![rendition1.img[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/2TA4Vi8.jpg "rendition1.img[1].jpg")
Anyone else buying this because there hasn't been a decent WW1 game in forever?
battlefield 1 more like battlefield juan you know what im saying
What makes you think this one will be decent? Hardline was so bad that everyone dropped it in a week and went back to 4.
>>340009615
This one is actually developed by DICE and doesn't reuse BF4 assets.
me m8, I was expecting a WWI shooter for years
WE
>>340009337
Verdun is getting better tho
kingz and shit
>>340010369
are insecure white kids on /v/
atleast there won't be IGLAs/SMAWs/Stingers/etc that take you out every time you fly a chopper/jet.
People aren't going to like it because you're not in some super high-tech jet that can fuck everyone up. It was just trench warfare.
>>340010050
battlefront was developed by dice
why do people give dice and ea a free pass just because of setting? it was the same shit with battlefront.
i don't get some people.
>>340010545
Battlefront was made by a different DICE division.
>>340010714
>le b-team may may
>>340010376
okay
but Battlefield is guarenteed to have 20x the playerbase and a lot more support/content due to them not having a budget of pocket change and patreon donations
>>340010797
It's true though.
Just look at the Souls series
>DeS, DaS, Bloodborne and DaS3 made by Miyazaki team
>They were all great
>DaS2 made by B-team
>It's shit
>>340010797
Considering that B-team was in a whole different country, no.
>>340009337
Looks like a good game to me.
>>340010871
>the game will be good because it will get more attention and money
brilliant I never figured this before
>>340010369
WUZ
>>340009337
I'm getting it because I'm hopelessly addicted to WW1 aerial combat, and that red baron tease was too much.
