Is this worth picking up, even if it has no Bridget in it?
Yes, bridget is for fags in denial.
>>340099816
fuck you, bridget is the mostfuncharacter in the game
>>340099890
No he's not, because fun is subjective.
I personally find May to be a lot more fun to play than bridget.
>>340099618
>has no Bridget in it
>>340099816
I think most bridget fans are pretty out of the closet
>>340099816
I don't deny it's gay to jerk it to Bridget
>>340100094
Bridget was cut from Xrd for some reason.
No, but for another reason.
>>340100559
I don't think they ever intended for bridget to be in sign. They stated that there were difficulties with the story. The new design that was going around was for a pachinko game.
However, the same story problem was why Dizzy wasn't in sign either, and she's going to be DLC for revelator, so there's still hope for that faggot some day.
>>340099816
im not gay i just want to suck his cock.
>>340101163
I just want to slam that ass. Not gay though.
>>340101125
>They stated that there were difficulties with the story.
I'm sure there can be some person Bridget wants to go kill to prove that he's a real man with a super girly voice, wearing a ridiculously short skirt snd carrying his teddybear everywhere.
Bridget doesn't need a big role, he just has to show up at the place for some reason and start beting up people.
>>340101806
>Bridget doesn't need a big role, he just has to show up at the place for some reason and start beting up people.
I'd be fine with that.
>>340099618
No, the sequel is out tomorrow. Don't get Sign, is old.
>>340102483
sequel isn't gonna have Bridget either, so the point is still valid
>>340102483
I'll just stick to XXAC+R, since that game actually has Bridget in it.
