VV is developing the remasters
They're most likely actually 'Remakes"

I don't think Acti owns him anymore

hey at least its not the shitass design with that fucking tattoo and junk

Sony only has the rights to the first 3 games

Activision owns him

>>341236485
I used to allways think this but the naughty dog art book had activisions name over crash bandicoot

though uncharted 4 doesnt

its so confusing

also>>341236425
who are VV should i be worried?

>>341236426
I dont mind the figure itself desu this really... really could have looked much worst

>>341236139
at first I was pretty mad when he said remasters, but now I feel like it's probably the best way to revive crash

it's better to let kids today eperience the games that made crash good than another crash of the titans

also. considering how popular skylanders is with the kids, it doesn't feel like putting crash in their games isn't a cheap cash-in like spyro was
it seems to be the other way around, a way to draw attention to crash
and he doesn't look bad either, kinda like those early drawings they made of him

>>341236139
If you listened to the e3 announce Sony msn clearly said it was a result of working with 'our partners at Activision' they still hold the rights but would have cut a deal with Sony

>>341237534
>who are VV should i be worried?
Vicarious Visions

They did the GBA games, and those were pretty good, actually.

>hey it's crash!
>...hd edition for ps4
>oh and skylanders
i dont know anymore

>>341237534
Vicarious Visions

They've developed Crash Games in the past. I trust them

Skylanders Crash is available on all platforms so I would still say Activision.

>>341240419
oh thank god, it's just the GBA games
yeah, those were pretty good, so this could turn out ok

Crash 1, improve the saving, add the cut levels as a bonus
Crash 2 keep the same bar graphic improvements
Crash 3, add more normal levels, maybe a new time period

>>341240719
They also did CNK which was very enjoyable

Their cutscenes are fantastic