>Nintencucks will defend this.
>>341619967
>NX
>Wii U
>>341619967
>expecting a game on a nintendo console to not look like garbage
>>341619967
Fuck off. It was funny when I posted watchdogs and uncharted downgrades but this isn't funny, faggot. At least they had a good reason to downgrade it. Unlike your games. Now again. Fuck off.
>>341620063
>He honestly believes this.
Someone post that Dark Souls 3 comparison image like OPs
>>341620174
is this satire
>>341620174
>How dare you point out flaws to what I like! F-Fuck off!
>>341619967
One (1) game
>>341620345
>>341620379
No. They had a legitimate reason to downgrade for gameplay. Those other games were to bait idots into getting it.
>>341620063
Kek
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Xhl5sk9i6Mk&ebc=ANyPxKqaVRgyIk6uJNOSpywkjFtXbuuUOrFggoeDQ8heXWDmmZrpWw6hYtSy5_9NwzRaGiWrw9DX
>>341620681
Plua Nintendo saved us after the video game crash.
>>341620689
>m.youtube.com
i want phoneposters to leave
>>341620681
>It's okay when Nintendo baits & switches
>>341620268
don't you mean dark souls 2?
>>341621085
Did you not read? It wasn't a bait and switch. They changed it to add mote content and gameplay.
>>341621382
>downgrade graphics to add more content and gameplay
what?
>>341621531
Yes. Higher graphics requires a lot more work and time for everything. They reduced it so it's a better game.
>>341621797
So meaning more content and gameplay.
>>341621797
but they were already made, you can see it in the video of the OP pic
>>341621797
Pretty sure this is the kind of excuse everyone developer has said before but only seems valid when your precious nintendo says it. Get fucked.
>>341621926
>>341622010
Fine. Stay ignorant. I am done explaining this to you idoits.
>>341622370
I'm almost certain you're a 15 year old Nintendo fanboy trying to argue your own hypocrisy without any semblance of logical evidence.
>>341622370
>make a game with good graphics
>downgrade it
>add new things
they could just not had downgraded it
>>341622796
>they could have just not added new things
>they could have just given us another shiny turd like sony
>>341622938
>implying they couldn't add new things letting the graphics the way it was
>implying they didn't downgraded it because the console can't run
>>341622938
>like sony
Could you be any more of an obvious fanboy?
>FOR US IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SPECS
FOR US IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SPECS
>FOR US IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SPECS
FOR US IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SPECS
>FOR US IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SPECS
FOR US IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SPECS
>FOR US IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SPECS
FOR US IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SPECS
>FOR US IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SPECS
FOR US IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SPECS
>FOR US IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SPECS
FOR US IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SPECS
>FOR US IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SPECS
FOR US IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SPECS
>FOR US IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SPECS
FOR US IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SPECS
>>341620681
>>341621382
>>341621797
You do realize that in order to use this site you must be 18 years or older, right?
It's evident that this game is straining the Wii U's hardware.
It also doesn't help that this game has a hideous art style and an even more hideous brown filter most of the time.
>>341620689
>red ocean
Still sticking with the Blue Ocean strategy. Your next system will be capacitive touch mummy bandages.
>>341619967
this thread AGAIN
>>341619967
I will defend this to my last dying breathe because this is Nintendo and not Sony! Fuck Sony! #FuckSony! Hail Nintendo!
>>341619967
The only people with less imagination than Sony are their fuckign fanboys.
>>341619967
Let's just say that if their inspiration was The Witcher 3, then this is just one more bit of evidence showing that inspiration.
>>341624741
>S-Sony!
yeah, Sony does this all the time and is rightfully mocked for it. Nintendo deserves a pass because...?
Explain to me the why this ia bad? You can't.
>>341623324
>FOR ME IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SEX
>>341620225
>>He honestly believes this.
He doesn't. He's just making excuses. It's damage control, man.
