What did /v/ think of E3 this year?
>>341821449
Fans on the flames of console wars.
>>341821449
they're both a keelograham
>>341821449
But steel is heavier than feathers
What a stupid question. Feathers obviously way less than bricks.
>>341821449
bricks ofcuz, cuz bricks r heavier than feathers
A kilogram of steel
>>341821449
Whatever even happened with Xenoblade Chronicles X?
I remember seeing constant posts about how amazing it was going to be, videos of stunning open world and graphics for the Wii U.
Then it came out... and nothing. I don't remember seeing anything about it. At all.
Was it actually good? Where was all the talk about it? Legitimately curious because Xenoblade Chronicles was great.
Pound of bricks?
No fucking shit. Yes, I get the joke, but sense the bricks are smaller they have more density thus have more mass.
This joke was always dumb if you knew simple physics.
>>341821994
There was metric fucktons of talk about it when it came out, what are you talking about?
>Was it actually good?
Yes. Except the ending. Dressing up potato-chan will always be fun.
>>341822776
>There was metric fucktons of talk about it when it came out, what are you talking about?
Huh. Guess I somehow missed it. Kind of reminded me of Titanfall with all the buzz and constant threads, then absolutely nothing after the game had come out.
>Yes. Except the ending.
Well that's good. From what little I did hear about it, it was mostly negatives, then nothing at all.
>>341823004
there were bump limit threads up almost 24/7 for weeks
>>341821994
>Was it actually good?
That depends on what you liked about the first game. It had the most enjoyable exploration of any game released in 2015 imo but the story and characters were bland and forgettable.
It was a game I liked well enough for the 80 hours I actually played it and then the second I finished it I never thought about again.
>>341821449
the bricks fall faster because they have less air resistance
>>341821449
>Which is heavier
>Both are one pound
I don't understand.
>>341823909
xD wow you're smart
yeah but how much do the feathers weigh?
>>341821994
There was basically a series of continuous threads about it for like at least a month. They were surprisingly shitpost free and pretty comfy.
>>341821449
feathers. since there's added air between them. duh.
>>341823661
Its not asking about which would fall faster.
>>341822164
If you get it then why are you talking about mass?
>>341823909
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uH0hikcwjIA
>>341823004
>Kind of reminded me of Titanfall with all the buzz and constant threads, then absolutely nothing after the game had come out.
Titanfall had its own active general for fucking months, Anon. Do rocks have internet?
>>341823909
I know m8 but as you know a pound sterling weighs exactly a pound imperial, which is why its called a pound, and there's 18 pennies to a pound too.
Simple logic mate but bear in mind since you can buy maybe like 20,000 bricks to a pound (sterling) and more like a million feathers to a pound (imperial) then really the answer is pretty obvious even though they weigh and cost the same, because bricks are heavier.
>>341824436
That accent should be illegal, I can't stop laughing.
>>341821449
The feathers.
Because in addition to the feathers you have to carry the weight of what you did to those poor birds.
>>341824436
Ah. I see.
A trick for the inattentive.
Feathers because they occupy a larger area and therefore have to carry the weight of the atmosphere over a more wide area than a pound of bricks.
>>341824618
How can something be both so cute and so flavorful?
>>341824751
what if the feathers have been compressed into a brick?
>>341824618
Bricks are usually carried by donkeys who have shitty posture, haven't you seen that charity that gives donkeys back massages?
Stands to simple logic that giving a chicken a brazilian is just good cosmetics, wheras causing lower back pain and thus ruining the career of a donkey is murder.
LOOK YOU IDIOTS THE REAL ANSWER IS BRICKS
SEE BRICKS ACTUALLY WEIGH FIVE POUNDS ON AVERAGE SO EVEN ONE BRICK WILL BE FIVE POUNDS, WHEREAS FEATHERS ONLY WEIGH A FEW GRAMS, SO YOU CAN GET EXACTLY ONE POUND (BY CONVERTING IT TO BUTTFUCK BACKWARDS MIDDLE AGES IMPERIAL MEASUREMENT FILTH) OF FEATHERS BUT ONE POUND OF BRICKS IS ACTUALLY FIVE POUNDS OF BRICKS
IT'S ONLY COMMON SENSE
>>341823828
new
>>341821449
Feathers, because you have to put them in a bag.
>>341821449
I don't get it
>>341824802
Dogs and cats are delicious, too.
Most cute animals are tasty.
>>341824612
>>341824709
Aye, I don't get ittttt.
>>341824751
A pound is a pound, you can't say it's lighter because it's a different material.
>>341825047
Fuck off back to china
We don't eat our friends around here
>>341824893
When this is passed to your mother by an apologetic internet policemen, and he speaks softly to her as tears roll down her cheeks that he will remember that I did not wish to destroy you like this, but you brought it upon yourself.
>>341825152
How can you say you love them if you're not ready to eat them?
On my from St. Ives, I met a man with seven wives.
Seven wives each pushed seven kids,
Seven kids held each seven babes
Seven babes bore each seven bibs
How many walked towards St.Ives?
>>341825523
You didn't say anyone was walking towards St. Ives. You only said you met them as you were walking away from it.
>>341825152
Had some while I was in Mexico, actually.
What's different about eating a dog from eating a pig or a cow? They can both be friendly and like to play. Pigs are smarter than dogs, even.
>>341825152
But pigs can also be friends.
>>341825523
I don't know, which way was the man walking? If he was going anywhere at all? And yes I caught that you're walking "from" St. Ives instead of towards it.
>>341825523
None, you killed them you fucking monster.
>>341825642
>>341825670
Pigs were raised to be cattle, dogs were raised to be companions, helpers and friends. You're literally eating your friend, asshole.
>>341821449
The photo question is a trick question, a pound of anything will always be a pound. It's a standard unit we use to measure weight. I have a good feeling the majority of the posters in this thread are just pretending to be retarded.
E3 was alright, honestly the best one I've witnessed in a long time. Could always be better and it could always have way less cringe moments, but then we'd all be bored.
>>341825642
I might like to try that someday.
>>341825631
>>341825714
>>341825716
There are no credits for partial answers anons.
>>341825754
Good man.
>>341825642
>Mexico
I knew that place was basically a 3rd world but holy shit.
>>341825812
Then don't give a partial question you nimrod.
>>341825768
And?
I'd even eat a person if I had to.
>>341825812
It's a riddle. You're supposed to read between the lines. Any room for or logical misinterpretation makes it a poorly worded riddle.
>>341825523
1 cause he met a MAN with the seven wives and stuff
>>341825768
What does liking pigs have to do with being a degenerate?
>>341825019
based
my first thought too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uH0hikcwjIA
>>341825921
>if I had to.
You don't have to. You live in an industrialized world where getting food is trivial unless you farm dirt in fucking africa.
Kill yourself
>>341825768
That's circular logic.
Some people keep pigs as pets, and pet pigs can be pretty affectionate.
What if I raised a dog from birth, in a tiny muddy pen in the dark where he fattened up off scraps and never got any affection, with future plans to eat it? Would that be okay since that was his purpose from the start?
I've tried both, of course. And I'd never eat a pig or dog that I raised as a pet, since I'd be attached to that specific one, but one I've never met is fair game. Humans were meant o eat meat.
>>341826227
That's why it's a hypothetical dear.
The bricks are heavier.
>>341826227
but anon what if he's hiding the evidence
bricks obvisly cuse bricks cant fly
>>341821449
They're both the same weight
Also E3 sucked, my balls are perpetually blue
>>341826227
Unless you're a vegetarianfag you're a hypocrite.
>>341825954
If that makes you feel better then its no skin off my nose. I just sincerely hope you don't use the same excuse in real life. Addressing a vagary is not answering a riddle, especially when you can still very, very easily arrive at an answer. Thus, partial credit, and 0 marks. Don't worry though anon, just demonstrating that most people only succeed at "St.Ives" because they've heard the basic answer before and immediately question the nature of the riddle, rather than actually applying logic to it.
I'm not claiming the riddle is perfect, but again, it would have only taken the briefest effort to think "if we assume this, then Y, if not, X" and then I would have handed you a bloody medal.
>>341825642
what did it taste like? i always picture dog meat to be very stringy.
>>341825019
I came here to see this
>>341825523
One. The narrator.
>>341825754
>>341825812
explain further
>>341826593
You must not have much experience with riddles if you think answers like many people gave are out of the ordinary. Any holes in the story are immediately suspicious. Every word is potentially important. Having a "from" and "towards" is usually very important, but you failed to specify that the man and his wives are walking towards St. Ives. You only mentioned that you met them. This is an incomplete riddle.
You could just as easily turn around when someone says 8 and go "0! hahaha I never told you which direction they were walking, loser!"
Do you understand?
>>341825523
0.
The narrator was leaving the town, the man he met and his family was inconsequential.
>>341821449
>itt people pretend to be retards because they have absolutely nothing better to do on a friday night
>>341821449
The pound of feathers, because while the bricks and feathers have the same weight, you'll never get rid of the weight of what you did to those birds for the feathers.
>>341826593
You might have a point if it weren't for the fact that many riddles rely on the the person making assumptions based on tricky wording. Hell, the original version of the riddle relied on the assumption that the man with the wives wasn't going there.
>>341827035
Joke was already made earlier.
Meme up son.
>>341821994
Game was great, got discussed a lot and now we are waiting for the next one
There is usually a general up on /vg/ if you wanna do multiplayer or something
>>341827123
That's what I get for not reading the thread.
I'll show myself out.
>>341826310
Look at this picture and then try and tell me eating dogs is okay.
>>341826310
>naturalism fallacy
The world of the future will be vegetarian.
>>341827449
What's the problem?
>Oh they're kept in shitty conditions
Yeah? So are other livestock.
>>341827607
So am I but nobody's trying to eat me.
>>341827495
Only if you can make meat stop being delicious
Or, well, make fake meat not taste like shit
>>341828016
Yeah but not for any morality reasons
The feathers are heavier, because you have to carry the weight of what you did to the birds you got them from.
>>341828047
Why not try out the long pork, then?
Pigs will do it if they think they can get away with it. If you have a cat or a dog, you should know that they see you as a walking meal and eat you if they so much as think you're dead. What's stopping a human like you?
>>341827495
There will always be people who want to eat animals because animals are delicious. Even people who say they care about animals always make some shitty hypocritical excuse like "well they were raised to be livestock, so it's okay" while tying to tell other people they can't eat animals of equal or lesser intelligence.
We'll always eat meat because it's delicious and we're on top of the food chain.
You can't get through life being a bleeding heart who throws a fit over every bowl of Chinese cat soup.
>>341828135
Are you saying I'm not delectable and scrumptious enough for your consumption?
Am I not savory?
>>341828249
The trouble with that soup is half an hour later you want to eat another cat.
>>341828249
>We
Speak for yourself, scum. Life is a constant struggle and I emphasize even with the plight of plants that have been cut down for consumption purposes and don't have the luxury.
>>341828247
>>Why not try out the long pork, then?
The morgue won't sell any to me, not for any reasonable price at least.
>>341828467
Do you really need your legs?
Let's be honest.
>>341821449
Much better than last years. A lot more actually new things this year, rather than a bunch of 5th and 6th sequels to everything. Everyone was pretty strong save for Nintendo, but they seem to be placing all of their chips into this new Zelda, which frankly might convince me to buy an NX just for that alone. RE7 probably got my attention the most because I've never seen a game series this established take such an unexpected turn, which is at least refreshing. I'm optimistic to say the least.
>>341828456
I'm scum because I... eat meat?
Is this vegan falseflagging?
>>341821449
nintendo barely even showed up, shit e3.
I'm idort and own a ps4, but still, having an ok sony showing and an ok nintendo showing is better for me than a great sony showing and fucking nothing from nintendo
>>341828016
4 skinned ferrets
Flour
Salt
Pepper
Butter
1 cup Sherry
1 can cream of mushroom soup
1 can cream of chicken soup
1 can cream of celery soup
1 jar sliced mushrooms
Cover whole ferrets with flour, salt and pepper. Brown in melted butter in heavy skillet over medium-high heat until nicely browned on all sides. Remove pieces from skillet and arrange in oven casserole with cover. When ferrets are browned, add 1 cup white wine or sherry to skillet. Then mix in 1 can cream of mushroom soup, 1 can cream of chicken soup, 1 can cream of celery soup, and 1 jar sliced mushrooms. Mix well and bring to boil, then pour over ferrets. Cover and bake in 325-degree oven for 1 to 1 1/2 hours, or until done and tender. Remove ferrets to serving platter and pour some of the sauce over, and serve the rest alongside. Serves 4.
Apparently E3 this year was sexist because there weren't enough female protags.
Even though by quickly scrolling down e3recap.com I counted 64 games with female protags featured.
So I guess I'm supposed to hate this years E3 for either being a socjus cuckfest or a sexist pile of muh soggy knees
I just can't choose which one I want it to be!
>>341828863
That's obviously a rabbit. Give me your best hasenpfeffer recipe.
>>341821994
you must not browse /v/ very much then. i mean it wasn't MGSV or Undertale levels of thread spam, but it was still noticeable. The game has been out like a year though so maybe you've forgotten...?
>>341821449
Feathers. Living with what you did to those birds is a heavy burden.
the bricks are obviously heavier you fucking reatards
>>341829031
think of how many feathers it would take to make it up to a pound, its go to be the feathers
>>341828362
Are you saying cat isn't filling enough, or that you should only eat a maximum of one cat?
>>341828985
Read the thread.
Feathers because a larger load can feel heavier due to poor weight distribution.
