HAHAHAHHAHA D O W N G R A D E ALREADY
>>340923016
>Hahahaha
>>340923016
Come on now
Man it's not like they have to render a lot of shit since it's a wasteland
Should have just gone 2150
>>340923016
Goddamn that looks like shit
Loving the shells that have no shadows.
So is it true that most classes will have automatic weapons by default and that bolt action weapons are relegated to snipers only?
>mfw multiplayer isn't that impressive
>>340924134
Bolt actions are boring
>>340924246
This surprises you?
>>340923528
it's supposed to.
>Semi-Automatic rifles
>In a WW1 game
>>340924246
Its Battlefield
What did you expect?
>>340924246
Looks great. Battlefield 4 with a WW1 skin and some much needed mechanic changes.
>>340924847
Semi-automatic rifles existed in the time period. DICE said anything that existed and was deployed at some point in the war is fair game. If you were looking for some psuedo-realistic shit go play Verdun a.k.a Shittier RO2 that no one plays because it sucks
>>340923016
It literally is BF:SW or BF4 with a new skin.
Is it just me or is this a lot like bad company 2?
What year was bad company 2 set in again? The tank play seems similar
>>340925132
This attempt at bait right here
4 MAPS ON LAUNCH. Battlefield 4 had 11 for comparison.
>>340925132
>Experimental Semi-Automatic rifles were used and a failure in WW1
>This means we can avoid using bolt actions in BF1
>>340925132
>Semi-automatic rifles existed in the time period
Germans had V2's in WWII but how many vidya games have you played were every character had access to these at all times? The game is retarded but you just won't admit it.
Holy shit this is great. Literally everything about it looks bad and all the retards on here were hyped for it.
>>340925394
Anything that was deployed in the time period is fair game. Whys that so hard to understrand?
>>340925469
Its really not. It looks like a really solid battlefield title. You're just angry it didn't try to be super realistic and have everyone using bolt action rifles, as if fucking realism matters at all concerning how good a game is.
>>340925361
is this for real?
they took a modern setting battlefield game and gave it a ww1 paint
its just a cash in, everything from EA is a fucking cash in
>>340925713
Because what's the point in making a WW1 game when it plays exactly like Battlefield 4?
>>340925979
Gaze upon it for yourself https://www.battlefield.com/games/battlefield-1/maps
If only Red Orchestra 2 was like this. ;_;
>>340926160
Except for the part where it doesn't play exactly like Battlefield 4?
Significantly nerfed auto weapons, significantly nerfed anti-vehicle, tweaked gamemodes, just watch the fucking stream. Its way more of a jump between BC2 and BF3 or BF4 and Hardline.
Just go and play Verdun, its everything you want. I'm sure the other 20 players wouldnt mind your company.
>>340926290
>check back for more
They haven't shown them all off yet you stupid cunt
>>340926494
>Want WW1 game
>Don't get WW1 game
>WHY DID YOU WANT WW1 GAME?
>>340926494
>a $60 Battlefield 4 balance patch
>>340926676
How is it not a WW1 game? The only weapons, vehicles, and gadgets in the game are all WW1. There is nothing in the game made after WW1.
That fucking plane crash at the end...
>>340926763
And updated engine, new maps, entire new arsenal, better graphics, new vehicles, better destruction (ties in with updated engine)
>>340926857
>Everyone is using Experimental and rare equipment just so the game plays like a more modern shooter
>H-How is this not a WW1 game!?
Because The weapon options basically make it play like Battlefield 4.
They're weapon skins
>>340926586
You're right they still have the DLC maps to show!
>>340927307
>entire new arsenal
>1:1 reskins of existing weapons
>>340925979
obviously not
none of those has trains or horses, and there is no forest map here shown in trailers
so
>>340927418
Except not a single weapon in the game feels the same as any BF4 weapon? Not even the bolt actions are as good as BF4 snipers. Get real dude.
>>340926857
>>340927307
>SMG class in WW1
>Where SMG's were so experimental and unnoticed that they were forgotten about in the treaty of versillies
>>340927801
>I can tell what a whole map looks like from a jpeg image.
>>340927839
>SMG act like every SMG in Battlefield 4
>HMG act like every HMG in Battlefield 4
>Semi automatic rifles act like Semi automatic rifles from Battlefield 4
>No unique weapon styles in a WW1 game.
Who gives a shit.
Only Titanfall 2 might be decent, and even then it looks the same as the first one.
>>340927181
it imploded
>>340928176
>Experimental weaponry suddenly being used by everyone ever
>Just so EA don't need to think about weapon choice besides models.
>>340928164
>let me just make shit up for no reason
the handling looks like BC2 and Hardline more than BF4
>>340928176
It's well known that DICE employees lurk on /v/. You could be more subtle next time.
>>340928164
Except you're 100% wrong. You're not even watching the stream. SMGs fucking suck long range and infantry cant carry HMGs. You dumb?
>>340928434
Its weird how a decade ago everyone was praising the BF1942 expansion that added literal experimental WW1 tech that never saw the field to the game.
>>340928464
I'm an unemployed high-school dropout nice try.
If a dice employee IS in this thread though I wouldn't mind an alpha invite.
So far this e3 is doing the opposite of making me want to buy games nigger
>>340928504
>>340928459
>It looks nothing like BF4
>It looks like BC2 and Hardline
So it still looks nothing like a WW1 game.
>>340928683
WW2 tech* I fat fingered it.
Secret Weapons of WW2 was almost universally praised, because it was a fucking good expansion pack and realism matters fuck all compared to GAMEPLAY MECHANICS.
You were probably like 6 when 1942 came out though.
>Get somewhat excited about a Battlefield set in WW1
>everyone has smg's
>more than half of the weapons are automatic
>it's just a reskin
Why do they do this? fucking normies honestly.
Let's just give everyone a SMG a weapon so insignificant the allied were barely aware of its usage during the war.
>>340923016
3th match scores
>>340928683>>340928875
>Expansion adds Experimental WW2 tech as an addition
>Gets praised
>Entire base game is Experimental WW1 tech that detracts from the WW1 style
>Gets shat on
Gee, maybe when people think of WW2 they assume bolt action rifles and not Submachineguns spraying and praying.
>downgrade
>posts screenshot from a Twitch livestream
totally solid proof there pal
>>340929038
Niggers suck at video games holy shit.
>bother to even discuss the weapons and muh realism
>when neither Russia and not even fucking japan are in the game, but USA its magically relevant in a military way
fuck off, this was a shit WW1 game since its announcement, could end up being a good shooter, but the WW1 theme its just a skin
If I remember in 1942 the US assault had a BAR and the German an STG. It's nothing new.
>>340929091
Except in 1942 there was still a disproportionate amount of SMGs, vehicles, and semi-auto rifles? Did you actually play the game? It was nowhere near realistic.
>it says "Pre-Alpha" in the corner of the livestream
>Pre-fucking-Alpha
>game comes out in 4 months
when will this meme die? there is no way this is pre-alpha
>>340929038
>3th
>>340929626
>1942 has more bolt action rifles than Battlefield 1
>>340929883
Now you're just making things up to try and further your argument. Not a single battlefield game in the history of battlefield has ever had "realistic" weapon allocation. You picked your class and used what you had. The only fucking non-modern combat shooter that has realistic weapon allocation is in the RO series. You can just fuck off now, its an anonymous imageboard, you don't gotta save face.
TO THE AIRSHIP, QUICKLY
I TOLD YOU TO TIE IT TO SOMETHING SECURE
looks like battlefront, kill yourself
>>340926290
>check back for more
>>340930171
>1942 has more bolt action rifles than Battlefield 1
That sentence literally sums up everything wrong with Battlefield 1.
it doesn't matter about realistic weapon allocation, it's about the weapon allocation making it feel like the setting.
And this WW1 game has ONE bolt action rifle.
looks like shit
>it's a "shilling a we wuz niggers game" thread
>>340930614
who cares, it looks fun and fits the general setting
>>340931334
>Fits the general setting
>Sub-machine guns everywhere and everyone is running and gunning
>F-Fun
It looks like a skin over a modern battlefield game, so it will be shit.
>>340930614
Because it wouldn't fit the kind of gameplay that Battlefield aims for. In 1942 most people ran around with automatics (BARs, STGs, Thompsons, MP40s, Brens, etc). The exception being engineer/sniper who had semi or bolt action rifles, and AT ho had the rocket.
>>340931334
>who cares, it looks fun
like clockwork
>>340923016
reminder that battlefield one is going to be like star wars battlefront all over again.
huge hype and everyone abandoned the game really quick.
I can already see it.
>>340931573
Its aesthetics fit the general theme of ww1 so literally who cares
>>340930614
But Battlefield 1 has more bolt actions than 1942? Where are you getting your fake numbers?
You never even played 1942, at least not until a decade after its release after all your friends said it was the best battlefield.
>>340931607
>All Battlefield games must play the same from every single time period
>Everyone must run and gun
WHERE IS MY FLAMETHROWER YOU NIGGERS
>>340923016
so it's a map in france but thoses swedecuck didn't put the french as a team?
WTF
>>340931905
>Only Bolt action rifles in battlefield 1 is the sniper class
>Could use Bolt action in Battlefield1942 as scout and engineer
>>340923016
can someone explain what those fucking thanksgiving floats are
>>340929038
snoop dog so close to 420 score
Who /Titanfall/ now?
>>340931946
It plays that way because it's what has worked for them and what most people want. Nobody has bought Battlefield games for slower more tactical combat. This is nothing new.
>>340932337
Barrage balloons you nimrod
>>340932327
>>Only Bolt action rifles in battlefield 1 is the sniper class
Objectively false, sorry.
>>340923016
>those whales
>>340932534
>People who wanted a WW1 shooter wanted people running around running and gunning.
>>340932603
Can you prove otherwise?
cheapest place topre-order?
Why did DICE even bother with labeling their game as a WWI game? They should have just gone alternate history or fantasy altogether. I mean, if you're already taking huge liberties with the technology of the time, it's not much of a stretch to say "okay, now it's fantasy not-britain vs. fantasy not-germany"
It's not like millennials or niggers are even aware that there was a WWI.
>RIP COD
>>340932536
wow no need to be rude kiddo
never heard of those
>>340932818
The bin you find a few copies there
>>340928723
Fortunately, you're not the target audience. The hundreds of retards who will buy this anyway because holy shit it's a new Battlefield are.
>>340932796
It's still foremost a Battlefield game. I still don't understand how this surprises people.
NO
BOLT
RIFLES
WTF DICE
>>340932797
Did you watch any of the 3 games? They spectated someone with an unscoped bolt-action and un-scoped semi auto several times in each.
>UK vs Germany
>All UK infantry are Black
>>340923016
LOL THOSE ZEPPELINS LOOK LIKE BALLOONS
>>340927429
>getting desperate
here's the (you)
>>340932603
So where is the second class with the Bolt action?
>>340933194
Except they fucking didn't, the only bolt action visible in game was a gewehr 98 with optics
>>340933212
Probably a customisable thing like in battlefront. There were a lot of jazz musicians on the stream
This cold have been battlefronts gameplay
>>340925286
I think BC2 was set in like 2014?
>>340929629
You're dumb, fuck off
>>340933306
Desperate
(You)r turn
reminder that battlefield one is going to be like battlefront star wars all over again.
huge hype and everyone abandoned the game really quick.
I can already see it.
the gameplay remind alot of battlefront star wars, it's super fast like star wars
>>340933343
What? Holy shit you did not watch at all if you think there was only 1 scoped bolt action. There were several scoped AND unscoped. I'm done with you.
>>340925361
No you just have to pay extra for the rest. Is this your first EA game?
>>340933343
ur dumb
>>340933752
This might stick for a while longer. If all the maps are like this then its a mix between BC and Battlefront
>>340933693
you seriously believe this is pre alpha 4 months until release?
>>340933789
You don't know these weapons. There was only 1 bolt action
>>340933752
>>340933887
Provide me with one screenshot, just one, from that hour of MP gameplay
>>340933752
except star wars battlefront has absolutely trash gameplay mechanics while this is actually new take on battlefield
>>340923016
>compressed youtube stream rip
>trying to claim as evidence
every time
"1"
I can't defend anything
Can't tell if this bait or real
Deep down inside muh feels to ree
This terrible board stops me
Now that EA is through with me
I'm sitting up and can see
There's no good Battlefield since 3
Nothing is real but hype now
Hold my breath as I wish for death
Oh God please help me
Back in my tomb is on zeal
In pumps dewitoes that I must feel
But can't buy forward to reveal
Look to a time when games are good!
Fed with memes straight from /v/
Just like a modern day human bean
Tied to computers that stick to me
Wipe this game off me
Now EA is done Battlefield 1
Oh God help me
Hold my breath as I wish for death, Oh God please help meeeee
DANKNESS
IMPRISONING ME
ALL THAT'S ON /V/
ABSOLUTE HORROR
IT CANNOT LIVE
IT CANNOT DIE
TRAPPED IN ITSELF
CONTAINMENT IT'S HOLDING CELL
EA
HAS TAKEN OUR SIGHT
TAKEN OUR SPEECH
TAKEN OUR HEARING
TAKEN OUR ARMS
TAKEN OUR LEGS
TAKEN OUR SOUL
LEFT IS WITH A LIFE IN HELL!
>>340934478
I can see that the gameplay mechanics is based on battlefront, maybe they changed it a little bit but overall it's the same.
And I got that feeling that you can't prone in BF1 just like battlefront(and we havn't seen anyone prone in the gameplay.)
All this shilling ITT
Fuck off EA your game is garbage
I need everyone who had any ounce of hype for this game to leave this board and never come back.
>>340933331
God white people are fucking annoying.
Shut the fuck up and let him have his opinion.
>>340924246
Oh and CoD is really a treat innit
neeeeerrrrowwww boop
>>340923016
A battlefield game is pretty much cod on a bigger map with more players.
Why can no one see this.
>>340936883
But it's actually not.
t. someone who plays cod and bf along with other fps
>>340936541
WE WUZ AUSTRAILIAN N' SHEEEIT
>>340937182
>sprint to objective
>see enemy
>shoot at each other
>person who shoots most bullets into the foe wins
>continue sprinting to objective
>repeat
Yeah, tell me the diffrence.
>>340933212
LITERALLY go die you fu**ing racist fa**ot!
>>340937991
>>340937956
sounds like literally any fps
stop talking
>>340936883
Because they have completely different shooting mechanics, Battlefield uses an expanding cone of fire model with modifiers for stance and movement, all weapons have ballistics modelling.
Call of Duty uses a fixed cone of fire model, with stance modifiers only for unaimed fire, nearly all weapons are hitscan based.
>>340934890
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-jyQu6LNZY
>>340934890
>>340940021
Please tell me you've watched this concert. Best show Metallica has ever done imo.