are these worth playing? if so how do they emulate?
I've played through Drakengard 1 and i can tell you wholeheartedly do NOT waste your time playing it. It's fucking stale ass gameplay does not make up for it's actually fairly interesting story. If you're interested look up a lets play or read the wiki for the story.
Drakengard 2 i honestly can't say never played it.
as for emulation i'm sorry i also don't know.
>>341954105
>lets play
stopped reading there
>>341953871
I reccomend playing a bit to see what some had to suffer through but it didn't emulate well a couple years ago.
The story is good though.
>Drakenguard 2 was my first ever exposure to a "muso"
>Didn't even know what a "muso" was at the time
>Read online later that Drakenguard 2 was dogshit in comparison
>PS2 disk actually stopped working after I beat the game one
>>341954105
I see you aren't chosen.
I played both like crazy. Both play like off-brand dynasty warriors games. The most interesting thing about each game is the weapons, you can watch them change shape as they level up and each weapon has its own twisted story you learn as you max them out. I completed them both 100 just for the weapons, but in hindsight it wasn't fun.
last I checked they emulate like shite. They're not really worth playing, but the story is interesting/messed up and the weapons are cool.
>tfw i'm only one who likes 2
NOT MUH TARO GAME
nier the only good game taro made. drakengard was always dogshit.
>>341955292
the combat is better, the music is ok but nowe is a dumb twat.
>>341955474
and there was nowe twas gunna happen
Drakengard 1 is a glorious trainwreck of a story but plays like ass. 2 is a normal story, maybe a but more retarded than most, with minimal gameplay improvement.
Maybe it's one of those games you are better off watching on yt senpai.
