When was the last time you purchased a gaming magazine?
in the 90s
>>340261961
Is this real?
>>340261961
Its been a while.
Do people even buy any kind of magazine anymore? Excluding old people?
Magazines are dead on the whole, journalism too. Makes me a little sad, thinking back to my days reading Nintendo Power.
1994 or -95
>>340261961
I'm not a native english speaker but even I know that "women video game developers" is grammatically wrong
>>340263069
Nah, it's correct, word women is tied to gamergate, not video game developers.
>women video game developers
Nonsense basically.
>>340262327
yes
That issue of edge with the dark souls three special
>>340262037
good times
JUST
gamergate is responsible for this
>>340266285
Is this that literal prostitute?
>>340261961
>Women video game developers on the rise
like...
uh...
>>340266285
From a cushy job likely in the 60k to 90k range to 12k a year.
That's pretty successful responsibility.
>>340266285
What does she even do
isn't patreon supposed to be against "fund my life" projects
Around 2013, when one of the few good ones we have in my country had to shut down
When Gunk got changed to 9lives
>>340266681
That's Kickstarter. Pateron really doesn't have restrictions.
This whole "make shit up and blame it on gamergate" bit is getting really, really old.
>>340266482
Anita Sarkeesian of course
MFW americucks will never have true independent printed gaming pess
>>340261961
I still do every single month.
Mostly because I need something to read while sitting on the toilet.
But I'm German and German gaming magazines are actually about videogames and not politics so there's that.
>>340267114
Same can be said about "make shit up and blame it on SJWs" being repeated here ad nauseum
>>340266285
what is a "sex-positive"? AIDS?
>>340267513
It mainly just means they are feminists in favour of prostitution and generally slutting it up.
Sex-negative feminists think it's demeaning or something.
I buy it every month on the 15.
Joker for life.
>>340261961
like 2 years ago
the only living Swedish one is ok, not great but it's kinda fine though expensive as hell
>>340267781
But they hate sex. They hate "sexual" women. They accuse fit women of being a bad example and encouraging fat shaming. It only takes a glance of a woman in a sexual pose to trigger them.
How are they sex positive? They look like puritans to me
>>340261961
>Gamergate
ayyyy
>>340261961
5 or 6 years ago, when they stopped printing them over here
Back when they came with PS1 demos.
>hey /v/, whens the last time you SPLERG omagherd gender politics
nope.
>>340267413
With all the SJW friendly pandering in the last few years can you really blame us?
>>340266285
>"sex-positive"
Why are people allowed to change the words? If I want a janitor, I don't call it environmental engineer ?
what does gamergate have to do with the number of female game developers?
do these people ACTUALLY believe ggers were trying to scare women away from games development?
I'm pretty sure most gamergaters are either happy about it or don't care, unless those women are sjws/feminists (same applies to sjw/feminist men)
>AFTER GAMERGATE GAMES JOURNALISM TURNS REGRESSIVE LIBERAL PROPAGANDA UP TO 11 AND USES GG AS A SCAPEGOAT FOR EVERYTHING
would be more accurate
>>340261961
Yesterday actually.
>>340261961
2005
My bro was behind on "subs" so I get goyinformer every month.
>>340262037
"Went to war"
And got completely blown the fuck out. Good job.
>>340266681
She is an escort
>>340267186
Name a game she developed then...
Bought one the other week, an Overwatch guide, because I was going on a long train ride. 99% of it is "shoot guns to kill the enemies" type of tips.
Could you beat her in a fight?
>>340274282
She doesn't need to be a develop something in order to be a woman in tech, you sexist asshole
>>340262037
I hate this image so much. /v/ standing with that little faggot robot alien on his shoulder disgusts me, and anyone who is ok with it is part of the reason this place is a complete shithole.
>>340274494
No. Short, overweight women are my weakness. Please no bully.
>>340261961
The last gaming magazine I bought was a HL2 issue of PCGamer. So, 2004. There's not much reason to pay for something you read three weeks ago on the net for free
>>340273872
Nah.
>>340261961
Early 00's, like 06 or 07. I only bought them when going on long trips as reading material.
>>340274494
>flexing
>absolutely no muscle definition
Could I beat up a fat womanlet? Probably.
I still don't know which side is gamergate. Is it the SJWs?
>>340266482
Funny thing. The E3 after GG Anti-GG were crowing about how it was a great success to see so many female protagonists and women in video games. Problem is there were about half as many as there had been the previous year.
Last month.
>>340275080
That's possibly the worst cover I've seen
>tfw you work in a printing house and make magazines for a living.
Yeah,people still buy them but mostly we live on advrtising junk now.
>>340261961
>claims women in games are on the rise in 2016
>posts Lara Croft, a character who has been in games for LITERALLY two decades
Bravo lads
>>340275910
video killed the radio star.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iwuy4hHO3YQ
>>340261961
You just posted this thread as an excuse to bring the GoobleGarble back and make everyone fight for the "right side", didn't you OP :^)
>>340262037
Still mostly accurate today, except /v/ is now split in half and Notch is just fishing with bait in his million dollar mansion.
>>340262327
Yes. There's more from where that came from https://imgur.com/a/eOAuv#to37KYd
>>340267114
>>340271940
Remember, GG is both the internet KKK who managed to get women out of gaming through harassment and a dead movement of internet nerds
>>340275010
GG-> The side which said to fight for journalism, the one which the other side accused of hating minorities. Avoid tagging people SJW, it's become the person equivalent of RPG.
>>340276682
Took me a while to notice there's no title on that cover
>>340276547
>GoobleGarble
It's like Voldemort all over again
>>340262037
I still don't know what the fuck this was all about and at this point I don't care to ask.
Even when it was going on I ignored it because I wanted to talk about video games, not eceleb drama bulshit.
>>340277309
It's squeezed over on the right, mid-top. Really tiny though.
1997
I stole a few.
They were all shit tho.
>>340266285
She is my waifu
The only gaming outlet I read is Edge. Either via Zinio or Magster.
>>340262037
Notch is back.
A month ago.
>>340275010
Nice try.
>>340275080
Bien cabeza el lenguaje.
>>340278427
It's funny how most the games mentioned on the cover are 2-3 months old
>>340262160
This.
>>340273872
>And got completely blown the fuck out. Good job.
>Multiple people fired
>Gawker shat on
>They literally use "Gamergate" to blame anything
The power of shitposting.
>>340262037
Can't we all just move on and forget about it? Because this entire thing was just two groups of monkey's throwing shit at each other
>>340278714
>Because this entire thing was just two groups of monkey's throwing shit at each other
>I'm so desperate that this is my argument
>>340278714
Sure would be nice if GGers stoped publishing shit about SJWs. Oh wait...
>>340278427
>Fintroll detected
>>340273872
Actually, GG won just by virtue of existing. The fact that it raised awareness about corruption in journalism is enough. Anybody who was expecting an absolute winstate, like all the big websites admiting "yeah we are unethical as fuck, we resign" is stupid.
>>340276314
Thanks anon, I was wondering what to listen to
>>340278857
stop being a petty cunt.
Glad I moved away from estonia, everyone's a narrowminded overly opinionated gullible piece of shit.
>>340276314
god blessed video you faggot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N19Pu1KM3b4
>>340278831
They resort to shitposting instead
>>340278872
Where did the argument that it was about review ethics even come from? Because I don't recall that depression quest got reviews
I blame you faggots for this. If you never gave attention to an attention whore, literally doing exactly as she wanted, and instead let her get some kikes to shill her shit game in exchange for pussy this would have never happened.
Now, more than ever, the gaming industry needs to die. We need to burn the crops and salt the field. As of now the industry is attracting writing grads who are too shit at writing to do anything else so they go to gaming and shit on games so they can push their terrible ideas and convoluted ideals.
>>340261961
Dec 2013, the studio closed down . Shame the articles were pretty good and based. It was as good as you can get in a third world country.
>>340279364
>As of now the industry is attracting writing grads who are too shit at writing to do anything else so they go to gaming and shit on games so they can push their terrible ideas and convoluted ideals.
I really wanted to enjoy Siege of Dragonspear...
>>340279387
forgot pic.
>>340279364
I agree with this anon.
>>340267284
>canard pc
I followed a guy who wrote there. We had good exchanges but some of the stuff he retweeted was no different to OP's pic.
>>340278872
>The fact that it raised awareness about corruption in journalism is enough
But just in a small group of people. For Normies or score guys like >>340279290 gg is just a movement to harass poor and innocent womyn
>>340273872
Correct. Even a TV show blew the fuck out of these neckbeards
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2klLy8r8Ro
>>340261961
They're just catering to a rising market since no one with any real sense actually buys print any more.
>>340261961
2006, when Computer Gaming World got turned into "Games for Windows: The Official Magazine."
>>340279734
>implying that wasn't the best thing that came out of #gamergoy
>>340261961
today
>>340279604
GG might have started as a movement about review ethics, but it sure didn't continue or end that direction. Much like occupy wall Street you can't have a leaderless movement
>>340280247
>Disclosure agreements added to many review article
>Deepfreeze.it , literally a database of games journalists so you can judge how ethical the author published is
>Almost all companies have updated all of the ethics policies
>"I-it's not about ethics! They just hate womyn because the journalists they are trying to criticise said so"
>people start a hashtag and meme on a few "journalists" for a few weeks
>they are still mad about it years later
GG was a mistake.
>>340280491
And what is an fair ethnically review then? It's easy to throw the word around but you have to explain it
>>340261961
Back when EGM was still in print
This one, since they're one of the few journalist that I can still acknowledge nowadays.
