Delete joke reviews, require 20 hours played.

I would only allow approved reviewers review the game.

We ignore them.

>>341666312
>require 20 hours played.
If the game was actually really fucking shitty why would you even play it for more than 5 hours, let alone 20?

It would be a problem in today's industry anyway since most new games are shorter than 10 hours (excluding multiplayer)

Good fucking luck. Just look at those morons ranking it as helpful. With all these russsians and weebs coming in, steam is JUST going to get a lot worse.

>>341666312
most games are shorter than that nowadays

>>341666182
They should never have been added in the first place. They are either jokes, memes, or someone who has a shit grasp on English making a review.
>I'm a Christian and I'm proud of it! Copy and paste into your sig if you are too.

Age verification, nobody from non-English speaking countries can leave reviews, automatic shadowbans for any use of emoticons/YouTube links.

1) Remove the "funny" rating option.
2) When people post reviews like the one pictured, take away their reviewing privileges, temporarily or permanently.

>>341666182
anyone who reviews with any form of memes like in the picture gets permanently blocked from the store, banned from all games, has their bank accounts drained and has a hit-squad sent to their residence.

>>341667227
Make their reviews visible to friends only

Don't tell them

>>341666765
>non-English speaking

You just reminded me how much I wish they would put a ban on multilingual guides.

If you want your guide in two languages, submit two guides.

>>341666182
Scroll down and read the actual reviews while ignoring the joke reviews.

It's not that hard.

>>341666182
I've made a few longer winded reviews, thing is that people treat helpful/unhelpful as agree/disagree.

Eh, it's the trouble with community driven content. What the community wants is at the top, and evidently that's memes.

>>341666182

Steam users must pass an online IQ test with a three digit score before they can write reviews.

>>341668007
So you basically want to prevent /v/ from writing reviews?