>Sony saves VR
>All these poorfags are against it
>VR for anything but porn
>spending $400 to attach a gimmicky, glorified TV screen to your face
>>341189142
>spending about 400 dollars for some ugly head piece to ruin your eyes
no thanks. sony might have improved it but it was never going to be good
3D failed because people don't want to wear glasses, what do you think is going to happen to something even more uncomfortable that you wear on your face?
VR shouldn't be a thing until people can just literally plug their brain into the game.
How exactly? Licensed VR "experiences"? The only one we saw gameplay of was the FFXV one and that was a crappy indie game with a better game's graphics.
I mean if you want to strap a sub 720p 10 fps screen directly on your face and throw up every two seconds be my guest. Anyone who thinks that the ps4's hardware can deliver a god vr experience when it can't even keep a majority of its games at a stable 30fps is delusional. Current high end pc's are just now becoming capable of vr much less your 15 fps station.
>>341189142
>wanting another one of these
>>341192381
It doesn't matter how good their hardware is.
If their VR makes money, then there will be more VR games from companies who want to cash in.
>>341193495
>If their VR makes money, then there will be more VR games from companies who want to cash in.
That just sounds fucking horrible. It's like the playstation move and wii all over again.
>>341190745
>>341190475
>>341189142
It IS NOT $400.
It is $450 cause the camera is mandatory and not included.
It is $500 to buy the bundle with the move controllers and the camera.
>>341189142
>VR
>Low res sub 30fps
every single VR game amounted to slow ass FPS gameplay
remember when motion controllers failed because they were imprecise slow pieces of shit? that's what VR is
It's weird seeing actual VR games, not just cash-in Steam shovelware.
>>341196634
>Actual VR games
>Its the exact same motion control pistol shooting games
