>>341898104
You mean graphics alone are not enough, I'm so sick and tired of seeing shitty upscales of games and people pretend the graphics look good.
Look at the fucking lightning. It's not good. 480p with no aa masks this, bloating it up makes it more obvious

>>341898104
how much longer until this game gets a HD remaster for wii u?
but with normal controls then

>It's an OP asks a poorly structured question, and the doesn't stick around to clarify episode.

>>341898104
Do you have fun shitposting on /v/?
What if there was a 60 dollar game about shitposting on /v/? Now that would be a waste.

Think,son.

Motion controls are not and never will be fun.

>>341900938
It works for games like Metroid Prime, simple aim and click or aim and drag. But for the other games it's just a chore I agree

>>341898701

i dont see any lightning in that screenshot.

>>341901371
Nintendo's Lightning I meant

>>341901467
Rosalina?

>>341901519
Not quite

>>341898701
I'm sorry PC weener but that game looks better than any game right now in the PC market .
Art direction is GOAT. The shader that deals with far away objects is something you'll never see on a PC game.

>>341901850
Better isn't a provable statement, ergo ignoring the namecalling I'd like you to point out that knowing you've said reflects on having actual read, understood and countered my response. It's as if you're merely just talking to yourself.