Why are the scores so different, /v/?
>>340393719
Gamergate trolls
>>340393719
Review bombing. Been a thing for years. Look it up.
It's a shitty Fallout and reviewers are trash.
>>340394550
>>340394653
Naw, the game was fucking mediocrity at its finest. They managed to dumb down the rpg shit in the game even further than before.
The game was shit, it's just that
>>340394792
No.
In this instance it's literally review bombing. Go actually look at the wording. It's obvious.
>>340393719
A lot of people are just being grumpuses
>>340393719
>PS4 version - 58 critics
>PC version - 38 critics
>lemme just post the score with the least amount of critics because PC MASTURACE WOOT WOOT
pc gamers i swear...
They're both worthless metrics. "Critics" are low standard dolts who operate on a completely fucked up scale, while user score is the same sort of deal but with the added issue of man-children dumping 0s for inane reasons to try and counter it.
>>340395056
>with the added issue of man-children dumping 0s for inane reasons to try and counter it.
Which ironically also happens with people just giving games a straight 10
>>340393719
what I really wanna know is why are the scores so different from FO3's
Oh dear.
>>340393719
The ps4 and xbone scores are higher
>>340394550
>>340394653
>>340394873
>>340394892
>>340395005
I wonder who could be behind these posts
>>340393719
It really is a shame that idiots meme every user score into oblivion. I think it is so interesting to see critic scores actually start to be more forgiving and less scrutinizing than user scores, but that shift is being diminished/obfuscated by retarded fucking memers giving out 1s, not realizing that doing so defeats every possible purpose they could contribute to by giving a score at all
>>340395408
That's nice, hon.
>2100 reviews with nearly identical wording patterns
>all have throwaway names
>all no other reviews
>all give it a 0
Gee... Hrmm.. I wonder what happened?
>>340395645
>[suport reviews]
>[HATE REVIEWS]
>yes
>no(yes)
