They are still mad as fuck at James. Some choice quotes
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/19/fashion/ghostbusters-internet-attacks.html?_r=0
>“I refuse to watch it,” he said, sitting with his rimless glasses amid a gumball machine, “Star Trek” memorabilia and bookcases stacked with old VHS tapes.
>Next, I sent him an email. I wanted to know what he made of the furor. His response was astonishing. He was offended by some of the blowback — because, as he wrote in an email, it seemed to him that those angry over his video “have not watched it, or have been misquoting me or twisting my words.”
>Mr. Judging Before Seeing was mad because people were judging before seeing.
>When finally coaxed to the phone, Mr. Rolfe, who works from his East Coast home, did not want to talk about his “Ghostbusters” video, saying he thought it spoke for itself, and he didn’t want to address the fallout. “When people attack me, it’s always about trying to get a reaction,” he said.
stop giving them attention
>>341439158
This is a movie. Take it to /tv/ instead or find a subject on the same matter that is about a game.
HE'D RATHER EAT
>>341439589
THE ROTTEN ASSHOLE
James Rolfe don't want to watch it because to him you can't make a new Ghostbuster without the original cast. It has nothing to do with females.
Also the films looks like shit.
>>341439158
>Fans ask for Ghostbusters reaction vid
>Makes vid explaining why he won't do that.
>Critics blast his arse for not wanting to see a movie
I just don't get it, why do people give such a shit as to whether someone watches a film or not? Is it some superiority complex because they support girl ghostbusters or something?
>>341439787
OF A ROAD KILL SKUNK
>>341439854
Because retards like you click.
>>341439854
Everybody who doesn't pay money to see this film is sexist.
>>341439976
Like me? Click what? What the fuck are you talking about?
>fashion & style
what
>>341439854
It's because he likes Ghostbusters.
They are imagining that they are hitting his weak spot while in reality James goes: Oh more viewers!
>>341439158
>incestuous clickbait sites and blog rings circlejerk and prop up nonexistent controversy for easy pageviews
Oh my, this new revelation has shocked me to my core
>>341439854
Same reason fanboys of a specific platform get buttblasted when someone criticizes said platform or its games
>>341439158
>They are still mad as fuck at James.
'Course they are, prepare to hear more if that movie under performs.
>>341439158
Sony should force Bill Murray into shaming James
It would be amazing PR
>>341439158
>No archive/pastebin
Fuck off.
>Mr. Judging Before Seeing was mad because people were judging before seeing.
Wow this is a pretty awful comparison
>>341439158
>idiots who have no idea what they are complaining about are complaining about a man who is "internet famous" for making bad videos where he calls games bad when usually he is bad at games; an idiot who has no idea what he's complaining about
I enjoy this, let all the shitters destroy each other in a whirlwind of absolutely nothing.
>>341440279
>if that movie underperforms
I hope it flops so hard, can't wait for feminist tears. Feminists are so far gone that you can't even have opinions on movies anymore.
>>341440623
Aren't all extremists like that?
>>341440623
God forbid these feminists went and watched this movie themselves so it wouldn't flop.
>>341440196
Jokes on James. No one watched his video. They read the title and then flamed him on twitter.
I don't give a shit about Rolfe but it's obvious to anyone with half a brain that the movie looks like shit. There are plenty of people this writer could have attacked that legitimately have sexist leanings, this guy was a poor target.
The normie moviegoer doesn't choose movies based on hot-button social issues and certainly doesn't pay attention to tumblr/twitter SJW crusades. They also certainly don't choose films that are forcing an agenda, regardless of the agenda (unless that agenda is explosions and tits).
Those invested in the echobox/safespace public shaming culture are going to blame everything but themselves when this movie has a big weekend (like franchise blockbusters typically do) then fizzles out, completely missing the point that this "controversy" is completely manufactured by the studio fearful of a shitty product and that they are useful (very fat and misguided) idiots.
>>341440623
It's going to be like Chick fil a day.
Despite the boycott, people will go for political reasons to make a statement.
Like Chick fil a day it won't mean shit, because buying chicken or seeing a movie means nothing of substance. Despite their furor, gays can get married now.
>>341440834
>judging before seeing.
That's not what James is doing though, he's deciding not to watch a movie because he's not interested in it.
Jesus, are people now literally obligated to consume every piece of media, regardless of initial impressions, or they are seen as a bigot?
When will people stop pretending that women can be funny?
They know that people like James are the kind of longtime, discerning fans that enjoy a series but don't make it their identity (outside of a youtube persona), so they can call a spade a spade instead of defending it on principle.
It's easier to water down a medium, make it popular and scorn the long time minority than it is to create something that appeala to both sides.
Superheroes, games etc all have been normified so the standard.can slip with little resistance.
>>341439158
>Mr. Judging Before Seeing was mad because people were judging before seeing.
nice one
>>341441013
No one that flamed him on twitter watched the video.
>>341440374
Reminder that Bill Murray didn't want to be a part of this
https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/104704
Nice videogames!
>>341441090
Was amazing how all the butt-blastees seemed to forget what trailers are for so they could get mad at him
>>341441090
Not to mention he saw the trailer and discusses it. People aren't expected to consume every piece of media, just the ones feminists and SJWs approve of. If you watch or read or think something they don't like then you are also seen as a bigot. Toe the party line or face the consequences.And they say cultural Marxism doesn't exist
So what video and why is this on /v/?.
>(stares at reddit)
>(holds up spork)
Why the fuck do they emote like this? It completely undermines any point they might make.
>>341441185
What are you talking about, just look at the hilarity in the first 30 seconds of this video. Even Bill Murray can't help but shake his head and sigh at the sheer amount of laughs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZ0YexsRCPc
>>341439524
>stop giving them attention
That shit doesnt work when these people run media, politics and education
Time to grow up and face some facts
>yfw you lived to see James un-JUST himself
A kickstarter funded, SNL produced movie. Why would anyone want to watch it?
>>341441545
When was James ever JUSTed?
>>341441545
I take it all back, james
Bestest video by James.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h80c7nFrVzY
>>341441601
SNL is still a thing?
>>341441013
>100k likes on a 2 million view video
that's actually an impressive like-to-view ratio.
>>341441643
when the gave in and pushed the diversity shit his wife wanted for cinemassacre
look up the mrs nerd talks blog on this site and how she insulted their fanbase
>>341441440
http://cinemassacre com/2016/05/17/ghostbusters-2016-no-review-i-refuse/
That video.
>/tv/
>epic gamer nerd man
>movie with all female action heroes
Did anyone expect a different reaction from someone who married the first girl who fucked him?
>>341441643
Yeah, all the actresses are from the newish season apparently
>>341441669
>not Dream Phone
No AVGN video is his best because Board James trumps AVGN every time.
>>341441879
No anon, that is a link to a website, not a video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hz8X2A7wHyQ
>>341441643
>AVGN episodes were getting shittier
>SJW wife
>made a shit movie because the above forced him to add an interracial relationship to his lifelong dream
>daughter suffered possibly permanent injury at birth
Cut to now
>last couple AVGN were some of the best he's made
>made SJW look like petty shitstains with his ghostbusters video
>charitable organization healed his daughter, which he responded to by raising money for them
>>341441516
You fail at game theory, anon.
"Not paying attention will only work if everyone does it, and there's no way everyone is going to stop paying attention, so I'm going to pay attention."
>>341441934
Are you saying he dislikes the movie because of an agenda and not just simply personal taste
Not every place is tumblr, twitter and 4chan
>>341439158
>Mr. Judging Before Seeing was mad because people were judging before seeing.
Ah yes, James is the hypocrite here, right?
what does a e-celeb talking about a movie have to do with video games?
could it be you're just rambunctious children with no tangible lifes so e-drama is something you get off on? pity
>>341442042
The video is on that page retard. If I have a choice I'll take anything over jewtube.
>>341440491
What are you trying to tell me here? that's the budget not the gross.
>>341439158
>>341442145
You are shilling a website, just link the video.
>Mr. Rolfe, 35, advised his followers that Cinemassacre, known for movie and video-game reviews, would be sitting this one out.
>“I refuse to watch it,” he said, sitting with his rimless glasses amid a gumball machine, “Star Trek” memorabilia and bookcases stacked with old VHS tapes.
If there's one thing I can't stand about sites like the NY Times, it's that they're always so antsy about who you can talk shit about, but then dish it out on James for being into a "nerd" hobby. Fuck these hypocrites.
>>341439854
>Fans ask for Ghostbusters reaction vid
This seems to be the part that people don't get. This isn't some random attack on the movie, it's a sensible explanation to his own fanbase for why he's just not interested in it. Meanwhile a bunch of online drama queens are getting mad about a guy they probably never heard about before this.
>>341439158
Is the judging before seeing shit really a fair comparison?
>free 6 minute video vs. 2 hour 25$ movie.
One seems a bit easier to actually watch
>>341439960
AND DOWN IT WITH TEARS
>>341442102
Considering he refuses to even give the movie a chance, yes.
>>341442149
but Stu that's 144 eggs!
![hqdefault[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/gB6TwDc.jpg "hqdefault[1].jpg")
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YigM-F4oSIE
>>341442208
Collecting movies is a nerd hobby?
>>341442421
>You must consume every single piece of media
>You cannot decide whether or not to consume a piece of media based on its advertising
t. Goldsteinberg
>>341440491
Holy fuck when is this shit due out? I want to watch it burn.
>>341439976
the most accurate post in this thread. followed by the most ironic post in a while
>>341440106
absolutely gold
>>341442098
Canadian detected
>a bunch of literally who blogs try to bait AVGN into a manufactured controversy a while ago
>it falls flat and he doesn't even respond
>they try it again, now with the help of random fashion writer fag of the nytimes
>>341442485
Or pirate it.
>>341442506
The author obviously thinks so.
never forget
>>341442149
The bigger the budget, the more money the movie has to make to break even. Generally, the box office revenue should be about twice the budget for that to happen. (even if we don't take advertising into account, which may well be included in the 154 million dollar figure)
It is highly unlikely that this almost unanimously despised film will make more than 300 million dollars at the box office.
HOLY SHIT THERE'S A NEW AVGN
WHY DID NOBODYY TELL ME?!?!?
>>341442506
Not that guy, but the implication being made by the sentence is pretty obvious. What did the gumball machine etc have anything to do with what he was saying? The rest of the article didn't go into such detail when describing other things, so why did it do so when only when describing James and his surroundings?
Reminder that everyone hates reboots and this movie would have gotten shit regardless.
More like nu times amirite
>>341442421
Isn't that what movie trailers are for? To give movies a chance before paying to view the whole thing?
Fucking gamergators
>>341441516
>That shit doesnt work when these people run media, politics and education
These people wouldn't do these things if you hadn't given them attention to begin with. You are squarely to blame.
>>341442758
Because the guy is an idiot and didn't know WHY James decorated that area the way he did? ie making it look like an old video rental store.
>>341442827
ethics in gaming journalist my ass, they are fucking criminals
>>341442827
Shit. Getting swallowed whole, deathrolled, or drowned by that thing. Can't even imagine how the parents feel. Do those things just exist in the parks at all times?
>>341442653
Best thing about that is he never dignified them with a response.
>>341443025
im from florida
yeah they are just fuckin around and shit, most florida bois know not to go near them but the little retards get chomped
>>341443025
What astonishes me is that they keep looking and hoping the kid is alright.
I'm like kid is dead yo. Alligators don't take kids off to play cards with em.
>>341443137
If only 4chan did the same.
>>341443025
"gamers" are everywhere my friend. the tailtail sign is very soft hands and thick, trunk-like legs.
>>341441934
>Implying GB isnt James favorite movie
>implying he said he considers the GB game released a few years ago the sequel to the second movie
>implying he gave up the premise of a new movie since Harold Ramis passing.
Gr8 b8 m8 I r8 8/8!
James' work is timeless
Ghostbusters remake along with retarded online feuding will be outdated in a matter of months.
That's all that matters.
AVGN2's final boss looked like shit. Was the rest of the game good?
>>341442098
Not to mention that if you ignore them they will work behind the scenes to just change the laws in their favor.
https://heatst.com/tech/french-government-may-punish-games-it-deems-sexist/
>>341443247
I assume it's to sort of a coping mechanism for the grieving parents. Better to have some kind of false hope I guess. But yeah the kid is definitely dead and his body is definitely hidden in that lagoon somewhere.
>>341441484
Jesus Christ, Bill Murray looks dead inside lying through his teeth like that.
Poor guy.
>Mr. Judging Before Seeing was mad because people were judging before seeing.
>comparing a free to watch video on youtube to a fucking film
>>341442581
AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH
>>341442975
So by your logic when these sicks fucks are trying to indoctrinate children with gender identity shit in kindergarten the winning move is to ignore them?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWG8bfhejVs
You are pathetic
to be honest
will u guys spend money to watch this movie?
>>341443602
Nope, torrents are a thing.
>>341441271
Why did you think the anon used the word "force".
>>341442803
Trailers aren't always an accurate depiction of the movie quality. If he's such a le epic movie nerd like he claims to be, and if Ghost Busters is so important to him, you would think he would at least try to sit through the film.
I'm not saying it's gonna be a good film; I couldn't care less about movies, much less Ghost Busters, so I'm not going to see it, but James' refusal to see the film obviously stems from the all-female cast.
Why does not wanting to see a reboot/reimagining of a classic movie make you a bigot? I didn't want to go see the new Robocop and no one called me any names. No one called me out for being anti-progress. Michael Keaton didn't roast anyone on twitter for not supporting his new film.
When movies look like shit, people are going to comment that it looks like shit. Reboots especially. I can't name a specific time EVER when "shaming viewers into paying for a film" was ever a successful promotional strategy. This is a reboot saddled with an uninspired gimmick and when the trailer had shitty reactions Sony went into full-force "controversy creation mode".
It's ironic that all of these twitter crusaders that were in dire need of an actual real-life bully in 8th grade have now become social media bullies.
>>341439158
>a post about a fucking movie
>on /v/
>>341443504
This for AVGN 3's boss.
>>341442181
Patton oswalt is now dead to me.
>>341441484
>that delayed as fuck reaction from the cast
I think even they realize its shit
>>341443602
Not even remotely interested. The cast just doesn't seem good.
>>341442581
>>341443775
>Patton oswalt is now dead to me.
The guy has always been a major faggot playing the emasculated men in movies/tv shows
>>341440870
>There are plenty of people this writer could have attacked that legitimately have sexist leanings, this guy was a poor target.
You are misunderstanding their intent., you think this article in particular is about feminism.
It's not, it's about bashing an online celebrity in order to create clickbait.
Outrage culture is profitable.THIS SHIT IS STILL NOT VIDYA
>>341443775
>he ever liked patton oswalt
Wait, he got hate for that video? I agreed with everything he said. It looks stupid.
>>341443747
Trailers are supposed to give an impression. If they gave off a bad impression, then it's the suppliers fault and not the fault of the customer. It's a ridiculous assertion to say that you should spend money on something that doesn't seem good to you.
>>341443679
Why even torrent it? It looks like fucking trash, it doesn't even seem like the sort of movie that would be fun to laugh at.
I genuinely think those 2 hours of your life would be better spent fapping or shitposting on /v/.
>Heavy shows disapproval
>>341443602
This cash grab wont be grabbing my cash.
>>341443775
Just like his wife.
>>341443598
Just what the hell is this
>>341443025
considering that crocodile stomache acids are strong as fuck that can even melt some metals, there's nothing left of that little girl
>>341443747
>trailer is bad
>you should still pay to go watch it to give it a fair chance
Fuck this logic holy shit
>>341442042
That's actually pretty reasonable imo.
He knows based on the marketing material that it isn't the true successor he wanted, so instead of being like every other faggot Youtube reviewer and making a RAGE review about a movie he knows he'll hate he's just going to skip it. (and skip out on the potential ad revenue from a big video like that, because Ghostbusters means too much to him)
I see nothing wrong with this. What happened to the days when "If you don't like something, don't buy it." or "Voting with your wallet" was a normal and acceptable way to voice yourself as a consumer.
It's not like he was calling for a boycott of the film and encouraging people not to go, he was just putting it out there that he wasn't interested since he's known online as a big Ghostbusters fan and knew people would be hounding him for his opinion on the new movie.
There is literally nothing wrong with this. Poor James, and shame on all of those people trying to shit on him to further there agenda over this.
https://youtu.be/8huymZGRQ6Y
What did they mean by this?
>>341441484
How many jokes do they have to throw in one scene just for introducing the car?
>>341443753
because the people that actually call people bigots and racists right now are fucking retarded and have no real arguments.
The exact same thing is going to happen with watchdogs 2 if you don't think it looks like a good game it's because you're a racist and just hate it because the protagonist is black.
When the Black Panther movie bombs it's going to be because of racism not because he's a fucking terrible superhero that nobody gives a fuck about.
why can't feminists deal with opinions in entertainment other than theirs? If someone claimed they hate yooka laylee I wouldn't want to see dozens of articles from left wing rags condemning the person, even though the game looks good to me.
>>341442975
I didn't do SHIT to give these people attention, you cunt.
But these people are a problem of such importance now it's dangerous to ignore them.
FUCKIN' GET USED TO IT, AND MARCH TO GET PEOPLE SICK OF THESE IDENTITY POLITICIANS.
Christ.
>>341443928
Yep, journalists saw it and went "we can sell this" and fabricated drama.
>>341439158
>Mr. Judging Before Seeing was mad because people were judging before seeing.
Yeah, because it's not like the whole point of trailers is to show what kind of film it is to potential moviegoers.
>>341443971
Source? This is some horrible journalism.
>>341443996
This is what happens when you ignore the elephant in the room and let these people run wild all over media/education and politics
>>341443598
Disgusting, this damages children.
>>341443602
No.
>>341439158
>Attack
what fucking "attack"? he made a video explaining to his fans why he wouldn't be reviewing the new ghostbusters. the reaction to it has been fucking insane. these people are frothing at the mouth, desperate to portray him as some evil monster, without knowing anything about him. it's a goddamn witch hunt
>>341443025
my neighbor has one just chilling in his pool right now
>>341444089
>why can't feminists deal with opinions in entertainment other than theirs?
Because they literally want a police state where they are the ones in control.
>>341439158
>some dipshit using their low ranking job at NYT's fashion & style section to make a hit piece on a video game and classic cinema reviewer
Shouldn't this be a fireable offense or something?
Also, have a picture.
>>341444159
feminism: we need the government to ban "cyber violence" against women, but harassment campaigns against men are ok, even if it's just a taste in movies or what shirt you wear.
>>341443971
>>341442181
What pisses me off is that a nigga in a Dr. Suess hat calling anyone a man baby.
>>341444195
male or female
make your bets
>>341442181
>Dat Eric D. Snider dude
I don't think anyone who wears such a tacky hat on his Twitter profile is in a position to call anyone a manbaby.
>>341439158
Whoever wrote this is a scumbag of the highest degree.
>>341444056
>What happened to the days when "If you don't like something, don't buy it." or "Voting with your wallet" was a normal and acceptable way to voice yourself as a consumer.
Not appropiated for the FEEL AND BELIEVE new order
Now eat you propaganda cupcakes, apollo
>>341439158
>sitting with his rimless glasses amid a gumball machine
What about this detail makes it worth including
>write hundreds of articles about him calling him every name there is
>pester him via email
>fucking call him when his statement wasn't click generating enough
Alright everyone, say it with me:
Harassment is only bad if the harassed agrees with my views!
No bad tactics, only bad targets.
>>341443971
>googoo dada speak
I can hear the butthurt.
>>341444050
Any reports on how big the animal was? Did it just snap up the kid and leave? Do crocs eat shit whole or do they rip it apart?
>>341441484
Poor Bill. Looks like he's screaming on the inside the whole time.
Not one video game is being discussed.
>>341439158
Man, the New York Times has really gone down the shitter if they're trying to pass this shit off as "journalism." So much for objectivity.
>>341443971
hahaha oh god
>>341444446
They are, ironically, trying to shame his for being a loser nerd as a way to discredit him.
Despite the fact that appropriating nerd culture is super fashionable right now, and exactly what the new Ghostbusters movie is capitalizing now.
>>341444521
they pull it down to the bottom of the river and wait til the body starts to rot and then they eat it, often over a long period of time
>>341444603
There are important political issues at stake and you're worried about fucking video games?
>>341439568
This is about James you fucking simpleton.
>>341439158
>http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/19/fashion/ghostbusters-internet-attacks.html?_r=0
>19/6/2016
>article dated for the 14th anyway
>fashion & style
>attack
the fuck is going in this article
>>341444521
I think sometimes they'll bury food and let it rot a bit before eating, but you're already dead at that point.
>>341443971
If conservatives wrote something this stupid it would be all other the news and rightfully mocked. Why do liberals get to do this on a regular basis, feminists especially?
Reminder that the new Ghostbusters is just a part of a conspiracy to keep putting Melissa McCarthy in movies to satisfy this man's fetish.
How about a fucking archive link
OP you fucking shill?
>>341439158
lmao they're still butmad about this
nytimes hahaha
>>341439158
This article seems aimless in the second half.
Does the NYtimes not have editors or something?
>>341444051
>>341443938
So do you retards honestly not know what a reviewer is?
>>341444784
Because they control the media in the first place.
>>341442416
Pretty much this.
Then the compounding fact other opinion writers condem his opinion and rational behind this decision is equally horrid and just plain bad journalism
>>341445036
A reviewer is under no obligation to review every single film/game/whatever
>>341445036
Good thing James specifically said his video is a "non-review".
>>341441484
God damn what an infuriating clip that was
>>341445101
At this point i am not sure it can be called journalism anymore.
>>341444890
The only thing that Paul "The Faggot" Fieg secretly has a fetish for is men.
>>341441484
I saw on /tv/ that he was threatened with lawsuits if he didn't promote the movie but I'm not really sure
>>341444726
At this point he is literally who.
>Hiroyuki will never ban celebrities form /v/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGz4crv-OZI
>>341439158
>When people attack me, it’s always about trying to get a reaction
James is based
>>341439158
Honestly I've been shocked by the level of character assassination on James and I fucking hate the angry video nerd.
The Internet is ripping him to shreds
>>341444195
>>341444347
Numales. Not even once.
>>341445279
KEK
>>341441484
nothing I hate more in the world than "quirky' middle aged women
>>341445195
True, i should have used the word research. But God some of these related articles are snide, picking out selected manerisims and things in the back ground is just disgusting. If I did that to a female reporter or critic Id be labeled sexist
>>341439158
>rimless glasses
>glasses had rims
Okay
>>341445279
loool
>>341445459
The left one looks like the "TRIGGERED" woman
>>341445036
Most of the stuff James reviews is older than the internet. New movies aren't his usual routine.
Regardless of what gender the lead actors/actresses are, if a trailer looks like shit it looks like shit. I don't understand how pointing this out makes one sexist.
This is all just a clickbait conspiracy to garner pageviews, right? People don't actually think like this do they?
Please tell me this is all some huge joke.
>>341445241
Correct.
https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/104704
AlsoSteinberg, Weil, Yankelevits
>>341445251
Your dank maymays are a trillion times more cancerous but you keep doing them.
>>341443380
>Implying GB isnt James favorite movie
James favorite movie is "It's a mad mad mad mad world".
>>341442091
>>daughter suffered possibly permanent injury at birth
explain pls
>>341441484
He is trully dead inside.
>>341443919
Big Fan and that Pixar movie were good imo.
Liberals: getting angrier at a white dude for not wanting to see a dogshit-looking movie than they do at ISIS for murdering 50 of their beloved homos.
>>341444062
>thumbnail is the "sheboon" going full stereotype as called in that one picture.
Jesus
Relevant: http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2007/01/hitchens200701
>>341443536
Probably right next to that pirate treasure I never found.
>>341441484
Reminder that Bill was forced into this movie with threats of legal action if he refused. HAHAH JUST GLAD TO BE PART OF THIS EPIC NEW PROJECT
>>341443971
>I have no interest in thing
>WOW DO YOU NOT LIKE WOMEN? YOU SEXIST, CAPITALIST, CIS, PIECE OF SHIT!!!!
Even if this movie were all men, it's Paul Feig and i still wouldn't see it.
>If you dont like it you are sexist
>If you dont watc it you are sexist
>If you are a white male you are already sexist
What the fuck is next? This is getting retarded.
>>341443970
Because this way we can say it's a bad movie
>>341445764
Nu-liberal
I consider myself liberal, but I agree with James.
Quality should not be sacrificed for the sake of shoehorned diversity.
>>341442181
It utterly boggles my mind that journalists are engaging in namecalling spats in a public venue.
>>341443338
>tailtail sign
>>341444160
picture
>>341444078
more than zero would be nice
>>341445947
If youre a gay man who doesn't want to fuck FtMs, you're a bigot. This is a thing that's already happening.
This thread was moved to >>>/tv/70858243
