>Ctrl+F
>No Arma thread
Post potato quality Tanoa screenshots, faggots.
>>341690901
>potato quality
No thanks
>>341690901
>>341692326
>brought to you by 10fps inc.
>>341690901
I had so much fun spanning 288 jets and watching them fight
>>341692718
Nope solid 60
Get a better computer
>>341692326
Slightly less potato shot, displaying the merits of possesing a profound inability to give a fuck
>>341693543
That's a qt 3.14 operator
>>341693048
>Solid 60
And then it drops to 20 the second you get to multiplayer.
>>341692771
>LETTHEAIRFRAMESHITTHEFLOOR.jpg
>>341693675
Nope, stays 60 on every server I go on. The only time it drops is when I'm providing CAS in a wipeout, then it drops to 40.
>>341693828
This brought my framerate down to the low twenties
>>341693656
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=374775446
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=374780664
I was using the Scarred Mason head.
>>341693675
what is it about mp that fucks with the fps so much. i can get 100+ fps in sp with ultra graphics, but as soon as i go mp, it drops to 20-25 no matter how low i put my settings
>>341694075
IIRC everyone's max fps is tied to the servers or something.
>>341694075
Everyone who complains about multiplayer frame drops are playing shitty "ecelb youtuber XDDD" mods like altis life, dayz, wasteland, etc. But if you play on milsim servers like BMR insurgency and whatnot you don't get framedrops at all.
>>341694058
That's surprising. I always hear about how people get 60 in singleplayer, but drop to 20-30 in multiplayer.
>>341694075
I get 25 in singleplayer. In multiplayer, it drops as low as 10, but hovers around 15-20. That being said, I am so used to potato PCs that my definition of a smooth framerate is 20, so at first I was surprised about how the fan wasn't trying to lift the PC off the ground.
Arma 3 Tanoa ops when?
Fix when?
>>341695018
>Arma 3 tanoa ops when
When it actually releases
>>341690901
>>341695018
soontomorrow
>>341694463
the only servers i've ever played on have been invade and annex servers
>>341693656
>>341693543
Arma 3 is a well optimized game thanks to excelent multi-core support and uses your GPU completely. If you can't run it well get a better computer.
>>341696086
Arma 3 Karts has been gifted to your steam account
>>341696086
1.You can enable multiple cores using a launch command but if you are using a shitty AMD CPU or anything lower than the RECOMMENDED i7 than you are shit out of luck
2.My GPU is constantly being used, maybe you should check your control panel settings
3.Well yeah if you can't run it then get a better computer because I have a better computer than you and I can run it.
>>341692326
Fuck, for a second i thought it was crysis.
>>341692326
Looks like modded oblivion
>>341697317
Sure it does anon, keep telling yourself that
>>341697317
You mean it looks fantastic.
>>341697982
>hey it looks bad from an angle you'll never even actually be at in game
>>341697982
You ain't seen shit yet. THIS is what fantastic looks like.
>>341698321
>>341697982
>>341692337
>>341690901
Shieet are they porting Arma to consoles now?
How hard would it be to make a horror scenario?
>>341698172
I agree! Arma 3 is an infantry sandbox. I wish there were flyable helicopters but I'm glad BIS focused on the important things like mid-range textures where the bulk of infantry combat has you looking at. Top notch work here.
>>341698635
Considering the fact that there's piles of them on the steam workshop, not very.
>>341698639
>I have bad perfroamnce on my shit pc halp me pls
>why can't i load grass for miles arma 3 bad game
>i play milsims for grafics
>please listen to me
>plese give me attention
Here is your (you) anon, you worked hard for it.
Hows Arma 3 singleplayer? I bought it after watching these videos of huge epic open world battles with hundreds of people and turns out I got memed on. Played it on release and then dropped.
I want to give it another chance
>>341698841
I remember playing the mothman one. It was pretty neat up until you find the mothman.
>>341698929
Arma 3 isn't a milsim kid.
>>341699052
The singleplayer is amazing when it can be. It gets to a point where you get to choose what missions you want to do, and you carry them out how you want.
But it can get frustratingly hard because of hte A.I.
>>341699052
The "Armed Assault" Showcase gives a really good massive battle feeling, and the campaign is pretty ok too. The multiplayer isn't bad right now, if you find the right server.
>>341699121
>He doesn't play on the right servers
>He doesn't install mods
>He only knows about shitty normie garbage like dayz and stratis life
Stay on funnyjunk you retard
>>341699121
>no com link
>flying slow as shit
why, if you were trying to make your steer time you could have corrected a lot earlier
>>341698929
>>341699540
That rabid fanboyism
Arma 3 Apex:
>Still no shotguns despite shotguns frequently being used in jungle warfare
>Vehicle-in-vehicle is just magically teleporting into a VTOL, can't even open the rear ramps anymore
>Maps is full of indestructible objects and buildings you can't enter
>No enhanced nightvision, no bouncing swedish grenades, no flashbangs
>Chinese OICW just fired .50 beowulf, no airburst grenades
>Vision of the future is still thermals and rcws everywhere instead of actually cool stuff
>>341700494
wow you really showed them
>>341700616
>them
me*
>>341700530
Wait, ARMA 3 seriously doesn't have shotguns? What the fuck lol
>>341696479
[Un-muffled eurobeat]
>>341700692
Nope, sorry retard
>>341700616
No need when BIS fanboys are fucking retarded and recommend people get i7s when ARMA multicore support is extremely bad and you get better results overclocking an i3.
Unless disabled with a script command Arma also does raycast checks for all units even if other machines are in control of them and extensively uses CPU stencil shadows in a CPU intensive game.
I play BF2 Project Reality.
>>341701042
took you 4 minutes to shop that lmao
>>341701206
Squad and PR are better games/infantry sims, they're just not as sandboxy as arma which is a shame.
>>341701216
>Provides proof
>Y-You shopped that
How does it feel to be mentally disabled
>>341701156
Considering the newer skylakes have the best single core performance the 6700k really is the best processor for arma 3
>>341701336
>thinks something that easily editable counts as proof
How does it feel to have the mind of a tech illiterate autistic child?
>>341698639
>>341698321
>>341697982
Is there a developer more incompetent that BIS?
What's up with the performance on AMD CPU's and shit?
>>341701560
You tell me
>>341701485
It is still like buying a gtx titan to play minecraft.
>>341701697
>no u
Literal autism
>>341701680
Just like every game, shitty
The game relies heavily on single core performance and AMD isn't very good at that in any way. Their solution is always "add moar cores"
>>341701680
AMD CPUs have shit single core performance and that is the most important thing when it comes to running Arma.
>>341701738
It's exactly like that
>Mod Minecraft
>FPS starts steadily going to shit as more stuff is going on
>Mod Arma 3
>FPS starts steadily going to shit as more stuff is going on
>>341701738
>Buying a good processor to play a CPU intensive game is like buying a $1,000 dollar GPU to play a game that isn't GPU intensive
>>341701791
>>341701839
Alright, you guys gave me good advice.
brb switching out my motherboard and getting an I7.
>>341701680
Game from incompetent devs tries to run on hardware by incompetent engineers
>>341701972
Nobody told you to get an i7 anon...
Just don't play the game
>>341701953
>Buying a multicore processor to play a game that uses 1 and half cores at best
The ball is in BIS's court to optimize their game. Eagle dynamics released a proper engine for DCS and people went from 40fps to 120+.
>>341696086
>>341696743
Talking about CPU cores,im retarded at this
My CPU has 4 cores and 8 logical processors, so should I set the number of cores on the launch command to 4 or 8?
>>341700806
Not him but it actually does
They just never released them
>>341702293
It's a placebo. The game will automatically detect the number of cores you have and you should only use that launcher flag if it doesn't.
>>341702293
The logical processors are counted as actual cores on a hardware level so count it as 8
>>341693048
>with drops to 2fps every 30 seconds because bohemia
>>341700806
Arma 3 doesn't even have animations for bolt-action sniper rifles.
>>341702046
What if I want to play the game?
>>341702381
>>341702421
It detected 4, not 8
Ill go set it to 8 and see what happens
>>341702463
Nope, that only happens if you have your game installed on an HDD. Mine is on an m.2
Gee bill
>>341695580
WOW it almost (ALMOST) reaches the graphically fidelity as Crysis 1 back 2007 lmao what a joke and the gameplay in arma is clunky and retarded.
>>341702987
Good for you sonnyger
>>341702507
Switch out your motherboard and get an i7
>>341702575
>>341702421
>>341702381
Well I get 10 more frames, sitting at about 60-70fps in dense forest.
Woo, I guess.
Unless on a server in which case its still slogs along at 20
>>341702379
>Not him but it actually does
>They just never released them
So you're saying there's no shot guns?
>>341703135
Well, there are. We just cant use them.
So, its worse than them not existing, its them existing and BI just saying 'fuck you no shotguns even though they are done'
>>341703061
>Damage Control!!!
6k hours in CSGO, 100 hours in Arma 3
>>341701680
ArmA is built off of engine technology from 2001 when consumer multi-core processors didn't even exist.
It does not have true multi-threading capability, certain operations are delegated out to other cores and somewhat load balanced but the bulk of the work is still done by one, and single core performance is not AMD's strong point.
>>341703389
CSGO is a shit game that failed to add any of the improvments COD4 added.
>>341700530
>ai still sees through foliage
>no simple way to have custom loadouts in multiplayer
>damage modeling for vehicles is ps2-tier
>only has neo futuristic vehicles that are unbalanced for infantry gameplay unless infantry use lock on shit that's even more casual than cowadoody
>game often devolves into 700m shooting galleries, which are monotonous and frustrating unless you use twink gear, which makes the ai even more inept
>game is still unfinished and often updates in such a way that it breaks mods, which make up the only worthwhile content the game has
wew. perhaps we should have bought codemasters' game after all.
>>341702463
mine's on an ssd. stop making excuses.
>>341703389
>He thinks playing csgo makes him a mustard
>He thinks 100 hours of arma 3 makes him a mustard
Stay on your living room super computer
>>341703135
Not that idiot but BIS made a KSG and never released it.
They aren't putting out any shotguns because Arma is still based on code written by a Czech college student's pet project more than a decade ago and doesn't support shotgun tube reloading (you can't load shells individually, only as a magazine containing shells and each muzzle can have only one mag at a time).
The Arma configs are one giant mess. It was only recently that guns had any say in the muzzle velocity and not soley based on magazines used by the weapons.
>>341703503
>codemasters' game
OFP2 had AI that could clear rooms. In 2016, BIS still hasn't figured out urban combat for the AI.
