Anyone else think the design is close to perfect?
>>341599021
Yeah, I like it.
That's definitely not my issue with the Crash announcements at E3. I wanted a new game, not remasters. But the style they used is good to me.
I would have loved a new game too but honestly a remake of Crash 1-3 is something that makes me almost as excited.
Honestly Crash looks like he belongs in FNaF. I'd almost rather have his shitty tribal-tattoo ps2 appearance.
Are the remakes going to be exclusive?
>>341599467
Yes
Head and mouth are way too big
>>341599021
>a remake of Crash 1-3 is something that makes me almost as excited
I'll hold my judgement to see if they will add new content and not casualize the game with unecessary shit. The fact they didn't show any footage is worrysome to me. But I'll wait and see.
Is nostalgia really that strong for this to sell? I still have my discs and people can just buy it off of PSStore.
>>341599021
Skylanders? Oh boy, Activision's at it again.
>>341599467
A neogaf guy said he heard there were multiple SKU for the remasters by Activision, implying they could end multiplat. But like most Neogaf asspulls, I wouldn't trust them.
>>341599584
Meant for >>341599275
Where is he???? :(
>>341600001
Ded
>>341599021
I'm afraid because they specifically said REMASTER in the conference, not remake.
Knowing Naughty Dog, they will just up the resolution and framerate and be done with it, like TLoU Remastered and the job will probably be outsourced to some shitty Indian start-up company
>>341599584
>casualize the game with unecessary shit
Why does it matter as long as it doesn't directly affect the gameplay? I mean it's not like the games are hard in the first place, I don't know what they could do that would make it more casual.
Also, i'm guessing that the remake announcement was somewhat of a "last minute" decision and they haven't done much yet.
>>341600001
In a shitty game. I hope the crash remaster also sparks interest in a Spyro remaster, I like Spyro a lot more than Crash.
>>341600086
Naughty Dog hasn't owned the rights to Crash in a long time, they're not going to touch it at all.
>>341600086
ND isn't even involved. It's just Activision helped by Vicarious Visions, the guys that worked on the Crash GBA games (which were ok).
Sony simply holds the copyrights to the first three games.
And yeah, I am afraid too they will be just remasters with prettier graphics than remakes.
>>341600086
Well TLOU was only a year old and hadn't really aged graphically at all, so the res and 60fps bump were honestly more than sufficient.
Uncharted remasters should be the standard, they were all done excellently by based Bluepoint.
>>341599725
Sony owns the first 3 games and they were developed by Naughty Dog so they will remain exclusive.
>>341600532
Does the same apply to Spyro?
>mfw sonyponys think their shit fur bait excuses for franchises are in any way shape or form anything other than complete and utter dirty brown water trash
Rehash bandisloot, shy pooper, ratshit and stank, ballsac and haxtar, isharted and so many other shitty franchises are complete ass and the only reason anyone thinks they're anything close to not the functional equivalent of a heaping mound of garbage is because they were the few games that took more than 20 minutes to beat among the mountain of shovel ware shit that got dumped on the wobbleststion 2 which is all you played with when you were kids because your family was to fucking poor to buy anything other than some two bit nip cuck mediocre DVD player
Fuck off faggots
>>341600336
>I mean it's not like the games are hard in the first place, I don't know what they could do that would make it more casual
That's exactly what I am afraid of. They could made them even more easy. And basically ruin them by adding unecessary tutorials and command propts that were never there in the first place.
Either way, I'll wait. So far I am unimpressed.
>>341599021
Weird, Crash looks better here than I remember from watching the trailer live the other day.
Anyway, I think the remakes are a good thing. Better to spark up interest for a potential sequel, rather than put out one and it not go anywhere.
>>341600774
In regards to the first 3? Sony don't own Insomniac however the same applies to them holding the rights.
I imagine Spyro is more valuable to Activision though so this will be much more difficult
>>341600774
Hopefully. I'd love to see a remaster of my favorite trilogy.
Jap Crash is best Crash
>>341601170
Is Spyro more valuable? I mean I know he's technically a part of Skylanders but does he actually even matter in those games? Never played them but all the advertisements I see don't even show him anymore.
>>341600835
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%3Emfw%20sonyponys%20think%20their%20shit%20fur%20bait%20excuses%20for%20franchises%20are%20in%20any%20way%20shape%20or%20form%20anything%20other%20than%20complete%20and%20utter%20dirty%20brown%20water%20trash%20%20%20Rehash%20bandisloot%2C%20shy%20pooper%2C%20ratshit%20and%20stank%2C%20ballsac%20and%20haxtar%2C%20isharted%20and%20so%20many%20other%20shitty%20franchises%20are%20complete%20ass%20and%20the%20only%20reason%20anyone%20thinks%20they%27re%20anything%20close%20to%20not%20the%20functional%20equivalent%20of%20a%20heaping%20mound%20of%20garbage%20is%20because%20they%20were%20the%20few%20games%20that%20took%20more%20than%2020%20minutes%20to%20beat%20among%20the%20mountain%20of%20shovel%20ware%20shit%20that%20got%20dumped%20on%20the%20wobbleststion%202%20which%20is%20all%20you%20played%20with%20when%20you%20were%20kids%20because%20your%20family%20was%20to%20fucking%20poor%20to%20buy%20anything%20other%20than%20some%20two%20bit%20nip%20cuck%20mediocre%20DVD%20player%20%20%20Fuck%20off%20faggots/
So is there any reason why they aren't doing Crash Team Racing with online? You know, the main thing people would actually want out of something like this?
>>341599021
I like it! It's a hell of a lot better than Skylander's Spyro, that's for sure.
>>341600835
>>341601560
Probably big enough to get its own separate release later
>>341599021
It's not as bad as Spyro's redesign in Skylanders but a different kind of bad.
>>341600001CRASH WAS ALWAYS A BETTER CHARACTER THAN THAT PURPLE LITTLE FAGGOT
>>341601560
If the reamsters are successful, they will make more remasters.
If not, they will drop Crash once again.
But where's the Ape Escape platformer comeback?
>yfw Sony is literally SO Jewish that they won't buy Crash back when they could easily afford it
>missing out on opportunity to pander to nostalgia ala Nintendo, AND have a new mascot for extra brand recognition that they can plaster everywhere
It's like they hate money
>>341602449
What do you think the point of the remasters are? To gauge attention in a new Crash. Why put the time and effort into a new Crash game if people don't really want them? I expect to see if they'll actually make a new crash after The remasters come out. Also
>mfw the remasters cost $60
>>341602449
Activision would level let an important nostalgia IP like Crash to Sony. Maybe for a very big sum of money Sony clearly doesn't want to spend.
>>341602715
They are coming bundled together
>>341602715
Sony can't make new Crash games if they don't own the brand
>>341602301
>>341602136
>Crash Bash remaster
>Trophy for getting 200%
Dear God.....
What is your best completion percentage for that game, /v/? And with what character/s?
Mine is 176% with Crash. Everything but 12 Platinum Relics. They are complete and utter bullshit, I tell you what.
>>341599021
wasn't really happy on how they announced it.. they showed skylanders gamplay not even concept art of the remake.
the design is a lot better than the weird tattoo one
I really hope it sells well. I really want a CTR remake. hell I wouldn't even mind crash bash
>>341599021
Yeah, it is really good. It is closest to his original designs.
>>341601282
>Jap changes to Crash are what gave us the dance
>>341602870
I meant $60 altogether.
>>341602893
Why bother buying the brand if you don't know if people are truly interested in a new game, fucktard.
>>341603317
>after it sells well, activision raises the selling price to Sony, because they know it's worth something
>as opposed to Sony buying the franchise and taking the risk with a far smaller net loss if it fails
Looks good imo
>>341603576
The profit from the remasters will go into buying the franchise back
>>341602893
>>341603317
>>341603576
after they announced the remakes, have they ever said that they don't own crash?
I remember a few threads ago, some guy at neo-gaf or reddit made post about activision always saying "no comment" regarding not owning crash
>>341603941
2005 looks to best to me
>>341603941
This bugs me cause that first crash is from crash 2/3 So 1997 not 1996 there's never love for crash 1
>>341599021
I saw this today as the video of when you summon crash and imo Sony/Activision fucked up. This is the best the sky lander crash ever looked and it really would have gone ahead better if they opened their skylander trailer with this. I legit think this webm looks 10x better then what we saw on the trailer. It's the lightening and Angle is why this looks so good. Having the camera face directly on level with crash makes him look taller.
People are complaining his head is too big and needs to be taller but if the camera was straight and level I don't think they'd be an issue with the design
>>341605076
Crash 1 is the secret best Crash game. Only those with fine patrician taste like it.
>>341601085
Same. His upper body and head seem a bit too large, the eyebrows as well but the expressions are nice and wouldn't be mad if this was the final model for the remaster, remake, new one, whatever it is.
