>turned Zelda into Witcher 3 ripoff with some survival elements slapped on it
>people praise it to heaven because it's the only game WiiU will ever get
Zelda fags will defend this
>>341722128
If the graphic wouldn't suck, the game would be great for kids.
The Witcher 3 audience is 18+ and you can cut other enemies heads off, so not intended for children.
NINTENFAGGOTS BTFO
>>341722128
I think people praise it more because Nintendo is doing more than a simple copy paste job of the previous title like a lot of their franchises.
>>341722227
Could you remove the pants or is only by outfits?
>Witcher 3 ripoff
>survival elements
Either drink more bleach or stop altogether.
>>341722415
That's amusing. I've never watched Witcher. Is the enemy getting staggered or something?
>>341722868
Yes.
Back on release, there was a really broken build you could do by choosing specific Alchemy and Fast Attack Skills. When combined with two specific alchemy potions, you become an infinite whirlwind that has infinite attacks, infinite HP since your hits restore HP and the fastest DPS in the game.
You can't do it as effectively anymore. It was nerfed into the ground.
BTFO
>>341722128
It'll probably be the first Zelda game to actually be good since fucking Link to the Past.
>>341722817
yes, you can remove the pants. link starts the game without pants.
Why does every game have to be a clone to you faggots?
>>341723090
Go to bed, Arin.
>>341722128
woah they even copied the big tree in distant
>>341722128
How is it a witcher 3 ripoff?
>>341723090
>Le epic OoT is bad meme
Every Zelda game to be released since ALttP is good, if not great.
>>341722128
But the WiiU already has more games than any other platform this generation, except the 3DS.
>>341722415
>>341723064
>>341723264
>Nintenyearolds are this mad
Calm down, Jimmy.
>>341722128
I've had shits that played better than The Witcher 3.
That's such a low bar for quality even the worse Zelda beats it.
Though I do agree that games on Nintendo systems are overhyped. For example, Metroid Prime is touted as one of the best games ever by Nintendo fans because it's one of the few FPS style games on Nintendo systems and Nintendo fans simply don't know any better.
>>341723264
That's a volcano, anon
>>341723329
>He's a shitcher fag
>all these people trying to start a witcher/Zelda war
What do these games have in common besides an open world? And why not enjoy both? Sometimes it feels like /v/ is just different marketers arguing with eachother
>Angry Nintendo fan was the person spamming Witcher 3 WEBMs
Makes sense, Witcher 3 was an exclusive...Exclusively not on Nintendo.
>>341723264
>looks like shit now
>fetch quest
The Witcher fags are the worst, truly
>>341723405
So they ripped off Uncharted 4 too? Woaaahhh
>>341722227
>>341723479
There's literally zero fetch quest in the 120 hours of gameplay in Witcher 3. Can't say the same about Zelda U.
>>341722128
Super Mario Maker
Pokken Tournament
Bayonetta 1 & 2
Zelda remakes
Splatoon
Smash 4
Mario 3D World
Donkey Kong: Tropical Freeze
The Witcher series sucks, stop feeling like Nintendo stole your beloved game nerd
>>341723264
>>341723064
>>341722415
So was it you who has been shitposting in Witcher threads for over a year now?
Buttmad it didn't come out on Wii U so you spent an entire year posting the same webms over and over?
>>341723429
I've never played Witcher. I just think its cute that you're trying to make BotW seem better, by bashing a completely separate game.
>>341722415
>>341723064
>>341723329
Oh my god, it's literally fucking Runescape
>people actually praise this game's combat
>>341723996
Which one are you talking about?
>>341723996
I didn't praise the combat. Again, read my post >>341723834
Trying to make one game look good, by bashing a completely different game, is retarded.
If you're game is good, it should be able to stand on its own merits. If you have to bash another game to look good in comparison, then maybe your game isn't as good as you thought it was.
>>341724194
>Trying to make one game look good, by bashing a completely different game, is retarded.
Aaaaaand where did I do that? The thread in fact started, when someone tried to make Witcher look good by comparing it to BotW. Clearly BotW ripped Witcher off, and Witcher is so much better, even though Witcher is Runescape 3D. Just look at those webms, they're literally just spamming attacks and tanking damage. That's not good gameplay.
You're just turning things around, nobody is trying to make BotW look good by bashing Witcher, it's the opposite. We're just pointing out that it's not working.
>>341722415
>>341723064
wtf is this shit
Let's see, there's Pikmin, and Bayonetta 2, and Star Fox, and Splatoon, and Super Mario 3D world, and Smash for the Wii U, and Tropical freeze, and Super Mario Maker, And Xenoblade Chronicles X, and WWHD, and TPHD, and Nintendo Land, and Wonderful 101 and now Zelda: BotW.
That's a lot of games, OP.
>>341722128
>People keep saying this is a "Return to the style of LoZ"
I think people who say this have never actually played the first LoZ. LoZ is basically what Link's Awakening became years later, if anything this is more like Adventure of Link or a generic Open World game.
>>341724423
>The thread in fact started, when someone tried to make Witcher look good by comparing it to BotW
The entire thread's literally someone trying to make Witcher looks bad by posting bugged webm.
Not sure why would the Zelda fans do that since aren't even in the same genre.
>>341724423
>We're
You mean you.
I get it, you're upset your game got announced, and it looked like shit. I know /v/ is the home for Nintoddlers, but it doesn't mean you can act completely arrogant to facts.
>>341724561
OP started this by comparing Zelda and Witcher. OP established this idea of comparing the two, so it's no surprise that some people would have the opposite opinion.
>toddlers mad that they're the only system who didn't get GOTY
Hilarious and pathetic
wew lad
>>341723090
Link to the Past is the weakest out of the first eight or so games.
>>341724592
Oh my fucking god, this post is just full of delicious low IQ idiocy.
>I get it, you're upset your game got announced
Oh yes, I'm so upset that a game that I'd be interested in got announced - Except it didn't get announced. It got announced years ago, we just saw some new gameplay footage.
>and it looked like shit.
Subjective, I think it looks good. It looks like Nintendo really put a lot of thought into what makes this genre great, and they borrowed concepts from many other games and they're combining all of the best things into one game.
>I know /v/ is the home for Nintoddlers
Fucking leave then if you feel that way.
>but it doesn't mean you can act completely arrogant to facts.
>arrogant to the facts
Might wanna look up what the word "arrogant" means. You are honestly one of the hugest retards I've ever seen on /v/ and I've been here for 8 years.
>>341722128
My fucking side the salt is real
>>341724783
>OP compares the games
>you, and yes, its obvious you are the assblasted nintenfag, start posting webms making the witcher look like shit
>trying to make zelda seem better, by showing the witchy as a buggy game
Stay deluded, fanboy.
>>341723395
Metroid Prime is overrated as fuck, not because it's a FPS, but because the exploration/puzzles in it are weak as hell.
>>341724434
the "goty" of turbo casual faggots that suck the cock of devs based on twitter popularity and kotaku coverage.
How is something that's been in development for longer than the Witcher 3 has been in existence a ripoff?
>>341723560
Explain to me what a 'fetch quest' is.
>>341722128
lol wtf why is Link wearing high heels??
>>341724539
>LoZ is basically what Link's Awakening became years later, if anything this is more like Adventure of Link
What the fuck am I reading?
>>341722128
Whats even Witcher about this? do Witcher babies really think their garbage drowner killing and letter reading simulator is the first open world game?
>>341725037
I don't save webms of shitty games, because that's not something I'm interested in. But hey, keep telling yourself that it's impossible for two people to enjoy Zelda games, yet not enjoy shitty damage tanking Witcher games.
>trying to make zelda seem better, by showing the witchy as a buggy game
Again, it's literally the opposite. You're trying to make Zelda look bad by comparing it to Witcher, and you're upset now that it flew back in your face.
>>341724795
I played the witcher on ps4, I didn't like it. I thought it was boring from the beginning. Why can't you take it when someone disagrees with you?
You're all cancer
>Any other platform gets a decent looking game
>Sonyggers show up in droves and leave salty posts everywhere
Shouldn't you be happy with all your great exclusives or do you not feel like rewatching Uncharted for the x-th time?
>>341723321
TP and SS were shit
>>341725194
What the fuck is wrong with you. Are you that attached to a brand that you've gone mentally retarded?
>>341725297
can you explain to me the logic behind a sonyfag posting webms that make a ps4 game look bad.
i dont follow it myself.
I've beaten every home console Zelda. They're not all perfect, some of them aren't even good games. But overall it's a series worth checking out.
Witcher on the other hand sucks. I played the first one for a few hours and I got bored with it and stopped. Didn't even bother with 2 or 3. It's just incredibly boring combat, uninteresting world / characters, etc. Mediocre garbage.
But we're being told that Witcher is so much better than Zelda, and all the little Witcher fags are so upset that people have a different opinion. How could anyone possibly prefer the better series? Shame on us I guess.
>>341722128
The butthurt this game is creating is great.
Shitposters are basically parrotting non stop shit like "muh graphics" and "b-but it copied *insert game here*".
>>341725321
Yeah, you're right, I'm clearly a fanboy for preferring fun games like Zelda, and not damage tanking garbage like Witcher. Keep proving me right.
>>341725128
Go to shitty location and bring me back one bear ass I can't be fucked to do it.
>>341725514
Jesus, you need to take a break from /v/, you sound really bitter.
>>341725464
not really "parroting shit" when it looks like fucking ass, bullshotted hard on teasers, rips off every other game we've had for decades bringing nothing new to the table but will still hold a $60 price tag and be praised as Wii Us best game, which is probably true sadly enough.
>>341724423
> even though Witcher is Runescape 3D. Just look at those webms,
Are you really this dumb
https://youtu.be/hYwRa5egX1I?t=9m7s
>>341725464
Yeah but be real, it's entering the open world explore genre not only late, buttwo years delayed :^)
So are you guys going to spend $300+ on a new console, or will you be playing the shitty version of Zelda?
>>341723705
Don't put the trash heap shit show that was pokken tournament on the list with the rest of those good-decent titles. And put W101 on there.
>Its another "Nintendo sucks thread" because people are not allowed to like things
>>341723705
Dude Pokken Tournament blows two dicks at once.
>>341722227
Damn, Link is /fit/ af.
>>341725669
Okay?
>>341725812
I want to FUCK Utage-sensei
>>341725464
>"b-but it copied *insert game here*".
I honestly think the fact that it copied so many different games, is one of its greatest assets. I see elements of Dark Souls, Assassin's Creed, Dragon's Dogma, Monster Hunter, etc. Best case scenario, it takes the best elements of all of these games and combines them all into one.
Of course, fags will try to turn this around and turn it into a negative thing. Like "oh my god it copied all these games! How pathetic, Nintendo can't even come up with their own ideas!"
>>341724795
You do know most people who own a Nintendo console on /v/, also play on PC? Sony and Microsoft aren't relevant to most of us. The most popular combo on /v/ is Nintendo and PC. I am one of these people and I have to say, Zelda is a great series, Witcher sucks.
How was skyward sword generally received?
I played it on release but honestly can't remember much. I thought it was alright.
>>341726380
That's why its kind of a wet fart, just sayin'
>>341726590
>I honestly think the fact that it copied so many different games, is one of its greatest assets
Jack of all trades, master of none.
>>341726590
Don't forget they stole ico's art design
>>341724527
2 ports, 2 eshop titles, a fucking budget game developed solely as a bundle package, a game also available on the 3DS and a underwhelming, mediocre sequel to a franchise everybody was hyped for.
What a great console.
>>341726791
There's no reason to assume this will be the case. I think it will be the best at everything, and will piss all the Sony and Microsoft fans off.
>>341725180
>The overworld
>Dungeons being shaped like shit
>The sidescrolling sections
>Dungeons are slower paced than AlttP and more in the style of the original
The only thing that's really changed is the linearity. Hell Oracle of Seasons was originally devised as a LoZ remake which is why it has all the bosses from that game and old man grottos in it.
>>341726887
Too bad you'll either have to buy a new expensive console or play a shitty version.
>>341726830
>these games don't count because [insert shitty reason here]
Wow we've never seen this post before
>>341725564
No Zelda execpt SS actually has fetch quests at all. You're otherwise never told to get something where you're actually given the location, you either have to find it yourself or figure out what to even do in the first place. The few times this does happen it occurs on a timer, so it ends up being a test to see if you can get to the place fast enough.
>>341726964
You know what you're right, I'm rushing to the shops to buy a Wii U right now just for motherfucking Mario Maker.
>>341726590
It's sad though that the game that used to be known for it's uniqueness has stooped to copying other genres in order to survive. I might have to buy that desert notsecret of mana game they just announced just so something with the Zelda gameplay will live on.
Until I see some dungeon footage. None of that shrine stuff.
>>341726947
Kind of like how Twilight Princess on the Gamecube was so much worse than the Wii version, right?
No, I'm getting the Wii U version and it will be as good, if not better. I'm not interested in the NX's stupid gimmick controller, or whatever dumb gimmick they will shoehorn into the game for the NX version, much like how I wasn't interested in TP's motion controls in the Wii version, and I happen to like the Wii U pad for Zelda games. We saw how it works in WWHD and TPHD, and how this controller is appropriate for Zelda games, and I think it's great.
>>341727083
It's better than whatever shit you play now (GTA and Witcher)
>>341726887
>I think it will be the best at everything
Pretty much not possible. Theres no way its going to borrow elements from a bunch of different games, and then do them better than their respective games. Its nice to hope, but its just not possible. Especially with a lot of the hardware limitations its facing.
>>341726590
>I honestly think the fact that it copied so many different games
I see two primary influences, both of which are earlier fucking Zelda titles, the original LoZ, and Wind Waker.
Which I guess by proxy means it's also influenced by Miyazaki films like Nausicaä, but those aren't games
>nintendo make a bad game
>people get angry at them
>nintendo make a good game
>people get angry at them
>>341727110
The GC version of TP was better because it had a controller instead of waggle shit, Link was left handed, and the differences in performance were basically non-existent because the hardware was pretty much the same.
The Wii U version will have worse performance because of worse hardware.
>>341727183
Yes I see the light now, where did I go wrong in my life playing only non-NintendoTM games!
>>341723560
What about the goat quest for the pellar? Or the horse thing for the tree in the ladies of the wood quest?
>errone mad
>I will enjoy this game no matter what
>only happy one here
>>341727110
>I'm getting the Wii U version and it will be as good, if not better.
How delusional can you get
>>341726604
This game was made in response to Skyward Sword's negative feedback
>>341727249
Then you're fucking blind. They even outright stated Skyrim was a influence, and if you don't see Minecraft in the open world crafting, you're delusional.
>>341727243
Explain why that isn't possible? When you play a game, don't you ever envision how things could be better?
Well, imagine if you played 5 different games, liked elements from all of them, but also thought of ways to improve all of them. Why wouldn't it be possible to put all of these improvements into one game?
>>341727258
Jealousy.
>>341722128
I usually don't take /v/'s criticisms of games that aren't our yet very seriously, but I gotta agree the new Zelda looks like absolute shit.
You guys are seriously delusional if you don't think they'll give the NX version some special feature. They have to sell the new console somehow. As it stands right now, Wii U owners aren't going to buy the NX at launch after how badly they were burned with droughts. And people who aren't really Nintendo fans don't have any reason to buy it. They have to give it something or else everyone will just buy the Wii U version.
>>341727367
They had a 30 min presentation at E3 about how the design of the game world is a throwback to the original LoZ. Skyrims popularity might have been the reason for them to go back to their older methods, but it's still their own fucking methods.
And Minecraft? Like wtf, you think that game invented putting stuff together to get other stuff or something?
>>341727286
Oh yes, your snarky little comments about this arbitrary restriction you put on your own gaming experience sure is making me look silly. Clearly it's better to pick random developers and go "You know what? I'm just not gonna play any of their games for no reason".
Have fun playing Drive Around and Shoot People 87 later.
>>341727375
>Why wouldn't it be possible to put all of these improvements into one game?
Because its facing serious hardware limitations, and if the respective games its taking elements from, which usually run on much better hardware, weren't able to get it perfect, what makes you think this game will?
Usually those games have multiple iterations to get that game mechanic down pat, but you think Zelda will do it in one shot, while mastering all the elements of other games as well, while also facing much more strict hardware limitations?
Sometimes, a Zelda sequel has a hard time getting its previous game elements correctlyMost sequels suffer from this, though.
No, its not likely.
>>341727773
>chop tree
>get wood
>make wooden sword
>wooden sword breaks
>use pickaxe to mine stone to make stone sword
What game am I talking about here?
>>341727769
This.
>b-b-but they promised they would be the same!!
Yeah, and they also promised this game would be Wii U exclusive and come out in 2015. They've still got 9 months to hit you with another announcement, especially since they haven't talked about the NX at all.
>>341727963
>Have fun playing Drive Around and Shoot People 87 later.
As opposed to Tree Cutter and Stone Miner 64?
>>341728017
Not zelda because you don't turn the sticks into swords or mine with a pickaxe?
>>341727271
>The GC version of TP was better because it had a controller instead of waggle shit
Right - And the Wii U version of BotW will be better, because it won't have that "hey, check it out, your thumbs cover part of the screen!" shit.
>The Wii U version will have worse performance because of worse hardware.
Right - Kind of like how the GC version of TP has worse performance than the Wii version.
>>341727349
Your anime reaction image and unsubstantiated claim that I'm delusional, sure debunked my long, detailed explanation of why I'm going to buy the Wii U version.
>>341728274
>it won't have that "hey, check it out, your thumbs cover part of the screen!" shit.
That was proven to be fake you humongous retard. Holy shit.
>Kind of like how the GC version of TP has worse performance than the Wii version.
Power gap between Wii U and NX will be bigger than the gap between Wii and GC.
>>341728092
Cutting down trees took up less than 1% of the overall presentation. But no, no, cutting down trees is the definitive game element in BotW. That's the thing people will remember about the game. That's how the game will go down in history; you could chop down trees.
>>341728092
Hey dude, Harvest Moon 64 was pretty fun, don't knock it.
>>341727996
I think certain games have concepts that are cool, but could EASILY be done better.
>>341728420
>That was proven to be fake you humongous retard. Holy shit.
Not necessarily, but the point is, whatever gimmick the NX version has isn't going to be interesting.
>Power gap between Wii U and NX will be bigger than the gap between Wii and GC.
People are already speculating that the NX is to the Wii U, as the Wii is to the gamecube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xhl5sk9i6Mk
No matter what you say, you're not going to suddenly get me interested in whatever gimmick the NX has, and I'm going to get the Wii U version. I look forward to using the Wii U pad to play the game, and I'm not interested in whatever the NX has to offer in terms of its controller. I want to use the Wii U pad, I'm buying the Wii U version, end of story.
>>341728617
Sure, but not their main concept or element that another game would be using.
>>341728502
Not really. I found the DS games more fun
>>341728839
Whatever, enjoy playing the shitty version then faggot. Only hurting yourself
>>341727365
>I don't have any clue how development timelines work.
Feedback could have impacted elements of the game, but the overall scope and direction, if not a good chunk of the game, would have been in progress when Skyward Sword launched.
>>341729118
Enjoy paying 400 dollary doos just for bigger textures. Maybe when the next Zelda after this comes out, you'll have the funds available to buy the Nintendo NX XL, for an extra 200px2 of textures.
>>341728926
But why not? This is just an assertion. Look at Assassin's Creed. I can imagine how its combat, stealth mechanics, climbing, etc. could all be better. These are major game elements. Look at GTA, I could imagine how the driving and shooting could be better. Again, major game elements. It's not hard to make something better, all you need to do is picture it in your head then program it. Why is Nintendo not capable of doing that?
>>341729118
>hurting myself
>by saving money
Ok, sure. You just sound like you're upset that I'm one of the millions of Nintendo fans who won't blindly buy the next console and will actually make sure it's good first. I did the same thing with the Wii U, I waited 2 years to buy it and I made the right decision.
People buying consoles for 1 or 2 games is one of the hugest cancers to gaming.
>>341729698
Enjoy not supporting one of the last, if not last, bastions of gaming that actually make fun games, faggot.
>>341729870
delusional fucking nintendrone, why the hell should anyone buy the NX after the ridiculous droughts that Wii U had? Fucking Wii U's life didn't even begin until Pikmin 3, 9 months after launch.
Fuck off already.
>>341729870
But I bought the Wii U. You're telling me to blindly buy a console without knowing if it's good or not yet. You're cancer.
>>341729962
how about you go shill for the ps4 neo in some other thread more sonygger
>>341730165
>b-b-b-but SONY!!!!111!!!
go to bed child
Sonyggers are at full force I see
>>341723506
What game is the girl from?
>>341722128
Imagine how great this board would be if not for console war faggots
>>341723064
So uhh...why isn't that enemy attacking? it's hilarious.
>>341730305
#FE
>>341730302
>The NX will have some kind of special feature, totally worth paying an extra $400 for, like your thumbs covering part of the screen
>>341730165
>I-I'm n-not the sh-shill, y-you are!!
>>341722128
reminded me a lot more of dragons dogma
not a fan of the tedious resource gathering but everything else looks good
>>341725431
>Witcher on the other hand sucks. I played the first one for a few hours and I got bored with it and stopped. Didn't even bother with 2 or 3.
Then how do you know it sucks?
>>341730552
If it doesn't keep my interest, then the game is bad. Simple.
>>341730552
>>341730613 (not me)
This guy is trolling, probably because he's another butthurt Witcher fan who is upset by what I'm saying.
I am the original guy, and let me tell you about my track record. I have finished hundreds and hundreds of games. I'm very lenient. I even finish games that I don't really enjoy sometimes, just to be able to say I got the full experience and I know for sure it's bad, and it's not one of those games that got good 20 hours in.
If I drop a game, it's fucking boring.
>>341723996
even people who actually like those fucking games admit that it's the worst combat in pretty much any 3rd person rpg
>>341730771
You're not the same guy and he's trolling BUT 'here's my reasoning and it's exactly the same'.
>>341722415
>It's an autist nitpicks witcher 3 chat scenarios and trys to pass it off as normal
>People don't just tell him to fuck off retard
Fuck off retard. You're fooling no one.
>>341730974
This post doesn't even make sense, you just don't like the notion of someone who has played a lot of games and is credible, but doesn't like the Witcher series.
>>341731073
>credible
On whose authority.
>>341731150
see:
>>341730771
also
>I only respond to authority
>>341722128
What does this even mean?
Wii U has a bunch of games.
>>341730481
>like your thumbs covering part of the screen
Already proven to be false months ago.
This Zelda is going to be so groundbreaking, don't you want to play the definitive version?
>>341731209
How's this.
I've played all the games you have+1, and Witcher is a good game.
>>341731321
>the definitive version
Kind of like how the Wii version is the definitive version of Twilight Princess
>>341731364
>how about I just make something up?
>something made up is as good as something that's actually true
You like a shitty fucking game. That's all this really boils down to, and all that can really be said. You're even willing to defend it with flat out lies, like you just said. That's how delusional of a fanboy you are.
>>341731507
What makes you think it's made up, and what's making me think you're not making it up.
>>341722128
But Witcher, Dark Souls and all those games are copying Zelda in the first place. Hell, every 3D adventure game rips off OoT still.
>>341731298
It means he tried to make this shitpost back when Xenoblade X came out and it didn't work like he wanted it to so he's trying again
>>341727271
Aiming was way too good in the Wii version for me to consider the Gamecube version anything but a joke.
Yeah the waggling was as bad as ever but the aiming worked incredibly well.
>>341731585
And it looks like now the master has become the student.
>>341731617
Guess you didn't see the reply to that post
>>341731298
Nintendo hasn't given anyone a reason to buy it for non first-party games.
>anti-nintendofags are shitposting about how this will be a barren overworld with nothing in it despite the fact that we've only seen the tutorial area and have made fun of zelda for being linear before this
>nintendofags are praising this as the return of jesus and innovation even though half the stuff shown in the trailer has been done in other rpgs before
It looks like a fun game even if it is catching up with what most rpgs have been capable of for the last decade (although the stylization will dtop it from appearing dated in 5 years). Not sure if I'll buy it for wii u or get an nx and play it on that. Certianly going to be better than skyward sword and hopefully some actual lore this time besides the basic story of the three goddesses.
The only real gripe i have with the game is it came out 2 years too late but at least theyreactually listening to people's opinions and fixing problems. That's more than miymoto would have done
I'm so sorry Zelda fans, once you get Witcher faggots in your threads they're dead forever.
They absolutely destroyed MGSV threads with their shitposting. They can't be reasoned with, if you ignore them they post more.
I'm so sorry, you will never be able to discuss Zelda again now they have you in their sights.
>>341722415
So... This is the power... Of the goty 2015... Woah.
>>341722128
>>341722128
Everyone knows it's true. They just don't want to admit it because they've been expecting it for years.
It isn't original and it has so many competitors now it's silly. Aonuma should be embarrassed it took them this long to produce it.
>>341732069
They're giving back what was given to them. I for one can't wait to see every single Zelda thread being shitposting into oblivion.
>>341722415
>>341724434
>>341731032
>>341723329
>>341723706
>0 damage
>0 damage
>0 damage
At least don´t cheat to make the game look bad.
>>341722128
It will be a much better game than Witcher3 will be.
>>341731921
Again, I guess you didn't see the reply. And now you'll just post the reply to that post. Why don't we just assess the situation and read the arguments, instead of going back through everything? Oh yeah because then you'd have to admit that I made logical, rational arguments and what I'm saying makes sense.
>>341732301
I mean if you want to play the shitty version thats on you, it will clearly be inferior. Enjoy your worse experience.
>>341723705
>happens to make a list of games, most of which outsold Bloodborne
Why is Sony's attach rate so abysmal?
>>341732571
Nintendo fans are so starved for games so they buy in unison whatever comes out, whereas Playstation has a wide and diverse enough library that sales are even spread.
>>341732781
BTFO
>>341732182
This image is so true. Nintendo brand power is insane.
Look at Hyrule Warriors. Same old Dynasty Warriors crap, but it's got Zelda fanservice so it's finally "the good one".
>>341729559
>It's not hard to make something better, all you need to do is picture it in your head then program it.
If it was really that simple, then all games would master every element they are achieving to have.
They can't, because of two main factors.
Budget, and hardware limitations.
And thats the main reason why Nintendo won't be able to replicate the element of multiple games, and do them better. Its that simple.
>>341728017
Runescape
Alternatively there is crafting in fire emblem too.
>>341732916
Shut the fuck up, Hyrule Warriors was nothing like Dynasty Warriors.
>>341732781
>Playstation has a wide and diverse enough library
>>341730305
Wew lad
>>341733243
It was a slow start but the next year is starting to look good.
>>341733179
And here it is in effect.
>>341733505
This.
Star Fox 64 is literally superman 64 and if you claim Star Fox 64 is better you are a nintendrone.
>>341733481
Three years is a slow start? You fucking serious?
>>341722532
this. i'm glad they're taking influence from other games and trying new shit, instead of following OoT's formula yet again
>>341726604
stale as hell. paint by numbers 3D zelda, so it's not bad just nothing new
3D Zelda hasn't been innovative since the N64 and has been doing essentially the same thing for over a decade
>>341722415
>western videogames
...
>>341727000
Lmao that's a huge fucking lie. The very first and second zelda had fetch quests you underage fuckwit, and so did TP.
>posting hyperbole and lies on /v/ to bait others
So...... this...... is.... the power.... of the..... unemployed
