find a flaw
Return of the King was better
>>340180458
this
>>340179748
parry kills only have excellent ratings
also >>340180458
>>340180458
/thread
>>340179748
EA Games
EA was good back then before this
>>340179748
Great game, but;
>>340180458
>>340179748
Fug this was my shit back in the day. Just recently got a ps2 emulator and this was the first disk I put in and played
Was this games any good? I remember getting it thinking it was an action game and ended up liking it a lot more than I thought I would but I was probably like 10 at the time so I don't really recall. I remember the random battles would get a little annoying in some spots.
>>340179748
Return of the King was even better. That's about it.
>>340185292
Yes. It was kinda overlooked but how many LotR JRPGs do you get, even if characters are just carbon copies of existing Fellowship guys? And evil campaign was sweet.
>>340179748
I wonder how many skipped it simply because it was a licensed game and those are traditionally shit.
Is this an LoTR games thread?
>>340185292
Don't believe >>340185505 lies.
The game was textbook turn-based RPG. If you REALLY want a LOTR it's palettable but nothing about the game is memorable except the ending.What fucking idiot thought it was a good idea to literally fight the Eye of Sauron atop of Barad-Dur?
>>340179748
Am I only the only one who got his ass kicked in these games?
>tfw black gate
>>340179748
Fangorn Forest sucked
no co op
>>340180458
Gotta say this.
If I remember Two Towers didn't have co-op multiplayer as well, did it?
Both great, Return of the King was Greatest lotr game of all time.
>>340185292
this game was the TITS
if youre a final fantasy fan, get it!
Combos get too repeatitive
>>340185292
Great game.Aged decently.
>>340179748
>tfw you keep kicking the ladders down and then they just blow up half the wall anyway
>>340187995
It did
But the action flow was better in ROTK, as well as the combat system and animations/general visuals
>>340185292
yes, it was good.