I don't care what anyone else thinks. I'm having fun and that's all that matters. Half the best movies ever made were critically disliked box office failures. Fuck the consensus.
>>340574698
>I don't care what anyone else thinks.
posts opinion online
>>340574698
damn is that mike ross?
the game must be hard now that sfv bombed
>>340574698
well i honestly thought the concept of the story was neat
the game is just a generic shooter though
>>340574698
Tell me, anon, what are these "best movies every made" that were critically panned box office failures?
>>340575115
>Tell me, anon, what are these "best movies every made" that were critically panned box office failures?
It's a Wonderful Life.
Blade Runner.
Fight Club.
Heaven's Gate cost 40 million dollars to make and made 4 million dollars. It almost destroyed the studio, and crippled the American film industry. It was considered one of the worst films ever made.
Except it's now considered one of the best American films ever made. A cinematic masterpiece.
>>340574872
>the game is just a generic shooter though
What makes a shooter "generic"? What does "generic" even mean?
I notice they updated the depots a few hours ago. https://steamdb.info/app/223100/depots/ The 1.5 patch should be released within the next 24 hours or so, which will be nice because it should squash the remaining major bugs.
>>340574698
If you stuck a Naughty Dog logo on that, people would bend over backwards with "photorealistic, wow, power of the PS4."
>>340575623
depends
my definition and standards is probably different than yours
and my opinion varies from game to game
for example:
id say far cry is a unique shooter but what makes it unique is that its a ubisoft tower climbing simulator which is unlike a handful of open-world shooters out there
but the inverse is that its a generic ubisoft title because its a tower climbing simulator
>>340575510
The big difference is that those films didn't fail because they were far too generic and exactly the same as everything else on the market.
The cinematic comparison would be the next transformers moving failing because nobody gives a shit anymore.
>>340576405
>The big difference is that those films didn't fail because they were far too generic and exactly the same as everything else on the market.
But how is that relevant to Homefront? There are only a handful of games on the market that Homefront resembles, and most of them were released years ago.
>>340576405
>The cinematic comparison would be the next transformers moving failing because nobody gives a shit anymore.
Allow me to point out that whenever Michael Bay makes a unique film that isn't about giant robots ass-pounding each other, it flops. But every Transformers film cracks a billion dollars. So your comparison might be flawed.