>that downgrade
Was the game shown back in 2014 running on NX?
who gives a hell
how many times can you maroons discuss the same thing over and over again
>>342024679
Oh look. it's you again.
The guy who can't tell the difference between a teaser trailer that isn't even in the game to prove a concept and cropped youtube stream screenshot of a e3 demo presented 9+ months before the game is released.
Also you should have completely expected this shit since 2006 when every game has a teaser that isn't in any way a full representation of the final product shown off years before the game is even released.
>>342024679
No. The Video showed back in 2014 was a video on no nintendo hardware because it wasn't part of the game in any way.
Welcome to Teaser trailers.
>>342024679
Wasn't it just a cinematic teaser trailer? Have you fags never heard of that?
>>342024679
It was pre-rendered on a PC
>>342024679
It's okay when Nintendo does it anon
Nice one OP! 0.13 cents have been deposited into your paypal account.
Thank you for making /v/ a shitty place!
It's never not okay when Nintendo does it.
>>342026301
>Quick! Point the camera up so nobody can see it!
>>342026301
No it isn't
But this has happened on every hyped up game and at least one faggot has to make threads like these and later post "It's okay when (insert one of the big 3 here) does it". Like they think they are clever.
Happened with Division, Watchdogs. DA3, Halo 5, hell even Hyrul warriors.
Just random faggots being faggots.
>>342024679
>running on NX?
Yeah anon. A whole new fucking engine with different shaders, aliasing, e.t.c it was just the NX version.
People are this retarded.
>>342024679
>See that mountain? YOU CAN CLIMB IT!!!!
>>342027262
First time someone said that and they weren't wrong.
>this desperate to troll for replies
I would tell you to kill yourself but I'll just off myself because this board sucks so much.
Oh hey look it's this thread again
>>342026301
This looks like a gamecube game
Why does it look so fucking bad? Why don't they make it look good? What the shit is nintendo's fetish with being the inferior console graphically every time? The game honestly looks fun to play from the mechanics and gameplay, but holy shit man it looks like a PS2 game.
>>342024798
this
it's depressing how many /v/-goers are so young that they STILL believe games will actually look like their E3 footage
How many times can the same thread be made in one day? I swear i've seen that image 10 times today alone.
>>342024798
>>342025271
>>342025657
>>342025965
>>342027609
>Its okay when nintendo does it
kys
>>342024679
It is down grade but what do you expect a lot of games do this now. The only game I have seen that looks better graphical after its e3 reveal was alien isolation.
>>342028014
look at
>>342026648
>>342028014
Leafy go home.
>>342028112
He forgot the Witcher 3 down grade.
>>342028112
look at
>>342028014
>>342024679
OP is a blind retard for not being able to see the small blades of grass on the ground. There are still tall fields of grass in the demo.
>tfw Nintendo is still using the graphics/artsyle/animation from Wind Waker which is over a decade old.
Almost as lame as using a decade old engine. I'm looking at you Bethesda.
>>342024679
>>342024679
You have literally posted this image about 200 times since E3.
I kid you not.
And since then you've even gone out of your way to make the bottom one look even worse.
Just shut up already and get banned
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOrwRtDWWhc
>>342028326
>that pop in
I really hope the nx version isn't plauged by this cause the game looks really fun but damn.
>>342028237
Can't name them all.
I would be here listing 90% of all games released since 2006
>2016
>Caring about graphics still
>>342028456
>actually looks amazing
OP BTFO
>>342028326
My god, they've learned how to use fire. We're all doomed.
>>342028469
What did you expect from a E3 demo made months before E3 happened.
I'm sure there will still be pop in on launch but Nintendo has been pretty damn good and squashing that shit before launch.
>>342024679
Bottom screen is a lot less saturated and blurry as shit so much of the detail is lost, otherwise they are certainly comparable. Above was done in-engine and in real time, don't know why anyone is calling it a bullshot that's not what they are.
This isn't even an uncommon practice.
Tons of video games since the first E3 have pulled a bait and switch on people with footage and previews that look nothing like the final product.
I'm not mad that you want to rip on Nintendo, I'm mad that you're a piece of shit casual that got into games last week.
>>342026301
Name one large-scale open world game that doesn't have pop-in
I fucking dare you
>>342028849
Legend of Legacy
>>342024679
Top is supposed to be a pic on NX, while bottom runs live on wii u.
>>342028337
>mfw
Am I the only one who's sick to death of cell-shading?
Am I the only who thinks it's an easy cop-out for lazy devs when it comes to producing great graphics?
>>342029121
He said in the fucking video it was running on the wii-u
https://youtu.be/vga0QYSOuIc?t=87
>>342028962
I meant one in which EVERYTHING is open, not separated by loading screens.
Alright cheap shit, how about a console game?
>>342028337
Ohhhh, you're one of those edgy fucks who wants Zelda to be dark and gritty like your FPS games, aren't you?
>>342030024
its funny how people are defending the downgrade saying thats its youtubes fault for making it look like that.
yet the video you just posted, which is also a youtube video, looks so much better than how zelda looks currently.
why are nintendo fans so fucking delusional? just accept the fact that the game was downgraded.
>>342024679
Top
>press kit shot (extra AA) of a location picked by the devs to show off the game's best graphical feature (tall grass) and show a nice vista while minimizing its biggest weaknesses (shitty LOD distance and lousy trees)
Bottom
>cherrypicked low-quality stream capture of empty ground
>>342030553
You fucking what? Everything in that was pre-rendered you fucking cuck
>>342030621
this desu
>>342026617
I noticed this too
>>342030720
>i-it was all prerendered!
>the graphics still look like that! its just a different part of the game!
>the graphics only look like that because it was just an E3 demo
MAKE UP YOUR FUCKING DELUSIONAL MINDS!
>>342030354
>Dark and gritty
How about normal graphics with no distortions, filters, blurring and other warping?
>>342029994
yes you are
cel shading stands the test of time and ages much slower than "current graphics"
>>342024679
Gonna keep posting that stupid comparison between the teaser and that blurry blurry stream image to try and trick people?
>>342031052
>i-it was all prerendered!
Yes, what they showed us at E3 2014 was pre-rendered, anyone with half a brain can see that.
>the graphics still look like that! its just a different part of the game!
You'd have to be delusional to think that in-game footage could live up to pre-rendered. Nobody here thinks thatbesides you.
>the graphics only look like that because it was just an E3 demo
That's a real possibility, desu. They've still got a while to finish the game, and demos do usually look worse than the finished product.
>>342030553
>saying thats its youtubes fault for making it look like that.
Uh? what? It was Twitch. and yes Twitch has bad bitrate. also, cherry piking and not the same location.
Can some one post that image of the witcher 3 downgrade comparing pic related to ingame?
I am trying to go there and see for my self.
>>342031462
forgot pic
>>342030354
Calm down kiddo, I simply meant using a different "art style", gritty or not, wouldn't hurt instead of milking the shit out of cell-shading.
And yeah I would prefer if Zelda wasn't a kids cartoon 100% of the time but that doesn't mean it has to be edgeville.
>>342028014
Nice way to show arguments proving nothing
>>342028962
https://youtu.be/jAHZ2Ei8pQ4?t=2m51s
You fucking cuck it's LITERAL pop-in
>>342028337
How much blind you have to be? They are both different.
WW was more cutesy, SD-like
BotW took inspiration from Ghibli movies
>>342028849
But you don't understand, it's not okay when Nintendo does anything.
I think the gameplay looks fun as fuck but the game really does look like shit graphically and, somehow, despite looking like a Gamecube game, it still has some of the worst pop-in I've seen in a while.
They sort of half-assed the style too so it's semi-cell shaded, or something. Compared to WW with it's thick lines and bold colors, this washed-out, blurry, low-res Zelda looks like a hot fucking mess.
All that being said, visuals are never more than a bonus for me when it comes to games. If the game plays well, that's really the main thing that matters.
What fucking infuriates me though is that you goddamn children lose your shit any time a game doesn't look as good as it's reveal trailer EXCEPT for this one because it's Nintendo and it's Zelda. Why the fuck can't you admit that the game looks like garbage? That has zero effect on whether or not it will be a good game. Why does it have to be 10/10 in every department? Why do you have to stick your fingers in your years while screaming that it looks better than TW3/Horizon/God himself and anyone who doesn't agree is a shill?
I swear I thought Nintoddlers was at least mostly just a meme before this E3.
>>342024679
>gameplay is fun
>graphics are bad
>game is bad
>>342031978
LMAOOO
yo this site is funny as fuck sometimes.
>>342031442
>Nobody here thinks that
you obviously have not been to the zelda threads when they started showing streams of the game.
>>342028496
>I would be here listing 90% of all games released since 2006
Feels bad man.
This industry is fucked.
>>342032784
seriously, if that were true Dwarf Fortress would be literally the worst game ever created instead of the best
>>342029994
Nope. I was sick of them by the end of the 6th gen.
>>342033003
>thinking the minority of retards on /v/ accounts for everyone
