How the hell can anybody have fun with this game? Just look at this webm. It's so unsmooth it's fucking unplayable and just gives me a headache watching it.
>>340877939
I can because I am not autistic.
>>340877939
It's not like we had a 1080p 60 FPS experience in the 90's. Play with the cards you are dealt.
Majora's Mask drops to 10 at times but it's still one of my favourites
>>340877939
Emulate it with dolphin and use fps hacks then you dumb millennial
>>340878173
Speak for yourself, PC master race has always been ahead of the curve
Weird how it looks like 60 fps, I never realized it runs on such bad frames.
>>340878776
but that's wrong and you know it is
>>340878776
>first person garbage
sorry I'm not interested in bunnyhopping, and if I was, I'd play Jumping Flash.
It's some of that Nintendo magic that seems to have extinguished these days.
Yesterday they could make a sub 30fps one of the best games ever.
Today they can't push a smooth 60fps game out of mediocrity.
>>340878898
It's because the framerates didn't jump all over the place. Games were made with care and if you weren't going to achieve max framerate, they'd make it so it runs at a consistent framerate.
Games now just ignore that and can drop frames if someone nearby farts due to bad coding.
>>340877939
Because the game is older than you are
You are what's wrong with gaming. Not the SJWs, not the dudebros, not the OverWatch shills. YOU, motherfucker
>>340877939
>being this angry at something so stupid
I guess being born post 2009 can do that to you. Stick to games of your time kid. In the 90s we didn't give a fuck about fps let alone know what it was, we only cared about if the game was fun.
Also autism wasn't as rampant then as it is now.
3rd person games are not as nauseating as first person ones.
The animations and combat are simple so it's not an eye sore to play. Not fast paced either.
>>340879361
But a game literally can't be fun without 60 fps, so I guess you admit yourself that 90's was the dark age of video games since they were all just a bunch of shit slideshows.
>>340879612
I don't admit anything. Don't put words into my mouth. Maybe it's cuz im older now but I don't even play games anymore. I look at what's out there and it's depressing. I feel bad for kids like you for missing out on the golden age of gaming.
>that feeling of going to a new friend you just made at schools house and finding out he has a super Nintendo or n64
If anything the dark age is now, what with all the lack of imagination, and risk. Ah well, just go back to your generic fps and mobas
>>340880235
>I don't even play games anymore
Your average /v/ shit poster.
>>340877939
is it just me or is oot still an awesome looking game? god i love its art style and general look. timeless to me 2bh
>>340877939
Dark Souls is basically Zelda for adults right?
>>340880478
It's just you.
>>340878173
consoles STILL don't have consistent 1080p 60FPS so yeah, sucks
>>340880643
>Zelda for adults
Pic related.
>>340880235
>I don't even play games any more
Fucking millenials finally admit that they don't give a shit about video games
They got we got out of that shitty era of 'games' they grew up with
Because it was groundbreaking when it was released and runs on nostalgia fuel.
I think is an objectively good game but has really started to show is age.
>>340880779
mein neigre
>>340877939
How about playing the 3D version of it?
>>340877939
I never noticed but then again mine was the Gamecube version and it already had a couple of tweaks like having the resolution doubled.
>>340879361
>we only cared about if the game was fun.
Then why the fuck are you defending OoT, the most boring, un-fun, slog of a game in existence.
>>340878776
>PC master race has always been ahead of the curve
lmao
now THIS is underage
>>340881853
Gamecube version was already 30 fps.
I remember wowing at the difference in the framerate when i got the disc along with wind waker.
>>340878776
>1080p60fps on a voodoo 4
>16:9 in 1999
No.
>>340882413
t. consolefriend who doesn't know what software mode is
>>340882413
>software mode
look at this poorfag
>>340877939
most 64 games had low frames but they were stable and designed around it so it didn't bother you.
>>340882506
>Gamecube version was already 30 fps.
It wasn't. It does render at a higher resolution though (but has some graphical glitches like missing lens flare).
>>340879612
>But a game literally can't be fun without 60 fps
Oh nevermind, it's one of these threads.
>>340880779
>Zelda for tryhard early teens
Remember getting hyped for it and finding out it was an uninspired mess for people who has a boner for shoulderplates.
>>340877939
Play the 3DS version nigga, solid 30fps and remastered visuals. It's only 20 bucks
>>340882620
>>340882631
>being so underage they don't know Quake only had software mode on release
>framerate fags
Go away asscancer.
>>340877939
Frame rate wasn't a major issue or talked about much until the group thinkers decided to take up the ideals of a British man dying from cancer.
>>340882776
>quake 3
>>340882690
Huh really. I remember it running way smoother.
>>340877939
Are you underage? This was completely normal for console gaming back then. A smooth 30fps was a rarity.
There are probably others but offhand the only game I can think of that ran at a smooth 60FPS on console at the time was F-Zero X and it sacrificed a lot of graphical detail for that. It was a good choice though because the game played much better because of it.
>>340883083
Yeah, seriously. The engine in the N64 is hardcoded for 20 FPS. I don't think emulators can get around this without some serious hacking.
The 3DS version runs on a different engine so it is exempt from this restriction.
Oh, and here's a little known fact. OoT is 20 FPS but actually reads input at 60 FPS. Mario 64 is the same. It's a feature of that game engine that input reading isn't synchronized with the displayed framerate.
>>340877939
>literally proving you are underage
Mods, come on.
>>340877939
>not just playing it at 60 with the HD texture pack on Dolphin, same with Majora's Mask
I mean 60 FPS breaks shit quite a lot, but still. 30 is better but still can break some stuff like the hookshot.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8HqQsZEc_AE
>>340883316
Neat didn't know that, that would explain why the inputs never felt delayed like they would on a modern game running at 20FPS.
my friends used to invite me over to play 4-player split-screen Perfect Dark with them, and that shit went down to like 8 FPS sometimes. They couldn't understand why I didn't enjoy playing it
>>340885595
When we were younger none of us knew what autism was.
You were just that annoying whiny kid.
>>340882530
I don't quite recall Quake 3 being considered a Voodoo centric time.
>>340877939
>how the hell could kids have fun
Even current kids for whom these games are aimed at have no idea what you are saying.
>>340885831
it was on the way out but the cards were still great on games with glide support
>>340883316
wait so ELI tech illiterate.
Why couldn't we do this with modern games that run at 30FPS. A lot of the problems I have with most games at 30 are because of input lag and percieved smoothness.
>>340885595
>Perfect Dark
At least it's not Turok. Dem graphics though.
>It's a graphics fag
>>340885809
>When we were younger none of us knew what autism was.
and you still don't, apparently. Playing a game with terrible controls at 10FPS against 3 people who are actually good at it when you don't know the first thing about how to win wouldn't be fun for anyone - autism or no autism.
>>340886547
You could. Most games now don't have framerates nearly as fucking stable as OoT, which was the only reason it was playable at all and continues to be.
>>340886973
Keeping a frame rate of at least 30 at all times is not really the same as having "good graphics." It is a fucking requirement for any game to be considered playable.
Games with really shitty graphics look equally as terrible at low FPS as games with really good graphics
> /Underages blog
thread
>>340887268
>I can't relax when playing with childrens toys
Autism
>>340877939
it was designed for old CRTs senpai, you barely noticed it back then, final fantasy 7 is the same shit
>>340886547
>Why couldn't we do this with modern games
Well on PC it's just because the games are usually poorly optimized. On modern consoles (PS4, Xbone), the CPU is actually the bottleneck and that's what reads the input.
Also GPUs are very unified now, which means the whole thing can be used in a very maximized way.
N64's GPU has separated vertex and pixel pipeline like old GPUs did (actually it's the very first consumer-level GPU to have both a vertex and a pixel pipeline on the one chip) so it's possible for one half to be running faster than the other: they are inherently un-synchronized.
>>340880779
>edgey ass game
>for adults
Kek m8
