variety
>over 70 vheicles including battleships and planes you could walk around in (LOL at BF1's "titans")
>Best modding community ever: Forgotten Hope, Desert Combat, and a shit ton of other classics like a pirate mod, a Star Wars mod, a vietnam mod, ect.
>game play based around fun; doesen't try to be realistic or overly goofy
God, where the fuck did they go wrong? They've literally downgraded in every department besides the graphics.
>>342092176
Bad Company 2
I'm curious, did people who say BF4 is the best ever play BF2 or 1942?
Citing BF3 as the best is a red flag. It was objectively worse than the others. Still good, but definitely the worst.
>lackluster map design
>supression
>bad netcode
>bottlenecks everywhere
>>342094107
The map design was miles ahead of anything dice shat out for vanilla bf4. The two best maps in the game are dlc.
>>342094107
I really tried to like BF3 a lot, but the map design just shredded my opinion of it. It was either a person-to-person meatgrinder or vast tracts of land between tiny areas of interest around the control points.
>>342094107
The close quarters expansion had gr8 map design and was 100% the strongest expansion for the game
>>342094089
I played them both even back at launch and I unironically think bf4 is the best
>>342094215
>>342094107
This so much. What were they thinking?
>>342094107
I'm still mad at them over never balancing it. Other BF games have had bad launches but they fixed them over time. BF3 got abandoned super quickly so they could work on BF4 instead, which is basically just BF3: Good Edition.
>>342094089
people born in 1998 are now allowed to post here
that might explain it
netcode alone makes bf3 shit tier
I liked bf3 but it wasn't as fun as bad company 2
>>342092176
My experience of battlefield is painfully limited because I didn't start playing the series until bad company 1. BC2 was my favorite until BF4 had enough polish applied to make it my favorite. I know that 2142 and BF2 are probably better or whatever but I missed their heydays so whatever, no use worrying about it.
>>342094292
While that may be (never got into that), you have to realize that the best thing it has to offer is something that's not in the spirit of the series. That pretty much says it all.
I have a theory on why the maps in bf3 are so bad: it came out at the sime time they intentionally tampered with the netcode in the cod series to make it lag at random, randomizing latency advantage across all players to even the field. Same applies to BF3 maps. They are intentionally designed so you can't really get a good overwiew of most situations, then you get shot at from some random blind spot and thanks to supression, you can't even retaliate and kill the dude most of the time.
Tl;dr bf3 was intentionally casualised
>>342094702
CQ wasn't in the spirit of the series I agree, but it worked better than anything else the game had offered up until that point, excluding maybe Seine Crossing on Rush.
SOFLAM + Guided Missile Tank Rounds.
>>342092552
>>342092997
>>342092965
>>342093997
>the best Battlefield games are the least Battlefield
seriously, the only way you could have chosen worse was heroes.
>>342094292
I think you mistyped Aftermath there, lad
>>342095528
Aftermath had some great ones too, but cq was the most consistent in terms of quality andfun
BC1 > 2142 > 1942 > BF3 > BF 2 > BC2 > nothing else is worth playing lol
Does BF3 even have active servers? I bought a while back before I had a decent pc, and I've been thinking of downloading it and playing it.
>>342096249
plenty, if conquest and rush is your thing.
>>342096312
Conquest is pretty much the only gamemode I played back on the PS3.
Those were dark times.
>>342096405
yes, conquest on consoles suck ass. conquest in general sucks in the newer battlefields since its giant open worlds with like 8 points and each point has a house or 2 defending it. i just play rush and air superiority in bf3 still.
1943 was a ton of fun on xbox, I'm sad we never got a PC version since I can't stand console shooters these days
>>342096486
Well, hopefully the learning curb isn't too hard since I'm very new to using K/BM.
>>342096683
expect to get wrecked. funny enough i pretty much built a pc just for bf3 back in 2011 but still played it on my 360. i was not used to kb/m AT ALL. i played with my 360 controller and did way better than using kb/m for the first few weeks. it was pretty crazy, how accustomed you get to one playstyle. im good with both now but find it harder to use a controller for fps games unfortunately.
>>342092604
>>342092626
This.
Homosexual little children who never played this never knew what they were missing.
The only good ones are 1942, 2 and to a lesser degree 2142
>all these console shitters
>>342093937
You're hurting me anon.
>>342095628
>BF Vietnam
>not worth playing
>>342092176
best BF was a fan mod Dice was always shit.
>>342094392
>tfw born in 1998 and still playing bf2
>>342098448
>Turn on bf vietnam
>It ain't me starts playing
is it worth getting BF4 for 15€ onPS4?
>>342102191
no. dont listen to the retarded redditors. bf4 is one of the worst in the series, vehicle abuse out the ass, terrible base maps, and general movement feels so sloppy.
>>342092176
Nigger, this is why:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuFrliIZz18
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MaNZ4gTbpk0
>>342092176
BF1942
You could headbang in your Kübelwagen, while wearing a Stahlhelm
BF2 was my favorite. It felt so chaotic, and every game could feel very different. Commander was cool as shit and the arty they could call was terrifying.
Did hate the earlier parts of the game where landmines were friendly fire and trammates would punish you for the tk after they ran over your at mine.
1942 and Vietnam were gold too. I kinda liked 2142, but the limit to four classes and unlocking shit threw me off.
If they just remade any of those four, and updated the graphics and gunplay while adding destruction, it would fucking print money.
>>342092604
Mfw I bf2 was my first online game on my parents shitty computer. Then I picked up 2142 with my dad from the store and was so excited to install it. I got home and the game barely ran so I never got to complete a match...
Most fun - BC2
Best all-round - BF2
BF4 is underrated too, it's a genuinely good FPS now after they patched it a millions times.
>>342092176
>Not BC2 or BF2
Get out
>>342096891
>missing the spammiest BF
Titan battles were spammier than 64 player metro. It was nothing but people throwing grenades down corridors. And half the maps were narrow lanes.
bf2 with good hit reg when
BF2
After BC2, everything is shit
>>342092176
BC3 had a pretty nice campaign. BF4's campaign was probably one of the worst FPS campaigns i've played in recent years. I know nobody really plays BF for the campaign, and the game is pretty much designed around multiplayer, but why bother including a campaign if you're just going to make it dogshit? THe campaign was riddled with bugs, terrible pacing, was incredibly short and did a bad job of creating an actual feeling of being in a "war". Most of the campaign I was just stuck with two of my braindead AI teammates that I had to manually control, where as in 3 there were several moments in the campaign where you were stuck in an actual warlike setting.
As for the multiplayer, I think it's far more balanced than 3. It has some really great maps as well. Although I still prefer BF3s maps. Just my two pennies.
>>342106807
i wasn't able to finish bf4 campaign because of the swimming bug but from what i played it felt terrible
>>342106914
Don't bother finishing it unless you want to unlock some guns for multiplayer. It only gets worse. That swimming bug was absolutely terrible. Once hannah joins your team everything goes full retard. Irish is the only good thing about the campaign and the only reason I continued it.
>>342107089
are we talking MoH Warfighter level of terrible because that game was ratshit
>>342093656
damn shotguns and pistols onlyTDM on canal map was the shit
>>342107503
The BF4 campaign left me with this unfulfilled/empty feeling, especially since it had this amazing piece:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeKF-60uq_MI'm glad I used the origin trial for it and didn't buy the game
>>342107503
As someone who loved the campaign of the first MoH (the 2010 version), how bad is it? Because I was thinking of buying it for a couple of bucks
>>342108434
i to liked moh 2010, so for me warfighter was completely terrible it felt like they wanted to do a bf game. its about the same length as moh 2010 if you buy it for say 5$ that would be what it's worth, dont bother with the online its been dead for many years
>>342092626
>>342092604
this
>all these battlefield 3 and 4 answers
hows it feel that BF3 was your first BF game and now you think you're entitled to an opinion
>>342107089
It no shit took me 15 minutes of finaggling to get through that one section of the game because of that swimming bug.
Also, Bf4 is comprised of
>turn corner
>tank blasts you
>turn corner
>dude blasts you
>turn corner
>apc blasts you
>turn corner
>camper blasts you
or alternatively
>run to cap point
>blasted from miles away by and apc
Bf4 doesn't have the same feeling as BF1942 or BF2. It feels like Bf2 with tons of CoD thrown in.
Bf3 was the most obvious " mw2 is vastly outsold bfbc2 so now we want the COD audience".
They even hacked/somehow got !modern warfare.com to reroute to their battlefield website, AND the tagline. For bf3 was "this is modern warfare"
>>342092176
BC2
>>342108970
a big issue i have with the newer bf is the vehicles are just so strong, in the old games you could take out a tank for instance in a few rockets. in bf4 when i played it i would hit a tank with all my rockets and it wouldn't even get disabled
>>342092616
BF4 was more multiplayer fuckery than a story led game like BF3
>>342108434
I literally have over hours in BF4 and have never touched the campaign.
The campaign in BF3 was so absolute shit it put me off any BF singleplayer forever.Post them and prove you are not some scrub faggot being roflstomped like a newbie
>>342109185
I agree, especially with the automated defense upgrade, makes it almost pointless to fight a vehicle unless you're in one as well. It also depends on what kind of rockets you're using, the RPG is a beast against literally anything but it has no homing capabilities so it's limited.
My hang up is the fact that aircraft have infinite use of chaff, it usually goes
>I lock onto aircraft with stinger
>They chaff
>Fly out of range until chaff is usable again
>Repeat ad infinitum
Fucking frustrating when NO ONE ELSE is using AA.
>>342109185
You high?
The old games had inseat engis auto fixing vehicles they were operating or in the case of BF2 engis created a repair aura for other vehicles nearby. Having tank/apc both manned by engis could be a rape fest. That isn't even mentioning the planes which could clear entire points/squads with one bombing pass. And really this is something I really miss.
And vehicles are supposed to be a pain in the ass to down involving multiple people. I didn't play 4 but the only time post 2142 that a tank was even remotely a pain in the ass was a Rush map in BC2 where the tank could hull down on a mountain over the first point.
If you played BF2 back in the day, you will enjoy BF4 more than BF3
2142>bad company 1/2>1942/vietnam>BF2>BF4>BF3>>>>>>>>Spinoffs
>>342109536
>You high?
Why are you not?
>>342109661
you couldnt even prone in bad company. That was a shitty console port. I agree 1942 and 2142 are the best in the series, but bad company sucked a horses fat knob.
>>342109780
The first one was great, shame it was console only because it was better than BF3.
>>342109780
It was a lot of younger peoples' first BF, so they're nostalgic. Not sure why. The only good shit to come out of BC was the destructable terrain, ads, and shotgun slugs.
Everything else was a huge downgrade from previous titles.
Out of the way, opinions incoming:
BC2+Nam > 4 > Nam > 1942 > 2 > 3
I Never played 2142.
camp Gibraltar 2142
Im gonna miss jumping over the wall and running all the way to harbour and back capping.
Playing as PAC jump in the jeep as fast as you can and try speed past everyone to Central Camp hoping nobody put mines at toll station
best game ive ever played
>>342108818
That's what worrying me, I loved MoH 2010 because its campaign was exactly what BF and COD weren't.
MoH was one of the few series didn't go the 'save the world/epic battles' direction.Belly of the Beast is still one of my favorite FPS missions ever
>>342092176
Best Battlefield was Battlefield 2142.
2142
BF2. Every modern era BF game that came after was derivative compared to BF2. It had a progression system that added longevity while not breaking the game for new players, the jets felt powerful like they should, and the special forces expansion turned it into a completely different game with fun gadgets and unique vehicles.
/v/ will claim it's nostalgia because newer BF games are just clearly better, but when you've already sunk hundreds of hours into an earlier iteration of what is at its bones the same game then it's hard to call them better from that perspective.
bf1942 has the most gameplay features, it is the most enjoyable, it's map design along with bf2 is also about creating a literal field of battle, rather than a circle or corridor like the post modern warfare games in the series
>>342106914
FUCKING SWIMMING BUG
HOW FIX?
>>342112892
you don't honestly, some people brute force it by swimming forward opening the menu and going back to the game when they start to rubber band . others swim backwards
>>342113105
christ, fuck that.
Frustrating too, because the premise has me just enough to want to keep seeing where it goes, despite a total lack of stakes, reasonable characters with motivations or anything else positive that a plot should have by the fucking half way mark.
DICE should never have bothered
>>342092176
BF4
>>342092965
nigga that was an xbox arcade game.
>>342111757
Bf2 is superior on the account of having mods alone.
Base game alone had dozens active servers 10 years after launch.
PR and FH made the game a good bargain even without a sale.
Fuck planned obsolescence in games.
>vehicles after 2142 handle like shit.
>console games in best gen (PS2, GC, XHUEG) had better car handling and car physics
>land based vehicles feel like they're magnetically stuck on the ground
>stiff as hell
>"maybe they won't be as shit in BF1"
>they are
I don't get it. BF's biggest draw is vehicles yet they handle like shit. Even Halo 1's vehicles handled like fucking perfection compared to BF.
>>342094089
ive played the shit out of bf2 senpai
i still do from time to time and its not a fun experience anymore because of some really bad design decisions and bad mechanics.
>>342102361
>vehicle abuse out the ass
anon please kill your self.
>>342102361
>vehicle abuse
nigga it's battlefield
>>342111757
Agreed, Battlefield 2 was so great when it launched. Riding into battle with like 6 bros in a helicopter across the ocean was so awesome.
>>342115587
only to be destroyed by the jet or attack chopper.
my first was 2142 and I tried to play bf2 and bf3 but they weren't as great. 2 felt too stiff and 3's netcode lag always makes me angry as fuck (see guy, duck behind cover, die...).
I was pleased with the footage of BF4 I saw but was still too salty from spending 60$ on Bf3 when Bf4 came out like a year later with everything looking the same but with different maps and gameplay. I don't know but it really looks like bf4 is just bf3 with nice things in it.
>>342092176
Bad Company 2 hands down. Especially when you include the Vietnam expansion.
is it worth pirating bad company 2 for solo?
>tfw island based combat from 1942 will never come back
>All these kids in love with the piece of shit that is BF3
How times change.
>>342116005
Nah.
>>342092176
b8 hide and report
Nah it is bf2 closely followed by bfbc2
>>342116101
i'd say its one of the better campaigns compared to bf3/4
how many of you are playing on battlelog.co?
>>342116101
No but it is worth buying it for MP. You'll probably realize how shit 3 and 4's netcode is after playing this.
BF4 is the best currently. I think BF1 will top it.
>>342109336
>Div 1 jets
props to you for managing to be actually decent in jets, but it should be noted that being div 1 isn't anything if literally 95% of the players don't have a single jet kill.
>div10 tanks
yeah this about proves it. you're nothing m8
>>342117038
that wouldn't be hard, i do wonder what xp grinding map they will add like metro or lockers are
>>342116862
...Wat
BC2 has garbage hit detection due to the low 10 update simulation rate. Tons of client side headshots with the loud PING and blood spatter, and nothing. Tons of engagements up close where shots go right through, or knife stabs get the full lunge and rip out animation but does no damage.
Typical /v/ parrot bullshit praising a shitty game to fit in and spouting absolute nonsense.
>>342117483
it cant be worse than bf2's reg right?
I liked the BF4 campaign. Better than BF3.
>>342092176
BF2 > 2142 > Patched BF4 > BC1 > BC2 > Vietnam > 1942 > BF3 > Hardline
somehow forgot to add in 4 but put in hardline
>>342117571
I'd say it's worse because BC2 has more client side indicators of hits. The hitmarker, the loud PING for headshots, the blood spatters, the knife animation, etc all make it -painfully- obvious when you connect. When you get that feedback and nothing happens, it's more frustrating.
>>342092176
BF3 had the best maps and campaign
BF4 had the best gameplay
>MFW there will never be a good Battlefield that doesn't use shitty web browser plugins and crashes every 5 minutes
Is it too much to ask for a giant open world battlefield game that ISN'T dead?
>>342092176
Anything past BF2142 cannot be the best game, because that's when BF became a console series. BF4 was alright after they fixed the netcode and had more than 10hz servers.
BF1942 or BF2 are the best imo.
>>342110393
Fuck man that map was so based. Using the shotgun support could unlock was an instawin once the fight centralised to central camp.
>>342118034
Oh shit. He doesn't know about the upcoming changes?
Someone's not in the alpha.
2 > 1942 > 2142 > BFBC2 > V > 4 >> 3
Didn't play BC2V, barely played BC1, Heroes and 1943 don't count.
Hardline did not look good.
Note that I actually really like BF4, and just generally love this series.
2 has the ever-underrated Daqing Oilfields and will forever be the god-king of online shooters, even in death.
>>342096620
> tfw killing american pig with japanese sword
beautiful
>>342118581
>Upcoming changes
You mean none?
![6TOLlsk[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/O05Qikq.jpg "6TOLlsk[1].jpg")
>>342092176
Had the best experience with BF2. But that was also due to having serious clan wars.
If i would have had a clan in bf3/ 4 they would most likely have been better.
I haven't played for some time. But i did enjoy patched bf4 more then 3.
>>342093771
It just requires different skills. Less twitch aim, more smart movement/positioning and teamwork.
>>342118927
2 is still alive friend. hardline was just bf4 cops and robbers edition
>>342119096
You mean like how EA is completely ditching a web based browser for their games and are intending to have a launcher program for all your games?
Sounds like none to me.
>>342095528
That skyscraper map was my shit. Too bad it was on exactly 1 server's rotation once in a blue moon last time I played.
Anything past 2/2142 is codkiddie bullshit.
1942 and 2 a best
>>342119236
Source?
They say it's going to have a server browser, but that can also mean battlelog
>>342113583
Jesus man! You are giving me flashbacks to the leaked chopper gunner from Irag.
>>342119564
It's currently under NDA right now, so I can't provide source. You'll hear about it July 6th when the embargo on it lifts though, so not far off.
>>342119440
Explain
>>342119440
recent updates to 4 make it not half bad really
So Battlefield Hardline flopped because
>less weapons
>less maps
>boring levolution
>less customization
>barely any vehicles
>boring maps
yet, for some strange reason, I am fairly certain that Battlefield 1 is going to end up exactly like Hardline did.
OFFICIAL RANKING LIST
2>BC2>1942=VIETNAM>2142>4>BC1>3>HEROESbf1 will be as good as bf4, but will die due to lack of content pretty quick
>>342119702
Seems legit.
>>342102361
Fuck up spaz.
It's a fun game. I know you're not used to it. So fuck up nyaggh
>>342119702
So another layer on top of origin or are they working on an origin-integrated solution.
![whisper[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/5Ed8PgZ.jpg "whisper[1].jpg")
Project Reality BF2
>>342092176
2142. Modern. Fun. It's battlefield.
>>342120170
Dead.
>>342104462
I agree with everything you said. I wish more /v/dditors shared this god tier taste
>>342120298
Still at least 2 full servers per region during prime time.
>>342119778
not him but its obvious, they reduced number of classes, factions and weapons, to make it more rambo-style because consoles can't into 64 player machhes. If you had played older games you would've noticed..
>>342104462
They can't even update Battlefront properly. They should stay away rightfully so from their good games
>>342119885
Hardline was b team playing with battlefield assets.We will never get another Dead Space because of this.
is [BFG] still a thing?
>>342115692
you never played bf2
>>342110393
>bomb jumping on the really tall buildings
>dropping beacon
>sniping
>>342116862
bwahahaha
BC2 is worse than 3/4
are you on crack?
BF4>BF3>release bf4
other battlefields are no longer relevant due to being dead
>tfw BF4 had no karkand/wake island/sharqi
>got fucking oman again
>firestorm
>no seine
>no bazaar
>>342121227
shit taste
siene and bazaar were garbage
bf3 karkland was an emaciated shell of it's bf2 map, not even fun without artillery and the old gameplay
Bf2 no contest
>
>>342121559
i still have nightmares about shotgun snipers
>>342092176
>bf3
>no destruction
>cod tier ttk
>supression system
>sun shining like a gorillion stars
>bugs out the ass
>/v/ - The Vidya: why haven't you gotten a girlfriend yet?
>good
>bf4
>lelvolution is just scripted destruction
>bugs out the ass
>cod tier ttk
>dude references lmao
>good
>bfh
>more lelvolution but with scripted enviroment timers
>randum reloads xdd
>not as many bugs because Visceral is actually competent
>good
>dicefront
>good
And i can keep going you Jävla bögar
>>342092176
1942
any other answer is invalid as it shows you didn't play 1942, the best and most complex game in the series. sorry, but absolutely nothing compares to using destroyers, shoreline guns, aircraft carriers, dive bombers etc in combat.
today its easy-fly jets and lock on missiles and shit. laugh.
>>342121559
lmao
i remember this shit
BC2 Vietnam GOAT
BF3 was fun because it had a good balance between being arcady and objective.
BF4 is a superior fps/combined arms experience, but it is much less forgiving and doesn't empower the single player as much.
>post yfw a standard round of conquest turns in to King of the Hill
>Bad Company 2
>implying
Let's see:
>bloom everywhere
>monochrome maps
>32-player limit
>grinding for class equipment
>maps built around rush mode
>only four classes
>only two factions (unless you count the two locked behind DLC)
>Frostbite 2 (Literally headglitching and bullet curve: the engine)
>single player actively regressed in just about every way from the first Bad Company
>writing went from BC1's sincere, if campy, humor to tryhard shit
>instability melee with MW2 commando levels of lunge
Everything that went wrong with Battlefield (aside from vehicle regen) started in Bad Company 2, and if you try to tell people this, they'll just stammer something like
>At least they didn't charge us for extra content!
Wrong. The only free content was tweaking maps for modes they weren't available for before (many of which were already on the disk at launch) and a couple shit weapons from some online signup (again, on the disk) The actual new maps/vehicles (Vietnam) cost money.
>At least it isn't completely blue!
Good point! Some maps are completely brown, some are completely gray, and some are completely green. I guess three colors are better than one!
>>342124639
>The maps were way better!
Absolutely wrong. Need a reason? I can give you five.
1. Cold War
2. Nelson Bay
3. Valparaiso
4. Laguna Presa
5. White Pass
Every single one of those maps is worse than Operation Metro. Stupid tightly packed shit that felt like particularly claustrophobic Call of Duty maps, even with 32 players. Not to mention the fact that every map (except a couple of the Vietnam maps) was this awful straight line of points due to the maps being designed, again, entirely around Rush mode. All of the Battlefield series' worst maps are in Bad Company 2.
>The buildings were destructible!
EVERYTHING was destructible in Red Faction: Guerilla's multiplayer. That didn't make it good.
>It's just the most fun :^) le funfield may may XDDD
Nigger.
I can't believe how infuriating it is that people, even here, talk about how piss-poor the Battlefield series has become while giving Bad Company 2 a pass. It is the single worst Battlefield game that isn't Free2Play, a piss-poor attempt to ape Call of Duty, and it negatively influenced DICE's game design to such an extent that it may never recover.
Fuck Bad Company 2, and fuck all the sycophants who defend it.
>>342121760
>>342124539
>mfw still cant see shit in the game because of all the effects
>>342123358
Fuckin' A loved me some Hill 137, amazing sound design.
>>342092441
Hardly. I find the map design of BF4 really bad, personally, a step down from BF3, and BF3 didn't have stellar maps either.
I'd pay so much money for a new battlefield game with the current engine, but with all BF2 maps.
Darqin oilfield, Fushee Pass, Karkand, Jalalabad, Sharqi, Ghost Town, Cleansweep, Blue Pearl, Mashtuur, Kubra... So many good maps.
It's the small things that I miss the most from earlier battlefield games... Remember how killing a tank in BF2 didn't require 5 rockets if you weren't perfectly position in its rear? Just shoot two rockets in the tracks and it goes burning, requires a little bit of aiming, but it rewards you for it... Shit like that.
Also miss the lack of lock-on weapons.
>>342124639
>>342124736
>having an autistic tantrum because someone likes something you don't
top cuck m8
