Why don't we hold developer's feet to the fire for shoddy, inexcusable, broken games? There should be no reason for games to be released in such a poor state.
>pic very related
>inb4 kek you bought it. No I didn't but I did play it.
kek you played it
>>341559656
>Why don't we hold developer's feet to the fire for shoddy, inexcusable, broken games?
We do you retard, it's called researching before you buy the fucking game.
You deserve what you got for being such a cuck and buying a sequel to one of the lowest-scoring games of last gen, without even looking online to see if it was good.
>>341559951
>calling someone a retard
>not being able to read
>>341560048
>caring about the quality of a game you didn't even buy
>>341560048
Are you genuinely retarded? Can you not see the forest for the trees?
>>341559656
>hold developer's feet to the fire
wut
I love how you fucking mongs miss the point entirely. There is no reason any game should be released in the kind of state Homefront was. Especially now in this era of gaming. Homefront is just one example but a good one to use. Developers should be made, on a legal ground to make amends either through consistant upkeep, updates, and repairs.
Sure you can simply not buy something, but that is more or less a sidestep from the problem. Why accept any game to be so broken on release?
>>341560308
>>341560308
If people don't buy a shit game developers will stop making shit games. Was that really hard to understand?
once again people on this board are incapable of debating without resorting to playground name calling. Never change /v/
>>341560440
>implying that has ever been true or proven true.
Then why are there still shit games, dipshit
>>341560541
Because people keep buying them, dipshit.
