Should companies be able to use your behavior in vidya for hiring decisions.
>>340802068
> retards who act like retarded assholes in video games are more likely to act like retarded assholes in real life
You don't say
>>340802068
>toxic
What the fuck does that even mean?
>>340802184
the problem is "toxic behavior" in LoL can be something as innocuous as saying gg after a match.
Moba babbies scream and bitch about everything.
>>340802068
What does toxic behavior mean?
I've seen this word used to describe typical male behavior.
Is this just an extension of "all men are rapists"?
>>340802302
it's just a pc way of saying you're being a dick
>>340802068
Fuck no. Video games are an outlet to escape work, not an extension of it.
If I behave like an asshole online, it's most likely because I had a hard day at work. How do they expect employees to act when they're being monitored on their favorite game and therefore have no outlet?
Sometimes I purposely act like an asshole on the off chance people will become legitimately upset.
>>340802472
>Fuck no. Video games are an outlet to escape work, not an extension of it.
Uh no. If an employee has a hobby of breaking into homes to release stress, I'd fire his ass.
>If I behave like an asshole online
Nice to know you're impotent in real life so you have to resort to being a dick online
>>340802806
Here's your reply.
I've always worried about when this day would come, so ever since I was young and started playing GTA III I have obeyed every traffic signal, every stop sign, and have tried to avoid getting in as many accidents as possible. I never shoot anybody that I don't have to and I use professional dialogue in every situation possible, even modding the game so that my character doesn't use profanities.
They're watching and I'm ready
>>340802068
>Get banned from TF2 server for playing Soldier as intended
>Get banned from TF2 server for being the Medic in a Heavy/Medic combo
>Employee sees these bannings
>Get fired because of toxic behavior
THANKS VIDEOGAMES
>>340803101
shouldn't have cheated
>>340802068
>be neck-deep in hostile work environment at riot
>play lol to unwind, release some tension
>management: "you're fired because you play LoL like an asshole, pack your shit and get out"
i feel like this would cause workplace shootings
>>340802068
Riot games are a cancer that needs to be expunged.
>>340802068
I used to spray gay porn on the walls in Counter Strike - something I've only ever done a couple of times in real life. Never at work, though.
Why the fuck is LoL so popular? I tried it for a few games and it just wasn't fun.
>type up a report faster than a coworker
>gg ez
>you have been fired for toxic behavior
WOOOOOOOOOW
>>340803198
Worse anon.Shooting rockets towards their spawn from a distance
>>340802068
>a quarter
that's a pretty shitty correlation
![beZHQ[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/cmeqq8W.jpg "beZHQ[1].jpg")
>riot employees
lol
I dunno about getting the info, but if they figure out you tend to act like a dick when you think no one you know can hold you responsible for it then yeah it's more likely that you'll cause problems.
>>340802598
>Saying "gg easiest game of my life" to the enemy team after you LOSE still upsets and confuses them
>>340802068
This is 100% bullshit through and through
I shit talk so much in BF4 its silly, but I still end up MVP.
I haven't ever gotten in any sort of hot water at my work for the last 3 years either.
Riot is just retarded.
Has any other recent dev ruined gaming as much as Riot? They coined the generic as fuck term """MOBA""", which means literally nothing so people call all sorts of games that aren't Dotaclones MOBAs. On top of that, using "toxic" as a descriptor for an asshole has blown up and fucking everyone uses it.
>even if the opposite isn't always true
So they're saying that some people they fire are rude online, and that some people they don't fire are also rude online?
This is meaningless without more information. How many of their current employees have "bad feedback from teammates"? Is it also 25, or less? If so, how much less?
>>340803796
No you don't.
>>340802184
If you whip someone hard enough they will call you a cheater and complain and report you. I have had it lots. Its the most fun part of many games.
>>340803796
>I bought these anime figures as a joke
How did you get to the point in your life where you lie to strangers on the internet to make yourself feel better?
>>340802068
>correlation
>a quarter
I don't think that's how it works.
Was the journalist or Riot being retarded here? Hard to say, given both their histories of being retarded.
>toxic toxic toxic toxic
for what purpose
>>340802068
>a quarter
So what you're saying is that 75% of staff fired showed no noticeable aggression when playing online, so it's less likely that your activity online correlates to your attitude in work?
Also, what of those that weren't fired?
The information is worthless. At most it can be said "Assholes get fired".
>>340804063
my dick would fit perfectly into that mouth...
just saying
TOXIC
TOXIC
TOXIIIIIIIIIIICCCCCCCCCCCCC
MAKE IT STOP!
>>340803796
>I work in my family's business (IT consulting and service).
Translation:
>I live at home unemployed with my mum and sometimes answer the phone while she is at work.
>>340803508
>use game feature
>get suspended for 3 days
>>340803508
Wait, what?
Explain?
>a quarter
that's it?
not much of a smoking statistical gun, now is it
>>340803508
>dude acts like an ass
>gets banned
Sweet justice.
>>340802068
You can't escape. We are keeping close watch on everything you have ever done and everything you will do.
>>340802068
they should be able to fire employees for violating company policies, such as their terms of service
> Google article
> read comments
> see this
What the fuck is wrong with people?
>>340804506
The guy didn't want to play support when he had a riot employee on his team and said he would random instead so the riot employee banned him before he could random.
Net society was a mistake.
>>340804814
That's the part I need a little explanation about.
Adults don't act like that.
>>340804750
without looking i'd guess bait from a troll to get someone they are mad at hounded by autistic faggots
>>340804997
riot employees are manchildren. they don't think like adults
>>340805017
A lot of normalfags share this opinion, anon.
>>340804997
Pendragon is a notorious faggot. Before he got hired by Riot gaming he ran the biggest Dota fan forum and when Riot hired him he took it down and replaced the front page with an advertisement for League of Legends. He wouldn't give up the archives of the site until years later and called former users entitled for wanting them in the first place.
>>340805162
>>340805253
That's so hilariously retarded. Just think: less than twenty years ago people like that wouldn't be able to generate an income.
>>340804750
State worship.
WITH A TASTE OF YOUR LIPS I'M ON A RIDE
Post toxic behavior.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGCq3Bj7_x0
>>340804997
Yeah, adults don't queue for the tryhard mode and then act like children because they didn't get the role they wanted. They suck it up and play the hand they're dealt, because if you're going to tryhard then you accept that shit can happen and you have to deal with it.
>>340804063
I'll bet 25% is way higher than for the population at large.
>>340802068
>have a game that punishes you for your teammates ineptitude which at higher levels becomes serious setback
>wow why are these people getting upset at other players how toxic
>>340805719
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Cl4hotb01g
>>340805719
https://youtu.be/3DfxQi7haAI?t=5
>last game of league for the night
>my team is winning by alot
>write gg in all chat like i always do after the game
>boss calls me next morning saying they don't need a 'toxic dishwasher'
>can't even play league because I'm banned
>>340803896
>hard enough
I had some faggot tell his team to report me because of this:
>he talking shit to everyone on ally team all game
>i never talk at all in chat
>him: "IM THE FUCKING BEST PERSON ON THIS TEAM YOU ALL SUCK"
>me: "You're not all that great"
>him: WOW YOURE FUCKING TOXIC, YOURE THE REASON WERE LOSING
>tfw my kda was 3 times better than him
>>340802068
riot is literally the most cancerous company in the industry and the fact that people get fired for being "toxic" is fucking hilarious.
what a shit game
>>340804217
If your fired employees have a 25% rate of being assholes but your employee population at large has a 5% chance of being assholes, that still means it's more likely that your online activity correlates to your attitude in work. Go take a stats class.
>>340802806
The ironing
I troll people in videogames and i find fucking with people hilarious. Obviously I'd never go farther than minor annoyance, actually hurting people or things makes me feel terrible, but having people furious at me but unable to do anything is the funniest shit. If I had the powers irl that I had in videogames I'd be litterally unhireable.
>>340802068
Sure, why not.
Though laugh out loud @ League of Legends. What the devs call "toxic" I call fun. They have a personal goddamn crusade against racism, BMing, bantz, trolling your teammates, funposting in-game, and otherwise having a chuckle at the expense of the oversensitive salty anti-racist mad bad sad lads.
>>340802184
Takes 2 people for 1 to offend the other 1, anon.
You're as much of an asshole as they are for being so easily upset. Try to relax. Being able to face things and stay calm (or stay happy) will help you a lot in life!
>>340802302
Buzzword.
It's used in situations where person A does something that hurts person B's feelings, and implies that it's person A's fault. This is of course not true.
The reason offensive fun spreads is because it's fun. And also because training yourself to face offensive things without taking offense is both great personal growth AND a great way to form friendly rivalries with the other players.
Think of it as social combat, as part of a social game.
Every game has a loser (offended person), and it sucks to lose (get offended). But you can get better (not be offended so much), and win (stay happy while others are upset)!
>>340802336
If you understand what people mean when they say "toxic" then you'll understand why saying gg after a match is considered toxic.
Saying gg after a shit match hurts someone's feelings, because they are reminded that they suck.
"Toxic" means they're blaming you for their own over-sensitivity, and implying that you're the bad person for saying gg, but they AREN'T the bad person for taking offense to the gg, even though the hurt feelz are 99% the fault of the offended lad in this case.
>>340802437
>What does toxic behavior mean?
>I've seen this word used to describe typical male behavior.
>Is this just an extension of "all men are rapists"?
Tangentially related.
It's not a word used to target male behaviour, it's a word used -by- people who are easily upset, to blame others for their poor emotional hygiene.
Now, who else is easily upset and loves to blame others?
Yep, SJW types.
It's similar. It's not "all men are rapists" it's "all men make me afraid of rape", and that's as much of a feelz problem as gettin' mad at someone saying "bg 2ez".
Remember: Hurt feelings are sometimes just the first step to realising you are wrong, or bad. And thus, the first step on the road to gitting gud.
Christ, I'm not the first person to get frustrated at a game after it kicks my ass. But I learned that the frustration isn't the game's fault, it's mine.
Some people never learn that.
Some people think their feelings are never wrong.
That if they feel upset, it's ALWAYS because there's something else bad nearby, not because their feelz are mis-calibrated and giving a false positive.
Some people think their feelings are always justified.
As in, if they feel upset, they feel justified in attacking someone. Even if they're just escalating the problem, and not solving anything.
True. Sometimes yes your feelings ARE justified and it IS right to be offended. Probably about 2/3rds of the time, if not more. Someone spreads a false rumor? Damn straight you should be pissed about that. Someone intentionally spreading propaganda to sabotage your work? Get pissed at that, too.
But 8/10 times if someone says something, it's because they believe it, and they're more or less trying to help the world by spreading correct info.
Getting offended in that case doesn't help anything.
>>340802068
>le toxic buzzword
>>340802441
>it's just a pc way of saying you're being a dick
More or less, though "being a dick" is the phrase equivalent of a buzzword. Buzzphrase?
Takes 2 people for one to be a dick to the other. Stop being so easily dicked.
>>340802472
>Video games are an outlet to escape work, not an extension of it.
I disagree with you completely but that's probably because I enjoy my job. I have no particular need to "escape" work. Much like I have no particular need for escapism in vidya. I honestly think escapism is a pathetic crutch for people who can't handle IRL.
>How do they expect employees to act when they're being monitored on their favorite game and therefore have no outlet?
Exactly the way they would when they aren't monitored. Being watched shouldn't change your behaviour. Do what you think is right and if someone has a problem with that, tell them to go fuck themselves.
Unless you're being watched by incompetent people who take offense at things that aren't bad, and take issue with things that aren't problems. But in that case I'd advise quitting. Your bosses being in opposition to you doing the right thing (or doing your job) is a timebomb.
>>340802598
>Sometimes I purposely act like an asshole on the off chance people will become legitimately upset.
Of course.
You need to practice facing upsetting things in order to handle them properly (without getting offended the fuck out and running away or banning them).
Most people actively practice facing things they don't like in order to overcome them, but some people prefer the hugbox.
In that case, you must bring the harsh reality to them.
>>340802806
>If an employee has a hobby of breaking into homes to release stress, I'd fire his ass.
I'd report him to the police, but not fire him. Unless he breaks into my workplace. Then out the door he goes.
>it says here you didn't say gg at the end of the round...
>mind explaining why I shouldn't fire you and call child protective services?
>>340804997
>ASSFAGGOTSers
>adults
>>340802806
>Nice to know you're impotent in real life so you have to resort to being a dick online
The person you're replying to probably IS impotent in real life, I'll give you that.
But that's not the only motivator to intentionally doing things that upset people.
People are objectively better human beings if they can handle a harsh fact without flipping the fuck out.
Or, if not a harsh fact, then just an uncomfortable opinion that SOMEONE genuinely believes. Open discussion is a good thing for finding the truth, after all.
What are the most common sources of offense these days? Racism, Homophobia, telling fat chicks they're fat, and telling women that their vagina does not earn them respect (on its own).
All with correct elements to them.
Now, I'm not saying "bg ez" is the same as redpilling the normies.
But it DOES train them to not be so easily upset.
That is what the bantz does. It's a form of group training. It teaches you to handle the bantz in-game, so that you can handle emotional challenges out of game.
>>340802921
Thank you.
>>340803101
You really shouldn't work with an employee who fires you for things like that.
>>340803203
>>be neck-deep in hostile work environment at riot
>>play lol to unwind, release some tension
>>management: "you're fired because you play LoL like an asshole, pack your shit and get out"
>i feel like this would cause workplace shootings
Not at Riot it won't, they specifically hire spineless sycophants that wouldn't have the balls to do it.
The thing is, they KNOW they have a hostile work environment, but they blame their workers for not fitting in with Riot's culture rather than for being extremists and, essentially, punishing employee thoughtcrime.
I'm surprised anyone can stomach working there.
Honestly I'm surprised anyone can stomach playing the damn game.
But to each their own
>>340802068
Is it public knowledge?
If not a company has no right to know.
![maxresdefault[2].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/vWF4Uie.jpg "maxresdefault[2].jpg")
>>340812352
>Being watched shouldn't change your behaviour
>>340810581
Political correctness is not about making sure no one's feefees are hurt. The purpose of political correctness is to deny White people the vocabulary to advocate for their own interests.
>>340805253
He also blatantly stole hero ideas from that forum and never gave proper attribution to their creators.
>>340803713
>Has any other recent dev ruined gaming as much as Riot?
Apple
>>340811361
It's all to do with this generation of narcisistic bastards the confortable life in the city created. The more time people have to be retarded, the more retarded they act.
>>340812352
>being watched shouldn't change your behavior.
The observer effect clearly states it will, regardless if you want it to or not.
>>340813320
Sounds like your fee fees are hurt right now.
>>340812352
>Being watched shouldn't change your behaviour. Do what you think is right and if someone has a problem with that, tell them to go fuck themselves.
Friend, the fact that you know you are being watched on or you think it has been studied and as shown that human subconsciously censor themselves.
>>340804750
Anonymity is your second line of defense against oversensitive faggots.
Your first is, of course, to not go to places where there are oversensitive faggots.
>>340813320
>Political correctness is not about making sure no one's feefees are hurt. The purpose of political correctness is to deny White people the vocabulary to advocate for their own interests.
It's both, depending on who's using it.
Also, stopping vocabulary is a fool's game. The internet has proven it'll generate vocabulary faster than you can block it.
>>340802068
>toxic
There's that word again. Did Riot invent this word? I always hear it with respect to LoL. Then again, I heard it with respect to Reddit as well.
What the fuck does it even mean?
>>340813492
Yeah I'm sure he stole Teemo and whatever, it's not possible at all that they just made a similarly shitty character all on their own, no sir.
>>340802336
No one has ever, EVER been banned from lol for saying gg. People have been banned for saying "gg easy." Huge difference
>>340812981
This is what killed most of my interest to work on huge companies. Company Culture is retarded. I think GTA5 ilustrate this pretty well.
>>340814214
>Also, stopping vocabulary is a fool's game.
Has that ever stopped anyone from trying?
>>340810581
>If you understand what people mean when they say "toxic" then you'll understand why saying gg after a match is considered toxic.
I don't play LoL, but in other games, I say gg in every situation - whether I curb stomp them, or I lose horribly, or if it's actually close. I say it in sincerity, and out of good sportsmanship.
Would LoL players seriously see this as toxic?
>>340812352
>If an employee has a hobby of breaking into homes to release stress, I'd fire his ass.
>I'd report him to the police, but not fire him.
lol b8 detected
>>340813608
>It's all to do with this generation of narcisistic bastards the confortable life in the city created.
It's not Narcissism. It's Low self esteem.
>The more time people have to be retarded, the more retarded they act.
Acting retarded is fun. The problem is when you start taking your retardation seriously ( >>>/vp/ ).
>>340813283
>>340813717
Imma test if Observer effect applies to me and change my opinion if I'm wrong.
Still, why is Observer effect a thing? The right thing is the right thing, regardless of who's watching.
>>340814785
>Has that ever stopped anyone from trying?
Hah, of course not. Point taken.
You're right, most of the bullshit people have tried in the name of control has just resulted in wasting resources.
#1 way to take control of people is to convince them you're working towards what they value.
#2 is to convince them to value what you're working towards.
#3 and onwards are irrelevant.
>>340802068
thats dumb as fuck just because im telling someone to kill them selves for being shit at a game and wasting my time, doesn't mean im going to tell my coworker the same thing for being an incompetent employee
>friends use toxic as a word nonstop
What's the best way to call them out on being such insufferable fags?
>>340814601
>This is what killed most of my interest to work on huge companies. Company Culture is retarded. I think GTA5 ilustrate this pretty well.
I agree. I don't know what it is about bureaucracies that attract control-addicted dumbshits that have a chip on their shoulders about %current_year_boogeyman%, but it happens.
>>340814891
>Would LoL players seriously see this as toxic?
Toxic means "would they take offense to this and then blame you?"
Well, they'd obviously blame you. They're trained to blame the speaker (rather than the listener, or a 50/50 balance of both) for any offense caused.
Therefore, the question is "would they take offense to this?"
Yes. Yes they would.
You curb stomp them, they get upset, because that's the natural reaction to getting curb stomped. Feeling bad because you git scrub rekt is normal, and it motivates you to git gud.
Now, you say "gg".
Someone will interpret you as rubbing it in, because it was a "good game" to you.
Their existing upset at sucking?
They'll project it onto you for saying "gg"
So yes, they'll get upset.
They'll blame you for it.
They'll call it toxic.
Though at this point I'm surprised they don't call losing the game "toxic".
They view any loadout other than the standard ones (1 top 2 mid 2 bot, 1 2 1 1 jungle) as "toxic".
Bear in mind that 2 top 2 mid 1 bot is mechanically NEAR IDENTICAL to 1 2 2 and they'll call it toxic.
Get a Jungler rotating in and out of Bot? Toxic.
Playing 1 2 2 (you are one of the 2 in mid), and you go 1 1 3 for a tower push? Toxic. And the two on bot will report you.
You probably think I'm bullshitting you or lying for the sake of humor.
I am NOT.
This is actually how they react to you trying a non-standard strat in the game.
>>340815050
>It's not Narcissism. It's Low self esteem.
It's the result of mommy and daddy telling them what special little snow flakes they are.
Everyone's a winner! Except when the real world catch up with them.
>>340815756
You're a winner Anon. Winner of my big dumb dick
>>340815462
>What's the best way to call them out on being such insufferable fags?
Point out that the word is a crutch.
"Toxic" only means "My feelings are hurt".
It doesn't mean "My feelings are hurt, and YOU are responsible".
They are responsible for their own feelz, and using the word "Toxic" to deflect blame.
>>340815756
>It's the result of mommy and daddy telling them what special little snow flakes they are.
False.
Re-check your numbers.
It's a result of Daddy being missing or busy or shunted off to the side by Mommy.
Tell someone they're a special snowflake does introduce problems, but mindless conformity and attacking the wrongthink is NOT one of them.
What you're seeing is a result of the child mimicing the parent, and the parent being an easily offended hambeast that doesn't tolerate when their children challenge their authority.
>>340802068
No, but of course retards will defend it.
Unless I am in a position where I personally am representing the company, my personal affairs are none of their concern.
>>340815859
>You're a winner Anon. Winner of my big dumb dick
Thank you. *zaps a magic wand at you* Now it is a little smart vagina. ;3c~
>>340816115
Isn't that parent the result of the molly coddling parent? People that weren't pushed because
>"Eh, they don't need to be pushed"
>>340816648
Actually yes, failure to push your children DOES result in this (assuming your children don't push themselves). my bad.
It's RARE that a child won't push themselves though. Little buggers WILL find an interest and will try to get gud at it.
>Toxic players tended to be toxic employees, even if the reverse wasn't always true
What did they mean by this? Doesn't that just contradict itself?
>People this stupid read /v/: >>340816973
>>340814426
>People have been banned for saying "gg easy." Huge difference
Oh man if that were the case in real sports half the athletes who ever win championships would be banned.
>>340816973
OH BOY I GET TO POST THIS
It's the logic table of IMPLYING!
>>340817038
Not really.
The article is about how toxic players tend to be toxic employees. But that statement implies that toxic employees do not tend to be toxic players. So that statement is also implying that even their "toxic' employees" actually act civilized in game. So truly there isn't a correlation.
>>340817272
im a retard. how the fuck do you read this?
>>340802068
So 1/4 of fired employees were "toxic" in-game and this is some sort of significant correlation to draw a conclusion from? A 25% success rate on your hypothesis means your study is irrelevant.
>>340817556
Hang on, lemme give you the retard version.
Here you go. There is a puzzle in the picture. Please tell me what you think the solution to the puzzle is.
Those of you who already know the solution, please do not spoil it for the anon.
>>340817556
The two left columns are "statements"
The column on the right is the equation.
So for example the first row says:
If "p" is true, and "q" is true, then p = q is true.
On the second row, p is true and q is false, therefore p does not equal q.
>>340817843
retard here. would you turn over the A card and the 4 card?
>>340818120
Nope! A and 7.
The failure state is "A card has a vowel on one side, and an odd number on the other side"
Check if 7 is opposite a vowel.
Check if A is opposite an even number.
4 being opposite a consonant fits the rule.
>>340818120
why the A card?
>>340814426
Has anyone been banned for going SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU?
>>340817315
wrong again friend
this study says the most obvious fucking thing like, "people who are assholes more likely to be assholes" so of course the /v/ thread has tons of people posting essays about how society is fucked up and they come off sounding like adachi from p4
>>340818310
ahhhhhh, ok i see. so you look for the failure state, otherwise it will fit within the rule because it doesn't state the even number corresponds with a vowel just the other way around. or something like that
>>340818636
Wasn't Adachi's motive boredom, and he wanted to see if starting a situation was fun?
>>340818680
Oh shit you LEARNED!
Whenever I play a MP game I always say I really enjoy the game that rivals the game I'm playing.
I've gotten way more butthurt for positive speaking than I ever have trying to talk shit. The best part is I don't get banned because I'm saying everything is nice.
>>340802068
Only 25% what about the other 75
>>340818680
Now
"If a person is Toxic in game, then they are Toxic out of game"
What is/are the failure state(s)?
>>340818774
no need to be so sarcastic and toxic
>>340805162
Knew a Riot employee who was trying to hit on a minor, i actually had certain pics to prove it dunno if it would result in anything, but the girl was a attention whore so i didnt care much about it anyway.
>>340818774
yes i did,hopefully.thanks anon
>>340818904
if a person was toxic in game, but not toxic in real life?
>>340802068
I'm a fucking winner mate, lets go.
>>340818907
It's ok bro I love you <3
>>340818779
>Whenever I play a MP game I always say I really enjoy the game that rivals the game I'm playing.
>I've gotten way more butthurt for positive speaking than I ever have trying to talk shit. The best part is I don't get banned because I'm saying everything is nice.
Works great on /tg/ too. Tell them you like something that they don't like (e.g. Powergaming, 4th edition, Fetishes in game). They get somadlol.
USED to work on /v/ until /v/ evolved to its post-post-post-irony phase where you can't tell whether someone genuinely likes thing, or is a falseflagger who hates thing and is acting retarded on purpose.
>>340819048
Post pics for the lulz
>>340819060
>if a person was toxic in game, but not toxic in real life?
YES!
In particular, someone being toxic IRL but nice in game is NOT a failure state!
Someone being nice in game and toxic IRL is also not a failure state!
You have logic'd!
>>340819236
No don't, I'm a Riot employee and I've hit on multiple minorsI also shitpost in every game
>>340817907
That's a truth table for implication.
The statement "p implies q" is only ever false when p is true and q is false. This is because "p implies q" means "whenever you have p, you also have q." The statement is automatically true if p is false because the state of q doesn't really matter in that case.
If you see the rule here >>340817843
The rule can be read as "If you have a vowel (p) then you also have an even number (q)"
The first card has a vowel (p=true) so if the rule holds, the other side must have an even number (q=true).
The second card has an odd number which means that if there is a vowel on the other side, the rule is false.
The other 2 cards don't need to be checked because showing you D means p is false and no matter what q ends up being the rule is already true; and 4 means q = true, therefore no matter what p is the rule ends up being true also.
>>340802068
>a quarter of all fired employees had been unpleasent players.
>Toxic players tended to be toxic employees
Uhhhhh... what?
>a quarter
that means 75% of the fired employees weren't unpleasant players. That means the exact opposite of their conclusion.
Who wrote this shit?
>>340817556
Basically - if it's raining then it's wet outside (true) does not mean that if it's wet outside then it's raining.
I met a Riot employee once before he worked at Riot and he was nice.
>>340819574
It depends on the percentage of unpleasant players
>>340819135
This is why I love comming here. You never know.
What does it matter if someone is ~toxic~ shouldn't skill matter more than shittalking?
Also let`s look at what riot says
>toxic players lose x% more games
That's a fucking retarded statement on itself. All it shows is that people get mad when they're losing.
>>340821327
no, you being a spastic drives away potential customers, which is why it is expressly disallowed in the terms of service you agree to in order to use their service
>>340814426
Nope saying just gg when a match is only >15 minutes in and you pub stomping will get you banned same as gg easy.
>>340821952
What do you mean? The more anarchist the environment the more likely myself and those like myself are to enjoy it. Why don't we matter?
>>340822318
because you are poor neets
they want people that buy all teemo skins to play the game
>>340822409
How did you know?
